Optimal reverse Trendelenburg position in patients undergoing craniotomy for cerebral tumors

[Brain tissue relaxation in craniotomy: a modern view of the perennial problem]

Intraoperative relaxation of brain tissue is one of the important factors affecting the quality and successful outcome of neurosurgical interventions. Despite many clinical studies on the problem of brain bulging, many issues remain not fully resolved. First of all, these are safety aspects of the preventive and therapeutic use of various strategies to fight this phenomenon, development of indications for introduction of hyperosmotic solutions, and use of hyperventilation or lifting of the head end of the operating table.

Systematic review of decreased intracranial pressure with optimal head elevation in postcraniotomy patients: a meta-analysis

AIM

To determine an optimal head elevation degree to decrease intracranial pressure in postcraniotomy patients by meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

A change in head position can lead to a change in intracranial pressure; however, there are conflicting data regarding the optimal degree of elevation that decreases intracranial pressure in postcraniotomy patients.

DESIGN

Quantitative systematic review with meta-analysis following Cochrane methods.

DATA SOURCES

The data were collected during 2014; three databases (PubMed, Embase and China National Knowledge Internet) were searched for published and unpublished studies in English. The bibliographies of the articles were also reviewed. The inclusion criteria referred to different elevation degrees and effects on intracranial pressure in postcraniotomy patients.

REVIEW METHODS

According to pre-determined inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, two reviewers extracted the eligible studies using a standard data form.

RESULTS

These included a total of 237 participants who were included in the meta-analysis. (1) Compared with 0 degree: 10, 15, 30 and 45 degrees of head elevation resulted in lower intracranial pressure. (2) Intracranial pressure at 30 degrees was not significantly different in comparison to 45 degrees and was lower than that at 10 and 15 degrees.

CONCLUSION

Patients with increased intracranial pressure significantly benefitted from a head elevation of 10, 15, 30 and 45 degrees compared with 0 degrees. A head elevation of 30 or 45 degrees is optimal for decreasing intracranial pressure. Research about the relationship of position changes and the outcomes of patient primary diseases is absent.

Five-degree, 10-degree, and 20-degree reverse Trendelenburg position during functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Using the reverse Trendelenburg position (RTP) during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a safe, simple, and cost-free method that has been found to reduce intraoperative blood loss. However, the critical angle of RTP that produces the least amount of bleeding without compromising surgical technique and safety remains unanswered. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of 5-degree, 10-degree, and 20-degree RTP (5-RTP, 10-RTP, and 20-RTP, respectively) on intraoperative bleeding during FESS.

METHODS

This double-blind randomized controlled trial involved 75 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with and without nasal polyposis undergoing FESS. Twenty-five patients were enrolled into each group: 5-RTP, 10-RTP, and 20-RTP. Boezaart endoscopic field-of-view score (BS), total blood loss (TBL), mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), operating time, and blood loss per minute were recorded. An intention-to-treat analysis was used, with a Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Intervention groups were comparable in age, sex, nasal polyposis, and disease severity. Mean values of BS and TBL were as follows: 5-RTP (2.0, 231 mL), 10-RTP (1.8, 230 mL), and 20-RTP (1.4, 135 mL). The differences in means were significant for BS (p < 0.01) and TBL (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in MABP (p = 0.85), operating time (p = 0.10), or blood loss per minute (p = 0.11) between the 3 groups. Pairwise comparison between 5-RTP vs 20-RTP found significant difference in BS (p < 0.01) but not TBL (p = 0.04). Significance was not found in similar comparisons of 10-RTP vs 20-RTP and 5-RTP vs 10-RTP (p > 0.03).

CONCLUSION

FESS in 20-RTP produced the best BS and lowest blood loss without compromising surgical technique.