Effects of anodal tDCS on electroencephalography correlates of cognitive control in mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury

Transcranial direct current stimulation promotes angiogenesis and improves neurological function via the OXA-TF-AKT/ERK signaling pathway in traumatic brain injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and its resulting complications pose a major challenge to global public health, resulting in increased rates of disability and mortality. Cerebrovascular dysfunction is nearly universal in TBI cases and is closely associated with secondary injury after TBI. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) shows great potential in the treatment of TBI; however, the exact mechanism remains elusive. In this study, we performed in vivo and in vitro experiments to explore the effects and mechanisms of tDCS in a controlled cortical impact (CCI) rat model simulating TBI. In vivo experiments show that tDCS can effectively reduce brain tissue damage, cerebral edema and neurological deficits. The potential mechanism may be that tDCS improves the neurological function of rats by increasing orexin A (OXA) secretion, upregulating the TF-AKT/ERK signaling pathway, and promoting angiogenesis at the injury site. Cellular experiments showed that OXA promoted HUVEC migration and angiogenesis, and these effects were counteracted by the ERK1/2 inhibitor LY3214996. The results of Matrigel experiment in vivo showed that TNF-a significantly reduced the ability of HUVEC to form blood vessels, but OXA could rescue the effect of TNF-a on the ability of HUVEC to form blood vessels. However, LY3214996 could inhibit the therapeutic effect of OXA. In summary, our preliminary study demonstrates that tDCS can induce angiogenesis through the OXA-TF-AKT/ERK signaling pathway, thereby improving neurological function in rats with TBI.

Contrasting MEG effects of anodal and cathodal high-definition TDCS on sensorimotor activity during voluntary finger movements

Introduction

Protocols for noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) are generally categorized as "excitatory" or "inhibitory" based on their ability to produce short-term modulation of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in peripheral muscles, when applied to motor cortex. Anodal and cathodal stimulation are widely considered excitatory and inhibitory, respectively, on this basis. However, it is poorly understood whether such polarity-dependent changes apply for neural signals generated during task performance, at rest, or in response to sensory stimulation.

Methods

To characterize such changes, we measured spontaneous and movement-related neural activity with magnetoencephalography (MEG) before and after high-definition transcranial direct-current stimulation (HD-TDCS) of the left motor cortex (M1), while participants performed simple finger movements with the left and right hands.

Results

Anodal HD-TDCS (excitatory) decreased the movement-related cortical fields (MRCF) localized to left M1 during contralateral right finger movements while cathodal HD-TDCS (inhibitory), increased them. In contrast, oscillatory signatures of voluntary motor output were not differentially affected by the two stimulation protocols, and tended to decrease in magnitude over the course of the experiment regardless. Spontaneous resting state oscillations were not affected either.

Discussion

MRCFs are thought to reflect reafferent proprioceptive input to motor cortex following movements. Thus, these results suggest that processing of incoming sensory information may be affected by TDCS in a polarity-dependent manner that is opposite that seen for MEPs-increases in cortical excitability as defined by MEPs may correspond to reduced responses to afferent input, and vice-versa.