Low variable rate stimulation strategy for cochlear implants using temporal cues and electrophysiological factors

The role of electroneural versus electrophonic stimulation on psychoacoustic electric-acoustic masking in cochlear implant users with residual hearing

Cochlear implant (CI) candidates with residual low-frequency hearing are nowadays often implanted with CI electrode arrays that allow preserving their acoustic hearing in the implanted ear. These subjects receiving combined electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) show enhanced speech perception scores when compared to traditional CI users without acoustic component. However, these benefits are limited by interaction effects such as masking between electric and acoustic stimulation. This study evaluates ipsilateral electric-acoustic masking in a psychophysical experiment conducted in 5 EAS subjects. The elevation of acoustic pure tone thresholds through simultaneous presentation of electric pulse trains and vice versa is measured for different acoustic frequencies and different settings of the electric stimuli. Electric-acoustic interaction could originate either from electroneural stimulation of auditory nerve fibers or from electrophonic stimulation of hair cells. The two fundamental goals of this study are to investigate the effects of stimulation rate and phase duration of the electric stimulus on electric-acoustic masking and to investigate the origin of electric-acoustic masking by assessing the contributions of electroneural versus electrophonic stimulation. The amount of electric-acoustic masking in the present study was independent of pulse rate and phase duration of the electric stimuli. Moreover, the results demonstrate that electric-acoustic masking depends on the spatial distance between the locations of electric or acoustic excitation in the cochlea, but not on the spectral content of the electric stimulus. We thereby conclude that psychoacoustic electric-acoustic masking in EAS users is dominated by electroneural-acoustic interaction, whereas the contribution of electrophonic stimulation is negligible.