Normal Development and Measurements of the Occipital Condyle-C1 Interval in Children and Young Adults

Utility of Anterior Atlantodens Interval Widening on Cervical Spine CT for Assessing Transverse Atlantal Ligament Injury

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, cross-sectional.

OBJECTIVES

To identify trauma patients with confirmed tears of the transverse atlantal ligament on cervical MRI and measure several parameters of atlanto-axial alignment on cervical CT, including the anterior atlantodens interval, to determine which method is most sensitive in predicting transverse atlantal ligament injury.

METHODS

Adult trauma patients who suffered a transverse atlantal ligament tear on cervical MRI were identified retrospectively. The cervical CT and MRI exams for these patients were reviewed for the following: anterior and lateral atlantodens interval widening, lateral C1 mass offset, C1-C2 rotatory subluxation, and transverse atlantal ligament injuries on cervical MRI.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were identified with a tear of the transverse atlantal ligament on cervical MRI. Twelve percent of these patients demonstrated an anterior dens interval measuring greater than 2 mm, 26% of patients demonstrated lateral mass offset of C1 on C2 (average offset of 2.4 mm), 18% of patients demonstrated an asymmetry greater than 1 mm between the left and right lateral atlantodens interval, and one patient demonstrated atlanto-axial rotation measuring greater than 20%. Ten patients had an accompanying C1 burst fracture and eight patients had a C2 fracture. One patient demonstrated widening of the atlanto-occipital joint space greater than 2 mm indicative of craniocervical dissociation injury.

CONCLUSIONS

An anterior atlantodens interval measuring greater than 2 mm is an unreliable methodology to screen trauma patients for transverse altantal ligament injuries and atlanto-axial instability. Moreover, C1 lateral mass offset, lateral atlantodens asymmetry, and atlanto-axial rotation were all poor predictors of transverse atlantal ligament tears.

Occult craniocervical dissociation on cervical CT: an under-appreciated presentation of craniocervical trauma requiring occipital cervical fusion

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Craniocervical dissociation is a rare and life-threatening injury that results from a significant hyperflexion-hyperextension force. Occult craniocervical dissociation is defined as an unstable craniocervical injury in the absence of atlanto-occipital joint space widening or other skull base line abnormality. The early and accurate diagnosis of craniocervical dissociation is crucial since the early diagnosis and subsequent stabilization with occipital-cervical fusion has been shown to reduce neurologic morbidity and mortality. Several normative skull base lines have been developed to predict craniocervical dissociation. The purpose of our study was to measure the atlanto-occipital joint space and four other common skull base lines in patients who underwent occipital-cervical fusion for post-traumatic craniocervical instability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent occipital-cervical fusion for craniocervical injury were identified retrospectively using a keyword search of radiology reports using Nuance mPower software. The cervical CT and MRI exams for these patients were reviewed and the atlanto-occipital joint space, Powers ratio, Wackenheim line, posterior axial line, and basion dens interval were measured. Detailed descriptions of craniocervical ligament injuries on MRI were recorded along with patient demographic information, clinical history, management, and outcome.

RESULTS

Nine adult patients who underwent occipital-cervical fusion for an acute craniocervical injury were identified. Six patients demonstrated an atlanto-occipital joint space measuring 2 mm or less on cervical spine CT with no additional abnormality in the Powers ratio, Wackenheim line, posterior axial line, or basion-dens interval. Three patients demonstrated widening of the atlanto-occipital joint space with two patients demonstrating an abnormality in at least two additional skull base lines. Clinical outcomes were variable with nearly half of the patients demonstrating persistent neurologic deficits, including one quadriplegic patient.

CONCLUSIONS

A normal atlanto-occipital joint space and skull base line measurements on cervical CT demonstrated a low predictive value for detecting unstable craniocervical injuries. Occult craniocervical dissociation was present in two-thirds of patients who underwent occipital cervical fusion for acute, craniocervical trauma. A high clinical and radiologic index of suspicion for craniocervical trauma with subsequent follow-up cervical MRI to directly evaluate ligamentous integrity is necessary to accurately diagnose and triage patients with high velocity trauma.

Upper Cervical Trauma

Craniocervical injuries (CCJs) account for 10% to 30% of all cervical spine trauma. An increasing number of patients are surviving these injuries due to advancements in automobile technology, resuscitation techniques, and diagnostic modalities. The leading injury mechanisms are motor vehicle crashes, falls from height, and sports-related events. Current treatment with urgent rigid posterior fixation of the occiput to the cervical spine has resulted in a substantial reduction in management delays expedites treatment of CCJ injuries. Within CCJ injuries, there is a spectrum of instability, ranging from isolated nondisplaced occipital condyle fractures treated nonoperatively to highly unstable injuries with severely distracted craniocervical dissociation. Despite the evolution of understanding and improvement in the management of cases regarding catastrophic failure to diagnose, subsequent neurologic deterioration still occurs even in experienced trauma centers. The purpose of this article is to review the injuries that occur at the CCJ with the accompanying anatomy, presentation, imaging, classification, management, and outcomes.

Occipital condylar avulsion fractures in the acute trauma setting: Stable or unstable injury?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Occipital condylar avulsion fractures are considered potentially unstable, associated with craniocervical dissociation spectrum injuries, and thought to carry a relatively high mortality rate based on the current literature. The purpose of this study was to identify patient with acute, occipital condylar avulsion fractures and evaluate for the incidence of concomitant cervical osteoligamentous trauma and craniocervical dissociation spectrum injury on cervical spine CT and MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who suffered an inferomedial occipital condylar avulsion fracture were identified retrospectively using Nuance mPower software. Cervical spine CT and MRI reports performed within 48 h for this patient cohort were then reviewed by two CAQ certified neuroradiologists. Confirmation of an occipital condylar avulsion fracture was recorded along with any concomitant craniocervical junction injury. Relevant clinical history, including management and outcomes, was recorded for each patient.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were identified with an inferomedial fracture of the occipital condyle. Of the 85% of patients who underwent cervical MRI, all but one patient demonstrated a 'negative' MRI without major craniocervical junction ligamentous injury. These patients were treated conservatively with external bracing without persistent neurologic deficits upon 4-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Inferomedial fractures of the occipital condyle are currently classified as potentially unstable fractures based on the Anderson classification system. Our data suggest that an isolated occipital condylar avulsion fracture without an additional C1-C2 fracture or widening of the atlanto-occipital joint space is likely a stable injury that can be treated conservatively with excellent clinical outcomes.

"Supradental space sign" on cervical spine CT-a sign of tectorial membrane injury in adults trauma patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The supradental space is a small, predominantly fat-filled recess superior to the atlanto-axial joint and inferior to the basion of the clivus that contains a small venous plexus. The posterior boundary of the supradental space is formed by the tectorial membrane, a stabilizing ligament of the craniocervical junction. The purpose of our study was to examine the imaging appearance of the supradental space in patients with tectorial membrane injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients with tectorial membrane injury were identified utilizing keyword searches of radiology reports using Nuance mPower software. Age-matched positive and negative control groups were obtained. Two CAQ-certified neuroradiologists evaluated the cervical CT exams of these patients for supradental fat pad effacement from hematoma formation. The integrity of the osteoligamentous structures of the craniocervical junction was recorded on CT and MRI exams along with demographic information, clinical history, surgical management, and global outcome. Statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Sixteen adults were diagnosed with tectorial membrane injury on cervical MRI. All patients with a visible supradental space demonstrated fat pad effacement and Hounsfield units consistent with hematoma formation. The positive and negative control groups demonstrated supradental fat pad effacement in 2/16 and 1/16 patients, respectively. A p-value of < 0.001 was obtained.

CONCLUSION

The "supradental space sign," defined as hematoma formation in the supradental space with effacement of the supradental fat pad is associated with tectorial membrane injury in adult trauma patients with sensitivity of 93.75% (95% confidence interval 69.77 to 99.84%) and specificity of 90.62% (95% confidence interval 74.98 to 98.02%).

Tectorial Membrane Injury, Frequently Identified in Adult Trauma Patients Who Undergo Occipital-Cervical Fusion for Craniocervical Instability

Background In the absence of frank craniocervical dissociation, there is a lack of consensus regarding what patterns of craniocervical junction ligamentous injuries require occipital-cervical fusion. This study was undertaken to examine the integrity of the craniocervical junction ligaments and analyze clinical outcomes in patients who underwent occipital-cervical fusion for craniocervical junction injury. Methods Adult patients requiring occipital-cervical fusion were identified retrospectively utilizing keyword searches in cervical computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging reports between 2012 and 2020 using Nuance mPower software (Nuance, Burlington, MA). The cervical magnetic resonance imaging examinations for these patients were reviewed for craniocervical ligamentous injury by two neuroradiologists. Descriptions of craniocervical junction injuries, demographic information, clinical history, surgical management, and global outcomes were recorded. Results Nine adult patients were identified with an acute, post-traumatic craniocervical junction injury requiring occipital-cervical fusion. All nine patients demonstrated a ligamentous tear in at least one of the four major craniocervical junction ligaments - the occipital condylar-C1 capsular ligaments, alar ligaments, tectorial membrane, and posterior atlantooccipital membrane. The tectorial membrane was the most commonly torn ligament followed by the alar ligament(s), posterior atlantooccipital membrane, and capsular ligament(s). There was wide variability in the number of major craniocervical junction ligaments torn, ranging from one ligament to all four ligaments. Four patients suffered persistent neurologic deficits following surgery. Conclusion Craniocervical injury is best evaluated by cervical magnetic resonance imaging. In the absence of overt craniocervical dissociation, we propose that an injury of the tectorial membrane in the adult population may indicate patients with significant craniocervical instability, possibly necessitating occipital-cervical fusion.

Anatomic, functional, and radiographic review of the ligaments of the craniocervical junction

The craniocervical junction (CCJ) is a complex and unique osteoligamentous structure that balances maximum stability and protection of vital neurovascular anatomy with ample mobility and range of motion. With the increasing utilization and improved resolution of cervical magnetic resonance imaging, craniocervical injury is being more accurately defined as a spectrum of injury that ranges in severity from overt craniocervical disassociation to isolated injuries of one more of the craniocervical ligaments, which may also lead to craniocervical instability. Thus, it is vital for the radiologist and neurosurgeon to have a thorough understanding of the imaging anatomy and function of the CCJ.

A 2D threshold of the condylar-C1 interval to maximize identification of patients at high risk for atlantooccipital dislocation using computed tomography

OBJECTIVE Measurement of the occipital condyle-C1 interval (CCI) is important in the evaluation of atlantooccipital dislocation (AOD) in pediatric trauma patients. The authors studied a large cohort of children with and without AOD to identify a 2D measurement threshold that maximizes the diagnostic yield of the CCI on cervical spine CT scans obtained in trauma patients. METHODS This retrospective, single-center study included all children who underwent CT of the cervical spine at Primary Children's Hospital from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2014, for trauma evaluation. Bilateral CCI measurements in the coronal (3 measurements per side) and sagittal (4 measurements per side) planes were recorded. Using an iterative method, the authors determined optimal cutoffs for the maximal CCI in each plane in relation to AOD. The primary outcome was AOD requiring occipitocervical fusion. RESULTS A total of 597 pediatric patients underwent cervical spine CT for trauma evaluation: 578 patients without AOD and 19 patients with AOD requiring occipitocervical fusion. The authors found a statistically significant correlation between CCI and age (p < 0.001), with younger patients having higher CCIs. Using a 2D threshold requiring a sagittal CCI ≥ 2.5 mm and a coronal CCI ≥ 3.5 mm predicted AOD with a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 73%, positive predictive value of 10.3%, and negative predictive value of 99%. The accuracy of this 2D threshold was 84%. CONCLUSIONS In the present study population, age-dependent differences in the CCI were found on CT scans of the cervical spine in a large cohort of patients with and without AOD. A 2D CCI threshold as a screening method maximizes identification of patients at high risk for AOD while minimizing unnecessary imaging studies in children being evaluated for trauma.

Application of Normative Occipital Condyle-C1 Interval Measurements to Detect Atlanto-Occipital Injury in Children

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Prior studies have found that widening or asymmetry of the occipital condyle-C1 interval on CT is a sensitive and specific marker for atlanto-occipital dislocation. Previously reported abnormal occipital condyle-C1 interval values are not age-specific, possibly leading to false-positive findings in younger children, in whom this joint space is normally larger than that in adults. This study assesses the utility of applying age-specific normative occipital condyle-C1 interval ranges to documented cases of atlanto-occipital injury compared with previously reported abnormal cutoff values.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of CT and MR imaging of 14 subjects with atlanto-occipital injury was performed, and occipital condyle-C1 interval measurements were made for each subject. Sensitivities and specificities of proposed occipital condyle-C1 interval cutoffs of 2 and 3 SDs above the mean and previously published occipital condyle-C1 interval cutoffs for atlanto-occipital injury were then calculated on the basis of occipital condyle-C1 interval measurements for each subject.

RESULTS

An occipital condyle-C1 interval 2 SDs above the age-specific mean has a sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 89%-100%, depending on the age group. An occipital condyle-C1 interval 3 SDs above the age-specific mean has a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 95%-100%. A 4.0-mm occipital condyle-C1 interval has a sensitivity of 36% and a specificity of 100% in all age groups. A 2.5-mm occipital condyle-C1 interval has a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 18%-100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Occipital condyle-C1 interval widening cutoffs used to establish atlanto-occipital injury lack both sensitivity and specificity in children and young teenagers. MR imaging is necessary to establish a diagnosis of atlanto-occipital injury in children and young teenagers when the appropriate mechanism of injury is present.