Vega-Basulto SD, Silva-Adán S, Laserda-Gallardo A, Peñones-Montero R, Varela-Hernández A. [Giant supratentorial intracranial aneurysms. Analysis of 22 cases].
Neurocirugia (Astur) 2003;
14:16-24. [PMID:
12655380 DOI:
10.1016/s1130-1473(03)70557-0]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Giant intracranial aneurysms represent 2 to 5% of all aneurysms. They are well characterized from the anatomical and clinical point of view. Their natural history shows its potential lethality. Surgical treatment of giant aneurysms is a challenge for neurosurgeons.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Twenty-two patients were operated on through pterional craniotomy, specialized neuroanesthesia and microneurosurgical technics. Auxiliary methods like transitory clipping and retrograde decompression-suction technique were applied. Patients were followed at intensive care units and they were evaluated three months after the operation. Nineteen patients were in the fourth and sixth decade of life. Seventeen were females. Aneurysms were located at middle cerebral artery bifurcation; paraclinoidal carotid artery; proximal anterior cerebral artery and carotid bifurcation. Ninety one percent of aneurysms were clipped. Retrograde decompression-suction technique was performed in thirteen cases.
RESULTS
Seventeen patients had good outcome and one patient died (4.5%). There were 6 postoperative complications and in four disappeared three months later.
CONCLUSIONS
Giant aneurysms were operated on following main neurosurgical rules helped by auxiliar procedures to reduce aneurysms size and wall, aneurysms tension. New knowledge about giants aneurysms and the development of new techniques will permit better results.
Collapse