Effect of nimodipine on the outcome of patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and surgery

Description of STRIVE-ON Study Protocol: Safety and Tolerability of GTX-104 (Nimodipine Injection for IV Infusion) Compared with Oral Nimodipine in Patients Hospitalized for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (aSAH): A Prospective, Randomized, Phase III Trial (STRIVE-ON)

Oral nimodipine is the only drug approved in North America for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, bioavailability is variable and frequently poor, leading to fluctuations in peak plasma concentrations that cause dose-limiting hypotension. Furthermore, administration is problematic in patients who cannot swallow. An oral liquid formulation exists but causes diarrhea. An intravenous nimodipine formulation (GTX-104) has been developed that has bioavailability approaching 100% and is not affected by feeding or gastrointestinal absorption. GTX-104 causes less hypotension and has more consistent peak plasma concentrations than oral nimodipine in human volunteers. Herein, we describe the protocol of a prospective, randomized, open-label safety, and tolerability study of GTX-104 compared with oral nimodipine in patients with aSAH (Safety and Tolerability of GTX-104 [Nimodipine Injection for Intravenous Infusion] Compared with Oral Nimodipine; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05995405). The study is designed to seek approval of GTX-104 by the Food and Drug Administration 505(b)(2) pathway. Inclusion and exclusion criteria match the prescribing information for oral nimodipine and include adult patients with aSAH of all Hunt and Hess grades who can receive investigational product within 96 h of aSAH. Study participants at imminent risk of death will be excluded. Study participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive GTX-104 or oral nimodipine for up to 21 days. The primary end point is the proportion of study participants with clinically significant hypotension, defined as hypotension requiring treatment that has a reasonable likelihood of being due to investigational product as determined by an independent, blinded end point adjudication committee. No statistical analysis of the end point is planned. Secondary end points include all episodes of hypotension, all adverse events, delayed cerebral ischemia, rescue therapy, and suicidal ideation. Clinical and health economic outcomes include quality of life using the EuroQol 5-dimension/3-level, modified Rankin Scale score at 30 and 90 days after aSAH and hospital resource use. The planned sample size is 100 study participants across 25 sites in the United States and Canada.

Nimodipine prophylaxis in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, a question of tradition or evidence: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

The prophylactic use of nimodipine following subarachnoid hemorrhage is a practice established four decades ago when clinical management differed from current and the concept of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia (DCI) was not established. The applicability of the original studies is limited by the fact of not reflecting current practice; by utilising a dichotomised outcome measure such as good neurological outcome versus death and vegetative state; by applying variable dosing regimens and including all causes of poor neurological outcome different than DCI. This study aims to review the available evidence to discuss the ongoing role of nimodipine in contemporaneous clinical practice.

METHODS

PRISMA guidelines based review, evaluated the evidence on the prophylactic use of nimodipine. The following search engines: Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science and PubMed, identified Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) with neurological benefit as outcome measure and the impact of fixed versus weight-based nimodipine dosing regimens.

RESULTS

Eight RCT were selected. Three of those trials with a total of 349 patients, showed a reduction on death and vegetative state (pooled RR: 0.62; 95 % confidence interval-CI: 0.45, 0.86) related to DCI. Amongst all studies, all cause death (pooled RR = 0.73, [95 % CI: 0.56, 0.97]) favoured a fixed-dose regimen (pooled RR: 0.60; [95 % CI: 0.43, 0.85]).

CONCLUSION

Available evidence demonstrates that nimodipine only reduces the risk for DCI-related death or vegetative state and that fixed-dose regimens favour all cause infarct and death independent of DCI. Contemporaneous studies assessing the benefit of nimodipine beyond death or vegetative states and applying individualized dosing are warranted.

Clinical effectiveness of nimodipine for the prevention of poor outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

In clinical practice, nimodipine is used to control cerebral vasospasm (CVS), which is one of the major causes of severe disability and mortality in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, the exact efficacy of nimodipine use for patients with aSAH is still controversial due to the lack of sufficient and up-to-date evidence.

Methods

In this meta-analysis, the latest databases of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed-Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and OVID-Medline were comprehensively searched for retrieving all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the efficacy of nimodipine in patients with aSAH. The primary outcome was a poor outcome, and the secondary outcomes were mortality and cerebral vasospasm (CVS). After detailed statistical analysis of different outcome variables, further evidence quality evaluation and recommendation grade assessment were carried out.

Results

Approximately 13 RCTs met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 1,727 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that a poor outcome was significantly reduced in the nimodipine group [RR, 0.69 (0.60–0.78); I² = 29%]. Moreover, nimodipine also dramatically decreased the mortality [RR, 0.50 (0.32–0.78); I² = 62%] and the incidence of CVS [RR, 0.68 (0.46–0.99); I² = 57%]. Remarkably, we found a poor outcome and mortality were both significantly lower among patients with aSAH, with the mean age < 50 than that mean age ≥ 50 by subgroup analysis. Furthermore, the evidence grading of a poor outcome and its age subgroup in this study was assessed as high.

Conclusion

Nimodipine can significantly reduce the incidence of a poor outcome, mortality, and CVS in patients with aSAH. Moreover, we strongly recommend that patients with aSAH, especially those younger than 50 years old, should use nimodipine as early as possible in order to achieve a better clinical outcome, whether oral medication or endovascular direct medication.

Systematic review registration

www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd, identifier: CRD42022334619.

Serum Levels of Myo-inositol Predicts Clinical Outcome 1 Year After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Early prognostication of long-term outcome in patients suffering from spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) remains a challenge. No biomarkers are routinely used for prognostication. A previous study has indicated that the metabolite myo-inositol (MI) may be used to predict long-term outcome.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if MI measured in serum correlates with long-term clinical outcome in patients suffering from SAH.

METHODS

We conducted an observational cohort study including 88 patients treated for SAH at Umeå University Hospital. Serum samples were collected in the hospital, and a gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy method was used to quantitatively measure MI. Patients were assessed after 1 year using the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended and dichotomized to favorable or unfavorable outcome. Differences in MI levels between the 2 groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

There was no difference in MI levels between the groups upon admission. Myo-inositol levels decreased over time in the entire study population. The decrease was significantly larger in the unfavorable outcome group. A receiver operating characteristics analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.903 (CI 0.8-1.0, P < .001) for the MI value on day 7 to predict favorable outcome after 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Myo-inositol measured in serum may aid prognostication of outcome in patients with SAH. The mechanism behind this remains unclear, although it can be theorized to reflect processes leading to delayed cerebral ischemia, which affects long-term outcome. This is the first study to quantitively measure MI in serum for prognostication of outcome in patients with SAH.

Neuroprotective effect of dapsone in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

In this study, the authors sought to define the differences in the incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) between patients treated with dapsone and those treated with placebo. Secondary objectives were to define the clinical outcome at discharge and 3 months and the incidence of brain infarction.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed and included patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) within 5 days from ictus who were candidates for aneurysm occlusion, and who had a Fisher grade of 3 or 4. Patients with sulfa or sulfone drug allergies, hemoglobin < 11 g/dl, known G6PD deficiency, and those refusing informed consent were excluded. A minimal relevant effect decrease of 35% in the incidence of DCI was established. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a regimen of dapsone 2.5 ml (100 mg) daily or a placebo (aluminum hydroxide suspension, 2.5 ml daily). Both groups received validated treatment for aneurysmal SAH. The appearance of DCI on CT was assessed in every patient at discharge and 3 months later. We used the chi-square test to compare the DCI incidence between both groups, and the Student t-test or nonparametric tests to compare quantitative variables.

RESULTS

Overall, 48 patients (70.8% women and 29.2% men) were included. The mean age was 50 years (SD 14.28 years, range 18-72 years). Prerandomization and postrandomization characteristics were balanced, except for the necessity of intra-arterial nimodipine administration in patients treated with placebo (15.4% vs 45.5%, p = 0.029. The incidence of DCI, the primary endpoint, for the whole cohort was 43.8% and was significantly lower in the dapsone group (26.9% vs 63.6%, p = 0.011). In addition, the irreversible DCI incidence was lower in the dapsone group (11.5% vs 54.5%, p = 0.12). A favorable modified Rankin Scale score was more frequent in the dapsone group at discharge and at 3 months (76.9% vs 36.4%, p = 0.005 and 80% vs 38.9%, p = 0.019, respectively). Also, the brain infarction incidence was lower in the dapsone group (19.2% vs 63.6%, p = 0.001). There was no difference between groups regarding adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Dapsone seems to play a role as a prophylactic agent in patients at high risk of developing DCI after aneurysmal SAH. A multicenter investigation is necessary to increase the study population and confirm the consistency of the results observed in this study.

An overview of pharmacotherapy for cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage

Introduction: Survival from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage has increased in the past few decades. However, functional outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage is still suboptimal. Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is one of the major causes of morbidity.Areas covered: Mechanisms underlying vasospasm and DCI after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and pharmacological treatment are summarized in this review.Expert opinion: Oral nimodine, an L-type dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, is the only FDA-approved drug for the prevention and treatment of neurological deficits after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Fasudil, a potent Rho-kinase inhibitor, has also been shown to improve the clinical outcome and has been approved in some countries for use in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Although other drugs, including nicardipine, cilostazol, statins, clazosentan, magnesium and heparin, have been expected to have beneficial effects on DCI, there has been no convincing evidence supporting the routine use of those drugs in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in clinical practice. Further elucidation of the mechanisms underlying DCI and the development of effective therapeutic strategies for DCI, including combination therapy, are necessary to further improve the functional outcome and mortality after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Failed Neuroprotection of Combined Inhibition of L-Type and ASIC1a Calcium Channels with Nimodipine and Amiloride

Effective pharmacological neuroprotection is one of the most desired aims in modern medicine. We postulated that a combination of two clinically used drugs-nimodipine (L-Type voltage-gated calcium channel blocker) and amiloride (acid-sensing ion channel inhibitor)-might act synergistically in an experimental model of ischaemia, targeting the intracellular rise in calcium as a pathway in neuronal cell death. We used organotypic hippocampal slices of mice pups and a well-established regimen of oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) to assess a possible neuroprotective effect. Neither nimodipine (at 10 or 20 µM) alone or in combination with amiloride (at 100 µM) showed any amelioration. Dissolved at 2.0 Vol.% dimethyl-sulfoxide (DMSO), the combination of both components even increased cell damage (p = 0.0001), an effect not observed with amiloride alone. We conclude that neither amiloride nor nimodipine do offer neuroprotection in an in vitro ischaemia model. On a technical note, the use of DMSO should be carefully evaluated in neuroprotective experiments, since it possibly alters cell damage.

Perioperative Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is an acute neurologic emergency. Prompt definitive treatment of the aneurysm by craniotomy and clipping or endovascular intervention with coils and/or stents is needed to prevent rebleeding. Extracranial manifestations of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage include cardiac dysfunction, neurogenic pulmonary edema, fluid and electrolyte imbalances, and hyperglycemia. Data on the impact of anesthesia on long-term neurologic outcomes of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage do not exist. Perioperative management should therefore focus on optimizing systemic physiology, facilitating timely definitive treatment, and selecting an anesthetic technique based on patient characteristics, severity of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, and the planned intervention and monitoring. Anesthesiologists should be familiar with evoked potential monitoring, electroencephalographic burst suppression, temporary clipping, management of external ventricular drains, adenosine-induced cardiac standstill, and rapid ventricular pacing to effectively care for these patients.

Angioplasty with the scepter C dual lumen balloon catheter and postprocedural result evaluation in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage related vasospasms

BACKGROUND

Delayed cerebral ischemia is one of the leading causes of death and disability in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Transluminal balloon angioplasty (TBA) is a therapeutic option for vasospasms affecting proximal intracranial arteries.

METHODS

Aim of this study was to report our experience using the Scepter C balloon catheter in the treatment of cerebral vasospasms due to SAH and evaluate the postprocedural result with the iFlow tool. We reviewed cases of patients treated at our hospital from 2014 to 2018. Patients were screened with transcranial doppler sonography (TCD) and multimodal computed tomography. In case of significant vasospasms, patients were transferred to the angiography suite and treated. We used the iFlow tool to quantify and evaluate the angiographic results by measuring and comparing peak density values on angiograms before and after the mechanical dilation.

RESULTS

The use of the Scepter C balloon catheter was feasible in all cases. Vasospasms of the anterior cerebral artery were treated in ten cases. We didn't observe complications or vasospasm recurrences of the treated arteries. The temporal difference between distal vessels and the proximal reference vessel was significantly reduced from a mean of 53%, prior to dilatation, to 26% after the treatment. The difference between pre-dilatation and post-dilatation values was statistically significant for the anterior circulation at the proximal as well as at the distal vessels.

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully treated endovascularly patients suffering from cerebral vasospasms refractory to medical treatment using the Scepter C balloon catheter. We didn't observe any complications. The therapeutic effect could be easily and reliably assessed with the iFlow tool.

Nimodipine Reappraised: An Old Drug With a Future

Nimodipine is a dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist that blocks the flux of extracellular calcium through L-type, voltage-gated calcium channels. While nimodipine is FDAapproved for the prevention and treatment of neurological deficits in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), it affects myriad cell types throughout the body, and thus, likely has more complex mechanisms of action than simple inhibition of cerebral vasoconstriction. Newer understanding of the pathophysiology of delayed ischemic injury after a variety of acute neurologic injuries including aSAH, traumatic brain injury (TBI) and ischemic stroke, coupled with advances in the drug delivery method for nimodipine, have reignited interest in refining its potential therapeutic use. In this context, this review seeks to establish a firm understanding of current data on nimodipine's role in the mechanisms of delayed injury in aSAH, TBI, and ischemic stroke, and assess the extensive clinical data evaluating its use in these conditions. In addition, we will review pivotal trials using locally administered, sustained release nimodipine and discuss why such an approach has evaded demonstration of efficacy, while seemingly having the potential to significantly improve clinical care.

Outcome of Oral and Intra-arterial Nimodipine Administration After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage - A Single-centre Study

BACKGROUND

Oral nimodipine is administered to improve clinical outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). In this study, clinical outcome in patients with and without oral nimodipine administration was assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 105 patients did not receive oral nimodipine but did receive intra-arterial nimodipine in the occurrence of hemodynamically relevant vasospasm after aSAH, whereas 74 patients received applications of both. Demographic/radiological details and clinical presentation were abstracted from the case records.

RESULTS

Patient baseline characteristics were comparable, a predominance of endovascular coiling was shown in cohort 2 (p=0.0135). Severity of initial aSAH and clinical status at admission (Hunt and Hess) was significantly higher in those receiving oral nimodipine. Incidence of angiographic vasospasm was significantly higher in patients not treated with oral nimodipine (p=0.0305); a significantly better outcome measured by the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (p=0.0213), was noted in those receiving oral nimodipine.

CONCLUSION

Oral nimodipine administration improved clinical outcome of patients after aSAH and should be administered routinely for such patients.

Nimodipine for the treatment of otolaryngic indications

PURPOSE

The uses of nimodipine for otolaryngic indications are reviewed, and recommendations for its use in clinical practice are provided.

SUMMARY

Nimodipine is currently indicated for the improvement of neurologic outcomes in adult patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, other oral and i.v. calcium channel blockers have not exhibited the same beneficial effects in patients with aSAH, leading clinicians to believe that nimodipine possesses unique neuroprotective effects in addition to its calcium channel-blocking and vasodilatory properties. Consequently, clinical investigations of nimodipine have been conducted for cochlear and facial nerve preservation after vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery, symptomatic management of Ménière's disease and peripheral vertigo, and recovery of vocal cord paralysis after laryngeal nerve injury. Three prospective randomized studies have investigated nimodipine for hearing and/or nerve preservation in patients undergoing VS resection, the results of which have suggested a potential benefit of initiating nimodipine during the perioperative period. Several studies of Ménière's disease and/or peripheral vertigo have reported improved symptom control with nimodipine. For vocal fold paralysis associated with recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury, nimodipine may increase the recovery rate based on the results of 1 nonrandomized prospective study that used nimodipine in a protocolized manner. One small pilot study found that nimodipine improved facial nerve function after maxillofacial surgery.

CONCLUSION

Due to its proposed vasoactive and neuroprotective effects, nimodipine may play a role in the treatment of a number of otolaryngic pathologies including VS, Ménière's disease, peripheral vertigo, RLN injury, and facial weakness after maxillofacial surgery. Small studies have shown improved symptom control and recovery after surgery. Since all of the aforementioned indications are still considered off label, clinicians and patients should collaboratively assess the risks and benefits before initiating treatment.

Impact of Early Versus Late Intravenous Followed by Oral Nimodipine Treatment on the Occurrence of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia Among Patients With Aneurysm Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Guidelines for aneurysm subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) management recommend treatment with nimodipine to all patients to reduce delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and poor clinical outcome. However, it did not give the most beneficial time to start therapy and route of administration.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the DCI occurrence and clinical outcome among aSAH patients who received nimodipine treatment at different times.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted by collecting data from medical chart reviews between August 30, 2010, and October 31, 2015, at Prasart Neurological Institute, Thailand. Patients were classified into 2 groups by time to receive nimodipine: early group and late group (<96 and >96 hours, respectively). All patients received intravenous (IV) followed by oral nimodipine to complete treatment course. Clinical outcome was graded using the Glasgow Outcome Scale at 21 days. The factors related to DCI were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients were recruited: early (n = 97) and late (n = 52). No difference in baseline characteristics between groups was observed. The occurrence of DCI was not statistically significantly different between groups (early group, 18.60%, vs late group, 20.80%; P = 0.74). The World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies IV to V was associated with DCI occurrence. The proportion of patients with good outcome, poor outcome, or death did not show any difference between groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Receiving IV nimodipine 3 to 7 days following oral therapy after bleeding can be the alternative regimen in patients who did not start nimodipine within 96 hours.

Towards use of MRI-guided ultrasound for treating cerebral vasospasm

Cerebral vasospasm is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), causing delayed neurological deficits in as many as one third of cases. Existing therapy targets induction of cerebral vasodilation through use of various drugs and mechanical means, with a range of observed efficacy. Here, we perform a literature review supporting our hypothesis that transcranially delivered ultrasound may have the ability to induce therapeutic cerebral vasodilation and, thus, may one day be used therapeutically in the context of SAH. Prior studies demonstrate that ultrasound can induce vasodilation in both normal and vasoconstricted blood vessels in peripheral tissues, leading to reduced ischemia and cell damage. Among the proposed mechanisms is alteration of several nitric oxide (NO) pathways, where NO is a known vasodilator. While in vivo studies do not point to a specific physical mechanism, results of in vitro studies favor cavitation induction by ultrasound, where the associated shear stresses likely induce NO production. Two papers discussed the effects of ultrasound on the cerebral vasculature. One study applied clinical transcranial Doppler ultrasound to a rodent complete middle cerebral artery occlusion model and found reduced infarct size. A second involved the application of pulsed ultrasound in vitro to murine brain endothelial cells and showed production of a variety of vasodilatory chemicals, including by-products of arachidonic acid metabolism. In sum, nine reviewed studies demonstrated evidence of either cerebrovascular dilation or elaboration of vasodilatory compounds. Of particular interest, all of the reviewed studies used ultrasound capable of transcranial application: pulsed ultrasound, with carrier frequencies ranging between 0.5 and 2.0 MHz, and intensities not substantially above FDA-approved intensity values. We close by discussing potential specific treatment paradigms of SAH and other cerebral ischemic disorders based on MRI-guided transcranial ultrasound.

Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage: our current understanding and its evolution over the past half century

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in the US, especially among the young. Primary injury in TBI is preventable, whereas secondary injury is treatable. As a result, considerable research efforts have been focused on elucidating the pathophysiology of secondary injury and determining various prognosticators in the hopes of improving final outcome by minimizing secondary injury. One such variable, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH), has been the focus of many discussions over the past half century as numerous clinical studies have shown tSAH to be associated with adverse outcome. Whether the relationship of tSAH with poorer outcome in TBI is merely an epiphenomenon or a result of direct cause and effect is unclear. Some investigators believe that tSAH is merely a marker of severer TBI, while others argue that it directly causes deleterious effects such as vasospasm and ischemia. At the present time, no proven treatment regimen aimed specifically at decreasing the detrimental effects of tSAH exists, although calcium channel blockers traditionally thought to target vasospasm have shown some promises. Given that tSAH may primarily be an early indicator of associated and evolving brain injury, vigilant diagnostic surveillance including serial head CT and prevention of secondary brain damage owing to hypotension, hypoxia and intracranial hypertension may be more cost-effective than attempting to treat potential adverse sequelae associated with tSAH.

Medical Management of Cerebral Vasospasm following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Review of Current and Emerging Therapeutic Interventions

Cerebral vasospasm is a major source of morbidity and mortality in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Evidence suggests a multifactorial etiology and this concept remains supported by the assortment of therapeutic modalities under investigation. The authors provide an updated review of the literature for previous and recent clinical trials evaluating medical treatments in patients with cerebral vasospasm secondary to aSAH. Currently, the strongest evidence supports use of prophylactic oral nimodipine and initiation of triple-H therapy for patients in cerebral vasospasm. Other agents presented in this report include magnesium, statins, endothelin receptor antagonists, nitric oxide promoters, free radical scavengers, thromboxane inhibitors, thrombolysis, anti-inflammatory agents and neuroprotectants. Although promising data is beginning to emerge for several treatments, few prospective randomized clinical trials are presently available. Additionally, future investigational efforts will need to resolve discrepant definitions and outcome measures for cerebral vasospasm in order to permit adequate study comparisons. Until then, definitive recommendations cannot be made regarding the safety and efficacy for each of these therapeutic strategies and medical management practices will continue to be implemented in a wide-ranging manner.

Angiographic vasospasm versus cerebral infarction as outcome measures after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Despite a significant reduction of angiographic vasospasm, the reduction of poor functional outcome in clinical trials on aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) remains challenging. While there is general consensus that vasospasm is associated with delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), cerebral infarction, poor functional outcome, and mortality after SAH, causal relationships are subject to discussion. Therefore, it was the aim of our study to investigate the relationship between various outcome measures and poor functional outcome in clinical trials on pharmaceutical treatment of SAH.

METHODS

Based on data from two systematic reviews and a post hoc exploratory analysis, the relationship between the following outcome measures was investigated: (1) radiographic vasospasm, (2) DCI, (3) cerebral infarction, (4) poor functional outcome, and (5) death.

RESULTS

A reduction of angiographic vasospasm did not correlate with an improvement on dichotomous Glasgow Outcome Scale/modified Rankin Scale (GOS/mRS). In contrast, a reduction of cerebral infarction correlated with better neurological outcomes. The heterogeneous definition of DCI in previous clinical trials did not allow pooling of the data.

CONCLUSION

Future clinical trials may use cerebral infarction and functional outcome as main outcome measures to -investigate the true impact of an intervention, assuming that the intervention targets cerebral infarction and hereby improves outcome.

Lower incidence of cerebral infarction correlates with improved functional outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Despite an undisputed association between vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), there is debate if this association implies causality. It has been suggested that cerebral infarction is a better outcome measure than vasospasm in clinical trials and observational studies. To further investigate the relationship between infarction and outcome, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that studied the efficacy of pharmaceutical preventive strategies in SAH patients, and had both cerebral infarction and clinical outcome as outcome events. Effect sizes were expressed in (pooled) risk ratio (RR) estimates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sensitivity analyses were performed for studies with a low risk of bias and for those who reported outcome at 3 months after SAH. Twenty-four studies including 8,552 patients were included. Pharmaceutical treatments decreased the incidence of both cerebral infarction (RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.93) and of poor functional outcome (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.86 to 0.98). The sensitivity analyses did not change the results essentially. These data suggest that the previously observed association between cerebral infarction and functional outcome implies causality, and that cerebral infarction is a better outcome measure than vasospasm in clinical trials and observational studies.

Ultrahigh-dose intraarterial infusion of verapamil through an indwelling microcatheter for medically refractory severe vasospasm: initial experience

Object

Vasospasm is one of the leading causes of morbidity and death following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Many patients suffer devastating strokes despite the best medical therapy. Endovascular treatment is the last line of defense for cases of medically refractory vasospasm. The authors present a series of patients who were treated with a prolonged intraarterial infusion of verapamil through an in-dwelling microcatheter.

Methods

Over a 1-year period 12 patients with medically refractory vasospasm due to aneurysmal SAH were identified. Data were retrospectively collected, including age, sex, Hunt and Hess grade, Fisher grade, aneurysm location, aneurysm treatment, day of the onset of vasospasm, intracranial pressure, mean arterial pressures, intraarterial treatment of vasospasm, dosages and times of verapamil infusion, presence of a new ischemic area on CT scan, modified Rankin scale score at discharge and at the last clinical follow-up, and discharge status.

Results

Twenty-seven treatments were administered. Between 25 and 360 mg of verapamil was infused per vessel (average dose per vessel 164.6 mg, range of total dose per treatment 70–720 mg). Infusion times ranged from 1 to 20.5 hours (average 7.8 hours). The number of treated vessels ranged from 1 to 7 per patient. The number of treatments per patients ranged from 1 to 4. There was no treatment-related morbidity or death. Blood pressure and intracranial pressure changes were transient and rapidly reversible. Among the 36 treated vessels, prolonged verapamil infusion was completely effective in 32 cases and partially effective in 4. Only 4 vessels required angioplasty for refractory vasospasm after prolonged verapamil infusion. There was no CT scanning evidence of new ischemic events in 9 of the 12 patients treated. At last clinical follow-up 6–12 months after discharge, 8 of 11 patients had a modified Rankin Scale score ≤2.

Conclusions

Prolonged intraarterial infusion of verapamil is a safe and effective treatment for medically refractory severe vasospasm and reduces the need for angioplasty in such cases.

High-dose intraarterial verapamil in the treatment of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

OBJECT

Because oral calcium channel blockers appear to reduce the severity of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), interest in their application intraarterially has emerged for cases in which noninvasive means of alleviating vasospasm are unsuccessful. Studies to date have been limited to the administration of low intraarterial doses because of concerns about hemodynamic stability and changes in intracranial pressure. These doses, although effective in cases of milder vasospasm, were inadequate in severe cases. The authors present a series of 10 patients with cerebral vasospasm who underwent 12 procedures in which they received > or = 20 mg of intraarterial verapamil per procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective review was undertaken of all patients who underwent endovascular treatment for cerebral vasospasm due to aneurysmal SAH by the senior author between February 2005 and October 2006. Ten patients were identified who had undergone a total of 12 procedures during which > or =20 mg of intraarterial verapamil had been administered. From angiography reports, anesthesia records, and nursing records, we obtained pre- and postverapamil mean arterial blood pressures (MABPs), heart rates, intracranial pressures (ICPs) (when available), and visible changes in the degree of vasospasm.

RESULTS

No statistically significant changes in MABP, heart rate, or ICP were observed after administration of > or = 20 mg of intraarterial verapamil, and the degree of improvement in vasospasm was statistically significant based on our grading system. No correlation was found between the change in hemodynamic parameters and the total dose of verapamil.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that high-dose intraarterial verapamil may be used to treat cerebral vasospasm without compromising hemodynamic stability or increasing ICP.

Calcium antagonists for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Secondary ischaemia is a frequent cause of poor outcome in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Its pathogenesis has been incompletely elucidated, but vasospasm probably is a contributing factor. Experimental studies have suggested that calcium antagonists can prevent or reverse vasospasm and have neuroprotective properties.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether calcium antagonists improve outcome in patients with aneurysmal SAH.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched April 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2006) and EMBASE (1980 to March 2006). We handsearched two Russian journals (1990 to 2003), and contacted trialists and pharmaceutical companies in 1995 and 1996.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing calcium antagonists with control, or a second calcium antagonist (magnesium sulphate) versus control in addition to another calcium antagonist (nimodipine) in both the intervention and control groups.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted the data and assessed trial quality. Trialists were contacted to obtain missing information.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen trials, involving 3361 patients, were included in the review; three of the studies were of magnesium sulphate in addition to nimodipine. Overall, calcium antagonists reduced the risk of poor outcome: the relative risk (RR) was 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 0.92); the corresponding number of patients needed to treat was 19 (95% CI 1 to 51). For oral nimodipine alone the RR was 0.67 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.81), for other calcium antagonists or intravenous administration of nimodipine the results were not statistically significant. Calcium antagonists reduced the occurrence of secondary ischaemia and showed a favourable trend for case fatality. For magnesium in addition to standard treatment with nimodipine, the RR was 0.75 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.00) for a poor outcome and 0.66 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.96) for clinical signs of secondary ischaemia.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Calcium antagonists reduce the risk of poor outcome and secondary ischaemia after aneurysmal SAH. The results for 'poor outcome' depend largely on a single large trial of oral nimodipine; the evidence for other calcium antagonists is inconclusive. The evidence for nimodipine is not beyond all doubt, but given the potential benefits and modest risks of this treatment, oral nimodipine is currently indicated in patients with aneurysmal SAH. Intravenous administration of calcium antagonists cannot be recommended for routine practice on the basis of the present evidence. Magnesium sulphate is a promising agent but more evidence is needed before definite conclusions can be drawn.

Cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: the emerging revolution

Cerebral vasospasm is the classic cause of delayed neurological deterioration after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, leading to cerebral ischemia and infarction, and thus to poor outcome and occasionally death. Advances in diagnosis and treatment-principally the use of nimodipine, intensive care management, hemodynamic manipulations and endovascular neuroradiology procedures-have improved the prospects for these patients, but outcomes remain disappointing. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated marked prevention of vasospasm with the endothelin receptor antagonist clazosentan, yet patient outcome was not improved. This Review considers possible explanations for this result and proposes alternative causes of neurological deterioration and poor outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage, including delayed effects of global cerebral ischemia, thromboembolism, microcirculatory dysfunction and cortical spreading depression.

Anaesthesia for endovascular management of cerebral aneurysms

Subarachnoid haemorrhage due to rupture of cerebral aneurysms is a multisystem disease. Treatment of the condition in the past has relied on craniotomy and clipping of the aneurysm to prevent a recurrent haemorrhage. There is now emerging evidence to suggest that endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms may reduce the morbidity associated with open surgery. The anaesthetic management of interventional neuroradiology also creates new challenges due to the novel approach to treatment. Anaesthetists need to be familiar with this procedure and the management of potential complications. This review provides an overview such considerations.

Endovascular Management of Cerebral Vasospasm

CEREBRAL VASOSPASM REMAINS a leading cause of death and disability in patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms. The development of endovascular intervention in the past two decades has shown promising results in the treatment of vasospasm. Endovascular techniques that have been used in humans include intra-arterial infusion of vasorelaxants and direct mechanical dilation with transluminal balloon angioplasty. This article reviews the current indications and role of endovascular therapy in the management of cerebral vasospasm, its clinical significance, and potential future therapies.

Endovascular treatment strategies for cerebral vasospasm

Cerebral vasospasm is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who have sustained a subarachnoid hemorrhage from aneurysm rupture. Symptomatic cerebral vasospasm is also a strong predictor of poor clinical outcome and has thus drawn a great deal of interest from cerebrovascular surgeons. Although medical management is the cornerstone of treatment for this condition, endovascular intervention may be warranted for those in whom this treatment fails and in whom symptomatic vasospasm subsequently develops. The rapid advancements in endovascular techniques and pharmacological agents used to combat this pathological state continue to offer promise in broadening the available treatment armamentarium. In this article the authors discuss the rationale and basis for using the various endovascular options for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm, and they also discuss the limitations, complications, and efficacy of these treatment strategies in regard to neurological condition and outcome.

Can angiographic vasospasm be used as a surrogate marker in evaluating therapeutic interventions for cerebral vasospasm?

✓ The authors tested the null hypothesis that published literature with a high level of evidence does not support the assertion that subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) causes cerebral vasospasm, which in turn causes cerebral infarction and poor outcome after aneurysmal SAH. The medical literature on SAH was searched in MEDLINE. The author's personal files of all published literature on SAH were reviewed. References cited in Cochrane reviews as well as the published papers that were reviewed were also retrieved.

There is no question that SAH causes what the authors have chosen to call “angiographic vasospasm.” However, the incidence and severity of vasospasm in recent series of patients is not well defined. There is reasonable evidence that vasospasm causes infarction, but again, accurate data on how severe and how diffuse vasospasm has to be to cause infarction and how often vasospasm is the primary cause of infarction are not available. There are good data on the incidence of cerebral infarction after SAH, and these data indicate that it is highly associated with poor outcome. The link between angiographic vasospasm and poor outcome is particularly poorly described in terms of what would be considered data of a high level of evidence.

The question as to whether there is a clear pathway from SAH to vasospasm to cerebral infarction to poor outcome seems so obvious to neurosurgeons as to make it one not worth asking. Nevertheless, the obvious is not always true or accurate, so it is important to note that published literature only weakly supports the causative association of vasospasm with infarction and poor outcome after SAH. It behooves neurosurgeons to document this seemingly straightforward pathway with high-quality evidence acceptable to the proponents of evidence-based medicine.

Evidence, education and practice

Stroke causes greater loss of quality-adjusted life years than any other disease and is also one of the most expensive disorders. The burden of stroke will increase in the future due to change in the age structure of populations. We have a vast body of evidence on how to prevent stroke and how to treat stroke patients. Good examples are treatment of hypertension, antithrombotic agents and carotid surgery in stroke prevention, thrombolysis in ischaemic stroke and stroke unit care for all stroke patients. We only have to translate scientific evidence into daily practice. If some pieces are missing, it is our duty to generate them through research. While taking part in randomized clinical trials (RCTs), the discipline, an essential part of RCTs, will improve the daily care of all stroke patients. Besides RCTs there are many other sources of scientific evidence for stroke management, one of which is the European Stroke Initiative (EUSI). The mission of the EUSI is to improve and optimize stroke management in Europe through education and by offering best practice guidelines. Also national and international societies and organizations play an important role in providing education. The human factor is one obstacle to more successful stroke management because to be more effective we must change our own clinical routine. We can make a difference by applying available evidence to our daily practice.

Intravenous magnesium versus nimodipine in the treatment of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized study

OBJECTIVE

The prophylactic use of nimodipine in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage reduces the risk of ischemic brain damage. However, its efficacy seems to be rather moderate. The question arises whether other types of calcium antagonists offer better protection. Magnesium, nature's physiological calcium antagonist, is neuroprotective in animal models, promotes dilatation of cerebral arteries, and has an established safety profile. The aim of the current pilot study is to evaluate the efficacy of magnesium versus nimodipine to prevent delayed ischemic deficits after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

METHODS

One hundred and thirteen patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage were enrolled in the study and were randomized to receive either magnesium sulfate (loading 10 mg/kg followed by 30 mg/kg daily) or nimodipine (48 mg/d) intravenously until at least postoperative Day 7. Primary outcome parameters were incidence of clinical vasospasm and infarction. Secondary outcome measures were the incidence of transcranial Doppler/angiographic vasospasm, the neuronal markers (neuron-specific enolase, S-100), and the patients' Glasgow Outcome Scale scores at discharge and after 1 year.

RESULTS

One hundred and four patients met the study requirements. In the magnesium group (n = 53), eight patients (15%) experienced clinical vasospasm and 20 (38%) experienced transcranial Doppler/angiographic vasospasm compared with 14 (27%) and 17 (33%) patients in the nimodipine group (n = 51). If clinical vasospasm occurred, 75% of the magnesium-treated versus 50% of the nimodipine-treated patients experienced cerebral infarction resulting in fatal outcome in 37 and 14%, respectively. Overall, the rate of infarction attributable to vasospasm was virtually the same (19 versus 22%). There was no difference in outcome between groups.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of magnesium in preventing delayed ischemic neurological deficits in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage seems to be comparable with that of nimodipine. The difference in their pharmacological properties makes studies on the combined administration of magnesium and nimodipine seem promising.

The influence of ethanol on blood flow velocity in major cerebral vessels. A prospective and controlled study

Cerebral vasospasm secondary to subarachnoid hemorrhage leads to increased cerebrovascular resistance and may cause ischemia in the affected vascular territories. The currently available therapeutic options for treating vasospasm are limited. The effect of ethanol at a concentration of 0.75 g/kg body weight on blood flow velocity in the major cerebral arteries was studied. In 31 healthy persons, the major extra- and intracranial cerebral vessels were examined by Doppler ultrasonography before and following oral ingestion of 0.75 g/kg body weight of ethanol. An additional 20 healthy subjects served as a control group. Ethanol in the applied concentration significantly increased the systolic, diastolic, and mean blood flow velocities and significantly decreased the pulsatility indices in the middle cerebral artery (MCA). It may reduce vascular resistance and may increase cerebral blood flow in the area supplied by the MCA in healthy persons.

Management of cerebral vasospasm

Cerebral vasospasm is delayed narrowing of the large arteries of the circle of Willis occurring 4 to 14 days after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). It is but one cause of delayed deterioration after SAH but, in general, is the most important potentially treatable cause of morbidity and mortality after SAH. Development of vasospasm is best predicted by the volume, location, persistence and density of subarachnoid clot early after SAH. Diagnosis is made by catheter angiography or, with less accuracy, by computed tomographic angiography, transcranial Doppler ultrasound or other methods. Treatment remains problematic because it is expensive, time-consuming, associated with substantial risk and largely ineffective. Treatment includes optimization of factors that affect cerebral blood flow and metabolism, systemic administration of nimodipine, hemodynamic therapy and pharmacologic and mechanical angioplasty.

Cerebral Vasospasm After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: An Overview of Pharmacologic Management

Cerebral vasospasm remains one of the leading causes of mortality in patients who experience a subarachnoid hemorrhage but survive the initial 24 hours. Vasospasm generally occurs 3-4 days after the initial subarachnoid hemorrhage and peaks at 5-7 days. The pathophysiology of vasospasm is poorly understood, which directly contributes to the inconsistency of management and creates a formidable challenge in clinical practice. Traditionally, hemodilution, hypervolemia, and induced hypertension (so-called triple H therapy); calcium channel blockers; and endovascular therapy have been used as either prophylactic therapy or treatment. However, management of vasospasm varies among physicians and institutions mainly because of a lack of large clinical trials and inconsistent results. Practice has been based primarily on case reports and the preference of each practitioner. Several experimental therapies have been explored; however, large, prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed to elucidate the role of these therapies.

Effect of Fasudil Hydrochloride, a Protein Kinase Inhibitor, on Cerebral Vasospasm and Delayed Cerebral Ischemic Symptoms After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage-Results of a Randomized Trial of Fasudil Hydrochloride Versus Nimodipine-

The efficacy and safety of fasudil hydrochloride, a novel protein kinase inhibitor, were evaluated for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm and associated cerebral ischemic symptoms in patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysm. This randomized open trial with nimodipine as the control included 72 patients who underwent subarachnoid hemorrhage surgery for ruptured cerebral aneurysm of Hunt and Hess grades I to IV. For 14 days following surgery, patients were administered either 30 mg of fasudil hydrochloride by intravenous injection over a period of 30 minutes three times a day or 1 mg/hr of nimodipine by continuous intravenous infusion. Fasudil hydrochloride and nimodipine both showed inhibitory effects on cerebral vasospasm. The incidence of symptomatic vasospasm was five of 33 patients in the fasudil group and nine of 32 patients in the nimodipine group. Good recovery evaluated by the Glasgow Outcome Scale was achieved by 23 of 33 patients in the fasudil group and 19 of 34 patients in the nimodipine group. Both drugs significantly improved consciousness levels and neurological deficits such as aphasia. However, fasudil hydrochloride improved motor disturbance more than nimodipine. Adverse reactions occurred in 13 of 37 patients receiving fasudil hydrochloride and 15 of 35 patients receiving nimodipine. There were no serious adverse events in the fasudil group. The results of this clinical trial indicate that fasudil hydrochloride is a safe and efficient agent for suppressing cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage surgery for ruptured cerebral aneurysm.

Calcium antagonists for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Secondary ischaemia is a frequent cause of poor outcome in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Its pathogenesis has not been elucidated yet, but may be related to vasospasm. Experimental studies have indicated that calcium antagonists can prevent or reverse vasospasm and have neuroprotective properties. Several types of calcium antagonists have been studied in several clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether calcium antagonists improve outcome in patients with aneurysmal SAH.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (September 2003). In addition, we searched MEDLINE (1966 to October 2003) and EMBASE (1980 to October 2003), handsearched two Russian journals (1990 to 2003) and contacted trialists and pharmaceutical companies (in 1995 and 1996) to identify further studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All unconfounded, truly randomised controlled trials comparing any calcium antagonist with control.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed trial quality. Trialists were contacted to obtain missing information.

MAIN RESULTS

We analysed 12 trials totalling 2844 patients with SAH (1396 in the treatment group and 1448 in the control group). The drugs analysed were: nimodipine (eight trials, 1574 patients), nicardipine (two trials, 954 patients), AT877 (one trial, 276 patients) and magnesium (one trial, 40 patients). Overall, calcium antagonists reduced the risk of poor outcome: relative risk (RR) 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 0.93); the absolute risk reduction was 5.1%, the corresponding number of patients needed to treat to prevent a single poor outcome event was 20. For oral nimodipine alone the RR was 0.70 (0.58 to 0.84). The RR of death on treatment with calcium antagonists was 0.90 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.07), that of clinical signs of secondary ischaemia 0.67 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.76), and that of CT or MR confirmed infarction 0.80 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.89).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Calcium antagonists reduce the risk of poor outcome and secondary ischaemia after aneurysmal SAH. The results for 'poor outcome' depend largely on a single large trial with oral nimodipine; the evidence for nicardipine, AT877 and magnesium is inconclusive. The evidence for nimodipine is not beyond every doubt, but given the potential benefits and modest risks of this treatment, against the background of a devastating natural history, oral nimodipine (60 mg every 4 hours) is currently indicated in patients with aneurysmal SAH. Intravenous administration of calcium antagonists cannot be recommended for routine practice on the basis of the present evidence.

Duration of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage for Prevention of Symptomatic Vasospasm and Late Hydrocephalus

The optimal duration of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage after acute aneurysm surgery is unclear. The association between the occurrence of symptomatic vasospasm or late hydrocephalus and the duration of CSF drainage was investigated using multiple logistic analysis in 95 consecutive patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage who underwent surgery within 72 hours after onset. The duration of drainage was significantly related to the occurrence of symptomatic vasospasm and late hydrocephalus. The cut-off values of the duration of drainage for preventing symptomatic vasospasm and late hydrocephalus were 11 days (adjusted odds ratio 0.347, 95% confidence interval 0.135-0.889, p = 0.0274) and 6 days (adjusted odds ratio 4.86, 95% confidence interval 1.46-16.2, p = 0.0099), respectively. Prevention of both symptomatic vasospasm and late hydrocephalus is not possible without additional procedures such as cisternal irrigation using fibrinolytic agents.

The effect of nimodipine on cerebral oxygenation in patients with poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage

Object. Nimodipine has been shown to improve neurological outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH); the mechanism of this improvement, however, is uncertain. In addition, adverse systemic effects such as hypotension have been described. The authors investigated the effect of nimodipine on brain tissue PO2.

Methods. Patients in whom Hunt and Hess Grade IV or V SAH had occurred who underwent aneurysm occlusion and had stable blood pressure were prospectively evaluated using continuous brain tissue PO2 monitoring. Nimodipine (60 mg) was delivered through a nasogastric or Dobhoff tube every 4 hours. Data were obtained from 11 patients and measurements of brain tissue PO2, intracranial pressure (ICP), mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) were recorded every 15 minutes.

Nimodipine resulted in a significant reduction in brain tissue PO2 in seven (64%) of 11 patients. The baseline PO2 before nimodipine administration was 38.4 ± 10.9 mm Hg. The baseline MABP and CPP were 90 ± 20 and 84 ± 19 mm Hg, respectively. The greatest reduction in brain tissue PO2 occurred 15 minutes after administration, when the mean pressure was 26.9 ± 7.7 mm Hg (p < 0.05). The PO2 remained suppressed at 30 minutes (27.5 ± 7.7 mm Hg [p < 0.05]) and at 60 minutes (29.7 ± 11.1 mm Hg [p < 0.05]) after nimodipine administration but returned to baseline levels 2 hours later. In the seven patients in whom brain tissue PO2 decreased, other physiological variables such as arterial saturation, end-tidal CO2, heart rate, MABP, ICP, and CPP did not demonstrate any association with the nimodipine-induced reduction in PO2. In four patients PO2 remained stable and none of these patients had a significant increase in brain tissue PO2.

Conclusions. Although nimodipine use is associated with improved outcome following SAH, in some patients it can temporarily reduce brain tissue PO2.

Marked reduction of cerebral vasospasm with lumbar drainage of cerebrospinal fluid after subarachnoid hemorrhage

OBJECT

Cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) continues to be a major source of morbidity in patients despite significant clinical and basic science research. Efforts to prevent vasospasm by removing spasmogens from the subarachnoid space have produced mixed results. The authors hypothesize that lumbar cisternal drainage can remove blood from the basal subarachnoid spaces more effectively than an external ventricular drain (EVD). This non-randomized, controlled-cohort study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of a lumbar drain in patients with SAH compared with those in whom an EVD or no form of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage was used to prevent the development of clinical vasospasm and its sequelae.

METHODS

The authors collected data on 266 patients with nontraumatic SAH who were admitted to the University of Utah Health Sciences Center between January 1994 and January 2003. Of these, 167 met the study entry criteria. The treatment group consisted of 81 patients in whom a lumbar drain had been placed for CSF shunting, whereas the control group was composed of 86 patients who received no form of CSF drainage or who were treated solely with an EVD. Primary outcome measures were as follows: 1) clinically evident vasospasm; 2) the need for endovascular intervention; 3) vasospasm-induced infarction; 4) disposition at time of discharge; and 5) Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score at 1 to 3 months postdischarge. Secondary outcomes included length of stay and the need for CSF shunting. The presence of a lumbar drain conferred a statistically significant protective and beneficial effect across all outcome measures, reducing the incidence of clinical vasospasm from 51 to 17%, the need for angioplasty from 45 to 17%, and the occurrence of vasospastic infarction from 27 to 7% (all p < or = 0.001-0.008). Patients in the treatment group were more likely to be discharged home (54% compared with 25%, p = 0.002) and to have a GOS score of 5 at follow up (71% compared with 35%, p < 0.001). The mean number of days spent in the intensive care unit and in the hospital overall was also fewer in the treatment group. A similar degree of benefit was found in patients with different Fisher grades and regardless of whether an EVD was needed on presentation, both by subgroup analysis and multivariate logistic regression modeling. There was no statistical difference between the groups in terms of patients requiring a shunt. Complications with lumbar drains were rare and yielded no permanent sequelae.

CONCLUSIONS

Shunting of CSF through a lumbar drain after an SAH markedly reduces the risk of clinically evident vasospasm and its sequelae, shortens hospital stay, and improves outcome. Its beneficial effects are probably mediated through the removal of spasmogens that exist in the CSF. The results of this study warrant a randomized clinical trial, which is currently under way.

Resolution of cerebral vasospasm with trapidil; an animal model

Cerebral vasospasm and rebleeding are important clinical phenomena associated with a high mortality rate. Therefore, any promising finding in the laboratory deserves assessment in clinical practice. The present study was designed to examine the possible effects of trapidil on the basilar artery of the rabbit through a cerebral vasospasm model. This experimental study was carried out on 26 adult New Zealand albino rabbits of both sexes weighing 2.5-3.0 kg. A transclival exposure was performed. Vasospasm was produced by an intracisternal injection of autologous blood. After observation of the vasospasm, trapidil was locally applied in increasing concentrations (10(-5)-10(-4) M). The effect of each concentration was measured independently after 10 minutes for each application and was extended to three hours. Trapidil was shown to have a clear spasmolytic effect on the rabbit's basilar artery. These data suggest that trapidil can have a potential use in the treatment of patients suffering from cerebral vasospasm.

Bromocriptine and the expression of c-myc and c-fos in human prolactinomas

Prolactinomas are one of the most frequent tumors of the human anterior pituitary. Dopamine agonists are the choice in the medical treatment of this disease. Bromocriptine (BC) is a well known anti-neoplasic agent in human PRL secreting adenomas although its effect on PRL cells is far from clear. We decided to investigate its influence on cell proliferation parameters: (3H)thymidine incorporation, expression of c-myc and c-fos, and number of estrogen receptors present in the samples. A total of 28 patients were included in this protocol. They were treated with BC (5-7.5mg day(-1) patient(-1)) or with vehicle orally 15 days before surgery. We found that in BC treated patients (3H)thymidine incorporation was lower than in vehicle treated patients. The oncogenes expression were diminished in BC comparing with vehicle-treated patients. No difference in the number of estrogen receptors was observed in the samples from BC or vehicle-treated patients. These results clearly demonstrate that one mechanism to reduce the size of human PRL secreting adenomas by BC is the inhibition of DNA duplication.

Cerebrospinal fluid membrane-bound tissue factor and myelin basic protein in the course of vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage

No marker that predicts accurately the time of occurrence of cerebral vasospasm due to subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) has been reported. In the present study, membrane-bound tissue factor (mTF) and myelin basic protein (MBP) concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were evaluated as a predictor of the time of occurrence of cerebral vasospasm. The mTF and MBP concentrations were measured in the CSF from 28 patients with SAH due to ruptured aneurysm. Serial assays were performed from day 4 to day 14 after SAH. CSF mTF and MBP concentrations from days 5 to 9 correlated with the volume of cerebral infarction due to vasospasm and outcome three months after SAH. From the serial assays, CSF mTF measurements predicted the time of occurrence and severity and irreversibility of symptoms due to vasospasm. In conclusion, CSF mTF is predictive of the occurrence and the recovery of cerebral vasospasm, while CSF MBP is only an indicator of severity of brain damage due to vasospasm.

Nimodipine-induced acute hypoxemia: case report

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE

Nimodipine is commonly used to improve neurological outcomes after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Although nimodipine reportedly has high specificity for the cerebral vasculature, adverse systemic effects such as hypotension have been described. This case report describes a patient with traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage who experienced two episodes of previously undescribed, life-threatening hypoxemia that was directly related to nimodipine therapy.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

The patient experienced acute hypoxemia (partial pressures of oxygen of 32.9 and 58.7 mm Hg), on two separate occasions (3 d apart), that was temporally related to single doses of nimodipine therapy for traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Other disease- and medication-related causes did not explain these episodes.

INTERVENTION

After the inspired oxygen concentration was increased to 100% (both episodes) and the positive end expiratory pressure was increased to 7.5 mm Hg (first episode), the arterial oxygen saturation of the patient returned to baseline levels (>99%) within 40 minutes in each instance. Nimodipine therapy was discontinued after each episode.

CONCLUSION

It is hypothesized that, in the presence of concomitant adult respiratory distress syndrome, nimodipine increased ventilation/perfusion ratio mismatch, through its direct vasodilatory effects on the pulmonary artery, and possibly interfered with the reflex hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction necessary to maintain adequate oxygenation for this patient. Clinicians should carefully monitor the oxygenation status of patients when nimodipine therapy is initiated.