Co-trimoxazole-sensitive, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Israel, 1988-1997

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in people living with HIV and healthy people in Kathmandu, Nepal

AIM

This study aimed to compare methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal colonization in people living with HIV (PLHIV) and healthy people from Kathmandu.

METHODS

MRSA isolated from 400 nasal swabs was screened using a cefoxitin disc and confirmed by the presence of the mecA gene.

RESULTS

MRSA nasal carriers among the PLHIV and control cohorts were 3.5% (7 out of 200) and 5.0% (10 out of 200), respectively. All the MRSA from PLHIV and most of MRSA from healthy controls were PVL positive. Longer duration of antiretroviral therapy significantly reduces the risk of MRSA nasal colonization in PLHIV.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference in MRSA nasal colonization in PLHIV and healthy controls in this study region.

The new perspective of old antibiotic: In vitro antibacterial activity of TMP-SMZ against Klebsiella pneumoniae

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) is broadly administered to treat multiple infections, and the paucity of effective treatment alternatives for infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae has led to a renewed interest in TMP-SMZ. The aim of this study is to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of TMP-SMZ against K. pneumoniae.

METHODS

The resistance genes of K. pneumoniae clinical isolates were investigated by PCR, followed by conjugation experiments and multilocus sequence typing.

RESULTS

The resistance rate of K. pneumoniae to TMP-SMZ decreased over the collection period from 26.7% (88/330) to 16.9% (56/332). The high carrying rates (173/175, 98.9%) of resistance determinants (sul genes or dfr genes) were the main mechanisms of TMP-SMZ resistance isolates, with sul1 (142/175, 81.1%) and dfrA1 (119/175, 68.0%). Only class 1 integron was detected, the prevalence of which in TMP-SMZ resistant K. pneumoniae was 63.4% (111/175).

CONCLUSION

These results provided insights into the antimicrobial efficacy of TMP-SMZ against K. pneumoniae, also illustrating the wide distribution of SMZ and TMP resistance genes among resistant K. pneumoniae. Simultaneously, the present study highlights the significance of reasonable administration and effective continued monitoring.

Management of Staphylococcus Mediated Systemic Infection by Enhancing the Resurging Activity of Co-trimoxazole in Presence of Cryptdin-2

Resurgence of sensitivity of the antibiotics, to which the pathogen had developed resistance in the past, requires special attention for strengthening the reservoir of antimicrobial compounds. Reports in the recent past have suggested that co-trimoxazole (COT) has regained its activity against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The present study exploited the use of COT in the presence of an antimicrobial peptide (AMP), cryptdin-2 (a murine Paneth cell alpha defensin), in order to reduce the selective pressure of the antibiotic on the pathogen. In vitro antibacterial activity and in vivo efficacy of the combination was ascertained against MRSA induced systemic infection using a murine model. Observations of the present study might help in restoring the regained activity of conventional antibiotics, such as COT, when used in combination with novel antimicrobial molecules like AMPs. This might prove as a viable strategy to eliminate the chances of re-occurrence of resistance due to their multi-prong targeting and synergistically combating infections caused by these resistant pathogens.

Time trends in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, 1988-2010, in a tertiary center with high methicillin resistance rates

INTRODUCTION

Changes in the epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) have been described in recent decades. Decreased mortality has been reported over time, mostly from countries with low methicillin resistance rates. We aimed to describe time trends in SAB in a tertiary center with high methicillin resistance rates.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 1692 patients with SAB, and compared between three time periods: 1988-1994 (342 patients), 1998-2004 (597 patients) and 2005-2010 (753 patients).

RESULTS

In our cohort, 30 days mortality increased significantly with time, reaching 42.9 % during 2005-2010. The latter period was characterized by higher rates of older patients (35.1 % aged 80 years and older), with lower functional capacity (46.5 % bedridden) and higher rates of comorbidities (33.6 % renal disease, 24.8 % heart failure, 19.0 % dementia). These patients were more likely to be ventilated (18.7 %) and carry a urinary catheter at presentation (46.6 %); present with septic shock (15.9 %) and have pneumonia (20.5 %) or endocarditis (7.2 %) as source. Similar characteristics were found among patients younger than 50 years and with independent functional status. No significant increase in methicillin resistant Staph aureus (MRSA) rates or inappropriate empirical therapy was demonstrated during 2005-2010.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, increased mortality in recent years in patients with SAB can be explained by baseline condition of patients. MRSA or inappropriate empiric therapy did not explain the increase in mortality. The patients afflicted with SAB changed over time. Epidemiology and outcomes of SAB vary with time and according to geographical location. External validity of studies should be taken into consideration.

Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance pattern of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from clinical specimens in Ardabil, Iran

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Reports on MRSA strains are increasing worldwide. The aim of this study was to find the prevalence of MRSA strains isolated from clinical specimens and to evaluate their resistance profile. Additionally we compared the phenotypic and genotypic methods for detection of methicillin resistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 41 isolates of S. aureus were collected from clinical specimens at two teaching hospitals in Ardabil, Iran. All isolates were identified at the species level by standard biochemical tests. The methicillin resistance were evaluated using three methods: PCR for mecA gene, agar dilution for determination of oxacillin MIC and disk diffusion test to detect methicillin, oxacillin and cefoxitin resistance. Antimicrobial resistance patterns were determined by disk diffusion method.

RESULTS

The results identified 19 (46.3%) out of 41 isolates as MRSA. Most of the MRSA strains (68.4%) were isolated from patients hospitalized in ICU. All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, mupirocin and linezolid. Among other antibiotics co-trimoxazole was more active against MRSA isolates. Using PCR as reference method all the phenotypic tests showed 100% specificity. The sensitivity for MIC test and cefoxitin was 100% and for methicillin and oxacillin disks was 77.7% and 89.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of MRSA strains in our hospitals especially in ICU ward was high and disk diffusion testing using cefoxitin or oxacillin MIC test as an alternative to PCR for detection of MRSA is recommended.

Update on the appropriate use of linezolid in clinical practice

Multi-antibiotic resistant Gram-positive cocci, which include Staphylococcus aureus, the coagulase-negative staphylococcal group, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, and other streptococci, represent emerging pathogens especially in the setting of the immunocompromised, hospitalized patients, in particular when surgery, invasive procedures, or prosthetic implants are of concern, patients are admitted in intensive care units, or underlying chronic disorders and immunodeficiency are of concern, and broad-spectrum antibiotics or immunosuppressive drugs are widely administered. During the recent years, the phenomenon of multiresistant Gram-positive cocci is spreading to the community, where the retrieval of such microorganism is progressively increasing. The spectrum of available antimicrobial compounds for an effective management of these relevant infections is significantly impaired in selection and clinical efficacy by the emerging and spread of methicillin-resistant and more recently glycopeptide-resistant Gram-positive microbial strains. The first oxazolidinone derivative linezolid, together with the recently licensed quinupristin–dalfopristin, daptomycin, and tigecycline, followed by a number of glycopeptides, fluoroquinolones, and other experimental compounds on the pipeline, represent an effective response to the great majority of these concerns, due to their innovative mechanisms of action, their maintained or enhanced activity against multiresistant pathogens, their effective pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties, their frequent possibility of synergistic activity with other compounds effective against Gram-positive pathogens, and a diffuse potential for a safe and easy administration, also when compromised patients are of concern. The main problems related to the epidemiological and clinical features of multiresistant Gram-positive infection, the potential clinical indications of all recently available compounds compared with the standard of care of treatment of resistant Gram-positive infections, and updated data on efficacy and tolerability of linezolid as the golden standard compound for vancomycin-resistant Gram-positive cocci in multiple clinical situations, are outlined and updated on the ground of an extensive review of all the available, recent evidences coming from the international literature.

Emerging drugs for complicated skin and skin-structure infections

IMPORTANCE OF THE FILED: With the worldwide surge of MRSA, skin and skin-structure infection (SSTI) treatment has become a challenge for physicians. Cultures and antibiotic susceptibility tests for SSTIs are the rule due to the implication in morbidity and mortality rates associated with MRSA infections. The need for new antibiotics is evident and the effort to decrease antibiotic resistance is a world priority.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This manuscript accesses the actual treatments and the developing of antibiotics for MRSA SSTIs.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

This is a review of the data on the available and emerging treatments for MRSA SSTIs.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

There is an unmet medical need for new antibiotics in the new millennium. As physicians, we must assure all appropriate procedures are completed in order to reduce the bacterial resistance, especially for MRSA.

Co-trimoxazole versus vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of co-trimoxazole versus that of vancomycin in adults with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective matched cohort study. Thirty-eight patients with MRSA bacteraemia, treated with co-trimoxazole as the main therapeutic agent, were matched with 76 patients treated with vancomycin as the main agent. The groups were matched for age, sex, functional status, endovascular source of infection, appropriateness of empirical antibiotic therapy, presence of a foreign body, sepsis severity and Charlson score. The outcomes collected were 30 day mortality, persistent bacteraemia [defined as positive blood culture (BC) >14 days after the first positive BC, but within 30 days], relapse (defined as recurrence of the same phenotype >30 days after the first positive BC within 12 months) and adverse events.

RESULTS

The groups were well matched. Thirty day mortality was not significantly different between the groups [co-trimoxazole 13/38 (34.2%); vancomycin 31/76 (40.8%); odds ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.34-1.7]. There was only one case of relapse in the co-trimoxazole group (2.6%) compared with nine cases in the vancomycin group (11.8%). Incidence of relapse or persistent bacteraemia was lower in the co-trimoxazole group (3/38, 7.9%) than in the vancomycin group (13/76, 17.1%), although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.182). Development of renal failure was similar [co-trimoxazole 11/38 (28.9%); vancomycin 21/76 (27.6%)].

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of a small retrospective study, co-trimoxazole had a safety and efficacy profile similar to that of vancomycin and may offer an attractive additional therapeutic option for MRSA bacteraemia. A prospective, randomized controlled trial is warranted.

New therapeutic choices for infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

In recent years, a marked increase in the incidence of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has occurred in many countries. This review addresses the effectiveness and limitations of drugs classically used for the treatment of MRSA, e.g. vancomycin, and also newer anti-MRSA antimicrobials, e.g. second-generation glycolipopeptides, tigecycline, and beta-lactams.

Antibacterial susceptibility testing in the clinical laboratory

This article familiarizes the clinician with the principles of bacterial susceptibility testing and reporting to facilitate communication with the clinical microbiology laboratory. As resistance continues to emerge among a wide range of clinically relevant bacteria, the complexity of this communication increases. This updated version provides an overview of the important susceptibility concerns for most commonly isolated bacterial pathogens.

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a forgotten alternative?

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a growing infectious concern, mainly in the context of its rapid adaptation to novel antibiotic options for its treatment and the growing morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs associated with its emergence. the authors sought to investigate whether an older antibiotic, such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), may have a role in treating MRSA-related infections, according to the available literature on the subject. The authors reviewed literature data on: resistance of MRSA to SXT worldwide in recent years, efficacy of SXT for MRSA decolonization or prophylaxis from MRSA infections, and clinical therapeutic efficacy of SXT in treating mild or severe community-acquired or hospital-acquired MRSA infections. Resistance varies worldwide, in general being low in the industrialized world and higher in developing countries. SXT is one of the numerous understudied options for MRSA decolonization and is growingly recognized as potentially effective in preventing MRSA infections in certain settings. Limited data on its therapeutic efficacy are encouraging, at least for mild, community-acquired infections. SXT may represent a cost-effective alternative weapon against MRSA. Its utility against this increasingly threatening pathogen need clarification through further clinical trials.

Antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and its relevance in therapy

Staphylococcus aureus is a major cause of infections. Only approximately 20% of the strains remain sensitive to penicillin. Beta-lactamase stable penicillins such as flucloxacillin form the mainstay of treatment of staphylococcal infection. Meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) are resistant to all beta-lactam antibiotics. Glycopeptide antibiotics are effective against most MRSA strains but, in the last few years, isolates of MRSA that have reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides (glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus) have been isolated. Some strains exhibit frank resistance to glycopeptides (vancomycin-resistant S. aureus). Infections due to these strains are difficult to treat. This review summarises the therapeutic options for MRSA, glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus. Novel therapeutic strategies such as immunotherapy and vaccines are also discussed.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of linezolid compared with vancomycin for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the cost-effectiveness of linezolid and vancomycin in the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia (NP) caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

METHODS

A retrospective decision-analytic model was applied to pooled data from 2 prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind studies, and claims data from a large health plan (3.3 million members) located in the Mid-Atlantic region. Using hospital claims for patients in the health plan with suspected NP, we then determined their daily billed (submitted) hospital charges for 4 mutually exclusive potential health outcomes of linezolid or vancomycin treatment: survival with bacteremia, survival without bacteremia, nonsurvival with bacteremia, and nonsurvival without bacteremia. To generate the expected total daily billed hospital charge for each drug-treatment group, we weighted the determined daily billed hospital charges by the probabilities of each outcome developing in each treatment arm, as derived from the clinical-trial data. Drug acquisition costs were then incorporated, and the difference in expected total costs relative to the difference in rates of survival between the linezolid and vancomycin arms was used to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for linezolid.

RESULTS

Costs were higher for nonsurviving patients compared with surviving patients. Estimated median daily billed treatment charges were $2888 for linezolid and $2993 for vancomycin. Based on Monte Carlo simulations, the respective 95% CIs were $2671 to $3106 and $2615 to $3372. Using mean treatment durations of 11.3 and 10.7 days, respectively, we obtained expected total hospitalization charges of $32,636 for linezolid treatment (95% CI, $30,182-$35,098), compared with $32,024 for vancomycin treatment (95% CI, $27,978-$36,078). The ICER for linezolid per life saved was $3600.

CONCLUSIONS

The higher acquisition cost of linezolid was almost completely offset by improved survival and a reduction in health care costs associated with improved survival. As a result, linezolid was almost cost-neutral compared with vancomycin in the treatment of NP caused by MRSA.

Longitudinal trends in antimicrobial susceptibilities across long-term-care facilities: emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic resistance in the longterm-care facility (LTCF) setting is of increasing concern due to both the increased morbidity and mortality related to infections in this debilitated population and the potential for transfer of resistant organisms to other healthcare settings. Longitudinal trends in antibiotic resistance in LTCFs have not been well described.

DESIGN

Correlational longitudinal survey study.

SETTING

Four LTCFs in Pennsylvania.

SUBJECTS

All clinical cultures of residents of the participating LTCFs (700 total beds) from 1998 through 2003. We assessed the annual prevalence of resistance to various antimicrobials of interest for the following organisms: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and enterococcus species.

RESULTS

A total of 4,954 clinical isolates were obtained during the study. A high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance was noted for many organism-drug combinations. This was especially true for fluoroquinolone susceptibility among the Enterobacteriaceae (susceptibility range, 51.3% to 92.2%). In addition, the prevalence of resistance to various agents differed significantly across study sites. Finally, significant increasing trends in resistance were noted over time and were most pronounced for fluoroquinolone susceptibility among the Enterobacteriaceae.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance has increased significantly in LTCFs, although trends have varied substantially across different institutions. These trends have been particularly pronounced for fluoroquinolone resistance among the Enterobacteriaceae. These findings demonstrate that antimicrobial resistance is widespread and increasing in LTCFs, highlighting the need for future studies to more clearly elucidate the risk factors for, and potential interventions against, emerging resistance in these settings.

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as a viable treatment option for infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

OBJECTIVE

To review available data regarding the efficacy of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) for the treatment of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search was performed (January 1966-December 2003) using the search terms Staphylococcus aureus , sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, co-trimoxazole, and methicillin resistance. Abstracts from infectious diseases meetings also were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The reported rate of TMP-SMX resistance in S. aureus is highly variable. From a mechanistic standpoint, TMP-SMX resistance among MRSA appears to be distinct from multidrug resistance, although some anecdotal reports suggest otherwise. Clonal outbreaks of MRSA resistant to TMP-SMX have been described; of these, the Brazilian clone has more often been resistant to TMP-SMX than the Iberian clone. Rates of TMP-SMX resistance are particularly high in institutions serving large numbers of patients infected by the human immunodeficiency virus, due to increased exposure for Pneumocystis prophylaxis. Limited studies and case reports have found TMP-SMX useful against infections caused by MRSA.

CONCLUSIONS

A large body of anecdotal data, but only one randomized clinical trial, indicates the effectiveness of TMP-SMX as a treatment for MRSA infections. Double-blind, randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the two available oral agents-TMP-SMX and linezolid-against MRSA.

Antibacterial susceptibility testing in the clinical laboratory

This article familiarizes the clinician with the principles of bacterial susceptibility testing and reporting to facilitate communication with the clinical microbiology laboratory. The emergence of resistance in nearly all commonly isolated bacterial organisms has highlighted the need for ongoing dialogue between the laboratory and those who use its services.