The Influence of Polypharmacy on the Initiation of Anti-Dementia Therapy in Germany

Anti-dementia drugs: a descriptive study of the prescription pattern in Italy

INTRODUCTION

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) and memantine are currently the only anti-dementia drugs (ADDs) approved for treating Alzheimer's disease (AD) in Italy. This nationwide study aims to characterize dementia drug utilization in a population > 65 years, during 2018-2020.

METHODS

Different administrative healthcare databases were queried to collect both aggregate and individual data.

RESULTS

ADD consumption remained stable throughout the study period (~ 9 DDD/1000 inhabitants per day). AChEI consumption was over 5 DDD/1000 inhabitants per day. Memantine consumption was nearly 4 DDD/1000 inhabitants per day, representing 40% of ADD consumption. The prevalence of use of memantine represented nearly half of ADD consumption, substantially unchanged over the 3 years. Comparing the AD prevalence with the prevalence of ADDs use, the gap becomes wider as age increases. In 2019, the proportion of private purchases of ADDs was 38%, mostly represented by donepezil and rivastigmine. In 2020, memantine was the only ADD with an increase in consumption (Δ% 19-20, 1.3%).

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this study represents the first attempt to investigate the ADD prescription pattern in Italy with a Public Health approach. In 2019, the proportion of ADD private purchases point out several issues concerning the reimbursability of ADDs. From a regulatory perspective, ADDs can be reimbursed by the National Health System only to patients diagnosed with AD; therefore, the off-label use of ADDs in patients with mild cognitive impairment may partially explain this phenomenon. The study extends knowledge on the use of ADDs, providing comparisons with studies from other countries that investigate the prescription pattern of ADDs.

Changes in Polypharmacy and Psychotropic Medication Use After Diagnosis of Major Neurocognitive Disorders: A Population-based Study in Québec, Canada

BACKGROUND

Older adults with major neurocognitive disorder (MNCD) are often exposed to polypharmacy. We aimed to assess the prescribing and discontinuation patterns of medications following diagnosis of MNCD among community-dwelling older adults.

METHODS

Using the Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System, we conducted a population-based cohort study comparing 1-year prediagnosis and postdiagnosis use of medications between a group of individuals older than 65 years newly diagnosed with MNCD in 2016-2017 and a control group without MNCD. The difference-in-difference method was used to estimate the prediagnosis and postdiagnosis variation in the number of medications prescribed and in the proportion of psychotropic and anticholinergic medication users.

RESULTS

In the MNCD group, the mean number of medications used (excluding Alzheimer disease treatments) increased by 1.25 in the year after the diagnosis. The respective increase was 0.45 in the control group, yielding an adjusted difference-in-differences of 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.74; 0.87) between groups. The adjusted difference-in-differences in the proportions of antipsychotic, antidepressant, and anticholinergic medication users was 13.2% (12.5; 13.9), 7.1% (6.5; 7.7), and 3.8% (3.1; 4.6), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The medication burden among older adults tends to increase in the year following a diagnosis of MNCD. The use of antipsychotics and antidepressants may explain a part of the observed increase.

Polypharmacy in chronic neurological diseases: Multiple sclerosis, dementia and Parkinson's disease

Polypharmacy is an important aspect of medication management and particularly affects elderly and chronically ill people. Patients with dementia, Parkinson's disease (PD) or multiple sclerosis (MS) are at high risk for multimedication due to their complex symptomatology. Our aim was to provide an overview of different definitions of polypharmacy and to present the current state of research on polypharmacy in patients with dementia, PD or MS. The most common definition of polypharmacy in the literature is the concomitant use of ≥5 medications (quantitative definition approach). Polypharmacy rates of up to >50% have been reported for patients with dementia, PD or MS, although MS patients are on average significantly younger than those with dementia or PD. The main predictor of polypharmacy is the complex symptom profile of these neurological disorders. Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), drug-drug interactions, poor treatment adherence, severe disease course, cognitive impairment, hospitalisation, poor quality of life, frailty and mortality have been associated with polypharmacy in patients with dementia, PD or MS. For patients with polypharmacy, either the avoidance of PIM (selective deprescribing) or the substitution of PIM with more suitable drugs (appropriate polypharmacy) is recommended to achieve a more effective therapeutic management.

Effect of Multiple Medicines on Dementia Initial Treatment: Experience and Thinking

Little is known about multiple medicines and initial therapy among people with dementia. To examine the effect of multiple medicines on the initiation of anti-dementia therapy in patients diagnosed with cognitive impairment (CI), a retrospective study with 2742 CI patients was conducted based on the outpatients' medical records. The dementias receiving 1-2 drugs were more likely to be prescribed with anti-dementia (one drug: OR = 1.877; two drugs: OR = 1.770) and psychotropic (one drug: OR = 1.980) treatment, whereas had lower chances of receiving psychotropic medication with the combinations of more than three drugs (Alzheimer's disease: OR = .365; vascular dementia: OR = .940; frontotemporal lobe degeneration: OR = .957; and dementia with Lewy bodies/Parkinson's disease dementia: OR = .952). Multiple medicines can affect anti-dementia therapy initiation in dementia patients and should be paid extreme caution.

Effect of a Social Norm Email Feedback Program on the Unnecessary Prescription of Nimodipine in Ambulatory Care of Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Nimodipine is a highly prescribed drug for the treatment of cognitive impairment and dementia in Argentina. There is little evidence to support the use of nimodipine for cognitive impairment and dementia.

OBJECTIVE

To test the effectiveness of a behavioral intervention based on social norm feedback to reduce prescription of nimodipine for cognitive impairment in Argentina.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This pragmatic parallel-group randomized clinical trial included 2 arms with a 1:1 allocation ratio. General practitioner physicians in the national health care system for older adults in Argentina (INSSJP-PAMI) with history of high nimodipine prescription rate were enrolled. The study was conducted from May 2019 to October 2019, and data were analyzed from November 2019 to February 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

The treatment group received 2 emails with evidence-based information about nimodipine plus the individual's level of nimodipine prescription compared with their peers. The control group received 2 emails with general information about the risks of overprescription in older adults.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the cumulative number of nimodipine prescriptions per 1000 prescriptions of all drugs made by the targeted physicians during the 6 months of the study. Secondary outcomes included annual monetary savings attributable to the intervention and physicians' qualitative perceptions of the acceptability of the procedure.

RESULTS

Of 1811 physicians enrolled, 906 physicians (354 [39.1%] women; mean [SD] age, 57.10 [10.73] years) were randomized to treatment and 905 participants (331 [36.6%] women; mean [SD] age, 56.49 [10.47] years) to the control group. Physicians in the treatment group wrote a mean of 93.25 (95% CI, 89.27 to 97.24) prescriptions of nimodipine, compared with 98.99 (95% CI, 95.00 to 102.98) prescriptions among practitioners in the control group during the half-year of the intervention (mean difference, -5.73 [95% CI, -11.38 to -0.10] prescriptions; P = .046), which meant a 5.79% reduction. Regression analysis revealed a significant association of the group condition with number of prescriptions per 1000 total prescriptions when controlling for baseline prescriptions (B = -0.312 [95% CI, -0.465 to -0.160]; P < .001). The observed difference corresponds to a 4.48% reduction in nimodipine prescriptions per 1000 prescriptions of all drugs made by physicians in the treated group compared with the control group. Physicians who effectively opened the email in the treatment group (427 physicians [47.1%]) prescribed the drug 11.3% less compared with the control group (426 physicians) (mean difference, -10.78 [95% CI, -18.53 to -3.03] prescriptions; P = .006). Expenditures were 7.18% lower in the treatment group, resulting in an estimated annual net cost benefit of US $234 893.35 (95% CI, $225 565.35 to $237 112.30).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, the social norm email feedback program showed an effect on curbing the nonrecommended prescription of nimodipine. It was highly cost-effective and well accepted by participants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN.org identifier: ISRCTN17823729.

Pharmaceutical Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: Utilization and Disparities

BACKGROUND

Four prescription drugs (donepezil, galantamine, memantine, and rivastigmine) are approved by the US FDA to treat symptoms of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Even modest effectiveness could potentially reduce the population-level burden of AD and related dementias (ADRD), especially for women and racial/ethnic minorities who have higher incidence of ADRD.

OBJECTIVE

Describe the prevalence of antidementia drug use and timing of initiation relative to ADRD diagnosis among a nationally representative group of older Americans, and if there are disparities in prevalence and timing by sex and race/ethnicity.

METHODS

Descriptive analyses and logistic regressions of Medicare claims (2008-2016) for beneficiaries who had an ADRD or dementia-related symptom diagnosis, or use of an FDA approved drug for AD. We investigate prevalence of use and timing of treatment initiation relative to ADRD diagnosis across time and beneficiary characteristics (age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, comorbidities).

RESULTS

Among persons diagnosed with ADRD or related symptoms, 33.3% used an approved drug over the study period. Odds of use was higher among Whites than non-Whites. Among ADRD drug users, 40% initiated use within 6 months of the initial ADRD or related symptoms diagnosis, and 16% initiated prior to a diagnosis. We observed disparities by race/ethnicity: 28% of Asians, 24% of Hispanics, 16% of Blacks, and 15% of Whites initiated prior to diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of antidementia drugs is relatively low and varies widely by race/ethnicity. Heterogeneity in timing of initiation and use may affect health and cost outcomes, but these effects merit further study.

Relevance of Coded Prodromal Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Routine Treatment of Patients with Dementia in Germany

Little is known about the impact of prior mild cognitive impairment (MCI, ICD-10: F06.7) diagnosis on the time to dementia diagnosis, anti-dementia drug therapy, and treatment persistence in patients with dementia (PWD). Patients with dementia diagnoses who started anti-dementia therapy between January 2010 and December 2016 were selected from 203 neurological/psychiatric practices in the Disease Analyzer databank (IQVIA). Patients with a history of MCI were compared to non-MCI controls in terms of demographic characteristics, anti-dementia therapy, and the rate of persistence with anti-dementia drugs. For persistence analyses, a 1:1 matching procedure was used based on age, gender, type of residence, and depression and dementia diagnosis. Persistence was represented using Kaplan-Meier curves. A Cox regression analysis was used to determine the influence of MCI diagnosis on persistence with anti-dementia drugs. 339 PWD with MCI diagnoses and 339 controls were available for analysis. PWD with MCI were younger (78.9 versus 80.4 years), less likely to live in a nursing home (8.5% versus 22.5%), more frequently received donepezil (40.1% versus 33.7%), and more likely to exhibit comorbid depression (29.6% versus 16.9%). There was no association between the risk of treatment discontinuation and prior MCI diagnosis. After 24 months, 40% versus 41.1% of patients had discontinued treatment. The prior MCI diagnosis presumably led to an earlier diagnosis of dementia and earlier anti-dementia treatment. Treatment continuity did not differ, which would suggest that it does not depend on prior MCI diagnosis but on the behavior of patients and their caregiving relatives.