1
|
Herings SDA, van den Elshout R, de Wit R, Mannil M, Ravesloot C, Scheenen TWJ, Arens A, van der Kolk A, Meijer FJA, Henssen DJHA. How to evaluate perfusion imaging in post-treatment glioma: a comparison of three different analysis methods. Neuroradiology 2024:10.1007/s00234-024-03374-3. [PMID: 38714545 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-024-03374-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion weighted (PW)-MRI can aid in differentiating treatment related abnormalities (TRA) from tumor progression (TP) in post-treatment glioma patients. Common methods, like the 'hot spot', or visual approach suffer from oversimplification and subjectivity. Using perfusion of the complete lesion potentially offers an objective and accurate alternative. This study aims to compare the diagnostic value and assess the subjectivity of these techniques. METHODS 50 Glioma patients with enhancing lesions post-surgery and chemo-radiotherapy were retrospectively included. Outcome was determined by clinical/radiological follow-up or biopsy. Imaging analysis used the 'hot spot', volume of interest (VOI) and visual approach. Diagnostic accuracy was compared using receiving operator characteristics (ROC) curves for the VOI and 'hot spot' approach, visual assessment was analysed with contingency tables. Inter-operator agreement was determined with Cohens kappa and intra-class coefficient (ICC). RESULTS 29 Patients suffered from TP, 21 had TRA. The visual assessment showed poor to substantial inter-operator agreement (κ = -0.72 - 0.68). Reliability of the 'hot spot' placement was excellent (ICC = 0.89), while reference placement was variable (ICC = 0.54). The area under the ROC (AUROC) of the mean- and maximum relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) (VOI-analysis) were 0.82 and 0.72, while the rCBV-ratio ('hot spot' analysis) was 0.69. The VOI-analysis had a more balanced sensitivity and specificity compared to visual assessment. CONCLUSIONS VOI analysis of DSC PW-MRI data holds greater diagnostic accuracy in single-moment differentiation of TP and TRA than 'hot spot' or visual analysis. This study underlines the subjectivity of visual placement and assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siem D A Herings
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise Neuro-Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Rik van den Elshout
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise Neuro-Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rebecca de Wit
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise Neuro-Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Manoj Mannil
- University Clinic for Radiology, Westfälische Wilhelms-University Muenster and University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, E48149, Muenster, Germany
| | - Cécile Ravesloot
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise Neuro-Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tom W J Scheenen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise Neuro-Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Arens
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise Neuro-Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anja van der Kolk
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frederick J A Meijer
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise Neuro-Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Dylan J H A Henssen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboudumc Center of Expertise Neuro-Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yamin G, Tranvinh E, Lanzman BA, Tong E, Hashmi SS, Patel CB, Iv M. Arterial Spin-Labeling and DSC Perfusion Metrics Improve Agreement in Neuroradiologists' Clinical Interpretations of Posttreatment High-Grade Glioma Surveillance MR Imaging-An Institutional Experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2024; 45:453-460. [PMID: 38453410 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a8190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE MR perfusion has shown value in the evaluation of posttreatment high-grade gliomas, but few studies have shown its impact on the consistency and confidence of neuroradiologists' interpretation in routine clinical practice. We evaluated the impact of adding MR perfusion metrics to conventional contrast-enhanced MR imaging in posttreatment high-grade glioma surveillance imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included 45 adults with high-grade gliomas who had posttreatment perfusion MR imaging. Four neuroradiologists assigned Brain Tumor Reporting and Data System scores for each examination on the basis of the interpretation of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and then after the addition of arterial spin-labeling-CBF, DSC-relative CBV, and DSC-fractional tumor burden. Interrater agreement and rater agreement with a multidisciplinary consensus group were assessed with κ statistics. Raters used a 5-point Likert scale to report confidence scores. The frequency of clinically meaningful score changes resulting from the addition of each perfusion metric was determined. RESULTS Interrater agreement was moderate for contrast-enhanced MR imaging alone (κ = 0.63) and higher with perfusion metrics (arterial spin-labeling-CBF, κ = 0.67; DSC-relative CBV, κ = 0.66; DSC-fractional tumor burden, κ = 0.70). Agreement between raters and consensus was highest with DSC-fractional tumor burden (κ = 0.66-0.80). Confidence scores were highest with DSC-fractional tumor burden. Across all raters, the addition of perfusion resulted in clinically meaningful interpretation changes in 2%-20% of patients compared with contrast-enhanced MR imaging alone. CONCLUSIONS Adding perfusion to contrast-enhanced MR imaging improved interrater agreement, rater agreement with consensus, and rater confidence in the interpretation of posttreatment high-grade glioma MR imaging, with the highest agreement and confidence scores seen with DSC-fractional tumor burden. Perfusion MR imaging also resulted in interpretation changes that could change therapeutic management in up to 20% of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghiam Yamin
- From the Department of Radiology (G.Y., E. Tranvinh, B.A.L., E. Tong, S.S.H., M.I.), Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Eric Tranvinh
- From the Department of Radiology (G.Y., E. Tranvinh, B.A.L., E. Tong, S.S.H., M.I.), Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Bryan A Lanzman
- From the Department of Radiology (G.Y., E. Tranvinh, B.A.L., E. Tong, S.S.H., M.I.), Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Elizabeth Tong
- From the Department of Radiology (G.Y., E. Tranvinh, B.A.L., E. Tong, S.S.H., M.I.), Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Syed S Hashmi
- From the Department of Radiology (G.Y., E. Tranvinh, B.A.L., E. Tong, S.S.H., M.I.), Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Chirag B Patel
- Department of Neuro-Oncology (C.B.P.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael Iv
- From the Department of Radiology (G.Y., E. Tranvinh, B.A.L., E. Tong, S.S.H., M.I.), Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wongsawaeng D, Schwartz D, Li X, Muldoon LL, Stoller J, Stateler C, Holland S, Szidonya L, Rooney WD, Wyatt C, Ambady P, Fu R, Neuwelt EA, Barajas RF. Comparison of dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) using gadolinium and iron-based contrast agents in high-grade glioma at high-field MRI. Neuroradiol J 2024:19714009241242596. [PMID: 38544404 DOI: 10.1177/19714009241242596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare DSC-MRI using Gadolinium (GBCA) and Ferumoxytol (FBCA) in high-grade glioma at 3T and 7T MRI field strengths. We hypothesized that using FBCA at 7T would enhance the performance of DSC, as measured by contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). METHODS Ten patients (13 lesions) were assigned to 3T (6 patients, 6 lesions) or 7T (4 patients, 7 lesions). All lesions received 0.1 mmol/kg of GBCA on day 1. Ten lesions (4 at 3T and 6 at 7T) received a lower dose (0.6 mg/kg) of FBCA, followed by a higher dose (1.0-1.2 mg/kg), while 3 lesions (2 at 3T and 1 at 7T) received only a higher dose on Day 2. CBV maps with leakage correction for GBCA but not for FBCA were generated. The CNR and normalized CBV (nCBV) were analyzed on enhancing and non-enhancing high T2W lesions. RESULTS Regardless of FBCA dose, GBCA showed higher CNR than FBCA at 7T, which was significant for high-dose FBCA (p < .05). Comparable CNR between GBCA and high-dose FBCA was observed at 3T. There was a trend toward higher CNR for FBCA at 3T than 7T. GBCA also showed nCBV twice that of FBCA at both MRI field strengths with significance at 7T. CONCLUSION GBCA demonstrated higher image conspicuity, as measured by CNR, than FBCA on 7T. The stronger T2* weighting realized with higher magnetic field strength, combined with FBCA, likely results in more signal loss rather than enhanced performance on DSC. However, at clinical 3T, both GBCA and FBCA, particularly a dosage of 1.0-1.2 mg/kg (optimal for perfusion imaging), yielded comparable CNR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doonyaporn Wongsawaeng
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand
| | - Daniel Schwartz
- Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, USA
| | - Xin Li
- Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, USA
| | - Leslie L Muldoon
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, USA
| | - Jared Stoller
- Department of Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, USA
| | | | - Samantha Holland
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, USA
| | - Laszlo Szidonya
- Department of Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, USA
| | - William D Rooney
- Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, USA
| | - Cory Wyatt
- Department of Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, USA
| | | | - Rongwei Fu
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, USA
| | - Edward A Neuwelt
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oregon Health & Science University, USA
| | - Ramon F Barajas
- Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, USA
- Department of Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, USA
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Prah MA, Schmainda KM. Practical guidance to identify and troubleshoot suboptimal DSC-MRI results. FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY 2024; 4:1307586. [PMID: 38445104 PMCID: PMC10913595 DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2024.1307586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion MR imaging (pMRI) has been shown to be a robust marker of neuroradiological tumor burden. Recent consensus recommendations in pMRI acquisition strategies have provided a pathway for pMRI inclusion in diverse patient care centers, regardless of size or experience. However, even with proper implementation and execution of the DSC-MRI protocol, issues will arise that many centers may not easily recognize or be aware of. Furthermore, missed pMRI issues are not always apparent in the resulting rCBV images, potentiating inaccurate or missed radiological diagnoses. Therefore, we gathered from our database of DSC-MRI datasets, true-to-life examples showcasing the breakdowns in acquisition, postprocessing, and interpretation, along with appropriate mitigation strategies when possible. The pMRI issues addressed include those related to image acquisition and postprocessing with a focus on contrast agent administration, timing, and rate, signal-to-noise quality, and susceptibility artifact. The goal of this work is to provide guidance to minimize and recognize pMRI issues to ensure that only quality data is interpreted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa A. Prah
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Kathleen M. Schmainda
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI,United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sobczyk O, Sayin ES, Poublanc J, Duffin J, Para A, Fisher JA, Mikulis DJ. The Choroid Plexus as an Alternative Locus for the Identification of the Arterial Input Function for Calculating Cerebral Perfusion Metrics Using MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2023; 45:44-50. [PMID: 38164530 PMCID: PMC10756570 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a8099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE MR imaging-based cerebral perfusion metrics can be obtained by tracing the passage of a bolus of contrast through the microvasculature of the brain parenchyma. Thus, the temporal signal pattern of the contrast agent is typically measured over a large artery such as the MCA to generate the arterial input function. The largest intracranial arteries in the brain may not always be suitable for selecting the arterial input function due to skull base susceptibility artifacts or reduced size from steno-occlusive disease. Therefore, a suitable alternative arterial input function window would be useful. The choroid plexus is a highly vascular tissue composed essentially of arterialized blood vessels and acellular stroma with low metabolic requirements relative to its blood flow and may be a suitable alternative to identify the arterial input function. MATERIALS AND METHODS We studied 8 healthy participants and 7 patients with gliomas who were administered a bolus of gadolinium. We selected an arterial input function from both the left and right M1 segments of the MCA and both lateral ventricles of the choroid plexus for each participant. We compared the changes in the T2* signal and the calculated resting perfusion metrics using the arterial input functions selected from the MCA and choroid plexus. RESULTS We found no systematic difference between resting perfusion metrics in GM and WM when calculated using an arterial input function from the MCA or choroid plexus in the same participant. CONCLUSIONS The choroid plexus provides an alternative location from which an arterial input function may be sampled when a suitable measure over an MCA is not available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Sobczyk
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging and the Functional Neuroimaging Lab (O.S., E.S.S., J.P., J.D., A.P., J.A.F., D.J.M.), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management (O.S., J.AF.), University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ece Su Sayin
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging and the Functional Neuroimaging Lab (O.S., E.S.S., J.P., J.D., A.P., J.A.F., D.J.M.), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Physiology (E.S.S., J.D., J.A.F.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julien Poublanc
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging and the Functional Neuroimaging Lab (O.S., E.S.S., J.P., J.D., A.P., J.A.F., D.J.M.), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James Duffin
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging and the Functional Neuroimaging Lab (O.S., E.S.S., J.P., J.D., A.P., J.A.F., D.J.M.), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Physiology (E.S.S., J.D., J.A.F.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Para
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging and the Functional Neuroimaging Lab (O.S., E.S.S., J.P., J.D., A.P., J.A.F., D.J.M.), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joseph A Fisher
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging and the Functional Neuroimaging Lab (O.S., E.S.S., J.P., J.D., A.P., J.A.F., D.J.M.), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management (O.S., J.AF.), University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Physiology (E.S.S., J.D., J.A.F.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David J Mikulis
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging and the Functional Neuroimaging Lab (O.S., E.S.S., J.P., J.D., A.P., J.A.F., D.J.M.), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shiroishi MS, Weinert D, Cen SY, Varghese B, Dondlinger T, Prah M, Mendoza J, Nazemi S, Ameli N, Amini N, Shohas S, Chen S, Bigjahan B, Zada G, Chen T, Neman-Ebrahim J, Chang EL, Chow FE, Fan Z, Yang W, Attenello FJ, Ye J, Kim PE, Patel VN, Lerner A, Acharya J, Hu LS, Quarles CC, Boxerman JL, Wu O, Schmainda KM. A cross-sectional study to test equivalence of low- versus intermediate-flip angle dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI measures of relative cerebral blood volume in patients with high-grade gliomas at 1.5 Tesla field strength. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1156843. [PMID: 37799462 PMCID: PMC10548232 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1156843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction 1.5 Tesla (1.5T) remain a significant field strength for brain imaging worldwide. Recent computer simulations and clinical studies at 3T MRI have suggested that dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI using a 30° flip angle ("low-FA") with model-based leakage correction and no gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) preload provides equivalent relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) measurements to the reference-standard acquisition using a single-dose GBCA preload with a 60° flip angle ("intermediate-FA") and model-based leakage correction. However, it remains unclear whether this holds true at 1.5T. The purpose of this study was to test this at 1.5T in human high-grade glioma (HGG) patients. Methods This was a single-institution cross-sectional study of patients who had undergone 1.5T MRI for HGG. DSC-MRI consisted of gradient-echo echo-planar imaging (GRE-EPI) with a low-FA without preload (30°/P-); this then subsequently served as a preload for the standard intermediate-FA acquisition (60°/P+). Both normalized (nrCBV) and standardized relative cerebral blood volumes (srCBV) were calculated using model-based leakage correction (C+) with IBNeuro™ software. Whole-enhancing lesion mean and median nrCBV and srCBV from the low- and intermediate-FA methods were compared using the Pearson's, Spearman's and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results Twenty-three HGG patients composing a total of 31 scans were analyzed. The Pearson and Spearman correlations and ICCs between the 30°/P-/C+ and 60°/P+/C+ acquisitions demonstrated high correlations for both mean and median nrCBV and srCBV. Conclusion Our study provides preliminary evidence that for HGG patients at 1.5T MRI, a low FA, no preload DSC-MRI acquisition can be an appealing alternative to the reference standard higher FA acquisition that utilizes a preload.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark S. Shiroishi
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Imaging Genetics Center, USC Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Dane Weinert
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Steven Y. Cen
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Bino Varghese
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | - Melissa Prah
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Jesse Mendoza
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Sina Nazemi
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Nima Ameli
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Negin Amini
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Salman Shohas
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Shannon Chen
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Bavrina Bigjahan
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Gabriel Zada
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Thomas Chen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Josh Neman-Ebrahim
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Eric L. Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Frances E. Chow
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Zhaoyang Fan
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Wensha Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Frank J. Attenello
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jason Ye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Paul E. Kim
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Vishal N. Patel
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Alexander Lerner
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jay Acharya
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Leland S. Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - C. Chad Quarles
- Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jerrold L. Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Ona Wu
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Kathleen M. Schmainda
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Anil A, Stokes AM, Chao R, Hu LS, Alhilali L, Karis JP, Bell LC, Quarles CC. Identification of single-dose, dual-echo based CBV threshold for fractional tumor burden mapping in recurrent glioblastoma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1046629. [PMID: 36733305 PMCID: PMC9887158 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1046629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI is widely used to distinguish high grade glioma recurrence from post treatment radiation effects (PTRE). Application of rCBV thresholds yield maps to distinguish between regional tumor burden and PTRE, a biomarker termed the fractional tumor burden (FTB). FTB is generally measured using conventional double-dose, single-echo DSC-MRI protocols; recently, a single-dose, dual-echo DSC-MRI protocol was clinically validated by direct comparison to the conventional double-dose, single-echo protocol. As the single-dose, dual-echo acquisition enables reduction in the contrast agent dose and provides greater pulse sequence parameter flexibility, there is a compelling need to establish dual-echo DSC-MRI based FTB mapping. In this study, we determine the optimum standardized rCBV threshold for the single-dose, dual-echo protocol to generate FTB maps that best match those derived from the reference standard, double-dose, single-echo protocol. Methods The study consisted of 23 high grade glioma patients undergoing perfusion scans to confirm suspected tumor recurrence. We sequentially acquired single dose, dual-echo and double dose, single-echo DSC-MRI data. For both protocols, we generated leakage-corrected standardized rCBV maps. Standardized rCBV (sRCBV) thresholds of 1.0 and 1.75 were used to compute single-echo FTB maps as the reference for delineating PTRE (sRCBV < 1.0), tumor with moderate angiogenesis (1.0 < sRCBV < 1.75), and tumor with high angiogenesis (sRCBV > 1.75) regions. To assess the sRCBV agreement between acquisition protocols, the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was computed between the mean tumor sRCBV values across the patients. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the optimum dual-echo sRCBV threshold. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared between the obtained optimized threshold (1.64) and the standard reference threshold (1.75) for the dual-echo sRCBV threshold. Results The mean tumor sRCBV values across the patients showed a strong correlation (CCC = 0.96) between the two protocols. The ROC analysis showed maximum accuracy at thresholds of 1.0 (delineate PTRE from tumor) and 1.64 (differentiate aggressive tumors). The reference threshold (1.75) and the obtained optimized threshold (1.64) yielded similar accuracy, with slight differences in sensitivity and specificity which were not statistically significant (1.75 threshold: Sensitivity = 81.94%; Specificity: 87.23%; Accuracy: 84.58% and 1.64 threshold: Sensitivity = 84.48%; Specificity: 84.97%; Accuracy: 84.73%). Conclusions The optimal sRCBV threshold for single-dose, dual-echo protocol was found to be 1.0 and 1.64 for distinguishing tumor recurrence from PTRE; however, minimal differences were observed when using the standard threshold (1.75) as the upper threshold, suggesting that the standard threshold could be used for both protocols. While the prior study validated the agreement of the mean sRCBV values between the protocols, this study confirmed that their voxel-wise agreement is suitable for reliable FTB mapping. Dual-echo DSC-MRI acquisitions enable robust single-dose sRCBV and FTB mapping, provide pulse sequence parameter flexibility and should improve reproducibility by mitigating variations in preload dose and incubation time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aliya Anil
- Division of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neuroimaging Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Ashley M. Stokes
- Division of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neuroimaging Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Renee Chao
- Division of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neuroimaging Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Leland S. Hu
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Lea Alhilali
- Neuroradiology, Southwest Neuroimaging at Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - John P. Karis
- Neuroradiology, Southwest Neuroimaging at Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Laura C. Bell
- Early Clinical Development, Genentech, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - C. Chad Quarles
- Cancer System Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States,*Correspondence: C. Chad Quarles,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vossough A. Advanced pediatric neuroimaging. Pediatr Radiol 2022:10.1007/s00247-022-05519-z. [PMID: 36216985 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-022-05519-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Advanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging techniques play an important adjunct role to conventional MRI sequences for better depiction and characterization of a variety of brain disorders. In this article we briefly review the basic principles and clinical utility of a select number of these techniques, including clinical functional MRI for presurgical planning, clinical diffusion tensor imaging and related techniques, dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging using gadolinium injection, and arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging. The article focuses on general principles of clinical MRI acquisition protocols, relevant factors affecting image quality, and a general framework for obtaining images for each of these techniques. We also present relevant advances for acquiring these types of imaging sequences in a clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arastoo Vossough
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kuo F, Ng NN, Nagpal S, Pollom EL, Soltys S, Hayden-Gephart M, Li G, Born DE, Iv M. DSC Perfusion MRI-Derived Fractional Tumor Burden and Relative CBV Differentiate Tumor Progression and Radiation Necrosis in Brain Metastases Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022; 43:689-695. [PMID: 35483909 PMCID: PMC9089266 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Differentiation between tumor and radiation necrosis in patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery is challenging. We hypothesized that MR perfusion and metabolic metrics can differentiate radiation necrosis from progressive tumor in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated MRIs comprising DSC, dynamic contrast-enhanced, and arterial spin-labeling perfusion imaging in subjects with brain metastases previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. For each lesion, we obtained the mean normalized and standardized relative CBV and fractional tumor burden, volume transfer constant, and normalized maximum CBF, as well as the maximum standardized uptake value in a subset of subjects who underwent FDG-PET. Relative CBV thresholds of 1 and 1.75 were used to define low and high fractional tumor burden. RESULTS Thirty subjects with 37 lesions (20 radiation necrosis, 17 tumor) were included. Compared with radiation necrosis, tumor had increased mean normalized and standardized relative CBV (P = .002) and high fractional tumor burden (normalized, P = .005; standardized, P = .003) and decreased low fractional tumor burden (normalized, P = .03; standardized, P = .01). The area under the curve showed that relative CBV (normalized = 0.80; standardized = 0.79) and high fractional tumor burden (normalized = 0.77; standardized = 0.78) performed the best to discriminate tumor and radiation necrosis. For tumor prediction, the normalized relative CBV cutoff of ≥1.75 yielded a sensitivity of 76.5% and specificity of 70.0%, while the standardized cutoff of ≥1.75 yielded a sensitivity of 41.2% and specificity of 95.0%. No significance was found with the volume transfer constant, normalized CBF, and standardized uptake value. CONCLUSIONS Increased relative CBV and high fractional tumor burden (defined by a threshold relative CBV of ≥1.75) best differentiated tumor from radiation necrosis in subjects with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Performance of normalized and standardized approaches was similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Kuo
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention (F.K., N.N.N., M.I.)
| | - N N Ng
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention (F.K., N.N.N., M.I.)
| | - S Nagpal
- Departments of Neurology (Neuro-Oncology) (S.N.)
| | | | - S Soltys
- Radiation Oncology (E.L.P., S.S.)
| | | | - G Li
- Neurosurgery (M.H.-G., G.L.)
| | - D E Born
- Pathology (D.E.B.), Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - M Iv
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention (F.K., N.N.N., M.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Henriksen OM, del Mar Álvarez-Torres M, Figueiredo P, Hangel G, Keil VC, Nechifor RE, Riemer F, Schmainda KM, Warnert EAH, Wiegers EC, Booth TC. High-Grade Glioma Treatment Response Monitoring Biomarkers: A Position Statement on the Evidence Supporting the Use of Advanced MRI Techniques in the Clinic, and the Latest Bench-to-Bedside Developments. Part 1: Perfusion and Diffusion Techniques. Front Oncol 2022; 12:810263. [PMID: 35359414 PMCID: PMC8961422 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.810263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Summarize evidence for use of advanced MRI techniques as monitoring biomarkers in the clinic, and highlight the latest bench-to-bedside developments. Methods Experts in advanced MRI techniques applied to high-grade glioma treatment response assessment convened through a European framework. Current evidence regarding the potential for monitoring biomarkers in adult high-grade glioma is reviewed, and individual modalities of perfusion, permeability, and microstructure imaging are discussed (in Part 1 of two). In Part 2, we discuss modalities related to metabolism and/or chemical composition, appraise the clinic readiness of the individual modalities, and consider post-processing methodologies involving the combination of MRI approaches (multiparametric imaging) or machine learning (radiomics). Results High-grade glioma vasculature exhibits increased perfusion, blood volume, and permeability compared with normal brain tissue. Measures of cerebral blood volume derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI have consistently provided information about brain tumor growth and response to treatment; it is the most clinically validated advanced technique. Clinical studies have proven the potential of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for distinguishing post-treatment related effects from recurrence, but the optimal acquisition protocol, mode of analysis, parameter of highest diagnostic value, and optimal cut-off points remain to be established. Arterial spin labeling techniques do not require the injection of a contrast agent, and repeated measurements of cerebral blood flow can be performed. The absence of potential gadolinium deposition effects allows widespread use in pediatric patients and those with impaired renal function. More data are necessary to establish clinical validity as monitoring biomarkers. Diffusion-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient analysis, diffusion tensor or kurtosis imaging, intravoxel incoherent motion, and other microstructural modeling approaches also allow treatment response assessment; more robust data are required to validate these alone or when applied to post-processing methodologies. Conclusion Considerable progress has been made in the development of these monitoring biomarkers. Many techniques are in their infancy, whereas others have generated a larger body of evidence for clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Otto M. Henriksen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Patricia Figueiredo
- Department of Bioengineering and Institute for Systems and Robotics-Lisboa, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Gilbert Hangel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
- High-Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Vera C. Keil
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ruben E. Nechifor
- International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Frank Riemer
- Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre (MMIV), Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Kathleen M. Schmainda
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | | | - Evita C. Wiegers
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Thomas C. Booth
-
School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, St. Thomas’ Hospital, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Neuroradiology, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liu P, Lee YZ, Aylward SR, Niethammer M. Perfusion Imaging: An Advection Diffusion Approach. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING 2021; 40:3424-3435. [PMID: 34086563 PMCID: PMC8686530 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2021.3085828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Perfusion imaging is of great clinical importance and is used to assess a wide range of diseases including strokes and brain tumors. Commonly used approaches for the quantitative analysis of perfusion images are based on measuring the effect of a contrast agent moving through blood vessels and into tissue. Contrast-agent free approaches, for example, based on intravoxel incoherent motion and arterial spin labeling, also exist, but are so far not routinely used clinically. Existing contrast-agent-dependent methods typically rely on the estimation of the arterial input function (AIF) to approximately model tissue perfusion. These approaches neglect spatial dependencies. Further, as reliably estimating the AIF is non-trivial, different AIF estimates may lead to different perfusion measures. In this work we therefore propose PIANO, an approach that provides additional insights into the perfusion process. PIANO estimates the velocity and diffusion fields of an advection-diffusion model best explaining the contrast dynamics without using an AIF. PIANO accounts for spatial dependencies and neither requires estimating the AIF nor relies on a particular contrast agent bolus shape. Specifically, we propose a convenient parameterization of the estimation problem, a numerical estimation approach, and extensively evaluate PIANO. Simulation experiments show the robustness and effectiveness of PIANO, along with its ability to distinguish between advection and diffusion. We further apply PIANO on a public brain magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion dataset of acute stroke patients, and demonstrate that PIANO can successfully resolve velocity and diffusion field ambiguities and results in sensitive measures for the assessment of stroke, comparing favorably to conventional measures of perfusion.
Collapse
|
12
|
Barajas RF, Politi LS, Anzalone N, Schöder H, Fox CP, Boxerman JL, Kaufmann TJ, Quarles CC, Ellingson BM, Auer D, Andronesi OC, Ferreri AJM, Mrugala MM, Grommes C, Neuwelt EA, Ambady P, Rubenstein JL, Illerhaus G, Nagane M, Batchelor TT, Hu LS. Consensus recommendations for MRI and PET imaging of primary central nervous system lymphoma: guideline statement from the International Primary CNS Lymphoma Collaborative Group (IPCG). Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:1056-1071. [PMID: 33560416 PMCID: PMC8248856 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Advanced molecular and pathophysiologic characterization of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) has revealed insights into promising targeted therapeutic approaches. Medical imaging plays a fundamental role in PCNSL diagnosis, staging, and response assessment. Institutional imaging variation and inconsistent clinical trial reporting diminishes the reliability and reproducibility of clinical response assessment. In this context, we aimed to: (1) critically review the use of advanced positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the setting of PCNSL; (2) provide results from an international survey of clinical sites describing the current practices for routine and advanced imaging, and (3) provide biologically based recommendations from the International PCNSL Collaborative Group (IPCG) on adaptation of standardized imaging practices. The IPCG provides PET and MRI consensus recommendations built upon previous recommendations for standardized brain tumor imaging protocols (BTIP) in primary and metastatic disease. A biologically integrated approach is provided to addresses the unique challenges associated with the imaging assessment of PCNSL. Detailed imaging parameters facilitate the adoption of these recommendations by researchers and clinicians. To enhance clinical feasibility, we have developed both “ideal” and “minimum standard” protocols at 3T and 1.5T MR systems that will facilitate widespread adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramon F Barajas
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Section, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland Oregon, USA.,Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Knight Cancer Institute Translational Oncology Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Letterio S Politi
- Humanitas University and Humanitas Research and Clinical Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nicoletta Anzalone
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Christopher P Fox
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jerrold L Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | | | - C Chad Quarles
- Department of Neuroimaging Research & Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Departments of Radiological Sciences and Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Departments of Radiological Sciences, Psychiatry, and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Dorothee Auer
- Versus Arthritis Pain Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ovidiu C Andronesi
- A. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andres J M Ferreri
- Lymphoma Unit, Department of Onco-Hematology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maciej M Mrugala
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.,Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Christian Grommes
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical School, New York, New York, USA
| | - Edward A Neuwelt
- Blood-Brain Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Prakash Ambady
- Blood-Brain Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - James L Rubenstein
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Gerald Illerhaus
- Clinic of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Motoo Nagane
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tracy T Batchelor
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kaufmann TJ, Smits M, Boxerman J, Huang R, Barboriak DP, Weller M, Chung C, Tsien C, Brown PD, Shankar L, Galanis E, Gerstner E, van den Bent MJ, Burns TC, Parney IF, Dunn G, Brastianos PK, Lin NU, Wen PY, Ellingson BM. Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain metastases. Neuro Oncol 2021; 22:757-772. [PMID: 32048719 PMCID: PMC7283031 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
A recent meeting was held on March 22, 2019, among the FDA, clinical scientists, pharmaceutical and biotech companies, clinical trials cooperative groups, and patient advocacy groups to discuss challenges and potential solutions for increasing development of therapeutics for central nervous system metastases. A key issue identified at this meeting was the need for consistent tumor measurement for reliable tumor response assessment, including the first step of standardized image acquisition with an MRI protocol that could be implemented in multicenter studies aimed at testing new therapeutics. This document builds upon previous consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol (BTIP) in high-grade gliomas and defines a protocol for brain metastases (BTIP-BM) that addresses unique challenges associated with assessment of CNS metastases. The "minimum standard" recommended pulse sequences include: (i) parameter matched pre- and post-contrast inversion recovery (IR)-prepared, isotropic 3D T1-weighted gradient echo (IR-GRE); (ii) axial 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo acquired after injection of gadolinium-based contrast agent and before post-contrast 3D T1-weighted images; (iii) axial 2D or 3D T2-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery; (iv) axial 2D, 3-directional diffusion-weighted images; and (v) post-contrast 2D T1-weighted spin echo images for increased lesion conspicuity. Recommended sequence parameters are provided for both 1.5T and 3T MR systems. An "ideal" protocol is also provided, which replaces IR-GRE with 3D TSE T1-weighted imaging pre- and post-gadolinium, and is best performed at 3T, for which dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion is included. Recommended perfusion parameters are given.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jerrold Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Raymond Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel P Barboriak
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christina Tsien
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Lalitha Shankar
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Evanthia Galanis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elizabeth Gerstner
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Terry C Burns
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ian F Parney
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gavin Dunn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Priscilla K Brastianos
- Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Departments of Radiological Sciences and Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Park JE, Kim HS, Lee J, Cheong EN, Shin I, Ahn SS, Shim WH. Deep-learned time-signal intensity pattern analysis using an autoencoder captures magnetic resonance perfusion heterogeneity for brain tumor differentiation. Sci Rep 2020; 10:21485. [PMID: 33293590 PMCID: PMC7723041 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78485-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Current image processing methods for dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) do not capture complex dynamic information of time-signal intensity curves. We investigated whether an autoencoder-based pattern analysis of DSC MRI captured representative temporal features that improves tissue characterization and tumor diagnosis in a multicenter setting. The autoencoder was applied to the time-signal intensity curves to obtain representative temporal patterns, which were subsequently learned by a convolutional neural network. This network was trained with 216 preoperative DSC MRI acquisitions and validated using external data (n = 43) collected with different DSC acquisition protocols. The autoencoder applied to time-signal intensity curves and clustering obtained nine representative clusters of temporal patterns, which accurately identified tumor and non-tumoral tissues. The dominant clusters of temporal patterns distinguished primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) from glioblastoma (AUC 0.89) and metastasis from glioblastoma (AUC 0.95). The autoencoder captured DSC time-signal intensity patterns that improved identification of tumoral tissues and differentiation of tumor type and was generalizable across centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Eun Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Ho Sung Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
| | - Junkyu Lee
- Department of Medical Science and Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - E-Nae Cheong
- Department of Medical Science and Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ilah Shin
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Soo Ahn
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo Hyun Shim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.,Department of Medical Science and Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Boxerman JL, Quarles CC, Hu LS, Erickson BJ, Gerstner ER, Smits M, Kaufmann TJ, Barboriak DP, Huang RH, Wick W, Weller M, Galanis E, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Shankar L, Jacobs P, Chung C, van den Bent MJ, Chang S, Al Yung WK, Cloughesy TF, Wen PY, Gilbert MR, Rosen BR, Ellingson BM, Schmainda KM. Consensus recommendations for a dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI protocol for use in high-grade gliomas. Neuro Oncol 2020; 22:1262-1275. [PMID: 32516388 PMCID: PMC7523451 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the widespread clinical use of dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI, DSC-MRI methodology has not been standardized, hindering its utilization for response assessment in multicenter trials. Recently, the DSC-MRI Standardization Subcommittee of the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition issued an updated consensus DSC-MRI protocol compatible with the standardized brain tumor imaging protocol (BTIP) for high-grade gliomas that is increasingly used in the clinical setting and is the default MRI protocol for the National Clinical Trials Network. After reviewing the basis for controversy over DSC-MRI protocols, this paper provides evidence-based best practices for clinical DSC-MRI as determined by the Committee, including pulse sequence (gradient echo vs spin echo), BTIP-compliant contrast agent dosing (preload and bolus), flip angle (FA), echo time (TE), and post-processing leakage correction. In summary, full-dose preload, full-dose bolus dosing using intermediate (60°) FA and field strength-dependent TE (40-50 ms at 1.5 T, 20-35 ms at 3 T) provides overall best accuracy and precision for cerebral blood volume estimates. When single-dose contrast agent usage is desired, no-preload, full-dose bolus dosing using low FA (30°) and field strength-dependent TE provides excellent performance, with reduced contrast agent usage and elimination of potential systematic errors introduced by variations in preload dose and incubation time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerrold L Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Representative of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) Cancer Research Group
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
- Representative of the American Society of Functional Neuroradiology (ASFNR)
| | - Chad C Quarles
- Department of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
| | - Bradley J Erickson
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
- Representative of the RSNA Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA)
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
| | - Elizabeth R Gerstner
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Representative of the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC)
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC–University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Representative of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | - Timothy J Kaufmann
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
| | - Daniel P Barboriak
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Representative of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) Cancer Research Group
- Representative of the RSNA Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA)
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
| | - Raymond H Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Representative of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Representative of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | - Evanthia Galanis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
| | - Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lalitha Shankar
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Paula Jacobs
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Representative of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | - Susan Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - W K Al Yung
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Representative of the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC)
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Representative of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)
| | - Bruce R Rosen
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Departments of Radiological Sciences, Psychiatry, and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Representative of the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC)
- Representative of the Ivy Consortium for Early Phase Clinical Trials
- Representative of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) Cancer Research Group
- Representative of the RSNA Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA)
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
| | - Kathleen M Schmainda
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
- Representative of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) Cancer Research Group
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hoxworth JM, Eschbacher JM, Gonzales AC, Singleton KW, Leon GD, Smith KA, Stokes AM, Zhou Y, Mazza GL, Porter AB, Mrugala MM, Zimmerman RS, Bendok BR, Patra DP, Krishna C, Boxerman JL, Baxter LC, Swanson KR, Quarles CC, Schmainda KM, Hu LS. Performance of Standardized Relative CBV for Quantifying Regional Histologic Tumor Burden in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: Comparison against Normalized Relative CBV Using Image-Localized Stereotactic Biopsies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020; 41:408-415. [PMID: 32165359 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a6486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Perfusion MR imaging measures of relative CBV can distinguish recurrent tumor from posttreatment radiation effects in high-grade gliomas. Currently, relative CBV measurement requires normalization based on user-defined reference tissues. A recently proposed method of relative CBV standardization eliminates the need for user input. This study compares the predictive performance of relative CBV standardization against relative CBV normalization for quantifying recurrent tumor burden in high-grade gliomas relative to posttreatment radiation effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS We recruited 38 previously treated patients with high-grade gliomas (World Health Organization grades III or IV) undergoing surgical re-resection for new contrast-enhancing lesions concerning for recurrent tumor versus posttreatment radiation effects. We recovered 112 image-localized biopsies and quantified the percentage of histologic tumor content versus posttreatment radiation effects for each sample. We measured spatially matched normalized and standardized relative CBV metrics (mean, median) and fractional tumor burden for each biopsy. We compared relative CBV performance to predict tumor content, including the Pearson correlation (r), against histologic tumor content (0%-100%) and the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve for predicting high-versus-low tumor content using binary histologic cutoffs (≥50%; ≥80% tumor). RESULTS Across relative CBV metrics, fractional tumor burden showed the highest correlations with tumor content (0%-100%) for normalized (r = 0.63, P < .001) and standardized (r = 0.66, P < .001) values. With binary cutoffs (ie, ≥50%; ≥80% tumor), predictive accuracies were similar for both standardized and normalized metrics and across relative CBV metrics. Median relative CBV achieved the highest area under the curve (normalized = 0.87, standardized = 0.86) for predicting ≥50% tumor, while fractional tumor burden achieved the highest area under the curve (normalized = 0.77, standardized = 0.80) for predicting ≥80% tumor. CONCLUSIONS Standardization of relative CBV achieves similar performance compared with normalized relative CBV and offers an important step toward workflow optimization and consensus methodology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Hoxworth
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.M.H., Y.Z., L.S.H.)
| | | | | | - K W Singleton
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (K.W.S., G.D.L., B.R.B., K.R.S.), Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - G D Leon
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (K.W.S., G.D.L., B.R.B., K.R.S.), Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - K A Smith
- Keller Center for Imaging Innovation (A.M.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - A M Stokes
- Keller Center for Imaging Innovation (A.M.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Y Zhou
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.M.H., Y.Z., L.S.H.)
| | - G L Mazza
- Department of Health Sciences Research (G.L.M.), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | | | | | | - B R Bendok
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (K.W.S., G.D.L., B.R.B., K.R.S.), Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - D P Patra
- Departments of Neurosurgery (D.P.P.)
| | | | - J L Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.L.B.), Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - L C Baxter
- Neuropsychology (L.C.B.), Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - K R Swanson
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (K.W.S., G.D.L., B.R.B., K.R.S.), Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - K M Schmainda
- Department of Radiology (K.M.S.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - L S Hu
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.M.H., Y.Z., L.S.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Iv M, Liu X, Lavezo J, Gentles AJ, Ghanem R, Lummus S, Born DE, Soltys SG, Nagpal S, Thomas R, Recht L, Fischbein N. Perfusion MRI-Based Fractional Tumor Burden Differentiates between Tumor and Treatment Effect in Recurrent Glioblastomas and Informs Clinical Decision-Making. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019; 40:1649-1657. [PMID: 31515215 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a6211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Fractional tumor burden better correlates with histologic tumor volume fraction in treated glioblastoma than other perfusion metrics such as relative CBV. We defined fractional tumor burden classes with low and high blood volume to distinguish tumor from treatment effect and to determine whether fractional tumor burden can inform treatment-related decision-making. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-seven patients with high-grade gliomas (primarily glioblastoma) with recurrent contrast-enhancing lesions on DSC-MR imaging were retrospectively evaluated after surgical sampling. Histopathologic examination defined treatment effect versus tumor. Normalized relative CBV thresholds of 1.0 and 1.75 were used to define low, intermediate, and high fractional tumor burden classes in each histopathologically defined group. Performance was assessed with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Consensus agreement among physician raters reporting hypothetic changes in treatment-related decisions based on fractional tumor burden was compared with actual real-time treatment decisions. RESULTS Mean lower fractional tumor burden, high fractional tumor burden, and relative CBV of the contrast-enhancing volume were significantly different between treatment effect and tumor (P = .002, P < .001, and P < .001), with tumor having significantly higher fractional tumor burden and relative CBV and lower fractional tumor burden. No significance was found with intermediate fractional tumor burden. Performance of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was the following: high fractional tumor burden, 0.85; low fractional tumor burden, 0.7; and relative CBV, 0.81. In comparing treatment decisions, there were disagreements in 7% of tumor and 44% of treatment effect cases; in the latter, all disagreements were in cases with scattered atypical cells. CONCLUSIONS High fractional tumor burden and low fractional tumor burden define fractions of the contrast-enhancing lesion volume with high and low blood volume, respectively, and can differentiate treatment effect from tumor in recurrent glioblastomas. Fractional tumor burden maps can also help to inform clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Iv
- From the Departments of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention (M.I., N.F.)
| | - X Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery (X.L.), Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - J Lavezo
- Pathology (J.L., R.G., S.L., D.E.B.)
| | - A J Gentles
- Medicine (Biomedical Informatics Research) (A.J.G.)
| | - R Ghanem
- Pathology (J.L., R.G., S.L., D.E.B.)
| | - S Lummus
- Pathology (J.L., R.G., S.L., D.E.B.)
| | - D E Born
- Pathology (J.L., R.G., S.L., D.E.B.)
| | | | - S Nagpal
- Neurology (Neuro-Oncology) (S.N., R.T., L.R.), Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - R Thomas
- Neurology (Neuro-Oncology) (S.N., R.T., L.R.), Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - L Recht
- Neurology (Neuro-Oncology) (S.N., R.T., L.R.), Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - N Fischbein
- From the Departments of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention (M.I., N.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Stokes AM, Semmineh NB, Nespodzany A, Bell LC, Quarles CC. Systematic assessment of multi-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using a digital reference object. Magn Reson Med 2019; 83:109-123. [PMID: 31400035 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brain tumor dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI is adversely impacted by T1 and T 2 ∗ contrast agent leakage effects that result in inaccurate hemodynamic metrics. While multi-echo acquisitions remove T1 leakage effects, there is no consensus on the optimal set of acquisition parameters. Using a computational approach, we systematically evaluated a wide range of acquisition strategies to determine the optimal multi-echo DSC-MRI perfusion protocol. METHODS Using a population-based DSC-MRI digital reference object (DRO), we assessed the influence of preload dosing (no preload and full dose preload), field strength (1.5 and 3T), pulse sequence parameters (echo time, repetition time, and flip angle), and leakage correction on relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and flow (rCBF) accuracy. We also compared multi-echo DSC-MRI protocols with standard single-echo protocols. RESULTS Multi-echo DSC-MRI is highly consistent across all protocols, and multi-echo rCBV (with or without use of a preload dose) had higher accuracy than single-echo rCBV. Regression analysis showed that choice of repetition time and flip angle had minimal impact on multi-echo rCBV and rCBV, indicating the potential for significant flexibility in acquisition parameters. The echo time combination had minimal impact on rCBV, though longer echo times should be avoided, particularly at higher field strengths. Leakage correction improved rCBV accuracy in all cases. Multi-echo rCBF was less biased than single-echo rCBF, although rCBF accuracy was reduced overall relative to rCBV. CONCLUSIONS Multi-echo acquisitions were more robust than single-echo, essentially decoupling both repetition time and flip angle from rCBV accuracy. Multi-echo acquisitions obviate the need for preload dosing, although leakage correction to remove residual T 2 ∗ leakage effects remains compulsory for high rCBV accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley M Stokes
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Natenael B Semmineh
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Ashley Nespodzany
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Laura C Bell
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - C Chad Quarles
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|