Access to and interventions to improve maternity care services for immigrant women: a narrative synthesis systematic review

A review of the effectiveness and experiences of welfare advice services co-located in health settings: A critical narrative systematic review

We conducted a narrative systematic review to assess the health, social and financial impacts of co-located welfare services in the UK and to explore the effectiveness of and facilitators and barriers to successful implementation of these services, in order to guide future policy and practice. We searched Medline, EMBASE and other literature sources, from January 2010 to November 2020, for literature examining the impact of co-located welfare services in the UK on any outcome. The review identified 14 studies employing a range of study designs, including: one non-randomised controlled trial; one pilot randomised controlled trial; one before-and-after-study; three qualitative studies; and eight case studies. A theory of change model, developed a priori, was used as an analytical framework against which to map the evidence on how the services work, why and for whom. All studies demonstrated improved financial security for participants, generating an average of £27 of social, economic and environmental return per £1 invested. Some studies reported improved mental health for individuals accessing services. Several studies attributed subjective improvements in physical health to the service addressing key social determinants of health. Benefits to the health service were also demonstrated through reduced workload for healthcare professionals. Key components of a successful service included co-production during service development and ongoing enhanced multi-disciplinary collaboration. Overall, this review demonstrates improved financial security for participants and for the first time models the wider health and welfare benefits for participants and for health service from these services. However, given the generally poor scientific quality of the studies, care must be taken in drawing firm conclusions. There remains a need for more high quality research, using experimental methods and larger sample sizes, to further build upon this evidence base and to measure the strength of the proposed theoretical pathways in this area.

Barriers and facilitators of maternal healthcare utilisation in the perinatal period among women with social disadvantage: A theory-guided systematic review

BACKGROUND

Women with social disadvantage have poorer perinatal outcomes compared to women in advantaged social positions, which may be linked to poorer healthcare utilisation. Disadvantaged groups may experience a greater diversity of barriers (e.g., feeling embarrassed about pregnancy, lack of transportation) or barriers judged to be particularly difficult (e.g., embarrassment about pregnancy). They may also experience barriers more frequently (e.g., depression). Using Levesque et al.'s (2013) framework of healthcare access, our review identifies the barriers and facilitators that affect maternal healthcare utilisation in the perinatal period among women with social disadvantage in high-income nations.

OBJECTIVES

Our review searches for the barriers and facilitators affecting maternal healthcare utilisation in the perinatal period, from pregnancy to the first year postpartum, among women with social disadvantage (Prospero registration CRD42020151506).

DESIGN

We conducted a theory-guided systematic review. PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Social Science Citation Index databases were searched for publications between 1999 and 2018.

FINDINGS

37 articles out of 12'972 were included in the qualitative synthesis. 19 domains of barriers and facilitators were extracted. Domains on the provider side includes 'information regarding available treatments' and 'trustful relationships.' On the user-side, domains include 'awareness of pregnancy' and 'unplanned/unwanted pregnancy' KEY CONCLUSIONS: Provider- and user-side characteristics interact to affect access. User-side characteristics that pose a barrier can be offset by provider-side characteristics that lower barriers to access.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

User-side characteristics (e.g., lack of awareness of pregnancy) play an important role in the initial steps toward access. Among women with social disadvantage, reducing barriers may require active outreach on the part of providers.