Management of low lumbar fractures by dorsal decompression, fusion, and lumbosacral laminar distraction fixation

Burst fractures of the fifth lumbar vertebra: Case series and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Burst fractures of the fifth lumbar vertebra (L5) are rare injuries and typically occur because of high-energy axial compressive load. Their unique anatomy and biomechanical characteristics distinguish them from other lumbar spine injuries. To the best of our knowledge, the treatment strategies for L5 burst fractures have not been thoroughly described. The aims of this case series and systematic review were to highlight the treatment strategies and outcomes of the L5 burst fractures.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case series of 8 patients treated for burst L5 fractures in our institution between 2005 and 2020. Additionally, a systematic review via PubMed and Cochrane Library databases according to PRISMA guidelines was performed to review L5 burst fractures treatment strategies. Only Articles in English with full text available were included. The references of the selected studies were checked to find all possible related articles. Treatment strategies were conservative, posterior segmental instrumentation and fixation (PSIF), PSIF with anterior corpectomy (AC), and PSIF with posterior corpectomy (PC). Outcomes measures included neurological status, radiological regional alignment, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 1449 publications were found, and 29 articles were finally selected for analysis. Of those, 15 were retrospective case reports, and 14 were retrospective case series. One hundred and sixty-nine patients were found in the review. The author's eight cases were added to the found in the literature for a methodological quality assessment. There were 52 (29%) patients managed non-operative, and 125 (71%) underwent surgery. One-hundred-two patients were neurologically intact, of whom 46 were managed non-operative. Canal compromise in intact patients ranged between 20 and 90%. Posterior segmental fixation and instrumentation with decompression was the preferred surgical strategy in patients with neurological deficits. Patients with combined anterior column restoration and anterior approach showed vertebral height and lordosis restoration. A 79% of the operative treated group reported neurological improvement. Patients with pre-operative neurological deficit managed non-operative reported the highest rate of complications (33.3%).

CONCLUSION

In the setting of L5 burst fractures, neurological injuries have a promising prognosis after surgery and are not correlated with the degree of canal stenosis. The compromise of the L5 vertebra affects the sagittal balance and its restoration can be achieved with an anterior corpectomy. Nonoperative management can be considered in cases of reasonable alignment, and no neurologic deficit.

A novel technique to repair a transverse sacral fracture in a previously fused lumbosacral spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND

Transverse fractures of the sacrum are rare, and surgical treatment for these fractures ranges from conservative to challenging. Transverse stress fractures of the sacrum after placement of lumbar-to-sacral instrumentation have been previously described. We report a new technique to repair a transverse Type-2 Roy-Camille fracture with spondylolisthesis of S1 over S2 in a previously fused instrumented high-grade L4-L5, L5-S1 spondylolisthesis.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 64-year-old female who previously had an L4-L5, L5-S1 fusion for spondylolisthesis presented with excruciating lower back pain and radiculopathy for over 6 months. She was found to have an S1-S2 transverse fracture caused by previous implantation of pedicle screws. She underwent repositioning of several failed right lumbar and sacral screws and then had bilateral S1-S2 screws placed directly across the fracture line. The patient had an unremarkable postoperative course. She discontinued most of her pain medications within 6 weeks postoperatively. In the months following surgery, she reported only minimal lower back pain and no radiculopathy with the last appointment 5 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a novel technique to reduce an iatrogenic transverse type-2 Roy-Camille fracture at S1-S2 in a previously instrumented high-grade L4-L5, L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. The patient's fracture achieved adequate reduction and fusion with symptomatic relief.

Fracture of S1–S2 after L4—S1 decompression and fusion

✓ The author describes a woman in whom an S1–2 fracture developed after L4—S1 decompression and fusion. Osteoporosis was not present, but the lesion failed to respond to conservative therapy, necessitating surgical extension of the spinal fusion. Although biomechanical complications of lumbosacral fusion are uncommon, pseudarthrosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and stress fractures have been reported. To date, only four cases of sacral stress fracture appear in the literature, all involving female patients and reportedly associated with osteoporosis. Unlike the present case, the fracture resolved satisfactorily in all cases with conservative treatment.