1
|
Blockeel C, Guivarc’h-Leveque A, Rongieres C, Swierkowski-Blanchard N, Porcu-Buisson G, Yazbeck C, Wyns C. From patient classification to optimized treatment in ART: the AMPLITUDE Delphi consensus. FRONTIERS IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2024; 6:1467322. [PMID: 39399814 PMCID: PMC11466932 DOI: 10.3389/frph.2024.1467322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2024] [Accepted: 09/12/2024] [Indexed: 10/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction A Delphi consensus was performed to evaluate expert opinions on the management of key aspects of ovarian stimulation. Methods A Scientific Committee developed eleven statements for patient profiles corresponding to predicted ovarian responses (low, normal, and high) based on antral follicle count (AFC) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH). The statements were distributed (online survey) to French and Belgian fertility specialists. Consensus was reached when ≥66.7% of participants agreed or disagreed. Results Among 52 respondents, a consensus agreement was reached for each patient profile for personalizing the initial dose of gonadotropin, taking age, weight, body mass index, nature of the cycle, and the decision to perform a fresh transfer or a freeze-all strategy into consideration. The respondents preferred a fresh transfer for low and normal responders and a freeze-all strategy in case of high risk of hyperstimulation, newly diagnosed uterine or tubal pathology and premature progesterone elevation. A consensus was reached for 10-15 oocytes as optimal oocyte target from the first round of voting. The panel agreed to increase the gonadotropin dose in case of insufficient response and preferred a GnRH antagonist protocol for a subsequent cycle in case of excessive response. Finally, a consensual answer was obtained for using LH/hCG activity in case of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, advanced age, inadequate response during first stimulation and suspected FSH receptor polymorphism. Discussion The AMPLITUDE consensus supports the importance of optimizing the ovarian stimulation protocol for patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment. Additional studies could complete these findings and guide fertility specialists in their daily practice to improve ovarian stimulation outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Blockeel
- Brussels IVF, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Catherine Rongieres
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Nelly Swierkowski-Blanchard
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Intercommunal Hospital Center, Poissy, France
- RHuMA-TEAM, UMR-BREED, UFR-SVS, UVSQ, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Géraldine Porcu-Buisson
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Institut de Médecine de la Reproduction, Marseille, France
| | - Chadi Yazbeck
- Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Reprogynes Medical Institute, Paris, France
- Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Groupe Hospitalier Privé Ambroise Paré Hartmann, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
| | - Christine Wyns
- Department of Gynecology-Andrology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jiang J, Kong N, Shi Q, Yan Y, Shen X, Mei J, Sun H, Huang C. Effect of Elevated Progesterone Levels on hCG Trigger Day on Clinical Pregnancy Outcome in Short-Acting GnRHa Downregulated Cycles. Int J Womens Health 2023; 15:1971-1979. [PMID: 38146586 PMCID: PMC10749555 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s437794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Previous studies suggested higher serum progesterone (P) levels were strongly associated with a lower clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). However, the effect of increased serum P levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration on clinical outcomes in short-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) downregulated IVF-ET cycles remains unclear. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study from January 2017 to December 2021, which included a total of 1664 patients receiving their first short-acting GnRHa IVF-ET cycles at our reproductive medicine centre of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. The smooth curve fitting and interaction analysis were employed to analyse the association between the CPR and the serum P levels with different embryo types (cleavage-stage embryo or blastocyst). In addition, total cycles were grouped according to different P levels on the trigger day of hCG administration for further analysis. Results The CPR of patients with increased serum P level (higher than 1.5 ng/mL) on the hCG day did not decrease. A smoothing curve fitting showed that the CPR did not change obviously with the increase in serum P levels. Subgroup analysis of different types of embryos transferred showed that no correlation was observed between the CPR and serum P levels on the day of hCG administration in cleavage-stage embryo transfer cycles. However, the CPR of patients receiving blastocyst transfer showed a downward trend with the increase in serum P levels. At the same time, an interaction analysis also confirmed that the CPR of blastocyst transfer was more likely to be affected by elevated serum P levels on the hCG day. Conclusion In the luteal phase short-acting GnRHa downregulated IVF-ET cycles, the elevated serum P levels on the hCG day did not affect the CPR of cleavage-stage embryo transfer but reduced the CPR of blastocyst transfer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingwen Jiang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Drum Tower Clinic Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
- Center for Molecular Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
| | - Na Kong
- Center for Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Drum Tower Clinic Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
- Center for Molecular Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qingqing Shi
- Center for Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Drum Tower Clinic Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
- Center for Molecular Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yuan Yan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Drum Tower Clinic Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
- Center for Molecular Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyue Shen
- Center for Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Drum Tower Clinic Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
- Center for Molecular Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jie Mei
- Center for Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Drum Tower Clinic Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
- Center for Molecular Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
| | - Haixiang Sun
- Center for Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Drum Tower Clinic Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
- Center for Molecular Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
| | - Chenyang Huang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Drum Tower Clinic Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
- Center for Molecular Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210008, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|