The feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of physiotherapy for adults with joint hypermobility syndrome

Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome/hypermobility spectrum disorders in older women: A feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorders cause joint instability, chronic pain, fatigue and progressive multisystemic dysfunction, increasing symptom burden and decreasing quality of life. Researchers know little about how these disorders progress in women as they age.

OBJECTIVE

This research aimed to determine the feasibility of an internet-based study to understand the clinical characteristics, symptom burden and health-related quality of life in older women with symptomatic hypermobility disorders.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, internet-based survey studied recruitment methods, suitability and usability of survey instruments and obtained baseline data on women aged 50 and older with hEDS/HSD. Researchers recruited participants from a Facebook group for older adults with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Outcome measures included health history, the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire and the RAND Short Form 36 health survey.

RESULTS

Researchers recruited 32 participants from a single Facebook group within 2 weeks. Nearly all participants were satisfied with the survey length, clarity and navigation, with 10 participants providing free-text recommendations for survey improvement. The survey suggests a high symptom burden and poor quality of life in older women with hEDS/HSD.

CONCLUSION

The results support the feasibility and importance of a future internet-based comprehensive study about hEDS/HSD in older women.

Multidisciplinary Approach to Treating Chronic Pain in Patients with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: Critically Appraised Topic

The Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) are a group of 13 related connective tissue disorders with a combined prevalence of 1 in 5000 people, with the most common noted as hypermobile EDS (hEDS). The EDS genetic condition is thought to affect both males and females equally, although most symptomatic patients are female. EDS causes a myriad of symptoms, including skin hyperextensibility and fragility, easy bruising and bleeding, joint hypermobility, subluxation, dislocation, and chronic pain. Pain is one of the most common symptoms of EDS, leading to disability and decreased quality of life. Current guidelines for treating chronic pain in EDS are lacking. Clinicians focus on a conservative multidisciplinary approach in patients with EDS, which avoids surgical interventions and its accompanying risks of morbidity and mortality. The multidisciplinary approach includes physiotherapy, occupational therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and pharmacologic interventions to decrease pain. This review identifies literature examining the components of this conservative multidisciplinary approach and their effectiveness across the PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Trip databases, using the terms "Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome AND Pain Management" that was then subsequently evaluated. The evaluation of this current literature provides weak evidence to support the efficacy of the individual components of the conservative multidisciplinary approach. Lack of alternative approaches leaves medical providers with little choice but to suggest these pain control methods, despite low-grade evidence of weak evidence of their efficacy. More research into the pathophysiology of chronic pain in EDS could help identify additional modes and rationales for therapy.

Rationale and Feasibility of Resistance Training in hEDS/HSD: A Narrative Review

Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorder (HSD) are genetic conditions characterized by increased joint hypermobility, often in the presence of other signs or symptoms if syndromic. This hypermobility can result in significant pain and ultimately decreased participation in recreational or competitive activity. Rehabilitation of patients with hEDS/HSD is not well understood, particularly since presentation can be relatively heterogenous. Regardless, more research is needed, particularly regarding resistance training, to allow patients with hEDS/HSD to participate in the activities they enjoy. The purpose of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the clinical features displayed by those with hEDS/HSD that have been found to be improved with resistance training in other populations, and to present the current evidence for resistance training in all types of study designs, ranging from case studies to randomized controlled trials.

An investigation of the control of quadriceps in people who are hypermobile; a case control design. Do the results impact our choice of exercise for people with symptomatic hypermobility?

Background

People with symptomatic hypermobility have altered proprioception however, the origin of this is unclear and needs further investigation to target rehabilitation appropriately. The objective of this investigation was to explore the corticospinal and reflex control of quadriceps and see if it differed between three groups of people: those who have symptomatic hypermobility, asymptomatic hypermobility and normal flexibility.

Methods

Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and Hoffman (H) reflexes of quadriceps were evoked in the three groups of people. The threshold and latency of MEPs and the slope of the input–output curves and the amplitude of MEPs and H reflexes were compared across the groups.

Results

The slope of the input–output curve created from MEPs as a result of TMS was steeper in people with symptomatic hypermobility when compared to asymptomatic and normally flexible people (p = 0.04). There were no other differences between the groups.

Conclusion

Corticospinal excitability and the excitability at the motoneurone pool are not likely candidates for the origin of proprioceptive loss in people with symptomatic hypermobility. This is discussed in the light of other work to suggest the receptor sitting in hypermobile connective tissue is a likely candidate. This suggests that treatment aimed at improving receptor responsiveness through increasing muscle tone, may be an effective rehabilitation strategy.

Exercise and rehabilitation in people with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: A systematic review

Objective

Data Sources

Study Selection

Data Extraction

Data Synthesis

Conclusions

The diagnostic journey in adults with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorders

BACKGROUND

Researchers have identified lengthy diagnosis delays in patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorders (hEDS/HSD), but the reason for these delays is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This review seeks to synthesize the existing qualitative research about hEDS/HSD to understand the reasons for diagnosis delay.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and Dissertations and Theses databases for all qualitative studies about hEDS/HSD that mentioned the diagnosis process. A total of 283 studies were retrieved, from which we identified 13 studies to include in this synthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

The reviewers identified and organized diagnosis delay themes under four overarching categories: disease, patient, provider, and system. Disease factors included the nature of the symptoms and lack of a confirmatory test. Patient factors included psychological and emotional responses, seeing multiple providers, and receiving multiple diagnoses. Provider factors related to limited knowledge and attitudes. System factors included silo-based health care systems and bureaucratic barriers.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Diagnosis delays result from complex, overlapping, and interacting factors. Nurse practitioners have a critical role in improving care and reducing diagnosis delays in patients with hEDS/HSD. Further research is needed to understand the causes and consequences of diagnosis delays in hEDS/HSD.

Fidelity of a Traffic Safety Education Intervention for Combat Veterans

Equipoise, feasibility, and fidelity were studied for the control condition of an occupational therapy driving intervention in a randomized controlled trial. We ranked equipoise and feasibility of six traffic safety education methods and created an implementation fidelity competency checklist. Education method selection was informed using the proportion of concordant ranks analysis while literature and a peer review informed competency checklist development. A proctored-online course delivery had the highest rater agreement (equipoise = .96 [.87-1.00]; feasibility = .99 [.97-1.00]). Implementation fidelity was supported by a 19-component training and evaluation checklist. This study supports promoting the scientific rigor of the RCT via - equipoise, feasibility, and implementation fidelity.

The effectiveness of conservative interventions for the management of syndromic hypermobility: a systematic literature review

Introduction

‘Syndromic hypermobility’ encompasses heritable connective tissue disorders such as hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorders which are characterised by excessive joint range of motion and pain. Conservative interventions such as exercise are the cornerstone of management, yet their effectiveness is unclear.

Aim

To systematically appraise the effectiveness of conservative management for people with syndromic hypermobility.

Method

A systematic online database search was conducted (AMED, BND, CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, PEDro, PsychINFO and SportDiscus). Potential articles were assessed for eligibility by two researchers against the following criteria: adults and children with a hEDS/HSD diagnosis (or equivalent diagnosis using specific criteria); non-pharmacological or non-surgical interventions; outcomes related to pain, physical function, psychological well-being or quality of life. Controlled trials and cohort studies were included. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklists were used to assess methodological quality.

Results

Eleven studies were included, comprising eight controlled trials and three cohort studies. All studies investigated interventions that had exercise as the primary component. Three small controlled studies demonstrated superior effects of conservative management relative to a control group. However, those studies only focused on a single area of the body, only recruited women, and had no long-term follow-up. All studies reported improvements in a wide range of outcomes over time.

Conclusion

Controlled trial evidence for the superiority of conservative management over comparators is weak. There is some evidence that people improve over time. Robust randomised controlled trial research of the long-term effectiveness of ‘whole-body’ (rather than individual joints or body areas) conservative management is required.

Key Points • Conservative management is the cornerstone of management of syndromic hypermobility. • The review found that evidence for the effectiveness of conservative management relative to no treatment or other conservative comparators was weak. • However, there was consistent evidence for effectiveness from pre- to post-treatment. • Further robust randomised controlled trial evidence is required.

Understanding the psychosocial impact of joint hypermobility syndrome and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type: a qualitative interview study

PURPOSE

Little attention has been paid to psychosocial factors in Joint Hypermobility Syndrome and Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hypermobility type). This study sought to identify the psychosocial impact by examining participants' lived experiences; and identify characteristics of effective coping.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adults with Joint Hypermobility Syndrome and Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (Hypermobility Type) were invited to discuss their own lived experiences and the impact of the condition. All met recognized criteria for clinically significant joint hypermobility, and had a self-confirmed diagnosis. The transcripts were coded and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Seventeen participants (14 women, 3 men) purposively selected to broadly represent different genders, ages and ethnicities. Analysis identified five key themes: healthcare limitations, a lack of awareness of Joint Hypermobility, and Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (Hypermobility Type) among healthcare professionals; a restricted life; social stigma; fear of the unknown; and ways of coping.

CONCLUSIONS

The results highlight the significant psychosocial impact on participants' lives. Coping approaches identified included acceptance, building social networks, learning about joint hypermobility, and adapting activities. Physiotherapists supported regular exercise. Further research should consider potential interventions to improve information provision, address psychological support, and increase awareness of hypermobility among healthcare professionals.Implications for rehabilitationParticipants who had help from family members to complete activities described guilt and shame, highlighting the need for a greater rehabilitation focus on maintaining independence.Difficulties with sexual relationships due to prolapse or erectile dysfunction, and associated anxieties have indicated a need for greater awareness of these issues within primary care.The provision of reliable information and materials is vital, both for healthcare professionals and patients, to reduce misinformation and fear.Physiotherapists with knowledge of Joint Hypermobility Syndrome and Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome hypermobility type were cited as sources of support and hope, which helped people to cope with and manage their condition.

Test-retest reliability and smallest detectable change of the Bristol Impact of Hypermobility (BIoH) questionnaire

OBJECTIVE

The Bristol Impact of Hypermobility (BIoH) questionnaire is a patient-reported outcome measure developed in conjunction with adults with Joint Hypermobility Syndrome (JHS). It has demonstrated strong concurrent validity with the Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical component score but other psychometric properties have yet to be established. This study aimed to determine its test-retest reliability and smallest detectable change (SDC).

DESIGN

A test-retest reliability study.

SETTING

Participants were recruited from the Hypermobility Syndromes Association, a patient organisation in the United Kingdom.

PATIENTS

Recruitment packs were sent to 1080 adults who had given permission to be contacted about research.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

BIoH and SF-36 questionnaires were administered at baseline and repeated two weeks later. An 11-point global rating of change scale (-5 to +5) was also administered at two weeks. Test-retest analysis and calculation of the SDC was conducted on 'stable' patients (defined as global rating of change -1 to +1).

RESULTS

462 responses were received. 233 patients reported a 'stable' condition and were included in analysis (95% women; mean (SD) age 44.5 (13.9) years; BIoH score 223.6 (54.0)). The BIoH questionnaire demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (ICC 0.923, 95% CI 0.900-0.940). The SDC was 42 points (equivalent to 19% of the mean baseline score). The SF-36 physical and mental component scores demonstrated poorer test-retest reliability and larger SDCs (as a proportion of the mean baseline scores).

CONCLUSION

The results provide further evidence of the potential of the BIoH questionnaire to underpin research and clinical practice for people with JHS.

The evidence-based rationale for physical therapy treatment of children, adolescents, and adults diagnosed with joint hypermobility syndrome/hypermobile Ehlers Danlos syndrome

New insights into the phenotype of Joint Hypermobility Syndrome (JHS) and Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome-hypermobile type (hEDS) have raised many issues in relation to classification, diagnosis, assessment, and treatment. Within the multidisciplinary team, physical therapy plays a central role in management of individuals with hypermobility related disorders. However, many physical therapists are not familiar with the diagnostic criteria, prevalence, common clinical presentation, and management. This guideline aims to provide practitioners with the state of the art regarding the assessment and management of children, adolescents, and adults with JHS/hEDS. Due to the complexity of the symptoms in the profile of JHS/hEDS, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) is adopted as a central framework whereby the umbrella term of disability is used to encompass functions, activities and participation, as well as environmental and personal factors. The current evidence-based literature regarding the management of JHS/hEDS is limited in size and quality and there is insufficient research exploring the clinical outcomes of a number of interventions. Multicenter randomized controlled trials are warranted to assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of interventions for children and adults. Until further multicenter trials are conducted, clinical decision-making should be based on theoretical and the current limited research evidence. For all individuals diagnosed with JHS/hEDS, international consensus and combined efforts to identify risk profiles would create a better understanding of the pathological mechanisms and the potential for optimizing health care for affected individuals. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.