Augmentation of endothelial function by endothelin antagonism in human saphenous vein conduits

Effect of Bosentan on Claudication Distance and Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilation in Hispanic Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease

Endothelin (ET) is involved in the etiopathogenesis of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). We hypothesized that ET antagonism might improve the endothelial function, inflammatory status, and symptoms in PAD. This pilot randomized clinical trial was designed to determine the clinical efficacy, pleiotropic effects, and safety of dual ET-receptor antagonist bosentan in Hispanic patients with PAD presenting intermittent claudication. The Bosentan Population-Based Randomized Trial for Clinical and Endothelial Function Assessment on Endothelin Antagonism Therapy was a 12-month, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, double-blind, proof-of-concept pilot study evaluating the effect of bosentan on absolute claudication distance (primary efficacy end point), flow-mediated arterial dilation, and C-reactive protein levels (primary pleiotropic end points) in patients with PAD with Rutherford category 1 to 2 of recent diagnosis. Secondary end points included ankle-brachial index, subjective claudication distance, and safety. Of the 629 screened subjects, 56 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive bosentan for 12 weeks (n = 27) or placebo (n = 29). Six months after the initiation, a significant treatment effect in flow-mediated arterial dilation of 2.43 ± 0.3% (95% CI 1.75 to 3.12; p = 0.001), absolute claudication distance of 283 ± 23 m (95% CI 202 to 366; p = 0.01), ankle-brachial index of 0.16 ± 0.03 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.23; p = 0.001), and a decrease in C-reactive protein levels of -2.0 ± 0.5 mg/L (95% CI -2.8 to -1.1; p = 0.02) were observed in the bosentan-treated group compared to the control group. No severe adverse effects were found in the bosentan group. In conclusion, in Hispanic patients with intermittent claudication, bosentan was well tolerated and improved endothelial function and claudication distance as well as inflammatory and hemodynamic states.

Biology of intracranial aneurysms: role of inflammation

Intracranial aneurysms (IAs) linger as a potentially devastating clinical problem. Despite intense investigation, our understanding of the mechanisms leading to aneurysm development, progression and rupture remain incompletely defined. An accumulating body of evidence implicates inflammation as a critical contributor to aneurysm pathogenesis. Intracranial aneurysm formation and progression appear to result from endothelial dysfunction, a mounting inflammatory response, and vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic modulation producing a pro-inflammatory phenotype. A later final common pathway appears to involve apoptosis of cellular constituents of the vessel wall. These changes result in degradation of the integrity of the vascular wall leading to aneurysmal dilation, progression and eventual rupture in certain aneurysms. Various aspects of the inflammatory response have been investigated as contributors to IA pathogenesis including leukocytes, complement, immunoglobulins, cytokines, and other humoral mediators. Furthermore, gene expression profiling of IA compared with control arteries has prominently featured differential expression of genes involved with immune response/inflammation. Preliminary data suggest that therapies targeting the inflammatory response may have efficacy in the future treatment of IA. Further investigation, however, is necessary to elucidate the precise role of inflammation in IA pathogenesis, which can be exploited to improve the prognosis of patients harboring IA.

A review of endothelial dysfunction in diabetes: a focus on the contribution of a dysfunctional eNOS

Although the etiology of vascular dysfunction in diabetes has been extensively investigated in both humans as well as animal models of human diabetes, the relative importance of the cellular pathways involved is still not fully understood. In this review, we focus on reviewing the literature that provides insights into how an acute exposure to hyperglycemia results in a dysregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase function, the subsequent downstream effects of endothelial nitric oxide synthase dysregulation, and the development of endothelial dysfunction.

Endothelin-1 and vein graft occlusion in patients undergoing bypass surgery

The saphenous vein is the most commonly used graft for revascularization procedures in patients with coronary artery disease and critical limb ischaemia. However, the patency rate of this vessel is poor, with a high proportion of patients requiring further surgery. Early graft occlusion is caused by vasoconstriction or thrombus formation, with later stages of graft failure being due to neointimal formation or atherosclerosis. Apart from its potent constrictor action, endothelin-1 is also a potent proliferative and proinflammatory peptide that is implicated in a number of vascular diseases. The surgical trauma caused during preparation of the saphenous vein as a bypass graft stimulates the release of a number of factors affecting vascular reactivity and structure, including endothelin-1. Endothelin-1 not only constricts animal and human isolated saphenous vein segments but also causes vascular smooth muscle proliferation and neointimal thickening in vitro, actions that are mediated via endothelin (A and B) receptors. Experimentally, the effects of subtype-selective and dual receptor antagonists have been shown to inhibit endothelin-1-mediated constriction and cell proliferation of the saphenous vein. In this review, data supporting a role of endothelin-1 in vein graft occlusion are presented, and the therapeutic potential of endothelin receptor antagonists in improving graft performance is discussed.

Endothelin receptor blockade in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension: selective and dual antagonism

Various treatments approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) target three of the many pathways implicated in the development of PAH: prostacyclin-, endothelin-1 (ET-1)-, and nitric oxide-mediated pathways. The objectives of this manuscript are to provide background information on the role of ET-1 in the pathogenesis of PAH, to provide theoretical considerations for the advantages and disadvantages of dual vs single endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) for the management of PAH, and to describe the clinical study results from randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials for the various ERAs. ET receptors (ET(A) and ET(B)) have different densities and distributions throughout the body and are dynamically regulated, such that blockade of ET(A) and ET(B) receptors may have different results in normal vs pathological conditions. Although differences in biological effects can be found in studies of isolated cells, blood vessels and animal models, clinical treatment studies have not identified clear differences in efficacy among the various ERAs. The main differences appear to be in safety profiles, with a greater frequency of serum liver function abnormalities occurring with the available dual ET(A)/ET(B) antagonist, and possibly higher rates of peripheral edema noted with selective ET(A) agents. Head-to-head studies will be necessary to resolve the question of whether single vs dual blockade produces better clinical results with fewer side effects in patients with PAH.

Mechanisms of ET-1-induced endothelial dysfunction

There is now increasing evidence that endothelial dysfunction is an early event in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases and can be corrected with certain therapies such as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors angiotensin type I receptor antagonists and stains independently of blood pressure lowering effects. Restoring endothelial function appears to be a crucial target since endothelial dysfunction predicts cardiovascular events in various situations such as coronary artery disease peripheral artery disease, or hypertension and in patients undergoing vascular surgery. Preclinical and clinical data strongly support that endothelin receptor antagonists belong to this restricted class of pharmacological agents able to act on the endothelium, and offer a potential therapeutic approach for numerous diseases associated with endothelial dysfunction. The purpose of this review will be therefore, 1) to propose mechanisms by which ET-1 can cause endothelial dysfunction; 2) to provide an overview of pathological situations associated with endothelial dysfunction related to ET-1; and 3) to assemble evidence on efficacy of endothelin receptor antagonists for improvement of endothelial function.

Effects of bosentan on cellular processes involved in pulmonary arterial hypertension: do they explain the long-term benefit?

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a rapidly progressing disease characterized by an over- expression of endothelin. In addition to its potent pulmonary vasoconstrictor effects, endothelin has been shown to produce many of the aberrant changes, such as hypertrophy, fibrosis, inflammation, and neurohormonal activation that underlie the shortened life span in pulmonary arterial hypertensive patients. The fact that endothelin expression correlates significantly with disease severity and outcome in these patients suggests that endothelin, through binding to both ETA and ETB receptor subtypes, is a key causative agent in the pathophysiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension. The orally active dual endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan competitively antagonizes the binding of endothelin to both endothelin receptor subtypes with high affinity and specificity. In animal models relevant for the pathophysiology of pulmonary hypertension, bosentan not only causes selective pulmonary vasodilation, but also prevents vascular hypertrophy and cardiac remodeling, attenuates pulmonary fibrosis, decreases vascular inflammation, and blunts neurohormonal activation. These experimental data may explain the effects on disease progression and the long-term benefit observed with bosentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Endothelium-derived relaxing factors: A focus on endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor(s)

Endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) is defined as the non-nitric oxide (NO) and non-prostacyclin (PGI2) substance that mediates endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization (EDH) of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC). Although both NO and PGI2 have been demonstrated to hyperpolarize VSMC by cGMP- and cAMP-dependent mechanisms, respectively, and in the case of NO by cGMP-independent mechanisms, a considerable body of evidence suggests that an additional cellular mechanism must exist that mediates EDH. Despite intensive investigation, there is no agreement as to the nature of the cellular processes that mediates the non-NO/PGI2 mediated hyperpolarization. Epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EET), an endogenous anandamide, a small increase in the extracellular concentration of K+, and electronic coupling via myoendothelial cell gap junctions have all been hypothesized as contributors to EDH. An attractive hypothesis is that EDH is mediated via both chemical and electrical transmissions, however, the contribution from chemical mediators versus electrical transmission varies in a tissue- and species-dependent manner, suggesting vessel-specific specialization. If this hypothesis proves to be correct then the potential exists for the development of vessel and organ-selective vasodilators. Because endothelium-dependent vasodilatation is dysfunctional in disease states (i.e., atherosclerosis), selective vasodilators may prove to be important therapeutic agents.Key words: endothelium, nitric oxide, potassium channels, hyperpolarization, gap junctions.