[The role of micronutrients in the comprehensive rehabilitation of patients with the novel coronavirus infection COVID-19]

[Multiplex analysis of post-Covid cardiorenal complications in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus according to the mobile diagnostic and treatment center (Diamobil)]

BACKGROUND

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at risk for a higher incidence and severity of COVID-19, as well as its adverse outcomes, including post-Covid syndrome.

AIM

to assess the incidence of cardiorenal complications in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes (T1DM/T2DM) who have had COVID-19, and to analyze the structure and severity of disorders according to examination data at the Diamobil mobile medical diagnostic and treatment center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

a cohort of T1DM and T2DM patients examined in Diamobil (n=318), with a confirmed anamnesis of COVID-19 (n=236). The time interval between COVID-19 and the visit to Diamobil was 8.7/8.2 months for T1DM/T2DM. The parameters of the last visit before COVID-19 recorded in the Federal Register of Diabetes (FRD) were used as initial data.

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics of patients with T1DM/T2DM: age - 49.2/64.5 years, duration of DM - 22/11 years, proportion of women - 64/73%, respectively. After analysis the data from visits before and after COVID-19 there weren't statistically significant differences in HbA1c levels for both types of DM (before 9.0/8.3%; after 8.4/8.2%, respectively), there was the intensification of glucose lowering therapy (the proportion of patients with T2DM on 2 and 3 component therapy increased by 4.3% and 1.6%, the proportion of patients on insulin therapy by 16%). After COVID-19, there was a statistically significant decrease in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in T1DM from 88.1 to 62 ml/min/1.73 m2; with T2DM from 74.7 to 54.1 ml/min/1.73 m2. When assessing acute diabetic complications, there was an increase in the frequency of coma in T1DM by 1.5 times, severe hypoglycemia in T1DM by 3 times, and in T2DM by 1.7 times. Analysis of the frequency of cardiorenal complications before and after COVID-19 showed a total increase of 8.5% in T1DM, by 13.2% in T2DM, of which myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, and CHF increased in T1DM in the range from 1.5 to 5 times, with T2DM by 1.3 times, the frequency of CKD with T1DM by 1.5 times, with T2DM by 5.6 times.

CONCLUSION

There was a decline of kidney filtration function (decrease in GFR) and an increase in the frequency of cardiovascular complications in both types of diabetes in post-Covid period while patients achieved a stable HbA1c levels by intensifying therapy during the COVID-19 infection. This fact reflects combined damage to the kidney and cardiovascular system as a part of the post-Covid syndrome and determines a key set of measures for the development of preventive strategies.

Gastrointestinal disorders in post-COVID syndrome. Clinical guidelines

Summary Post- COVID syndrome refers to the long-term consequences of a new coronavirus infection COVID-19, which includes a set of symptoms that develop or persist after COVID-19. Symptoms of gastrointestinal disorders in post- COVID syndrome, due to chronic infl ammation, the consequences of organ damage, prolonged hospitalization, social isolation, and other causes, can be persistent and require a multidisciplinary approach. The presented clinical practice guidelines consider the main preventive and therapeutic and diagnostic approaches to the management of patients with gastroenterological manifestations of postCOVID syndrome. The Guidelines were approved by the 17th National Congress of Internal Medicine and the 25th Congress of Gastroenterological Scientifi c Society of Russia.

Long-term outcomes of different rehabilitation programs in patients with long COVID syndrome: a cohort prospective study

After the resolution of the acute SARS-COV-2 infection, an important percentage of patients do not fully recover and continue to present several symptoms. Nevertheless, there is a lack of data in the literature on the effects of rehabilitation programs on medium- and long-term long COVID symptoms. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes after rehabilitation programs in long COVID syndrome patients. A prospective cohort study was conducted from August 2021 to March 2022, involving 113 patients with long COVID syndrome. The patients in the experimental group (EG, n=25) received a tailored and multidisciplinary rehabilitative program, involving aquatic exercises, respiratory and motor exercises, social integration training and neuropsychologic sessions, LASER therapy and magnetotherapy. Patients in the other three comparison groups received eastern medicine techniques (CG1), balneotherapy and physiotherapy (group CG2), self-training and home-based physical exercise (CG3). Once the several rehabilitation protocols had been performed, a structured telephone contact was made with the patients after 6 months ± 7 days from the end of the rehabilitation treatment, in order to record the frequency of hospital ad-missions due to exacerbation of post-exacerbation syndrome, death or disability, and the need for other types of care or drugs. The patients in the comparison groups were more likely to request therapeutic care for emerging long COVID symptoms (χ2=6.635, p=0.001; χ2=13.463, p=0.001; χ2=10.949, p=0.001, respectively), as well as more likely to be hospitalized (χ2=5.357, p=0.021; χ2=0.125, p=0.724; χ2=0.856, p=0.355, respectively) when compared to the patients of the EG. The relative risk (RR) of hospital admissions in the observed cohort was 0.143 ±1,031 (СI: 0.019; 1.078); 0.580±1,194 (CI: 0.056; 6.022); 0,340±1,087 (CI: 0.040; 2.860). The RR of hospital admissions for patients with long COVID syndrome was reduced by 85.7%; 42.0% and 66.0%, respectively, when the experimental rehabilitation technique was employed. In conclusion, a tailored and multidisciplinary rehabilitative program seems to have a better preventive effect not only in the short term, but also over the next 6 months, avoiding the new onset of disabilities and the use of medicines and specialist advice, than other rehabilitative programs. Future studies will need to further investigate these aspects to identify the best rehabilitation therapy, also in terms of cost-effectiveness, for these patients.