Cetuximab for the treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Oroxylum indicum Stem Bark Extract Reduces Tumor Progression by Inhibiting the EGFR-PI3K-AKT Pathway in an In Vivo 4NQO-Induced Oral Cancer Model

OBJECTIVES

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the predominant type of oral cancer. Its incidence is high in certain geographic regions, and it is correlated with chewing tobacco. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), induced by tobacco carcinogens, is overexpressed in OSCC, leading to poor prognosis. Thus, EGFR inhibitors are promising agents against OSCC. High cost and toxicity of existing EGFR inhibitors necessitate alternative EGFR-targeted therapy. Here, we tested the antitumor potential of ethyl acetate fraction of an ethnomedicinal tree, Oroxylum indicum stem bark extract (OIEA) in a 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4NQO)-induced oral carcinogenesis model.

METHODS

OIEA was prepared by solvent extraction method, and subsequently its in vitro radical scavenging activities were measured. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of OIEA was done to identify the constituent active compounds. Hemolytic, trypan blue exclusion, and MTT [3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide] assays were performed in normal and cancer cells to select an optimum dose of OIEA for antitumor activity study in 4NQO-induced oral cancer in F344 rats. Measurement of tumor volume, weight, and cell count was followed by tumor cell cycle analysis and comet and annexin V/Propidium Iodide (PI) assay. Pro-apoptotic markers were detected by western blot testing. Molecular docking was done to predict the interaction between OIEA active component and EGFR or phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K), which was further validated biologically. Finally, hepatic and renal function testing and histopathology were performed.

RESULTS

OIEA reduced tumor burden and increased survivability of the tumor-bearing rats significantly as compared to untreated tumor bearers. HPLC revealed oroxylin A as the predominant bioactive component in OIEA. Molecular docking predicted significant binding between oroxylin A and EGFR as well as PI3K, which was confirmed by western blot analysis of in vivo samples. OIEA also ameliorated hepato-, renal- and myelotoxicity induced by 4NQO.

CONCLUSION

OIEA reduces 4NQO-induced OSCC by modulating the EGFR/PI3K/AKT signaling cascade and also ameliorated toxicity in tumor bearers.

Palliative treatment standards for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma : Survey of clinical routine in German-speaking countries

BACKGROUND

The EXTREME (Erbitux in First-Line Treatment of Recurrent and Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma) protocol is generally considered the gold standard in palliative first-line treatment. However, there is some disagreement about its effectivity, toxicity, and applicability in daily clinical routine. The purpose of this cross-sectional survey was to describe the palliative treatment offered in German-speaking countries.

METHODS

From November 2013 to July 2014, 204 departments of otorhinolaryngology (ORL) in Germany, Austria, and the German-speaking parts of Switzerland were contacted and invited to take part in a web-based survey on the treatment of HNSCC.

RESULTS

In all, 62 of 204 treatment centers (30.4 %) participated in the survey. Of these, 58 departments offered palliative systemic therapy to their patients; 19 of 58 (32.8 %) treated patients undergoing palliative chemotherapy in their own ORL departments, while 40 of 58 (69 %) upheld a cooperation with medical oncologists in the same hospital and 24 of 58 (41.4 %) with medical oncologic practices. Many of these treatment centers offered multiple locations for treatment. Of the 58 departments, 56 provided an institutional standard for first-line palliative treatment, 13 for second-line, and two for third-line treatment. In 42 of 58 departments the EXTREME protocol was the institutional standard of care for first-line treatment. Moreover, 12 of 58 departments mentioned an individual protocol and two of 58 the inclusion in clinical trials as their local standard. The assessment of patients who could be treated with the first-line standard ranged from 0 to 95 % with a mean of 44.5 %.

CONCLUSION

Palliative systemic therapy seems to be well standardized for first-line treatment, whereas there is little standardization in second- and third-line treatments. A large variation was found regarding the estimate of the applicability of the institutional standard. Reasons for this could be the physicians' individual experience as well as the varying assessment regarding the toxicity of palliative systemic therapy.

Cost-Effectiveness of Cetuximab for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background

Costly biologicals in palliative oncology are emerging at a rapid pace. For example, in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma addition of cetuximab to a palliative chemotherapy regimen appears to improve survival. However, it simultaneously results in higher costs. We aimed to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of adding cetuximab to first-line chemotherapeutic treatment of patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, based on data from a randomized controlled phase II trial.

Methods

A cost effectiveness analysis model was applied based on individual patient data. It included only direct medical costs from the health-care perspective. Quality-adjusted life-years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated. Sensitivity analysis was performed by a Monte Carlo analysis.

Results

Adding cetuximab to a cisplatin-5-fluorouracil first-line regimen for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma resulted in an the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €252,203 per quality-adjusted life-year. Sensitivity analysis shows that there is a chance of less than 0.001 that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be less than a maximum willingness to pay threshold of €40,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, which is representative for the threshold used in The Netherlands and other developed countries.

Conclusions

Addition of cetuximab to a cisplatin-5-fluorouracil first-line regimen for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is not cost-effective when appraised according to currently accepted criteria. Cost-effectiveness analyses using outcome data from early clinical trials (i.c. a phase II trial) enable pharmaceutical companies and policy makers to gain early insight into whether a new drug meets the current eligibility standards for reimbursement and thereby potential admittance for use in regular clinical practice.

Treatments and costs for recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in the Netherlands

For patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN), chemotherapy can prolong life and alleviate symptoms. However, expected gains may be small, not necessarily outweighing considerable toxicity and high costs. Treatment choice is to a large extent dependent on preferences of doctors and patients and data on these choices are scarce. The purpose of this study is to obtain real-world information on palliative systemic treatment and costs of R/M SCCHN in the Netherlands. In six Dutch head and neck treatment centers, data were collected on patient and tumor characteristics, treatment patterns, disease progression, survival, adverse events, and resource use for R/M SCCHN, between 2006 and 2013. 125 (14 %) out of 893 R/M SCCHN patients received palliative, non-trial first-line systemic treatment, mainly platinum + 5FU + cetuximab (32 %), other platinum-based combination therapy (13 %), methotrexate monotherapy (27 %) and capecitabine monotherapy (14 %). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.4 and 6.0 months, respectively. 34 (27 %) patients experienced severe adverse events. Mean total hospital costs ranged from € 10,075 (± € 9,891) (methotrexate monotherapy) to € 39,459 (± € 21,149) (platinum + 5FU + cetuximab). Primary cost drivers were hospital stays and anticancer drug treatments. Major health care utilization and costs are involved in systemically treating R/M SCCHN patients with a limited survival.

Balancing Safety and Efficacy of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in more than 80% of squamous cell cancers of the head and neck (SCCHN). An evolving understanding of the role of EGFR in tumorigenesis has made the receptor an important therapeutic target in SCCHN. Several EGFR inhibitors (EGFRIs) are active in SCCHN, and their use is associated with improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival in various treatment settings. Nevertheless, EGFR inhibition is associated with significant mucocutaneous toxicity that must be balanced against its anticipated efficacy. This review summarizes the relevant clinical trial experience with EGFRIs, with attention to efficacy, toxicity, and methods of selecting patients most likely to benefit from therapy.

Inventory of economic evaluation of head and neck oncology from the German perspective

New treatment strategies for head and neck neoplasms include induction chemotherapy and biomarker treatment. Moreover, different therapeutic modalities, especially robotic surgery, induction chemotherapy, biotherapy and altered fractionation schedules of chemo-(radio)therapy are newly combined to optimize treatment benefit and minimize treatment-associated morbidity. Often, overall survival does not change significantly between the competing treatment schedules. Therefore, the evaluation of the patient's treatment-related quality of life (QoL) and organ function becomes more and more important. Finally, the sponsor's financial resources are restricted, which makes it necessary to evaluate therapies for pricing and effectiveness. In head and neck cancer in Europe, analyses of the current situation are lacking. Selective literature research for publications on economic cost-effectiveness analyses was performed. An overview of the current situation with a special focus on Europe is provided. Cost-effectiveness values and QoL assessments should be respected in former prospective study construction to gain systematic information on this topic.

Cetuximab: its unique place in head and neck cancer treatment

Head and neck cancer is the sixth most common cancer worldwide. At present, globally about 650,000 new cases of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) are diagnosed each year. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is almost invariably expressed in SCCHN. Overexpression of the EGFR is a strong and independent unfavorable prognostic factor in SCCHN. Cetuximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody, which binds with high affinity to the extracellular domain of the human EGFR, blocking ligand binding, resulting in inhibition of the receptor function. It also targets cytotoxic immune effector cells towards EGFR-expressing tumor cells (antibody dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity). The addition of cetuximab to radiotherapy (RT) improves locoregional control and survival when compared to RT alone. The addition of cetuximab to platinum-based chemoradiation (CRT) is feasible but does not lead to an improved outcome. Cetuximab plus RT has never been compared prospectively to CRT, which therefore remains the standard treatment for patients with locoregionally advanced SCCHN for whom surgery is not considered the optimal treatment, provided they can tolerate CRT. The addition of cetuximab to platinum-based chemotherapy prolongs survival in patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN. The combination of a platinum-based regimen and cetuximab should be considered as the standard first line regimen for patients who can tolerate this treatment.

Pharmacoeconomic issues in head and neck oncology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite medical advances, the global incidence, morbidity and mortality associated with head and neck cancer remain high. Pharmacoeconomic analyses of chemotherapeutic options commonly used by head and neck oncologists are reviewed in context with current clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

From the British health system perspective, cetuximab with radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck was found to be cost-effective compared to single modality radiotherapy in patients with a good performance status, and in whom platinum agents are contraindicated. Induction chemotherapy with the three-drug regimen docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil is considered cost-effective when compared to the doublet cisplatin-5-fluorouracil from the British and Italian perspectives. However, it is unclear whether induction chemotherapy per se is effective when compared to chemoradiotherapy. Cetuximab with chemotherapy is not recommended from a British health perspective for patients with metastatic/recurrent disease, whereas it is the preferred regimen in commonly used guidelines in the US, where economic evaluations are not incorporated in the drug approval process.

SUMMARY

The critical assessment and utilization of pharmacoeconomic evaluations, always in context with current clinical practice, should be further performed and promoted in head and neck oncology.

Systemic therapy strategies for head-neck carcinomas: Current status

Head and neck cancers, most of which are squamous cell tumours, have an unsatisfactory prognosis despite intensive local treatment. This can be attributed, among other factors, to tumour recurrences inside or outside the treated area, and metastases at more distal locations. These tumours therefore require not only the standard surgical and radiation treatments, but also effective systemic modalities. The main option here is antineoplastic chemotherapy, which is firmly established in the palliative treatment of recurrent or metastatic stages of disease, and is used with curative intent in the form of combined simultaneous or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with inoperable or advanced tumour stages. Neoadjuvant treatment strategies for tumour reduction before surgery have yet to gain acceptance. Induction chemotherapy protocols before radiotherapy have to date been used in patients at high risk of distant metastases or as an aid for decision-making ("chemoselection") in those with extensive laryngeal cancers, prior to definitive chemoradiotherapy or laryngectomy. Triple-combination induction therapy (taxanes, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil) shows high remission rates with significant toxicity and, in combination with (chemo-)radiotherapy, is currently being compared with simultaneous chemoradiotherapy; the current gold standard with regards to efficacy and long-term toxicity.A further systemic treatment strategy, called "targeted therapy", has been developed to help increase specificity and reduce toxicity. An example of targeted therapy, EGFR-specific antibodies, can be used in palliative settings and, in combination with radiotherapy, to treat advanced head and neck cancers. A series of other novel biologicals such as signal cascade inhibitors, genetic agents, or immunotherapies, are currently being evaluated in large-scale clinical studies, and could prove useful in patients with advanced, recurring or metastatic head and neck cancers. When developing a lasting, individualised systemic tumour therapy, the critical evaluation criteria are not only efficacy and acute toxicity but also (long-term) quality-of-life and the identification of dedicated predictive biomarkers.

EGFR Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A View beyond Cetuximab

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is a prevalent disease both in the United States and worldwide with an overall poor prognosis, in part due to limited activity of existing therapy. Primary therapy is largely dictated by the anatomical origin of the cancer and whether distant disease is present. Many patients with localized disease are treated with chemoradiotherapy, either in the definitive or adjuvant setting, and those with metastatic disease are treated with palliative chemotherapy. The chemotherapy used in SCCHN can be toxic, whether given with radiation or alone. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is highly expressed in SCCHN and serves as a logical therapeutic target. EGFR-directed monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) have higher activity in SCCHN than small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cetuximab, a widely studied EGFR MoAb, is FDA approved in the metastatic setting, as well as with radiation for locally advanced disease. Despite improvements in survival when cetuximab is incorporated with chemotherapy for metastatic disease, the prognosis of patients remains poor. Novel EGFR MoAbs are being developed with the goal of improving efficacy and tolerability. This paper will summarize the use of EGFR-directed MoAbs in treating SCCHN with a focus on novel agents being tested.

Current treatment options for recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer: a post-ASCO 2011 update and review of last year's literature

The majority of patients with a squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck present with locally advanced tumors. The first-line treatment of locally advanced tumor stages consists of a combined modality management. Despite these aggressive protocols, many patients develop locoregional recurrences or metastasis and place particularly high demands on the interdisciplinary treatment team. Treatment with a curative intent must be differentiated from a palliative one. In addition to prior treatment, resectability, age and performance status, patient wishes must be taken into consideration in treatment planning, especially considering that most therapies offer little to no overall survival benefit. Salvage surgery, chemo- and target therapies, and reirradiation are head and neck surgeon's and radiooncologist's weapons in the fight against these strong opponents. This review focuses on publications and meeting news from last year and reviews the current status of the clinical application of each treatment modality in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer.

Inhibition of radiation induced migration of human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells by blocking of EGF receptor pathways

Background

Recently it has been shown that radiation induces migration of glioma cells and facilitates a further spread of tumor cells locally and systemically. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether radiotherapy induces migration in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). A further aim was to investigate the effects of blocking the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and its downstream pathways (Raf/MEK/ERK, PI3K/Akt) on tumor cell migration in vitro.

Methods

Migration of tumor cells was assessed via a wound healing assay and proliferation by a MTT colorimeritric assay using 3 HNSCC cell lines (BHY, CAL-27, HN). The cells were treated with increasing doses of irradiation (2 Gy, 5 Gy, 8 Gy) in the presence or absence of EGF, EGFR-antagonist (AG1478) or inhibitors of the downstream pathways PI3K (LY294002), mTOR (rapamycin) and MEK1 (PD98059). Biochemical activation of EGFR and the downstream markers Akt and ERK were examined by Western blot analysis.

Results

In absence of stimulation or inhibition, increasing doses of irradiation induced a dose-dependent enhancement of migrating cells (p < 0.05 for the 3 HNSCC cell lines) and a decrease of cell proliferation (p < 0.05 for the 3 HNSCC cell lines). The inhibition of EGFR or the downstream pathways reduced cell migration significantly (almost all p < 0.05 for the 3 HNSCC cell lines). Stimulation of HNSCC cells with EGF caused a significant increase in migration (p < 0.05 for the 3 HNSCC cell lines). After irradiation alone a pronounced activation of EGFR was observed by Western blot analysis.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that the EGFR is involved in radiation induced migration of HNSCC cells. Therefore EGFR or the downstream pathways might be a target for the treatment of HNSCC to improve the efficacy of radiotherapy.