Short Pulse and Conventional Deep Brain Stimulation Equally Improve the Parkinsonian Gait Disorder

Proceedings of the 11th Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: pushing the forefront of neuromodulation with functional network mapping, biomarkers for adaptive DBS, bioethical dilemmas, AI-guided neuromodulation, and translational advancements

The Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Think Tank XI was held on August 9-11, 2023 in Gainesville, Florida with the theme of "Pushing the Forefront of Neuromodulation". The keynote speaker was Dr. Nico Dosenbach from Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri. He presented his research recently published in Nature inn a collaboration with Dr. Evan Gordon to identify and characterize the somato-cognitive action network (SCAN), which has redefined the motor homunculus and has led to new hypotheses about the integrative networks underpinning therapeutic DBS. The DBS Think Tank was founded in 2012 and provides an open platform where clinicians, engineers, and researchers (from industry and academia) can freely discuss current and emerging DBS technologies, as well as logistical and ethical issues facing the field. The group estimated that globally more than 263,000 DBS devices have been implanted for neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. This year's meeting was focused on advances in the following areas: cutting-edge translational neuromodulation, cutting-edge physiology, advances in neuromodulation from Europe and Asia, neuroethical dilemmas, artificial intelligence and computational modeling, time scales in DBS for mood disorders, and advances in future neuromodulation devices.

Deep brain stimulation with short versus conventional pulse width in Parkinson's disease and essential tremor: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To maximize clinical benefit and minimize stimulation-induced side effects, optimising deep brain stimulation (DBS) parameters is paramount. Recent literature suggests a potential benefit of short pulse width DBS (spDBS; ≤40 μs) over conventional pulse width DBS (cDBS; ≥60 μs) in movement disorders.

OBJECTIVE

To compare therapeutic window (TW), therapeutic and side effects and energy consumption of spDBS and cDBS in movement disorders.

METHODS

We systematically searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Appropriate paired analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Nine Parkinson's disease (PD) (143 patients), 4 essential tremor (ET) (26 patients) and no dystonia studies were included in the meta-analysis. TW defined as therapeutic amplitude range was larger with spDBS vs. cDBS in PD (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -1.04, p < 0.001) and ET (SMD = -0.71, p < 0.001), but the TW in terms of charge per pulse (CPP) did not differ. In PD, no differences were found in therapeutic and side effects (MDS-UPDRS-III, speech and gait, dyskinesia, non-motor symptoms and quality of life). In ET, Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale was lower with spDBS vs. cDBS (SMD = 0.36, p < 0.001). A qualitative analysis suggested fewer stimulation-induced side effects with spDBS. CPP was lower with spDBS vs. cDBS in PD (SMD = 0.79, p < 0.001) and ET (MD = 46.46 nC, p < 0.001), but real-world data on battery longevity are lacking.

CONCLUSION

Although spDBS enlarges the TW as a wider amplitude range in both PD and ET, it does not alter TW defined by CPP. The therapeutic efficacy of spDBS is not different from cDBS in PD, but spDBS apparently induces more tremor reduction in ET.

Effect of subthalamic coordinated reset deep brain stimulation on Parkinsonian gait

Introduction

Coordinated Reset Deep Brain Stimulation (CR DBS) is a novel DBS approach for treating Parkinson's disease (PD) that uses lower levels of burst stimulation through multiple contacts of the DBS lead. Though CR DBS has been demonstrated to have sustained therapeutic effects on rigidity, tremor, bradykinesia, and akinesia following cessation of stimulation, i.e., carryover effect, its effect on Parkinsonian gait has not been well studied. Impaired gait is a disabling symptom of PD, often associated with a higher risk of falling and a reduced quality of life. The goal of this study was to explore the carryover effect of subthalamic CR DBS on Parkinsonian gait.

Methods

Three non-human primates (NHPs) were rendered Parkinsonian and implanted with a DBS lead in the subthalamic nucleus (STN). For each animal, STN CR DBS was delivered for several hours per day across five consecutive days. A clinical rating scale modified for NHP use (mUPDRS) was administered every morning to monitor the carryover effect of CR DBS on rigidity, tremor, akinesia, and bradykinesia. Gait was assessed quantitatively before and after STN CR DBS. The stride length and swing speed were calculated and compared to the baseline, pre-stimulation condition.

Results

In all three animals, carryover improvements in rigidity, bradykinesia, and akinesia were observed after CR DBS. Increased swing speed was observed in all the animals; however, improvement in stride length was only observed in NHP B2. In addition, STN CR DBS using two different burst frequencies was evaluated in NHP B2, and differential effects on the mUPDRS score and gait were observed.

Discussion

Although preliminary, our results indicate that STN CR DBS can improve Parkinsonian gait together with other motor signs when stimulation parameters are properly selected. This study further supports the continued development of CR DBS as a novel therapy for PD and highlights the importance of parameter selection in its clinical application.

Subthalamic 85 Hz deep brain stimulation improves walking pace and stride length in Parkinson's disease patients

BACKGROUND

Mobile gait sensors represent a compelling tool to objectify the severity of symptoms in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (iPD), but also to determine the therapeutic benefit of interventions. In particular, parameters of Deep Brain stimulation (DBS) with its short latency could be accurately assessed using sensor data. This study aimed at gaining insight into gait changes due to different DBS parameters in patients with subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS.

METHODS

An analysis of various gait examinations was performed on 23 of the initially enrolled 27 iPD patients with chronic STN DBS. Stimulation settings were previously adjusted for either amplitude, frequency, or pulse width in a randomised order. A linear mixed effects model was used to analyse changes in gait speed, stride length, and maximum sensor lift.

RESULTS

The findings of our study indicate significant improvements in gait speed, stride length, and leg lift measurable with mobile gait sensors under different DBS parameter variations. Notably, we observed positive results at 85 Hz, which proved to be more effective than often applied higher frequencies and that these improvements were traceable across almost all conditions. While pulse widths did produce some improvements in leg lift, they were less well tolerated and had inconsistent effects on some of the gait parameters. Our research suggests that using lower frequencies of DBS may offer a more tolerable and effective approach to enhancing gait in individuals with iPD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results advocate for lower stimulation frequencies for patients who report gait difficulties, especially those who can adapt their DBS settings remotely. They also show that mobile gait sensors could be incorporated into clinical practice in the near future.

WITHDRAWN: Laterality and frequency settings of subthalamic nucleus DBS for Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal.

Parkinson's disease - current treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose is to review the results and impact of recent studies for current and future treatment of both motor and non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD).

RECENT FINDINGS

New formulations of levodopa further optimize motor fluctuations, allowing for more on-time and less dyskinesia. On demand apomorphine continues to showcase itself as an effective and tolerable tool for treating motor off-periods. Though there are no clear treatment guidelines for PD-related constipation and sleep related disorders, several new agents for these non-motor symptoms show promising preliminary data. Expiratory muscle strength training may represent a useful and cost-effective strategy to alleviate oropharyngeal dysphagia associated with PD. There is evidence to suggest that the use of shorter pulse width and directional deep brain stimulation leads can results in a greater therapeutic window.

SUMMARY

Though no interventions currently exist to significantly modify the disease progression of PD, new studies continue to give insight into optimal symptomatic management. Clinicians should be familiar with expanding the repertoire of tools available to treat the diverse range of symptoms and challenges associated with PD.

Efficacy of short pulse and conventional deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a common treatment for Parkinson's disease. However, the clinical efficacy of short pulse width DBS (spDBS) compared with conventional DBS (cDBS) is still unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis investigated the effectiveness of spDBS versus cDBS in patients with PD.

METHODS

Four databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase) were independently searched until October 2021 by two reviewers. We utilized the following scales and items: therapeutic windows (TW), efficacy threshold, side effect threshold, Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III off-medication score, Speech Intelligence Test (SIT), and Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG-Q).

RESULTS

The analysis included seven studies with a total of 87 patients. The results indicated that spDBS significantly widened the therapeutic windows (0.99, 95% CI = 0.61 to 1.38) while increasing the threshold amplitudes of side effects (2.25, 95% CI = 1.69 to 2.81) and threshold amplitudes of effects (1.60, 95% CI = 0.84 to 2.36). There was no statistically significant difference in UPDRS part III, SIT, and FOG-Q scores between spDBS and cDBS groups, suggesting that treatment with both cDBS and spDBS may result in similar effects of improved dysarthria and gait disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with cDBS, spDBS is effective in expanding TW. Both types of deep brain stimulation resulted in improved gait disorders and speech intelligibility.

Effects of deep brain stimulation on the kinematics of gait and balance in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Advanced stages of idiopathic Parkinson's disease are often characterised by gait alterations and postural instability. Despite improvements in patients' motor symptoms after deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus, its effects on gait and balance remain a matter of debate. This study investigated the effects of deep brain stimulation on balance and kinematic parameters of gait.

METHODS

The gait of 26 patients with advanced idiopathic Parkinson's disease was analysed before and after (between 3 and 6 months) after bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. Computerised analysis was used to study cadence, number of cycles with the correct support sequence, number of cycles, duration of the cycle stages, and knee and ankle goniometry. Balance, postural instability, and mobility were assessed using the Tinetti and Timed Up and Go test.

FINDINGS

After stimulation, the following changes were significant (p < 0.01): number of cycles with the correct support sequence, number of total cycles, and foot contact. Patients improved significantly (p < 0.01) in the Tinetti and Timed Up and Go tests, the risk factors for falls changed from high (median 17) to low (median 25), and they improved from minor dependence (statistical median 14) to normality (statistical median 8.70).

INTERPRETATION

Deep brain stimulation to inhibit hyperactivity of the subthalamic nucleus was associated with an improvement in the space-time variables of gait and balance in patients with Parkinson's disease for up to 3-6 months. These results highlight the major role of the subthalamic nucleus in motor control mechanisms during locomotion and balance.

A Randomized, Double-Blinded Crossover Trial of Short Versus Conventional Pulse Width Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson’s Disease

Background:

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is a well-established treatment for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Previous acute challenge studies suggested that short pulse widths might increase the therapeutic window while maintaining motor symptom control with a decrease in energy consumption. However, only little is known about the effect of short pulse width stimulation beyond the setting of an acute challenge.

Objective:

To compare 4 weeks of STN-DBS with conventional pulse width stimulation (60 μs) to 4 weeks of STN-DBS with short pulse width stimulation (30 μs) regarding motor symptom control.

Methods:

This study was a monocentric, double-blinded, randomized crossover non-inferiority trial investigating whether short pulse width stimulation with 30 μs maintains equal motor control as conventional 60 μs stimulation over a period of 4 weeks (German Clinical Trials Register No. DRKS00017528). Primary outcome was the difference in motor symptom control as assessed by a motor diary. Secondary outcomes included energy consumption measures, non-motor effects, side-effects, and quality of life.

Results:

Due to a high dropout rate, the calculated sample size of 27 patients was not met and 24 patients with Parkinson’s disease and STN-DBS were included in the final analysis. However, there were no differences in any investigated outcome parameter between the two treatment conditions.

Conclusion:

This study demonstrates that short pulse width settings (30 μs) provide non-inferior motor symptom control as conventional (60 μs) stimulation without significant differences in energy consumption. Future studies are warranted to evaluate a potential benefit of short pulse width settings in patients with pronounced dyskinesia.

Troubleshooting Gait Disturbances in Parkinson's Disease With Deep Brain Stimulation

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus or the globus pallidus is an established treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD) that yields a marked and lasting improvement of motor symptoms. Yet, DBS benefit on gait disturbances in PD is still debated and can be a source of dissatisfaction and poor quality of life. Gait disturbances in PD encompass a variety of clinical manifestations and rely on different pathophysiological bases. While gait disturbances arising years after DBS surgery can be related to disease progression, early impairment of gait may be secondary to treatable causes and benefits from DBS reprogramming. In this review, we tackle the issue of gait disturbances in PD patients with DBS by discussing their neurophysiological basis, providing a detailed clinical characterization, and proposing a pragmatic programming approach to support their management.

Combined Stimulation of the Substantia Nigra and the Subthalamic Nucleus for the Treatment of Refractory Gait Disturbances in Parkinson's Disease: A Preliminary Study

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is efficient for the treatment of motor symptoms (i.e., tremors) in patients with Parkinson's disease. Gait disorders usually appear during advanced stages of idiopathic Parkinson's disease in up to 80% of patients and have an important impact on their quality of life. The effects of deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus on gait and balance are still controversial. For this reason, alternative targets have been considered, such as stimulation of the pedunculopontine nucleus and the pars reticulata of substantia nigra, involved in the integration of the functional connections for gait. Due to the proximity of the subthalamic nucleus to the substantia nigra, their combined stimulation is feasible and may lead to better outcomes, improving axial symptoms. Our objective was to prospectively compare simultaneous stimulation of both structures versus conventional subthalamic stimulation in improving gait disorders. In ten patients with advanced Parkinson's disease, deep brain stimulation leads (eight linear contacts) were implanted, and gait analysis was performed 6 months after surgery in off-stimulation and after 4 weeks of dual or single subthalamic stimulation. An improvement in gait parameters was confirmed with both stimulation conditions, with better results with combined substantia nigra and subthalamic stimulation compared with conventional subthalamic stimulation. Further studies are needed to determine if this effect remains after long-term dual-target stimulation.

A Randomized, Double-Blinded Crossover Trial of Short Versus Conventional Pulse Width Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is a well-established treatment for patients with Parkinson's disease. Previous acute challenge studies suggested that short pulse widths might increase the therapeutic window while maintaining motor symptom control with a decrease in energy consumption. However, only little is known about the effect of short pulse width stimulation beyond the setting of an acute challenge.

OBJECTIVE

To compare 4 weeks of STN-DBS with conventional pulse width stimulation (60 μs) to 4 weeks of STN-DBS with short pulse width stimulation (30 μs) regarding motor symptom control.

METHODS

This study was a monocentric, double-blinded, randomized crossover non-inferiority trial investigating whether short pulse width stimulation with 30 μs maintains equal motor control as conventional 60 μs stimulation over a period of 4 weeks (German Clinical Trials Register No. DRKS00017528). Primary outcome was the difference in motor symptom control as assessed by a motor diary. Secondary outcomes included energy consumption measures, non-motor effects, side-effects, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Due to a high dropout rate, the calculated sample size of 27 patients was not met and 24 patients with Parkinson's disease and STN-DBS were included in the final analysis. However, there were no differences in any investigated outcome parameter between the two treatment conditions.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that short pulse width settings (30 μs) provide non-inferior motor symptom control as conventional (60 μs) stimulation without significant differences in energy consumption. Future studies are warranted to evaluate a potential benefit of short pulse width settings in patients with pronounced dyskinesia.