Using FDG-PET to measure early treatment response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: quantifying intrinsic variability in order to understand treatment-induced change

The Utility of Interim Positron Emission Tomography Imaging to Inform Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

ABSTRACT

In this article, as part of this special issue on biomarkers of early response, we review the current evidence to support the use of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging during chemoradiation therapy to inform biologically adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. We review literature covering this topic spanning nearly 3 decades, including the use of various radiotracers and discoveries of novel predictive PET biomarkers. Through understanding how observational trials have informed current interventional clinical trials, we hope that this review will encourage researchers and clinicians to incorporate PET response criteria in new trial designs to advance biologically optimized radiotherapy.

Repeatability of Quantitative 18F-FET PET in Glioblastoma

Purpose: O-(2-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET), a PET radiotracer of amino acid uptake, has shown potential for diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). To improve quantitative assessment of FET PET imaging, we evaluated the repeatability of uptake of this tracer in patients with GBM.Methods: Test-retest FET PET imaging was performed on 8 patients with histologically confirmed GBM, who previously underwent surgical resection of the tumour. Data were acquired according to the protocol of a prospective clinical trial validating FET PET as a clinical tool in GBM. SUV_mean, SUV_maxand SUV_98%metrics were extracted for both test and retest images and used to calculate 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA) on lesion-level, as well as on volumes of varying sizes. Impact of healthy brain normalization on repeatability of lesion SUV metrics was evaluated.Results: Tumour LoA were [0.72, 1.46] for SUV_meanand SUV_total, [0.79,1.23] for SUV_max, and [0.80,1.18] for SUV_98%. Healthy brain LoA were [0.80,1.25] for SUV_mean, [0.80,1.25] for SUV_max, and [0.81,1.23] for SUV_98%. Voxel-level SUV LoA were [0.76, 1.32] for tumour volumes and [0.80, 1.25] for healthy brain. When sampled over maximum volume, SUV LoA were [0.90,1.12] for tumour and [0.92,1.08] for healthy brain. Normalization of uptake using healthy brain volumes was found to improve repeatability, but not after normalization volume size of about 15 cm³.Conclusions Advances in Knowledge and Implications for Patient Care: Repeatability of FET PET is comparable to existing tracers such as FDG and FLT. Healthy brain uptake is slightly more repeatable than uptake of tumour volumes. Repeatability was found to increase with sampled volume. SUV normalization between scans using healthy brain uptake should be performed using volumes at least 15 cm³in size to ensure best imaging repeatability.

Test-retest repeatability of quantitative bone SPECT/CT

OBJECTIVE

Technological innovations in single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) have enabled a more accurate quantitative evaluation of the uptake, and the standardized uptake value (SUV) can be measured as a semi-quantitative value, as in positron emission tomography. Nevertheless, the reliability of the SUV of bone SPECT has not been well established. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the test-retest repeatability of the SUV of bone SPECT/CT in clinical settings.

METHODS

This prospective study recruited patients with prostate cancer planning to receive bone SPECT/CT for the evaluation of bone abnormality between August 2017 and September 2019. Bone images were acquired twice by an integrated SPECT/CT scanner (Symbia Intevo, Siemens) within a 4- to 10-day interval. The maximum SUV (SUVmax) and peak SUV (SUVpeak) were calculated for the volumes of interests on the normal bone areas, degeneration/fracture lesions, and metastatic lesions. To determine repeatability, we calculated statistical indicators, including intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), repeatability coefficient (RC), and mean absolute percentage difference (MAPD). For the ICC, the 95% confidential interval (CI) was also calculated, and an ICC of ≥ 0.8 was defined as an almost perfect correlation.

RESULTS

Twelve male patients were enrolled in the study (58-86 years; median, 71 years), and a total of 229 volumes of the interest were included in the analyses. The ICCs were 0.968 [95% CI (0.959, 0.975)] for SUVmax and 0.976 [95% CI (0.969, 0.981)] for SUVpeak. The RCs of the relative difference were 30.7% for SUVmax and 27.6% for SUVpeak, and the MAPDs (± standardized deviation) of all lesions were 12.3 ± 9.9% for SUVmax and 11.5 ± 8.3% for SUVpeak. The RCs and the MAPDs showed comparable value with the previous report regarding repeatability studies on PET.

CONCLUSION

An almost perfect correlation was demonstrated by repeated SUVmax and SUVpeak measured by quantitative integrated SPECT/CT. The quantitative values could be reliable indicators in patient management.

Early 18F-FDG-PET Response During Radiation Therapy for HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer May Predict Disease Recurrence

PURPOSE

Early indication of treatment outcome may guide therapeutic de-escalation strategies in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). This study investigated the relationships between tumor volume and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) parameters before and during definitive radiation therapy with treatment outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients undergoing definitive (chemo)radiation for HPV-related/p16-positive OPC were prospectively enrolled on an institutional review board-approved study. ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography scans were performed at simulation and after 2 weeks at a dose of ∼20 Gy. Tumor volume and standardized uptake value (SUV) characteristics were measured. SUV was normalized to blood pool uptake. Tumor volume and PET parameters associated with recurrence were identified through recursive partitioning (RPART). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) curves between RPART-identified cohorts were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs).

RESULTS

From 2012 to 2016, 62 patients with HPV-related OPC were enrolled. Median follow-up was 4.4 years. RPART identified patients with intratreatment SUV_max (normalized to blood pool SUV_mean) <6.7 or SUV_max (normalized to blood pool SUV_mean) ≥6.7 with intratreatment SUV_40% ≥2.75 as less likely to recur. For identified subgroups, results of Cox models showed unadjusted HRs for RFS and OS (more likely to recur vs less likely) of 7.33 (90% confidence interval [CI], 2.97-18.12) and 6.09 (90% CI, 2.22-16.71), respectively, and adjusted HRs of 6.57 (90% CI, 2.53-17.05) and 5.61 (90% CI, 1.90-16.54) for RFS and OS, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PET parameters after 2 weeks of definitive radiation therapy for HPV-related OPC are associated with RFS and OS, thus potentially informing an adaptive treatment approach.

Application of PET Tracers in Molecular Imaging for Breast Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Molecular imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) is a powerful tool to visualize breast cancer characteristics. Nonetheless, implementation of PET imaging into cancer care is challenging, and essential steps have been outlined in the international "imaging biomarker roadmap." In this review, we identify hurdles and provide recommendations for implementation of PET biomarkers in breast cancer care, focusing on the PET tracers 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose ([18F]-FDG), sodium [18F]-fluoride ([18F]-NaF), 16α-[18F]-fluoroestradiol ([18F]-FES), and [89Zr]-trastuzumab.

RECENT FINDINGS

Technical validity of [18F]-FDG, [18F]-NaF, and [18F]-FES is established and supported by international guidelines. However, support for clinical validity and utility is still pending for these PET tracers in breast cancer, due to variable endpoints and procedures in clinical studies. Assessment of clinical validity and utility is essential towards implementation; however, these steps are still lacking for PET biomarkers in breast cancer. This could be solved by adding PET biomarkers to randomized trials, development of imaging data warehouses, and harmonization of endpoints and procedures.

Prognostic value of FDG PET/CT during radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (FDG PET) with computed tomography (CT) before and during radiotherapy (RT) in patients with head and neck cancer.

METHODS

Twenty patients with primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled in this study, of whom 6 had oropharyngeal cancer, 10 had hypopharyngeal cancer, and 4 had laryngeal cancer. Fifteen patients received concurrent cisplatin and 2 received concurrent cetuximab chemotherapy. FDG PET/CT was performed before RT and in the 4th week of RT. The parameters of maximum standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the primary tumor were measured, and the prognostic significance of each was analyzed with the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Higher TLG (&gt;19.0) on FDG PET/CT during RT was a poor prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) (p = 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.007). In the multivariate analysis, TLG during RT as a continuous variable was significantly associated with OS and PFS rate (p = 0.023 and p = 0.016, respectively). Tumor response worse than partial remission at 1 month after RT was another independent prognostic factor for PFS (p = 0.024). Conclusions: Higher TLG of the primary tumor on FDG PET/CT during RT was a poor prognostic factor for OS and PFS in patients with head and neck cancer.

Repeatability of SUV in Oncologic 18F-FDG PET

Quantitative analysis can potentially improve the accuracy and consistency of ¹⁸F-FDG PET, particularly for the assessment of tumor response to treatment. Although not without limitations, SUV has emerged as the predominant metric for tumor quantification with ¹⁸F-FDG PET. Growing literature suggests that the difference between SUVs measured before and after treatment can be used to predict tumor response at an early stage. SUV is, however, associated with multiple sources of variability, and to best use SUV for response assessment, an understanding of the repeatability of the technique is required. Test-retest studies involve repeated scanning of the same patient on the same scanner using the same protocol no more than a few days apart and provide basic information on the repeatability of the technique. Multiple test-retest studies have been performed to assess SUV repeatability, although a comparison of reports is complicated by the use of different methodologies and statistical metrics. This article reviews the available data, addressing issues such as different repeatability metrics, relative units, log transformation, and asymmetric limits of repeatability. When acquired with careful attention to protocol, tumor SUV has a within-subject coefficient of variation of approximately 10%. In a response assessment setting, SUV reductions of more than 25% and increases of more than 33% are unlikely to be due to measurement variability. Broader margins may be required for sites with less rigorous protocol compliance, but in general, SUV is a highly repeatable imaging biomarker that is ideally suited to monitoring tumor response to treatment in individual patients.

Potential Role of PET/MRI for Imaging Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Head and Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVE

This article explores recent developments in PET and MRI, separately or combined, for assessing metastatic lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer.

CONCLUSION

The synergistic role of PET and MRI for imaging metastatic lymph nodes has not been fully explored. To facilitate the understanding of the areas that need further investigation, we discuss potential mechanisms and evidence reported so far, as well as future directions and challenges for continued development and clinical research.

Combining standardized uptake value of FDG-PET and apparent diffusion coefficient of DW-MRI improves risk stratification in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To assess the independent prognostic value of standardized uptake value (SUV) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), separately and combined, in order to evaluate if the combination of these two variables allows further prognostic stratification of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC).

METHODS

Pretreatment SUV and ADC were calculated in 57 patients with HNSCC. Mean follow-up was 21.3 months. Semiquantitative analysis of primary tumours was performed using SUV_maxT/B, ADC_mean, ADC_min and ADC_max. The prognostic value of SUV_maxT/B, ADC_mean, ADC_min and ADC_max in predicting disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated with log-rank test and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Patients with SUV_maxT/B ≥5.75 had an overall worse prognosis (p = 0.003). After adjusting for lymph node status and diameter, SUV_maxT/B and ADC_min were both significant predictors of DFS with hazard ratio (HR) = 10.37 (95 % CI 1.22-87.95) and 3.26 (95 % CI 1.20-8.85) for SUV_maxT/B ≥5.75 and ADC_min ≥0.58 × 10^-3 mm²/s, respectively. When the analysis was restricted to subjects with SUV_maxT/B ≥5.75, high ADC_min significantly predicted a worse prognosis, with adjusted HR = 3.11 (95 % CI 1.13-8.55).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of SUV_maxT/B and ADC_min improves the prognostic role of the two separate parameters; patients with high SUV_maxT/B and high ADC_min are associated with a poor prognosis.

KEY POINTS

• High SUV _maxT/B is a poor prognostic factor in HNSCC • High ADC _min is a poor prognostic factor in HNSCC • In patients with high SUV _maxT/B , high ADC _min identified those with worse prognosis.

18F-FDG PET-CT performed before and during radiation therapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Are they independent or complementary to each other?

INTRODUCTION

The aims of this study are to evaluate the prognostic value of metabolic parameters derived from (18) F-FDG PET-CT performed before definitive radiation therapy (RT) (prePET) in patients with mucosal primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (MPHNSCC) and to assess the additive prognostic values of FDG PET-CT performed during RT (iPET).

METHODS

One hundred patients with MPHNSCC treated with radical RT underwent staging prePET and iPET performed during the third week of treatment. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax ), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesional glycolysis (TLG) of primary tumour were analysed for both prePET and iPET, and results were correlated with loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), metastatic failure-free survival (MFFS) and overall survival (OS), using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Optimal cut-offs (OC) for prePET and iPET were derived from Receiver Operating Characteristic curves. Patients with metabolic parameters above/below the individual OC of prePET as well as iPET (i.e. combined prePET and iPET (comPET)) were evaluated against their outcomes.

RESULTS

Median age was 61 years (range 39-81), median follow-up of 20 months (range 4-70, mean 27), and AJCC 7th Edition clinical stage II, III and IV were 8, 24 and 68 patients respectively. Metabolic values below individual OC in comPET were found to be associated with statistically significant improvements (P < 0.05) in DFS, LRFS and OS. In addition, patients with SUVmax above the OC in comPET were associated with worse MFFS (P = 0.011) and confirmed on both univariate (P = 0.019) and multivariate analyses (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Addition of iPET significantly improves the prognostic values of all three metabolic parameters and can potentially be used in future adaptive local and systemic therapy trials.

Differentiation of benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer using PET/CT imaging

PURPOSE

To differentiate malignant from benign cervical lymph nodes in patients with head/neck cancer.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 39 patients with primary head/neck cancer who underwent Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computerized Tomography (CT) and image-guided lymph node biopsy were included.

RESULTS

Overall, 23 (59%) patients had biopsy-proven malignant cervical lymphadenopathy. Malignant lymph nodes had higher maximum standardized uptake (SUV-max) value (P<.001) and short-axis diameter (P=.015) compared to benign nodes. An SUV-max of ≥2.5 was 100% sensitive, and an SUV-max ≥5.5 was 100% specific for malignant lymphadenopathy.

CONCLUSION

The PET/CT SUV-max value can help with differentiation of malignant cervical lymph nodes in patients with head/neck cancer.

Evaluating tumor response of non-small cell lung cancer patients with ¹⁸F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: potential for treatment individualization

OBJECTIVE

To assess early tumor responsiveness and the corresponding effective radiosensitivity for individual patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on 2 successive (18)F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-six NSCLC patients treated in Maastricht were included in the study. Fifteen patients underwent sequential chemoradiation therapy, and 11 patients received concomitant chemoradiation therapy. All patients were imaged with FDG before the start and during the second week of radiation therapy. The sequential images were analyzed in relation to the dose delivered until the second image. An operational quantity, effective radiosensitivity, αeff, was determined at the voxel level. Correlations were sought between the average αeff or the fraction of negative αeff values and the overall survival at 2 years. Separate analyses were performed for the primary gross target volume (GTV), the lymph node GTV, and the clinical target volumes (CTVs).

RESULTS

Patients receiving sequential treatment could be divided into responders and nonresponders, using a threshold for the average αeff of 0.003 Gy(-1) in the primary GTV, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 100% (P<.0001). Choosing the fraction of negative αeff as a criterion, the threshold 0.3 also had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 100% (P<.0001). Good prognostic potential was maintained for patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy. For lymph node GTV, the correlation had low statistical significance. A cross-validation analysis confirmed the potential of the method.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of the early response in NSCLC patients showed that it is feasible to determine a threshold value for effective radiosensitivity corresponding to good response. It also showed that a threshold value for the fraction of negative αeff could also be correlated with poor response. The proposed method, therefore, has potential to identify candidates for more aggressive strategies to increase the rate of local control and also avoid exposing to unnecessary aggressive therapies the majority of patients responding to standard treatment.

Towards multidimensional radiotherapy: key challenges for treatment individualisation

Functional and molecular imaging of tumours have offered the possibility of redefining the target in cancer therapy and individualising the treatment with a multidimensional approach that aims to target the adverse processes known to impact negatively upon treatment result. Following the first theoretical attempts to include imaging information into treatment planning, it became clear that the biological features of interest for targeting exhibit considerable heterogeneity with respect to magnitude, spatial, and temporal distribution, both within one patient and between patients, which require more advanced solutions for the way the treatment is planned and adapted. Combining multiparameter information from imaging with predictive information from biopsies and molecular analyses as well as in treatment monitoring of tumour responsiveness appears to be the key approach to maximise the individualisation of treatment. This review paper aims to discuss some of the key challenges for incorporating into treatment planning and optimisation the radiobiological features of the tumour derived from pretreatment PET imaging of tumour metabolism, proliferation, and hypoxia and combining them with intreatment monitoring of responsiveness and other predictive factors with the ultimate aim of individualising the treatment towards the maximisation of response.

Diffusion-weighted imaging for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: quantifying repeatability to understand early treatment-induced change

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to define baseline variability of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and to compare it with early treatment-induced ADC change.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stages III and IV HNSCC were imaged with two baseline DWI examinations 1 week apart and a third DWI examination during the 2nd week of curative-intent chemoradiation therapy. Mean ADC was measured in the primary tumor and largest lymph node for each patient on the three DWI scans. Mean baseline percentage differences (%∆ADC) were compared with intratreatment change. The repeatability coefficient for baseline %∆ADC was calculated and compared with intratreatment %∆ADC. Repeatability was also assessed with Bland-Altman plots and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Sixteen patients underwent double baseline imaging, with 14 also undergoing intratreatment imaging. Baseline nodal disease ADC could be measured in 16 patients, but ADC in primary tumors could only be measured in five patients. The nodal mean (SD) baseline %∆ADC was 8% (± 7%), which was significantly different compared with intratreatment changes of 32% (± 31%) (p = 0.01). Baseline ICC was 0.86 for nodal disease and 0.99 for primary tumor (excellent correlation). The calculated repeatability coefficient for baseline nodal ADC was 15%. No patients had decreases in intratreatment ADC of more than 15%.

CONCLUSION

Baseline ADC variability for HNSCC is less than intratreatment ADC change for nodal disease. Assessment of response should consider intrinsic baseline variability.

Comprehensive population-averaged arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced vmagnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

To generate a population-averaged arterial input function (PA-AIF) for quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data in head and neck cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty patients underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI during concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Imaging consisted of 2 baseline scans 1 week apart (B1/B2) and 1 scan after 1 week of chemoradiation therapy (Wk1). Regions of interest (ROIs) in the right and left carotid arteries were drawn on coronal images. Plasma concentration curves of all ROIs were averaged and fit to a biexponential decay function to obtain the final PA-AIF (AvgAll). Right-sided and left-sided ROI plasma concentration curves were averaged separately to obtain side-specific AIFs (AvgRight/AvgLeft). Regions of interest were divided by time point to obtain time-point-specific AIFs (AvgB1/AvgB2/AvgWk1). The vascular transfer constant (Ktrans) and the fractional extravascular, extracellular space volume (Ve) for primaries and nodes were calculated using the AvgAll AIF, the appropriate side-specific AIF, and the appropriate time-point-specific AIF. Median Ktrans and Ve values derived from AvgAll were compared with those obtained from the side-specific and time-point-specific AIFs. The effect of using individual AIFs was also investigated.

RESULTS

The plasma parameters for AvgAll were a1,2 = 27.11/17.65 kg/L, m1,2 = 11.75/0.21 min(-1). The coefficients of repeatability (CRs) for AvgAll versus AvgLeft were 0.04 min(-1) for Ktrans and 0.02 for Ve. For AvgAll versus AvgRight, the CRs were 0.08 min(-1) for Ktrans and 0.02 for Ve. When AvgAll was compared with AvgB1/AvgB2/AvgWk1, the CRs were slightly higher: 0.32/0.19/0.78 min(-1), respectively, for Ktrans; and 0.07/0.08/0.09 for Ve. Use of a PA-AIF was not significantly different from use of individual AIFs.

CONCLUSION

A PA-AIF for head and neck cancer was generated that accounts for differences in right carotid artery versus left carotid artery, day-to-day fluctuations, and early treatment-induced changes. The small CRs obtained for Ktrans and Ve indicate that side-specific AIFs are not necessary. However, a time-point-specific AIF may improve pharmacokinetic accuracy.

Detection and quantification of focal uptake in head and neck tumours: (18)F-FDG PET/MR versus PET/CT

PURPOSE

Our objectives were to assess the quality of PET images and coregistered anatomic images obtained with PET/MR, to evaluate the detection of focal uptake and SUV, and to compare these findings with those of PET/CT in patients with head and neck tumours.

METHODS

The study group comprised 32 consecutive patients with malignant head and neck tumours who underwent whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/MR and PET/CT. PET images were reconstructed using the attenuation correction sequence for PET/MR and CT for PET/CT. Two experienced observers evaluated the anonymized data. They evaluated image and fusion quality, lesion conspicuity, anatomic location, number and size of categorized (benign versus assumed malignant) lesions with focal uptake. Region of interest (ROI) analysis was performed to determine SUVs of lesions and organs for both modalities. Statistical analysis considered data clustering due to multiple lesions per patient.

RESULTS

PET/MR coregistration and image fusion was feasible in all patients. The analysis included 66 malignant lesions (tumours, metastatic lymph nodes and distant metastases), 136 benign lesions and 470 organ ROIs. There was no statistically significant difference between PET/MR and PET/CT regarding rating scores for image quality, fusion quality, lesion conspicuity or anatomic location, number of detected lesions and number of patients with and without malignant lesions. A high correlation was observed for SUVmean and SUVmax measured on PET/MR and PET/CT for malignant lesions, benign lesions and organs (ρ = 0.787 to 0.877, p < 0.001). SUVmean and SUVmax measured on PET/MR were significantly lower than on PET/CT for malignant tumours, metastatic neck nodes, benign lesions, bone marrow, and liver (p < 0.05). The main factor affecting the difference between SUVs in malignant lesions was tumour size (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In patients with head and neck tumours, PET/MR showed equivalent performance to PET/CT in terms of qualitative results. Comparison of SUVs revealed an excellent correlation for measurements on both modalities, but underestimation of SUVs measured on PET/MR as compared to PET/CT.