1
|
Dietrich D, Bornet Dit Vorgeat H, Perrin Franck C, Ligier Q. A Mobile App (Concerto) to Empower Hospitalized Patients in a Swiss University Hospital: Development, Design, and Implementation Report. JMIR Med Inform 2024; 12:e47914. [PMID: 38546728 PMCID: PMC11009845 DOI: 10.2196/47914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient empowerment can be associated with better health outcomes, especially in the management of chronic diseases. Digital health has the potential to promote patient empowerment. OBJECTIVE Concerto is a mobile app designed to promote patient empowerment in an in-patient setting. This implementation report focuses on the lessons learned during its implementation. METHODS The app was conceptualized and prototyped during a hackathon. Concerto uses hospital information system (HIS) data to offer the following key functionalities: a care schedule, targeted medical information, practical information, information about the on-duty care team, and a medical round preparation module. Funding was obtained following a feasibility study, and the app was developed and implemented in four pilot divisions of a Swiss University Hospital using institution-owned tablets. IMPLEMENTATION (RESULTS) The project lasted for 2 years with effective implementation in the four pilot divisions and was maintained within budget. The induced workload on caregivers impaired project sustainability and warranted a change in our implementation strategy. The presence of a killer function would have facilitated the deployment. Furthermore, our experience is in line with the well-accepted need for both high-quality user training and a suitable selection of superusers. Finally, by presenting HIS data directly to the patient, Concerto highlighted the data that are not fit for purpose and triggered data curation and standardization initiatives. CONCLUSIONS This implementation report presents a real-world example of designing, developing, and implementing a patient-empowering mobile app in a university hospital in-patient setting with a particular focus on the lessons learned. One limitation of the study is the lack of definition of a "key success" indicator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien Dietrich
- Geneva Hub for Global Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Kheops Technologies SA, Plan-Les-Ouates, Switzerland
| | | | - Caroline Perrin Franck
- Geneva Hub for Global Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thielmann RRLC, Hoving C, Cals JWL, Crutzen R. The Effects of Online Access to General Practice Medical Records Perceived by Patients: Longitudinal Survey Study. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e47659. [PMID: 37266981 DOI: 10.2196/47659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient online access to medical records is assumed to facilitate patient empowerment and advance patient-centered health care. However, to date, the actual effects of online access to medical records perceived by patients and other outcomes are insufficiently empirically tested. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the effects of online access to medical records on patient empowerment, informed decision-making, and the patient-provider relationship perceived by patients. METHODS A nationwide, 2-wave, longitudinal survey study was conducted among Dutch adults (N=2402). Linear regression analyses were performed. In model 1, the perceived effects of online access to medical records (measured at T1 [first measurement; July 2021]) on 16 outcomes (measured at T2 [second measurement; January 2022]), which were associated with the use of online access to general practice medical records in previous research, were investigated. Model 2 included sociodemographic factors and patient characteristics as confounders. RESULTS Users indicated more strongly than nonusers that online access to medical records would increase their participation in health care, improve the relationship with their general practitioner, and support informed decision-making. These results were robust when adjusted for the influence of confounders. Effect sizes were very small, with unstandardized regression coefficients (B) ranging between -0.39 and 0.28. Higher digital and health literacy were associated with higher ratings of almost all effects. CONCLUSIONS Online access to medical records has the potential to empower patients and foster informed decision-making among patients. The effects in this study were small but might grow over time. Other factors, such as the attitude of general practitioners toward online access to medical records, might moderate these effects. The results indicate that the potential benefits of online access to medical records might be unevenly distributed. We suggest future exploration of the conditions under which online access to medical records can improve health care system functioning and efficiency without increasing health inequality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa R L C Thielmann
- School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Ciska Hoving
- School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Jochen W L Cals
- School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Rik Crutzen
- School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Glöggler M, Ammenwerth E. Improvement and Evaluation of the TOPCOP Taxonomy of Patient Portals: Taxonomy-Evaluation-Delphi Approach (TED). J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e30701. [PMID: 34403354 PMCID: PMC8527386 DOI: 10.2196/30701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient portals have been introduced in many countries over the last 10 years, but many health information managers still feel they have too little knowledge of patient portals. A taxonomy can help them to better compare and select portals. This has led us to develop the TOPCOP taxonomy for classifying and comparing patient portals. However, the taxonomy has not been evaluated by users. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the taxonomy’s usefulness to support health information managers in comparing, classifying, defining a requirement profile for, and selecting patient portals and to improve the taxonomy where needed. Methods We used a modified Delphi approach. We sampled a heterogeneous panel of 13 health information managers from 3 countries using the criterion sampling strategy. We conducted 4 anonymous survey rounds with qualitative and quantitative questions. In round 1, the panelists assessed the appropriateness of each dimension, and we collected new ideas to improve the dimensions. In rounds 2 and 3, the panelists iteratively evaluated the taxonomy that was revised based on round 1. In round 4, the panelists assessed the need for a taxonomy and the appropriateness of patient engagement as a distinguishing concept. Then, they compared 2 real portals with the final taxonomy and evaluated its usefulness for comparing portals, creating an initial requirement profile, and selecting patient portals. To determine group consensus, we applied the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Results The final taxonomy consists of 25 dimensions with 65 characteristics. Five new dimensions were added to the original taxonomy, with 8 characteristics added to already existing dimensions. Group consensus was achieved on the need for such a taxonomy to compare portals, on patient engagement as an appropriate distinguishing concept, and on the comprehensibility of the taxonomy’s form. Further, consensus was achieved on the taxonomy’s usefulness for classifying and comparing portals, assisting users in better understanding portals, creating a requirement profile, and selecting portals. This allowed us to test the usefulness of the final taxonomy with the intended users. Conclusions The TOPCOP taxonomy aims to support health information managers in comparing and selecting patient portals. By providing a standardized terminology to describe various aspects of patient portals independent of clinical setting or country, the taxonomy will also be useful for advancing research and evaluation of patient portals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Glöggler
- Institute of Medical Informatics, UMIT - Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard-Wallnöfer-Zentrum 1, Hall in Tirol, AT
| | - Elske Ammenwerth
- Institute of Medical Informatics, UMIT - Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard-Wallnöfer-Zentrum 1, Hall in Tirol, AT
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Glöggler M, Ammenwerth E. Development and Validation of a Useful Taxonomy of Patient Portals Based on Characteristics of Patient Engagement. Methods Inf Med 2021; 60:e44-e55. [PMID: 34243191 PMCID: PMC8294937 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Objective
Taxonomies are classification systems used to reduce complexity and better understand a domain. The present research aims to develop a useful taxonomy for health information managers to classify and compare patient portals based on characteristics appropriate to promote patient engagement. As a result, the taxonomy should contribute to understanding the differences and similarities of the portals. Further, the taxonomy shall support health information managers to more easily define which general type and functionalities of patient portals they need and to select the most suitable solution offered on the market.
Methods
We followed the formal taxonomy-building method proposed by Nickerson et al. Based on a literature review, we created a preliminary taxonomy following the conceptional approach of the model. We then evaluated each taxa's appropriateness by analyzing and classifying 17 patient portals offered by software vendors and 11 patient portals offered by health care providers. After each iteration, we examined the achievement of the determined objective and subjective ending conditions.
Results
After two conceptional approaches to create our taxonomy, and two empirical approaches to evaluate it, the final taxonomy consists of 20 dimensions and 49 characteristics. To make the taxonomy easy to comprehend, we assigned to the dimensions seven aspects related to patient engagement. These aspects are (1) portal design, (2) management, (3) communication, (4) instruction, (5) self-management, (6) self-determination, and (7) data management. The taxonomy is considered finished and useful after all ending conditions that defined beforehand have been fulfilled. We demonstrated that the taxonomy serves to understand the differences and similarities by comparing patient portals. We call our taxonomy “Taxonomy of Patient Portals based on Characteristics of Patient Engagement (TOPCOP).”
Conclusion
We developed the first useful taxonomy for health information managers to classify and compare patient portals. The taxonomy is based on characteristics promoting patient engagement. With 20 dimensions and 49 characteristics, our taxonomy is particularly suitable to discriminate among patient portals and can easily be applied to compare portals. The TOPCOP taxonomy enables health information managers to better understand the differences and similarities of patient portals. Further, the taxonomy may help them to define the type and general functionalities needed. But it also supports them in searching and comparing patient portals offered on the market to select the most suitable solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Glöggler
- Institute of Medical Informatics, UMIT-Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Elske Ammenwerth
- Institute of Medical Informatics, UMIT-Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nøst TH, Faxvaag A, Steinsbekk A. Participants' views and experiences from setting up a shared patient portal for primary and specialist health services- a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:171. [PMID: 33627122 PMCID: PMC7903028 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06188-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Recently, there has been an increasing focus among healthcare organisations on implementing patient portals. Previous studies have mainly focussed on the experiences of patient portal use. Few have investigated the processes of deciding what content and features to make available, in particular for shared portals across healthcare domains. The aim of the study was to investigate views on content and experiences from the configuration process among participants involved in setting up a shared patient portal for primary and specialist health services. Methods A qualitative study including 15 semi-structured interviews with persons participating in patient portal configuration was conducted from October 2019 to June 2020. Results Whether a shared patient portal for all the health services in the region should be established was not questioned by any of the informants. It was experienced as a good thing to have numerous participants present in the discussions on configuration, but it also was said to increase the complexity of the work. The informants considered a patient portal to be of great value for patient care, among other things because it would lead to improvements in patient follow-up and increased patient empowerment. Nevertheless, some informants advocated caution as they thought the patient portal possibly could lead to an increase in healthcare providers’ workloads and to anxiety and worries, as well as to inequality in access to health care among patients. The findings were categorized into the themes ‘A tool for increased patient involvement’, ‘Which information should be available for the patient’, ‘Concerns about increased workload’, ‘Too complex to use versus not interesting enough’, ‘Involving all services’ and ‘Patient involvement’. Conclusions Establishing a shared patient portal for primary and specialist health services was considered unproblematic. There was, however, variation in opinions on which content and features to include. This variation was related to concerns about increasing the workload for health care providers, causing anxiety and inequality among patients, and ensuring that the solution would be interesting enough to adopt.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torunn Hatlen Nøst
- Department of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
| | - Arild Faxvaag
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,Clinic of Orthopaedy, Rheumatology and Dermatology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Aslak Steinsbekk
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,Digital Health Care Unit, Norwegian Centre for E-Health Research, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yousef CC, Thomas A, Alenazi AO, Elgadi S, Abu Esba LC, AlAzmi A, Alhameed AF, Hattan A, Almekhloof S, AlShammary MA, Alanezi NA, Alhamdan HS, Eldegeir M, Abulezz R, Khoshhal S, Masala CG, Ahmed O. Adoption of a Personal Health Record in the Digital Age: Cross-Sectional Study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e22913. [PMID: 32998854 PMCID: PMC7657719 DOI: 10.2196/22913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As health care organizations strive to improve health care access, quality, and costs, they have implemented patient-facing eHealth technologies such as personal health records to better engage patients in the management of their health. In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, eHealth is also growing in accordance with Vision 2030 and its National Transformation Program framework, creating a roadmap for increased quality and efficiency of the health care system and supporting the goal of patient-centered care. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the adoption of the personal health record of the Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs (MNGHA Care). METHODS A cross-sectional survey was conducted in adults visiting outpatient clinics in hospitals at the Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs hospitals in Riyadh, Jeddah, Dammam, Madinah, and Al Ahsa, and primary health care clinics in Riyadh and Qassim. The main outcome measure was self-reported use of MNGHA Care. RESULTS In the sample of 546 adult patients, 383 (70.1%) reported being users of MNGHA Care. MNGHA Care users were more likely to be younger (P<.001), high school or university educated (P<.001), employed (P<.001), have a chronic condition (P=.046), use the internet to search for health-related information (P<.001), and use health apps on their mobile phones (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study show that there is substantial interest for the use of MNGHA Care personal health record with 70% of participants self-reporting use. To confirm these findings, objective data from the portal usage logs are needed. Maximizing the potential of MNGHA Care supports patient engagement and is aligned with the national eHealth initiative to encourage the use of technology for high-quality, accessible patient-centered care. Future research should include health care provider perspectives, incorporate objective data, employ a mixed-methods approach, and use a theoretical framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Consuela Cheriece Yousef
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
- King Saud bin Abdul Aziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abin Thomas
- King Saud bin Abdul Aziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed O Alenazi
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
- King Saud bin Abdul Aziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sumaya Elgadi
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Princess Noura Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Laila Carolina Abu Esba
- King Saud bin Abdul Aziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Aeshah AlAzmi
- King Saud bin Abdul Aziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abrar Fahad Alhameed
- King Saud bin Abdul Aziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Madinah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Hattan
- King Saud bin Abdul Aziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saleh Almekhloof
- King Saud bin Abdul Aziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed A AlShammary
- King Saud bin Abdul Aziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Primary Health Care, Prince Bader Housing Clinic, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nazzal Abdullah Alanezi
- King Saud bin Abdul Aziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Qassim Primary Health Care Center, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Qassim, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hani Solaiman Alhamdan
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Manal Eldegeir
- King Saud bin Abdul Aziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Pediatrics, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rayf Abulezz
- King Saud bin Abdul Aziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Madinah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sahal Khoshhal
- King Saud bin Abdul Aziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Pharmaceutical Care Department, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Madinah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Clara Glynis Masala
- King Saud bin Abdul Aziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Nursing, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Omaima Ahmed
- King Saud bin Abdul Aziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/BMT, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gimbel RW, Rennert LM, Crawford P, Little JR, Truong K, Williams JE, Griffin SF, Shi L, Chen L, Zhang L, Moss JB, Marshall RC, Edwards KW, Crawford KJ, Hing M, Schmeltz A, Lumsden B, Ashby M, Haas E, Palazzo K. Enhancing Patient Activation and Self-Management Activities in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using the US Department of Defense Mobile Health Care Environment: Feasibility Study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e17968. [PMID: 32329438 PMCID: PMC7284404 DOI: 10.2196/17968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Revised: 03/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Past mobile health (mHealth) efforts to empower type 2 diabetes (T2D) self-management include portals, text messaging, collection of biometric data, electronic coaching, email, and collection of lifestyle information. Objective The primary objective was to enhance patient activation and self-management of T2D using the US Department of Defense’s Mobile Health Care Environment (MHCE) in a patient-centered medical home setting. Methods A multisite study, including a user-centered design and a controlled trial, was conducted within the US Military Health System. Phase I assessed preferences regarding the enhancement of the enabling technology. Phase II was a single-blinded 12-month feasibility study that randomly assigned 240 patients to either the intervention (n=123, received mHealth technology and behavioral messages tailored to Patient Activation Measure [PAM] level at baseline) or the control group (n=117, received equipment but not messaging. The primary outcome measure was PAM scores. Secondary outcome measures included Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) scores and cardiometabolic outcomes. We used generalized estimating equations to estimate changes in outcomes. Results The final sample consisted of 229 patients. Participants were 61.6% (141/229) male, had a mean age of 62.9 years, mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 7.5%, mean BMI of 32.7, and a mean duration of T2D diagnosis of 9.8 years. At month 12, the control group showed significantly greater improvements compared with the intervention group in PAM scores (control mean 7.49, intervention mean 1.77; P=.007), HbA1c (control mean −0.53, intervention mean −0.11; P=.006), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (control mean −7.14, intervention mean 4.38; P=.01). Both groups showed significant improvement in SDSCA, BMI, waist size, and diastolic blood pressure; between-group differences were not statistically significant. Except for patients with the highest level of activation (PAM level 4), intervention group patients exhibited significant improvements in PAM scores. For patients with the lowest level of activation (PAM level 1), the intervention group showed significantly greater improvement compared with the control group in HbA1c (control mean −0.09, intervention mean −0.52; P=.04), BMI (control mean 0.58, intervention mean −1.22; P=.01), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (control mean −4.86, intervention mean 3.56; P<.001). Significant improvements were seen in AM scores, SDSCA, and waist size for both groups and in diastolic and systolic blood pressure for the control group; the between-group differences were not statistically significant. The percentage of participants who were engaged with MHCE for ≥50% of days period was 60.7% (68/112; months 0-3), 57.4% (62/108; months 3-6), 49.5% (51/103; months 6-9), and 43% (42/98; months 9-12). Conclusions Our study produced mixed results with improvement in PAM scores and outcomes in both the intervention and control groups. Structural design issues may have hampered the influence of tailored behavioral messaging within the intervention group. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02949037; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02949037 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/resprot.6993
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald W Gimbel
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States
| | - Lior M Rennert
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States
| | - Paul Crawford
- Nellis Family Medicine Residency Program, Mike O'Callaghan Federal Hospital, Las Vegas, NV, United States
| | - Jeanette R Little
- Mobile Health Innovation Center, Telemedicine & Advanced Technologies Research Center, U.S. Army Medical Research & Materials Command, Fort Gordon, GA, United States
| | - Khoa Truong
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States
| | - Joel E Williams
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States
| | - Sarah F Griffin
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States
| | - Lu Shi
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States
| | - Liwei Chen
- Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - LingLing Zhang
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jennie B Moss
- Nellis Family Medicine Residency Program, Mike O'Callaghan Federal Hospital, Las Vegas, NV, United States
| | - Robert C Marshall
- Clinical Informatics Fellowship Program, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA, United States
| | - Karen W Edwards
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States
| | - Kristy J Crawford
- Nellis Family Medicine Residency Program, Mike O'Callaghan Federal Hospital, Las Vegas, NV, United States
| | - Marie Hing
- Department of Internal Medicine, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA, United States
| | - Amanda Schmeltz
- Mobile Health Innovation Center, Telemedicine & Advanced Technologies Research Center, U.S. Army Medical Research & Materials Command, Fort Gordon, GA, United States
| | - Brandon Lumsden
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States
| | - Morgan Ashby
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States
| | - Elizabeth Haas
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States
| | - Kelly Palazzo
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|