Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis to preoperative evaluate intracranial solitary fibrous tumor: Relationship to Ki-67 proliferation index.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2022;
220:107364. [PMID:
35872434 DOI:
10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107364]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE
To explore the value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis in preoperative evaluating intracranial solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) and further investigate the relationship between ADC histogram parameters and the Ki-67 proliferation index.
METHODS
From January 2014 to March 2022, 37 patients with intracranial SFT (grade 2, n = 20; grade 3, n = 17) who underwent preoperative diffusion-weighted imaging were enrolled in this study. For each tumor, nine histogram parameters were automatically extracted and selected using MaZda software based on the axial ADC maps of the whole tumor, including mean, variance, skewness, kurtosis, as well as the 1st, 10th, 50th, 90th, and 99th percentile ADC (Perc.01, Perc.10, Perc.50, Perc.90, Perc.99). Differences in ADC histogram parameters between grade 2 and 3 intracranial SFT were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to determine the diagnostic performance, and Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to investigate the relationship between these parameters and the Ki-67 proliferation index.
RESULTS
The mean, Perc.01, Perc.10, Perc.50, Perc.90, and Perc.99 were significantly lower in grade 3 than in grade 2 intracranial SFT (all P < 0.05). ROC analysis showed that these parameters can effectively distinguish between the two groups, with Perc.01 generating the best differentiation performance. Significant negative correlations were also observed between these parameters and the Ki-67 proliferation index (r = -0.436 ~ -0.522, all P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in variance, skewness, or kurtosis between the two groups (all P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
ADC histogram analysis enables effective preoperative distinction of grade 2 and grade 3 intracranial SFT.
Collapse