Use of acidified versus non-acidified liquid human milk fortifier in very low birth weight infants: A retrospective comparison of clinical outcomes

Acid/base balance in fortified donor human milk: An experimental study

BACKGROUND

Our goal was to quantify the pH and total acidity of human milk fortified with human milk fortifiers (HMFs), powder infant formulas, and protein additives.

METHODS

Commercial liquid HMFs and powder infant formulas were added to pasteurized pooled donor human milk in triplicate and stirred. The pH of unfortified and fortified human milk at 22, 24, 26, 27, 28, and 30 kcal/ounce (624, 680, 737, 765, 794, and 850 kcal/g, respectively) was determined using a pH meter. Phenolphthalein acidity at 24 and 30 kcal/ounce (680 and 850 kcal/g, respectively) was determined using diluted sodium hydroxide.

RESULTS

The pH of unfortified human milk increased within the first hour (6.52 ± 0.06 vs 6.62 ± 0.05, P < 0.0001). Changes in pH largely correlated with caloric density; however, directional changes varied considerably between HMFs and powder infant formulas. Two liquid HMFs demonstrated modest reductions in pH with increasing caloric density whereas one liquid HMF alkalinized human milk with increasing caloric density (analysis of variance P < 0.0001). Phenolphthalein acidity was significantly higher for five HMFs and lower for one HMF at 30 kcal/ounce (850 kcal/g) but not 24 kcal/ounce (680 kcal/g). Powder infant formulas generally increased pH with increasing caloric density (analysis of variance P < 0.0001), but no differences in phenolphthalein acidity were noted.

CONCLUSION

Changes in acid/base balancefor fortified human milk are variable and may be a consideration when selecting a fortifying agent for human milk.

Human milk pH is associated with fortification, postpartum day, and maternal dietary intake in preterm mother-infant dyads

OBJECTIVE

To compare pH of human milk types (mother's own milk (MOM), pasteurized donor human milk (PDHM), fortified MOM, and fortified PDHM) fed to preterm infants.

STUDY DESIGN

This observational study consisted of 63 mother-infant dyads < 34 weeks gestation. Human milk samples (n = 245), along with maternal factors, were collected for pH analysis. pH of MOM was analyzed over the course of lactation accounting for fortification status, postpartum day, and storage conditions.

RESULTS

Mean pH of MOM was slightly acidic at 6.60 ± 0.28, which was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than other milk types. pH of MOM varied by fortification, postpartum day, and maternal vegetable/fiber intake. There was a significant interaction between fortification status and postpartum day; pH of MOM decreased over time, while pH of fortified MOM increased over time.

CONCLUSION

pH of human milk varied by type. pH of MOM was significantly associated with fortification status, postpartum day, and maternal vegetable/fiber intake.

Acidified Feedings in Preterm Infants: A Historical and Physiological Perspective

The use of acidified milk for feeding infants has a long, interesting history that appears to have developed from the use of buttermilk in Holland as early as the late 19th century for feeding infants with diarrhea. Physicians in the early 20th century assumed that the observed benefits were from buttermilk's acidity leading to the practice of acidifying infant formula. The historical and physiological perspective on the use of acidified infant formula is now especially relevant with the emergence of an acidified liquid human milk fortifier for preterm infants. Here, we review that history, with a deeper dive into the contemporary research on the use of acidified human milk fortifiers, the consequences for preterm infants, and the underlying physiological mechanisms. KEY POINTS: · In the late 19th and early 20th century acidified feedings were in common use for sick infants.. · By the mid-20th century, acidified feedings tested in preterm infants resulted in acidic physiology and poor growth.. · The current practice of acidifying feedings in preterm infants has been associated with metabolic acidosis, poor tolerance, and delayed growth..

Powdered to Liquid Human Milk Fortifiers in the Preterm Infant

In preterm infants, the goal of aggressive extrauterine nutritional management is to mimic in utero growth and nutrient accretion. Over the latter half of the 20th century, nutritional optimization through the practice of fortifying human milk rose to practice with increased survival rates in preterm infants of younger gestational age. The quest for optimal preterm fortification and nutrition remains a contentious area of debate. This review aims to summarize the historical perspectives of human milk fortification as well as the current literature advocating for the use of liquid human milk fortifiers in enterally fed premature infants.

Growth and Clinical Outcomes of Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants Receiving Acidified vs Nonacidified Liquid Human Milk Fortifiers

BACKGROUND

Liquid human milk fortifiers are used commonly in neonatal intensive care. Use of an acidified HMF (A-HMF) is associated with transient metabolic acidosis, but whether growth outcomes differ between infants fed A-HMF vs nonacidified HMF (NA-HMF) remains unknown.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of 255 infants born at <33 weeks' gestation and ≤1500 g who were receiving ≥75% fortified human milk on day of life 14, in a level III neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from May 2015 to December 2018. Infants born before October 2017 (n = 165) received A-HMF, whereas infants born after October 2017 (n = 90) received NA-HMF. We used logistic regression to estimate odds of metabolic acidosis (serum bicarbonate <16 mEq/L in the first 21 days of life) in infants receiving A-HMF vs NA-HMF and linear mixed models to compare the mean size at discharge (weight, length, head z-scores) by HMF type. We adjusted models for confounders and accounted for the nonindependence of multiple births.

RESULTS

Median gestational age was 28.7 weeks (range, 22.6-32.9) and birth weight 1.1 kg (range, 0.4-1.5). Infants receiving A-HMF had higher adjusted odds of metabolic acidosis than infants receiving NA-HMF (adjusted odds ratio, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.2-6.2). There were no differences between groups in size z-scores at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

In human-milkfed, very-low-birthweight infants, fortification with liquid A-HMF may contribute to metabolic acidosis in the first month of life, but this practice does not appear to impair growth through NICU discharge, compared with fortification with NA-HMF.