Self and Informant Memory Reports in FINGER: Associations with Two-Year Cognitive Change

Associations between Informant-Reported Cognitive Complaint and Longitudinal Cognitive Decline in Subjective Cognitive Decline A 7-Year Longitudinal Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the predictive values of informant-reported memory decline (IMD) among subjective cognitive decline (SCD) older adults from a 7-year community-based cohort study.

METHOD

Ninety SCD participants were included. Demographic data and neuropsychological test scores at both baseline and 7-year follow-up were collected. Differences between SCD with IMD (+IMD) and SCD without IMD (-IMD) were compared. Logistic regression models were used to determine whether baseline IMD could predict diagnostic outcomes at 7-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Forty-one percent of SCD adults had IMD. At baseline, the +IMD group showed more depressive symptoms (p = 0.016) than the -IMD group. Furthermore, the Beijing-version Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Digit Span Test-Forward, Visual Matching and Reasoning, and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-RC Picture Completion (WAIS-PC) scores in the +IMD group were significantly lower than those in the -IMD group. Fifty-four percent of +IMD participants converted to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia at follow-up, and 22.6% of the -IMD participants converted to MCI. Follow-up Mini-Mental State Examination, MoCA, and Verbal Fluency Test scores of the +IMD group were significantly lower than those in the -IMD group. The +IMD group was more likely to progress to cognitive impairment at 7-year follow-up (OR = 3.361, p = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

SCD participants with +IMD may have poorer cognition and are more likely to convert to cognitive impairment over time. Our long-term follow-up study confirmed the importance of informants' perceptions of SCD, which can help clinicians identify individuals at risk of cognitive decline.

Post-Approval Research in Drug Development: Priorities and Practices

A prescriber might ask if a new medication is a good option for use in the patients he or she sees in clinic, with their particular blends of demographic and comorbid clinical characteristics. Is this medicine more effective, safe, tolerable, or affordable than the options used in the past? A payer may ask if the new medication offers a more effective, cost-efficient, or convenient alternative to those treatments already being covered. These are the types of questions that are often difficult to answer on the basis of the clinical trials used to support a medication's initial approval, which are generally designed to evaluate a medication's efficacy, safety, and tolerability in narrowly defined patient populations. Consequently, in order to answer the questions most relevant to key stakeholders (i.e., regulators, patients, and clinicians), it is important to continue to examine a medication's impact and characteristics after it has received regulatory approval. Such studies vary in their purpose, scope, and methodology. In this chapter, we review the types of questions most likely to be investigated after regulatory approval, the methods generally used to investigate them, and the characteristics typically considered when prioritizing the allocation of resources.

The Challenge of Subjective Cognitive Complaints and Executive Functions in Middle-Aged Adults as a Preclinical Stage of Dementia: A Systematic Review

Subjective cognitive complaints correspond to a heterogeneous construct that frequently occurs in the early stages of older adult life. Despite being a common source of worry for middle-aged people, it can be underestimated when clinical and neuropsychological assessments discard any underlying pathological processes. Negative age stereotyping but also self-stereotyping can contribute to doing so. Although its diagnosis is a challenge, its implication as a possible predictor of mild cognitive impairment or dementia increases the interest in its early diagnosis and intervention. The present systematic review analyzes the empirical data on the relationship between these complaints and early executive dysfunction with possible predictive value for preclinical stages of dementia. The sixteen papers obtained from the PubMed and Embase databases were exploratory, cross-sectional and prospective in scope. The studies corroborated the relationship between subjective cognitive complaints and some executive processes, which is noteworthy since many people with subjective executive complaints progress to dementia. The relational studies confirmed that impaired executive performance is associated with CSF biomarkers and reduced cortical volume in specific brain regions. However, the heterogeneity of reports in these studies demands stronger efforts in future research with specific tools applied in clinical and neuropsychological assessments and analyzed under a gender perspective.

Learning to play golf for elderly people with subjective memory complaints: feasibility of a single-blinded randomized pilot trial

BACKGROUND

Subjective Memory Complaints (SMC) in elderly people due to preclinical Alzheimer's Disease may be associated with dysregulation of the Kynurenine Pathway (KP), with an increase in neurotoxic metabolites that affect cognition. Golf is a challenging sport with high demands on motor, sensory, and cognitive abilities, which might bear the potential to attenuate the pathological changes of preclinical AD. This trial investigated the feasibility of learning to play golf for elderly with cognitive problems and its effects on cognitive functions and the KP.

METHODS

In a 22-week single-blinded randomized controlled trial, elderly people with SMC were allocated to the golf (n = 25, 180 min training/week) or control group (n = 21). Primary outcomes were feasibility (golf exam, adherence, adverse events) and general cognitive function (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale). Secondary outcomes include specific cognitive functions (Response Inhibition, Corsi Block Tapping Test, Trail Making Test), KP metabolites and physical performance (6-Minute-Walk-Test). Baseline-adjusted Analysis-of-Covariance was conducted for each outcome.

RESULTS

42 participants were analyzed. All participants that underwent the golf exam after the intervention passed it (20/23). Attendance rate of the golf intervention was 75 %. No adverse events or drop-outs related to the intervention occurred. A significant time*group interaction (p = 0.012, F = 7.050, Cohen's d = 0.89) was found for correct responses on the Response Inhibition task, but not for ADAS-Cog. Moreover, a significant time*group interaction for Quinolinic acid to Tryptophan ratios (p = 0.022, F = 5.769, Cohen's d = 0.84) in favor of the golf group was observed. An uncorrected negative correlation between attendance rate and delta Quinolinic acid to Kynurenic acid ratios in the golf group (p = 0.039, r=-0.443) was found as well.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that learning golf is feasible and safe for elderly people with cognitive problems. Preliminary results suggest positive effects on attention and the KP. To explore the whole potential of golfing and its effect on cognitive decline, a larger cohort should be studied over a longer period with higher cardiovascular demands.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was retrospectively registered (2nd July 2018) at the German Clinical Trials Register ( DRKS00014921 ).