1
|
Schwierzeck V, Effner R, Abel F, Reiger M, Notheis G, Held J, Simon V, Dintner S, Hoffmann R, Hagl B, Huebner J, Mellmann A, Renner ED. Molecular Assessment of Staphylococcus Aureus Strains in STAT3 Hyper-IgE Syndrome Patients. J Clin Immunol 2022; 42:1301-1309. [PMID: 35655107 PMCID: PMC9537231 DOI: 10.1007/s10875-022-01293-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Hyper-IgE syndromes (HIES) are a group of inborn errors of immunity (IEI) caused by monogenic defects such as in the gene STAT3 (STAT3-HIES). Patients suffering from HIES show an increased susceptibility to Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) including skin abscesses and pulmonary infections. To assess if the underlying immune defect of STAT3-HIES patients influences the resistance patterns, pathogenicity factors or strain types of S. aureus. We characterized eleven S. aureus strains isolated from STAT3-HIES patients (n = 4) by whole genome sequencing (WGS) to determine presence of resistance and virulence genes. Additionally, we used multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) and protein A (spa) typing to classify these isolates. Bacterial isolates collected from this cohort of STAT3-HIES patients were identified as common spa types in Germany. Only one of the isolates was classified as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). For one STAT3 patient WGS illustrated that infection and colonization occurred with different S. aureus isolates rather than one particular clone. The identified S. aureus carriage profile on a molecular level suggests that S. aureus strain type in STAT3-HIES patients is determined by local epidemiology rather than the underlying immune defect highlighting the importance of microbiological assessment prior to antibiotic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Schwierzeck
- Translational Immunology in Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany. .,Institute of Environmental Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany. .,Institute of Hygiene, University Hospital Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany.
| | - Renate Effner
- Translational Immunology in Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Environmental Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Felicitas Abel
- Translational Immunology in Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Environmental Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.,University Children's Hospital, Dr. von Haunersches Kinderspital, Ludwig Maximilian University, 80337, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Reiger
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.,Department of Environmental Medicine, Medical Faculty of University Augsburg, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Gundula Notheis
- Translational Immunology in Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Environmental Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.,University Children's Hospital, Dr. von Haunersches Kinderspital, Ludwig Maximilian University, 80337, Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen Held
- Mikrobiologisches Institut - Klinische Mikrobiologie, Immunologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen und Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Valeska Simon
- Institute for Laboratory Medicine and Microbiology, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Dintner
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Reinhard Hoffmann
- Institute for Laboratory Medicine and Microbiology, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Beate Hagl
- Translational Immunology in Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Environmental Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.,University Children's Hospital, Dr. von Haunersches Kinderspital, Ludwig Maximilian University, 80337, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Huebner
- University Children's Hospital, Dr. von Haunersches Kinderspital, Ludwig Maximilian University, 80337, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Mellmann
- Translational Immunology in Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Ellen D Renner
- Translational Immunology in Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Environmental Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.,Department of Pediatrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 80804, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
[Infections due to multidrug-resistant pathogens : Pathogens, resistance mechanisms and established treatment options]. Anaesthesist 2020; 68:711-730. [PMID: 31555833 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-019-00645-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The increase in resistant pathogens has long been a global problem. Complicated life-threatening infections due to multidrug-resistant pathogens (MRD) meanwhile occur regularly in intensive care medicine. An important and also potentially modifiable factor of the rapid spread of resistance is the irrational use of broad spectrum antibiotics in human medicine. In addition to many other resistance mechanisms, beta-lactamases play an important role in Gram-negative pathogens. They are not uncommonly the leading reason of difficult to treat infections and the failure of known routinely used broad spectrum antibiotics, such as cephalosporins, (acylamino)penicillins and carbapenems. Strategies for containment of MRDs primaríly target the rational use of antibiotics. In this respect interdisciplinary treatment teams, e.g. antibiotic stewardship (ABS) and infectious diseases stewardship (IDS) play a major role.
Collapse
|
3
|
Kates SL, Hurni S, Chen MS. Development and challenges in setting up an international bone infection registry. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2020; 140:741-749. [PMID: 31701213 PMCID: PMC7202964 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-019-03303-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Osteomyelitis is an increasing burden on the society especially due to the emergence of multiple drug-resistant organisms. The lack of a central registry that prospectively collects data on patient risk factors, laboratory test results, treatment modalities, serological analysis results, and outcomes has hampered the research effort that could have improved and provided guidelines for treatments of bone infections. The current manuscript describes the lessons learned in setting up a multi-continent registry. MATERIALS AND METHODS This multicenter, international registry was conducted to prospectively collect essential patient, clinical, and surgical data with a 1-year follow-up period. Patients 18 years or older with confirmed S. aureus long bone infection through fracture fixation or arthroplasty who consented to participate in the study were included. The outcomes using the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (version 2), Parker Mobility Score, and Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living were assessed at baseline and at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months. Serological samples were collected at follow-ups. RESULTS Contract negotiation with a large number of study sites was difficult; obtaining ethics approvals were time-consuming but straightforward. The initial patient recruitment was slow, leading to a reduction of target patient number from 400 to 300 and extension of enrollment period. Finally, 292 eligible patients were recruited by 18 study sites (in 10 countries of 4 continents, Asia, North and South America, and Central Europe). Logistical and language barriers were overcome by employing courier service and local monitoring personnel. CONCLUSIONS Multicenter registry is useful for collecting a large number of cases for analysis. A well-defined data collection practice is important for data quality but challenging to coordinate with the large number of study sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen L. Kates
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1200 East Broad St, PO Box 980153, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
| | - Severine Hurni
- AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Maio S. Chen
- AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation, Davos, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lanckohr C, Bracht H. [Antibiotic stewardship : Measures for optimizing prescription of anti-infective agents]. Anaesthesist 2019; 67:3-8. [PMID: 29313072 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-017-0398-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Antibiotic stewardship (ABS) comprises a bundle of different interventions to improve anti-infective treatment in a hospital setting. An important component of ABS interventions is the interdisciplinary approach to infection management. Besides improving infrastructural aspects on a hospital level, including surveillance of the use of anti-infective agents and nosocomial infections, collation and interpretation of statistics on resistance and formulation of local treatment guidelines, ABS teams go to the wards and advise treating physicians on antibiotic therapy. Frequent approaches for optimization are selection of substances, administration route, dosing of medication and duration of treatment. An important overall objective of ABS is the reduction of resistance induction in order to preserve the therapeutic efficiency of antibiotics. A number of studies have shown that this goal can be achieved in different clinical settings without negatively affecting patient outcome. The strategies of ABS can also be applied with no problems to critically ill patients on the intensive care unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Lanckohr
- Antibiotic Stewardship (ABS)-Team, Institut für Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Robert-Koch-Str. 41, 48149, Münster, Deutschland. .,Klinik für Anästhesiologie, operative Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. A1, 48149, Münster, Deutschland.
| | - H Bracht
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Idelevich EA, Reischl U, Becker K. New Microbiological Techniques in the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2019; 115:822-832. [PMID: 30678752 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2017] [Revised: 10/04/2017] [Accepted: 10/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When a bloodstream infection is suspected, the preliminary and definitive results of culture-based microbiological testing arrive too late to have any influence on the initial choice of empirical antibiotic treatment. METHODS This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search of the literature and on the authors' clinical and scientific experience. RESULTS A number of technical advances now enable more rapid microbiological diagnosis of bloodstream infections. DNA- based techniques for the direct detection of pathogenic organisms in whole blood have not yet become established in routine use because of various limitations. On the other hand, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) has become available for routine use in clinical laboratories and has markedly shortened the time to diagnosis after blood samples that have been cultured in automated blood-culture systems turn positive. Further developments of this technique now enable it to be used directly for blood cultures that have been flagged positive, as well as for subcultures that have been incubated for only a short time on a solid nutrient medium. The microbial biomass of the subculture can also be used in parallel for more rapid susceptibility testing with conventional methods, or, in future, with MALDI-TOF MS. CONCLUSION The potential of all of these new techniques will only be realizable in practice if they are optimally embedded in the diagnostic process and if sufficient attention is paid to pre-analytical issues, particularly storage and transport times.
Collapse
|
6
|
Decousser JW, Woerther PL, Soussy CJ, Fines-Guyon M, Dowzicky MJ. The tigecycline evaluation and surveillance trial; assessment of the activity of tigecycline and other selected antibiotics against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens from France collected between 2004 and 2016. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2018; 7:68. [PMID: 29876099 PMCID: PMC5977734 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-018-0360-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2018] [Accepted: 05/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A high level of antibiotic consumption in France means antimicrobial resistance requires rigorous monitoring. The Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trial (T.E.S.T.) is a global surveillance study that monitors the in vitro activities of tigecycline and a panel of marketed antimicrobials against clinically important Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates. Methods Annually clinically relevant strains were prospectively included in the survey through a national network of hospital-based laboratories. MICs were determined locally by broth microdilution using CLSI guidelines. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints. Results Thirty-three centres in France collected 26,486 isolates between 2004 and 2016. Enterococcus species were highly susceptible (≥94.4%) to linezolid, tigecycline and vancomycin. Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), were susceptible (≥99.9%) to tigecycline, vancomycin and linezolid. Between 2004 and 2016, 27.7% of S. aureus isolates were MRSA, decreasing from 28.0% in 2013 to 23.5% in 2016. Susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates was 100% to vancomycin, and > 99.0% to levofloxacin, linezolid and meropenem; 3.0% were penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (100% susceptibility to vancomycin and linezolid). Escherichia coli isolates were highly susceptible (> 98.0%) to meropenem, tigecycline and amikacin. The rate of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) positive E. coli increased from 2004 (3.0%), but was stable from 2012 (23.1%) to 2016 (19.8%). Susceptibility of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates was 99.4% to meropenem and 96.5% to amikacin. The proportion of ESBL-positive K. pneumoniae isolates increased from 2004 (7.5%) to 2012 (33.3%) and was highest in 2016 (43.6%). A. baumannii was susceptible to meropenem (81.0%) and amikacin (74.9%); none of the 6.2% of isolates identified as multidrug-resistant (MDR) was susceptible to any agents with breakpoints. P. aeruginosa isolates were most susceptible to amikacin (88.5%), and MDR rates were 13.6% in 2013 to 4.0% in 2016; susceptibility of MDR isolates was no higher than 31.4% to amikacin. Conclusions Rates of MRSA decreased slowly, while rates of ESBL-positive E. coli and K. pneumoniae increased from 2004 to 2016. Susceptibility of Gram-positive isolates to vancomycin, tigecycline, meropenem and linezolid was well conserved, as was susceptibility of Gram-negative isolates to tigecycline and meropenem. The spread of MDR non-fermentative isolates must be carefully monitored.
Collapse
|
7
|
Heckel M, Geißdörfer W, Herbst FA, Stiel S, Ostgathe C, Bogdan C. Nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at a palliative care unit: A prospective single service analysis. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0188940. [PMID: 29228010 PMCID: PMC5724845 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2017] [Accepted: 11/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The emergence of multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms is a particular challenge for the health care systems. Little is known about the occurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDRGNB) in patients of palliative care units (PCU). AIM The primary aim of this study was to determine the carriage of MRSA among patients of a PCU at a German University Hospital and to assess whether the positive cases would have been detected by a risk-factor-based screening-approach. DESIGN Between February 2014 and January 2015 patients from our PCU were tested for MRSA carriage within 48 hours following admission irrespective of pre-existing risk factors. In addition, risk factors for MRSA colonization were assessed. Samples from the nostrils and, if applicable, from pre-existing wounds were analysed by standardized culture-based laboratory techniques for the presence of MRSA and of other bacteria and fungi. Results from swabs taken prior to admission were also recorded if available. RESULTS 297 out of 317 patients (93.7%) fulfilled one or more MRSA screening criteria. Swabs from 299 patients were tested. The detection rate was 2.1% for MRSA. All MRSA cases would have been detected by a risk-factor-based screening-approach. Considering the detected cases and the results from swabs taken prior to admission, 4.1% of the patients (n = 13) were diagnosed with MRSA and 4.1% with MDRGNB (n = 13), including two patients with MRSA and MDRGNB (0.6%). The rate of MRSA carriage in PCU patients (4.1%) was elevated compared to the rate seen in the general cohort of patients admitted to our University Hospital (2.7%). CONCLUSIONS PCU patients have an increased risk to carry MRSA compared to other hospitalized patients. Although a risk factor-based screening is likely to detect all MRSA carriers amongst PCU patients, we rather recommend a universal screening to avoid the extra effort to identify the few risk factor-negative patients (<7%). As we did not perform a systematic MDRGNB screening, further studies are needed to determine the true prevalence of MDRGNB amongst PCU patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Heckel
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center CCC Erlangen-EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Walter Geißdörfer
- Mikrobiologisches Institut - Klinische Mikrobiologie, Immunologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen and Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
| | | | - Stephanie Stiel
- Institute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Christoph Ostgathe
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center CCC Erlangen-EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Christian Bogdan
- Mikrobiologisches Institut - Klinische Mikrobiologie, Immunologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen and Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kumpf O, Braun JP, Brinkmann A, Bause H, Bellgardt M, Bloos F, Dubb R, Greim C, Kaltwasser A, Marx G, Riessen R, Spies C, Weimann J, Wöbker G, Muhl E, Waydhas C. Quality indicators in intensive care medicine for Germany - third edition 2017. GERMAN MEDICAL SCIENCE : GMS E-JOURNAL 2017; 15:Doc10. [PMID: 28794694 PMCID: PMC5541336 DOI: 10.3205/000251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Quality improvement in medicine is depending on measurement of relevant quality indicators. The quality indicators for intensive care medicine of the German Interdisciplinary Society of Intensive Care Medicine (DIVI) from the year 2013 underwent a scheduled evaluation after three years. There were major changes in several indicators but also some indicators were changed only minimally. The focus on treatment processes like ward rounds, management of analgesia and sedation, mechanical ventilation and weaning, as well as the number of 10 indicators were not changed. Most topics remained except for early mobilization which was introduced instead of hypothermia following resuscitation. Infection prevention was added as an outcome indicator. These quality indicators are used in the peer review in intensive care, a method endorsed by the DIVI. A validity period of three years is planned for the quality indicators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Kumpf
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan-Peter Braun
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Martin-Luther Krankenhaus, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Brinkmann
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum Heidenheim, Germany
| | - Hanswerner Bause
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Asklepiosklinikum Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Bellgardt
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Josef-Hospital, Klinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany
| | - Frank Bloos
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Rolf Dubb
- Kreiskliniken Reutlingen, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Fachkrankenpflege und Funktionsdienste (DGF), Germany
| | - Clemens Greim
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum Fulda, Germany
| | - Arnold Kaltwasser
- Kreiskliniken Reutlingen, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Fachkrankenpflege und Funktionsdienste (DGF), Germany
| | - Gernot Marx
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Universitätsklinikum RTWH Aachen, Germany
| | - Reimer Riessen
- Zentralbereich des Departments für Innere Medizin, Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Germany
| | - Claudia Spies
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg Weimann
- Department of Anesthesiology and Interdisciplinary Intensive Care Medicine, Sankt Gertrauden-Krankenhaus, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gabriele Wöbker
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Helios-Klinikum Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Elke Muhl
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christian Waydhas
- Department of Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany.,Medical Faculty of the University Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates from patients presenting with ear, nose and throat (ENT) infections in the German community healthcare setting. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2017; 36:1685-1690. [PMID: 28429163 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-017-2985-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Empiric initial antibiotic therapy of bacterial infections is based primarily upon the susceptibility of the most common causative pathogens. The purpose of this study was to provide susceptibility data on six bacterial species known to cause ear, nose and throat (ENT) infections. A total of 1066 isolates collected during a nationwide laboratory-based surveillance study were analysed. All Streptococcus pyogenes isolates were penicillin (PEN)-susceptible, indicating that natural penicillins can still be recommended as the first-line treatment for group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis. Of the S. pneumoniae isolates, 92.9% were PEN-susceptible and of the Haemophilus influenzae isolates, 89.7% were amoxicillin-susceptible, retaining aminopenicillins as the first-line treatment for acute otitis media (AOM) and acute rhinosinusitis (ARS), in case antibiotic therapy is considered. In contrast, cefuroxime axetil seems less likely to be suitable for the treatment of AOM or ARS, as all Moraxella catarrhalis and >99% of the H. influenzae isolates were categorised as intermediate or resistant. The susceptibility rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were 97-100% for the drugs tested, except for the fluoroquinolones (87.6%). Overall, bacterial isolates from outpatients presenting with ENT infections showed low frequencies of resistance in Germany. However, given the emergence of multidrug resistance to standard antibiotics in Escherichia coli and other pathogens, inappropriate use of broad-spectrum antibiotics for the treatment of ENT infections has to be avoided.
Collapse
|
10
|
Walter J, Noll I, Feig M, Weiss B, Claus H, Werner G, Eckmanns T, Hermes J, Abu Sin M. Decline in the proportion of methicillin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from non-invasive samples and in outpatient settings, and changes in the co-resistance profiles: an analysis of data collected within the Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network, Germany 2010 to 2015. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17:169. [PMID: 28231850 PMCID: PMC5324250 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2271-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2016] [Accepted: 02/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recent analysis of trends of non-invasive infections with methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), of trends of MRSA infections in outpatient settings and of co-resistance profiles of MRSA isolates are scarce or lacking in Germany. Methods We analysed data from the Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (ARS). We included in the analysis the first isolate of S. aureus per patient and year, which had a valid test result for oxacillin resistance and which was not a screening sample. We limited the analysis to isolates from facilities, which contributed to ARS for all six years between 2010 and 2015. We compared the proportion of methicillin resistance among S. aureus isolates by calendar year using Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test. We corrected for multiple testing using the Bonferroni correction. We stratified the analysis by sample type including various non-invasive sample types and by type of care (e.g. hospital versus outpatient clinic). We also analysed the non-susceptibility of MRSA to selected antibiotics. Results The analysis included 148,561 S. aureus isolates. The distribution of these isolates by sex, age, region, sample type, clinical speciality and type of care remained relatively stable over the six years analysed. The proportion of MRSA among S. aureus isolates decreased continuously from 16% in 2010 to 10% in 2015. This decrease was seen for all types of care and for the majority of sample types, including the outpatient clinic (12 to 8%), as well as blood culture (19 to 9%), urine samples (25 to 15%), swabs (14 to 9%), respiratory samples (22 to 11%) and lesions (15 to 10%). The non-susceptibility of MRSA isolates to tobramycin (47 to 32%), ciprofloxacin (95 to 89%), moxifloxacin (94 to 84%), clindamycin (80 to 71%) and erythromycin (81 to 72%) declined markedly, but it increased for tetracyclines (6 to 9%) and gentamicin (3 to 6%). Non-susceptibility of MRSA to linezolid, teicoplanin, tigecycline and vancomycin remained rare. Conclusion This analysis indicates that the incidence of MRSA infections declined in a variety of settings in Germany between 2010 and 2015 and that the co-resistance profiles of MRSA isolates changed markedly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Walter
- Robert Koch Institute, Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Postfach 65 02 61, D-13302, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Ines Noll
- Robert Koch Institute, Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Postfach 65 02 61, D-13302, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcel Feig
- Robert Koch Institute, Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Postfach 65 02 61, D-13302, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bettina Weiss
- Robert Koch Institute, Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Postfach 65 02 61, D-13302, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hermann Claus
- Robert Koch Institute, Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Postfach 65 02 61, D-13302, Berlin, Germany
| | - Guido Werner
- National Reference Centre for Staphylococci and Enterococci; Unit 13 Nosocomial Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistances; Robert Koch Institute, Burgstr. 37, D-38855, Wernigerode, Germany
| | - Tim Eckmanns
- Robert Koch Institute, Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Postfach 65 02 61, D-13302, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julia Hermes
- Robert Koch Institute, Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Postfach 65 02 61, D-13302, Berlin, Germany
| | - Muna Abu Sin
- Robert Koch Institute, Department for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Postfach 65 02 61, D-13302, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
MRSA Prevalence and Risk Factors among Health Personnel and Residents in Nursing Homes in Hamburg, Germany - A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0169425. [PMID: 28068356 PMCID: PMC5222188 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2016] [Accepted: 12/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The increase of multidrug-resistant organisms in hospitals causes problems in nursing homes. Staff in geriatric nursing homes are at greater risk of MRSA colonisation. The aim of the study was to describe the occupational exposure to MRSA among health personnel in geriatric nursing. Methods A point prevalence survey was conducted among health personnel and residents of geriatric nursing homes within the greater Hamburg district. Nasal swabs and, where relevant, wound swabs were collected for the screening survey. Risk factors for MRSA colonisation were identified by means of a questionnaire and using the files held on the residents. Where tests on nursing staff were positive, a control swab was taken; when the results were confirmed positive, decolonisation was performed. The responsible general practitioners were notified of positive MRSA findings among residents. A molecular biological examination of the MRSA samples was performed. Results A total of 19 institutions participated in the study. Nasal swabs were taken from 759 nursing staff and 422 residents. Prevalence of MRSA was 1.6% among staff and 5.5% among residents. MRSA colonisation among health personnel indicated a correlation with male gender (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.4–14.1). Among the residents, chronic skin diseases (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.0–10.3) and indwelling devices (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.2–8.1) were identified as risk factors. No link between MRSA in residents and in health personnel could be established. Conclusion The number of MRSA colonisations among nursing staff and residents of geriatric nursing homes in Hamburg was rather low at 1.6% and 5.5% respectively and equates to the results of other surveys in non-outbreak scenarios.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kresken M, Körber-Irrgang B, Petrik C, Seifert H, Rodloff A, Becker K. Temporal trends of the in vitro activity of tigecycline and comparator antibiotics against clinical aerobic bacterial isolates collected in Germany, 2006-2014: results of the Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trial (TEST). GMS INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2016; 4:Doc07. [PMID: 30671321 PMCID: PMC6301736 DOI: 10.3205/id000025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Given the rapidly changing landscape of antimicrobial resistance, continuous monitoring of antimicrobial susceptibility in clinically relevant bacterial isolates plays an important role in the management of infectious diseases. The Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trial (TEST) is an ongoing worldwide surveillance programme monitoring the in vitro activity of tigecycline and a panel of representative comparator antibiotics. We report longitudinal susceptibility data on a large set of isolates (n=36,044) from clinically significant bacterial species collected in 25 microbiological laboratories from 2006 to 2014. Trends include a strong increase of carbapenem and levofloxacin resistance in Acinetobacter spp., and smaller increasing rates of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Across the reporting period, the tigecycline minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) at which 50% and 90% of isolates were inhibited remained stable and susceptibility rates were consistently high (93–100%) for all bacterial species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Kresken
- Antiinfectives Intelligence GmbH, Rheinbach, Germany.,University of Applied Sciences gGmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Harald Seifert
- University Hospital Cologne, Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Cologne, Germany
| | - Arne Rodloff
- University Hospital Leipzig, Institute for Medical Microbiology and Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Karsten Becker
- University Hospital Münster, Institute of Medical Microbiology, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nillius D, von Müller L, Wagenpfeil S, Klein R, Herrmann M. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Saarland, Germany: The Long-Term Care Facility Study. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0153030. [PMID: 27073899 PMCID: PMC4830541 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2015] [Accepted: 03/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multiresistant organisms pose a threat for patients and care recipients. Control interventions need to be tailored to region, the type of institution considered, and risk factors. The German state of Saarland is ideally suited to study colonisation epidemiology throughout its various health and care institutions. After conclusion of a large admission prevalence study in acute care hospitals, we now performed a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) point prevalence study in Saarland long term care facilities (LTCF), allowing for a direct comparison with respect of MRSA prevalence and associated risk factors between these two institutional types located within a confined region. Methodology and Principal Findings Of all LTCF of the region, 65/136 participated in the study performed between 09/2013 and 07/2014. Overall, complete microbiological specimen and questionnaires of 2,858 of 4,275 (66.8%) LTCF residents were obtained. 136/2,858 (4.8%) screened residents revealed MRSA carrier status. Multivariate risk factor analysis yielded ulcer/deep soft tissue infection, urinary tract catheter, and MRSA history with multiple MRSA decolonisation cycles to be independently associated with MRSA carrier status. Conclusion As already known from previous studies, colonisation with MRSA is common in LTCF residents even in an area with relatively low MRSA prevalence. This found prevalence can now be related to the acute care admission prevalence (2.2%) as well as to the admission prevalence in acute care geriatric departments (7.6%). The common clonal attribution (spa type) of MRSA isolates prevalent in the LTCF population as well as in the acute care admission population points towards a close relationship between both types of institutions. However, the ostensible absence of risk factors such as “previous hospitalisation” in conjunction with newly identified factors such as “multiple decolonisation cycles” refers to MRSA colonisation risks independent of contact with acute care facilities. Overall, this large LTCF point prevalence study allows data-based, region-tailored decisions on MRSA screening policies and provides a basis for additional preventative measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothea Nillius
- Institute and State Laboratory of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Saarland University and Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Lutz von Müller
- Institute and State Laboratory of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Saarland University and Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Wagenpfeil
- Institute of Medical Biometry, Epidemiology, and Medical Informatics, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Renate Klein
- Saarland Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Women, and Family, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Mathias Herrmann
- Institute and State Laboratory of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Saarland University and Saarland University Medical Centre, Homburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gerlich MG, Piegsa J, Schäfer C, Hübner NO, Wilke F, Reuter S, Engel G, Ewert R, Claus F, Hübner C, Ried W, Flessa S, Kramer A, Hoffmann W. Improving hospital hygiene to reduce the impact of multidrug-resistant organisms in health care--a prospective controlled multicenter study. BMC Infect Dis 2015; 15:441. [PMID: 26493394 PMCID: PMC4619269 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-015-1184-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2014] [Accepted: 10/06/2015] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nosocomial infections are the most common complication during inpatient hospital care. An increasing proportion of these infections are caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). This report describes an intervention study which was designed to address the practical problems encountered in trying to avoid and treat infections caused by MDROs. The aim of the HARMONIC (Harmonized Approach to avert Multidrug-resistant Organisms and Nosocomial Infections) study is to provide comprehensive support to hospitals in a defined study area in north-east Germany, to meet statutory requirements. To this end, a multimodal system of hygiene management was implemented in the participating hospitals. METHODS/DESIGN HARMONIC is a controlled intervention study conducted in eight acute care hospitals in the 'Health Region Baltic Sea Coast' in Germany. The intervention measures include the provision of written recommendations on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) and multi-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MRGN), supplemented by regional recommendations for antibiotic prescriptions. In addition, there is theoretical and practical training of health care workers (HCWs) in the prevention and handling of MDROs, as well as targeted and critically gauged applications of antibiotics. The main outcomes of the implementation and analysis of the HARMONIC study are: (i) screening rates for MRSA, VRE and MRGN in high-risk patients, (ii) the frequency of MRSA decolonization, (iii) the level of knowledge of HCWs concerning MDROs, and (iv) specific types and amounts of antibiotics used. The data are predominantly obtained by paper-based questionnaires and documentation sheets. A computer-assisted workflow-based documentation system was developed in order to provide support to the participating facilities. The investigation includes three nested studies on risk profiles of MDROs, health-related quality of life, and cost analysis. A six-month follow-up study investigates the quality of life after discharge, the long-term costs of the treatment of infections caused by MDROs, and the sustainability of MRSA eradication. DISCUSSION The aim of this study is to implement and evaluate an area-wide harmonized hygiene program to control the nosocomial spreading of MDROs. Comparability between the intervention and control group is ensured by matching the hospitals according to size (number of discharges per year/number of beds) and level of care (standard or maximum). The results of the study may provide important indications for the implementation of regional MDRO management programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam G Gerlich
- Institut für Community Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
| | - Jens Piegsa
- Institut für Community Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
| | - Christian Schäfer
- Institut für Community Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
| | - Nils-Olaf Hübner
- Institut für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Walter-Rathenau-Straße 49a, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
| | - Florian Wilke
- Institut für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Walter-Rathenau-Straße 49a, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
| | - Susanne Reuter
- Universitätsapotheke, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Straße 20, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
| | - Georg Engel
- Universitätsapotheke, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Straße 20, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
| | - Ralf Ewert
- Zentrum für Innere Medizin, Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin B, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Straße, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
| | - Franziska Claus
- Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine Volkswirtschaftslehre und Finanzwissenschaft, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Friedrich-Loeffler-Straße 70, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
| | - Claudia Hübner
- Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre und Gesundheitsmanagement, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Friedrich-Loeffler-Straße 70, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
| | - Walter Ried
- Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine Volkswirtschaftslehre und Finanzwissenschaft, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Friedrich-Loeffler-Straße 70, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
| | - Steffen Flessa
- Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre und Gesundheitsmanagement, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Friedrich-Loeffler-Straße 70, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
| | - Axel Kramer
- Institut für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Walter-Rathenau-Straße 49a, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
| | - Wolfgang Hoffmann
- Institut für Community Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Heer-Sonderhoff A. Large numbers do not make for great science. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2015; 111:615. [PMID: 25283759 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0615b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
16
|
Meyer E. In reply. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2015; 111:615-6. [PMID: 25283760 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0615c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
17
|
Heizmann WR. Different study methods. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2015; 111:615. [PMID: 25283758 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0615a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
18
|
Maechler F, Peña Diaz LA, Schröder C, Geffers C, Behnke M, Gastmeier P. Prevalence of carbapenem-resistant organisms and other Gram-negative MDRO in German ICUs: first results from the national nosocomial infection surveillance system (KISS). Infection 2014; 43:163-8. [PMID: 25395161 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-014-0701-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2014] [Accepted: 11/01/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Standardized prevalence and incidence data on carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) and, as a relevant subgroup, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are scarce. CRO-surveillance within the German nosocomial infection surveillance system (KISS) aims to provide epidemiological surveillance data on CRO colonizations and infections. METHODS CRO-surveillance is part of a KISS-module for the surveillance of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). MDRO-KISS methods require surveillance of all patients admitted to the ward and standardized documentation of imported and ICU-acquired cases. Data on all MDRO-carriers including colonization and infection with MDRO are collected. All presented data were routine data collected from January 1st 2013 until December 1st 2013 in accordance with the German Protection against Infection Act (IfSG). RESULTS 341 ICUs submitted data on MDRO during the first year. In total, 5,171 cases of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MRGN) were identified. 848 were CRO (16%). 325 CRO-cases were acquired within the ICU (38%), and 373 CRO-patients had an infection (44%). CRO-prevalence was 0.29 per 100 patients. Acquisition rate of MRGN was 1.32 per 1,000 patient days. This rate is more than doubled the acquisition rates of other MDRO under surveillance within MDRO-KISS (0.57 MRSA, 0.49 VRE). CRO-acquisition rate was 0.3 per 1,000 patient days. Incidence density of MRGN infections bacteria was 0.58 per 1,000 patient days (CRO 0.15/1,000 patient days). CONCLUSIONS To date, CRO are common in German ICUs and the relatively large proportions of ICU-acquired CRO and infections emphasize their potential to cause outbreaks. High MRGN infection rates and high ESBL prevalence data from clinical studies suggest a lack of MRGN identification in asymptomatic carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Maechler
- Institut für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, Charité Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hagel S, Scheuerlein H. Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Antimicrobial Therapy of Intra-Abdominal Infections. VISZERALMEDIZIN 2014; 30:310-6. [PMID: 26535044 PMCID: PMC4571728 DOI: 10.1159/000368582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background The increase of antimicrobial resistances to first- and second-line antibiotics, especially of Gram-negative bacteria, and the lack of novel antimicrobial substances are a challenge in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. Methods Review article. Results The efficacy and safety of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in visceral surgery has been demonstrated by several meta-analyses. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is defined as a single administration of antibiotics shortly before a surgical intervention. A so-called prolonged prophylaxis including the postoperative period (e.g. 1-3 days postoperatively) should be avoided as it does not reduce the number of wound infections and is associated with an increased risk of antimicrobial resistance and side effects. Antimicrobial management of severe intra-abdominal infections involves a delicate balance of optimizing empirical therapy which has been shown to improve outcomes while simultaneously reducing unnecessary use of antimicrobials. Conclusion Antimicrobial resistance poses a serious threat to human health and requires a rational use of antibiotics to curb further spreading. This applies for perioperative prophylaxis as well as for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Hagel
- Center for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany, ; Department of Internal Medicine IV, Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany, ; Center for Sepsis Control & Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Hubert Scheuerlein
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|