Changes in allele frequencies of CSF3R and SETBP1 mutations and evidence of clonal evolution in a chronic neutrophilic leukemia patient treated with ruxolitinib

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia and atypical chronic myeloid leukemia: 2024 update on diagnosis, genetics, risk stratification, and management

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a rare BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) defined by persistent mature neutrophilic leukocytosis and bone marrow granulocyte hyperplasia. Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) (myelodysplastic "[MDS]/MPN with neutrophilia" per World Health Organization [WHO]) is a MDS/MPN overlap disorder featuring dysplastic neutrophilia and circulating myeloid precursors. Both manifest with frequent hepatosplenomegaly and less commonly, bleeding, with high rates of leukemic transformation and death. The 2022 revised WHO classification conserved CNL diagnostic criteria of leukocytosis ≥25 × 109/L, neutrophils ≥80% with <10% circulating precursors, absence of dysplasia, and presence of an activating CSF3R mutation. ICC criteria are harmonized with those of other myeloid entities, with a key distinction being lower leukocytosis threshold (≥13 × 109/L) for cases CSF3R-mutated. Criteria for aCML include leukocytosis ≥13 × 109/L, dysgranulopoiesis, circulating myeloid precursors ≥10%, and at least one cytopenia for MDS-thresholds (ICC). In both classifications ASXL1 and SETBP1 (ICC), or SETBP1 ± ETNK1 (WHO) mutations can be used to support the diagnosis. Both diseases show hypercellular bone marrow due to a granulocytic proliferation, aCML distinguished by dysplasia in granulocytes ± other lineages. Absence of monocytosis, rare/no basophilia, or eosinophilia, <20% blasts, and exclusion of other MPN, MDS/MPN, and tyrosine kinase fusions, are mandated. Cytogenetic abnormalities are identified in ~1/3 of CNL and ~15-40% of aCML patients. The molecular signature of CNL is a driver mutation in colony-stimulating factor 3 receptor-classically T618I, documented in >80% of cases. Atypical CML harbors a complex genomic backdrop with high rates of recurrent somatic mutations in ASXL1, SETBP1, TET2, SRSF2, EZH2, and less frequently in ETNK1. Leukemic transformation rates are ~10-25% and 30-40% for CNL and aCML, respectively. Overall survival is poor: 15-31 months in CNL and 12-20 months in aCML. The Mayo Clinic CNL risk model for survival stratifies patients according to platelets <160 × 109/L (2 points), leukocytes >60 × 109/L (1 point), and ASXL1 mutation (1 point); distinguishing low- (0-1 points) versus high-risk (2-4 points) categories. The Mayo Clinic aCML risk model attributes 1 point each for: age >67 years, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, and TET2 mutation, delineating low- (0-1 risk factor) and high-risk (≥2 risk factors) subgroups. Management is risk-driven and symptom-directed, with no current standard of care. Most commonly used agents include hydroxyurea, interferon, Janus kinase inhibitors, and hypomethylating agents, though none are disease-modifying. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant is the only potentially curative modality and should be considered in eligible patients. Recent genetic profiling has disclosed CBL, CEBPA, EZH2, NRAS, TET2, and U2AF1 to represent high-risk mutations in both entities. Actionable mutations (NRAS/KRAS, ETNK1) have also been identified, supporting novel agents targeting involved pathways. Preclinical and clinical studies evaluating new drugs (e.g., fedratinib, phase 2) and combinations are detailed.

Research progress of additional pathogenic mutations in chronic neutrophilic leukemia

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a rare type of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). Due to its nonspecific clinical symptoms and lack of specific molecular markers, it was previously difficult to distinguish it from other diseases with increased neutrophils. However, the discovery of the CSF3R mutation in CNL 10 years ago and the update of the diagnostic criteria by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2016 brought CNL into a new era of molecular diagnosis. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology has led to the identification of numerous mutant genes in CNL. While CSF3R is commonly recognized as the driver mutation of CNL, other mutations have also been detected in CNL using NGS, including mutations in other signaling pathway genes (CBL, JAK2, NARS, PTPN11) and chromatin modification genes (ASXL1, SETBP1, EZH2), DNA methylation genes (DNMT3A, TET2), myeloid-related transcription factor genes (RUNX1, GATA2), and splicing and RNA metabolism genes (SRSF2, U2AF1). The coexistence of these mutated genes and CSF3R mutations, as well as the different evolutionary sequences of clones, deepens the complexity of CNL molecular biology. The purpose of this review is to summarize the genetic research findings of CNL in the last decade, focusing on the common mutated genes in CNL and their clinical significance, as well as the clonal evolution pattern and sequence of mutation acquisition in CNL, to provide a basis for the appropriate management of CNL patients.

Recent progress of JAK inhibitors for hematological disorders

JAK inhibitors are important therapeutic options for hematological disorders, especially myeloproliferative neoplasms. Ruxolitinib, the first JAK inhibitor approved for clinical use, improves splenomegaly and ameliorates constitutional symptoms in both myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera patients. Ruxolitinib is also useful for controlling hematocrit levels in polycythemia vera patients who were inadequately controlled by conventional therapies. Furthermore, pretransplantation use of ruxolitinib may improve the outcome of allo-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myelofibrosis. In contrast to these clinical merits, evidence of the disease-modifying action of ruxolitinib, i.e., reduction of malignant clones or improvement of bone marrow pathological findings, is limited, and many myelofibrosis patients discontinued ruxolitinib due to adverse events or disease progression. To overcome these limitations of ruxolitinib, several new types of JAK inhibitors have been developed. Among them, fedratinib was proven to provide clinical merits even in patients who were resistant or intolerant to ruxolitinib. Pacritinib and momelotinib have shown merits for myelofibrosis patients with thrombocytopenia or anemia, respectively. In addition to treatment for myeloproliferative neoplasms, recent studies have demonstrated that JAK inhibitors are novel and attractive therapeutic options for corticosteroid-refractory acute as well as chronic graft versus host disease.

Case report: Chronic neutrophilic leukemia associated with monoclonal gammopathies. A case series and review of genetic characteristics and practical management

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a rare but potentially aggressive BCR::ABL1 negative myeloproliferative neoplasm, characterized by sustained mature, neutrophilic leukocytosis. The discovery of key driver mutations in the colony-stimulating-factor-3 receptor (CSF3R) gene resulted in the updated World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria in 2016. A significant number of CNL cases have been associated with plasma cell dyscrasias, predominantly multiple myeloma (MM) and monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS). Compared to pure CNL, mutated CSF3R is infrequently reported in CNL cases associated with monoclonal gammopathies (MG). Until now it remains unclear whether CNL and occurring plasma cell neoplasms are clonally related or CNL is developing secondary to the underlying dyscrasia. Owing to its rarity, currently no standard of care management exists for CNL and MG-associated CNL. In this case series we report the multi-center experience of five MG-associated CNL cases with a median age of diagnosis of 69 years. Three patients (66%) showed predominance of lambda light chain expression. Four (80%) eventually evolved to MM, and one CNL-MGUS patient developed secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Mutated CSF3R was present in the patient who developed AML but was absent in other cases. To assess possible associated genetic aberrations we performed recurrent analysis with next-generation sequencing (NGS). Two patients (40%) deceased with a median time of survival of 8 years after CNL diagnosis. Three (60%) are currently in follow-up with no reoccurring leukocytosis. This case series, followed by a short review, provides a long-term clinical and genetic overview of five CNL cases associated with MG.

Chronic Neutrophilic Leukemia: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Characteristics, Genetic Landscape and Management

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) represents a rare disease, that has been classified among the BCR/ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. The disease is characterized by marked leukocytosis with absolute neutrophilia and its clinical presentation may vary from asymptomatic to highly symptomatic with massive splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. CNL prognosis remains relatively poor, as most patients succumb to disease complications or transform to acute myeloid leukemia. Recent studies have demonstrated that CSF3R mutations drive the disease, albeit the presence of other secondary mutations perplex the genetic landscape of the disease. Notably, the presence of CSF3R mutations has been adopted as a criterion for diagnosis of CNL. Despite the vigorous research, the management of the disease remains suboptimal. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation represents the only treatment that could lead to cure; however, it is accompanied by high rates of treatment-related mortality. Recently, ruxolitinib has shown significant responses in patients with CNL; however, emergence of resistance might perturbate long-term management of the disease. The aim of this review is to summarize the clinical course and laboratory findings of CNL, highlight its pathogenesis and complex genetic landscape, and provide the context for the appropriate management of patients with CNL.

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia: 2022 update on diagnosis, genomic landscape, prognosis, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a rare, often aggressive myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) defined by persistent mature neutrophilic leukocytosis, bone marrow granulocyte hyperplasia, and frequent hepatosplenomegaly. The 2013 seminal discovery of oncogenic driver mutations in colony-stimulating factor 3 receptor (CSF3R) in the majority of patients with CNL not only established its molecular pathogenesis but provided a diagnostic biomarker and rationale for pharmacological targeting.

DIAGNOSIS

In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) recognized activating CSF3R mutations as a central diagnostic feature of CNL. Other criteria include leukocytosis of ≥25 × 10⁹ /L comprising >80% neutrophils with <10% circulating precursors and rare blasts, and absence of dysplasia or monocytosis, while not fulfilling criteria for other MPN.

MANAGEMENT

There is currently no standard of care for management of CNL, due in large part to the rarity of disease and dearth of formal clinical trials. Most commonly used therapeutic agents include conventional oral chemotherapy (e.g., hydroxyurea), interferon, and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, while hematopoietic stem cell transplant remains the only potentially curative modality.

DISEASE UPDATES

Increasingly comprehensive genetic profiling in CNL, including new data on clonal evolution, has disclosed a complex genomic landscape with additional mutations and combinations thereof driving disease progression and drug resistance. Although accurate prognostic stratification and therapeutic decision-making remain challenging in CNL, emerging data on molecular biomarkers and the addition of newer agents, such as JAK inhibitors, to the therapeutic arsenal, are paving the way toward greater standardization and improvement of patient care.

Rare evolution of CSF3R-mutated chronic neutrophilic leukemia to t(4;12)(q12;p13) acute myeloid leukemia with SETBP1 mutation

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a rare myeloproliferative disease accompanied by mutations in CSF3R. Here, we present a patient with CNL who developed to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) at the same time that a t(4;12)(q12;p13) translocation appeared. The uniqueness of this cytogenetic abnormality led us to delineate the molecular aberrations relevant for clonal evolution. While the CSF3R mutation was present throughout the course of the disease, the SETBP1 mutation was newly acquired at the AML transformation. The present case suggests that careful monitoring of t(4;12)(q12;p13) and SETBP1 is crucial to predict AML evolution in CNL patients.

Genetic Landscape of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms with an Emphasis on Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory Testing

Chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are hematopoietic stem cell neoplasms with driver events including the BCR-ABL1 translocation leading to a diagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), or somatic mutations in JAK2, CALR, or MPL resulting in Philadelphia-chromosome-negative MPNs with constitutive activation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. In the Philadelphia-chromosome-negative MPNs, modern sequencing panels have identified a vast molecular landscape including additional mutations in genes involved in splicing, signal transduction, DNA methylation, and chromatin modification such as ASXL1, SF3B1, SRSF2, and U2AF1. These additional mutations often influence prognosis in MPNs and therefore are increasingly important for risk stratification. This review focuses on the molecular alterations within the WHO classification of MPNs and laboratory testing used for diagnosis.

Current Management of Chronic Neutrophilic Leukemia

OPINION STATEMENT

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a rare myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by oncogenic driver mutations in colony-stimulating factor 3 receptor (CSF3R). Due in large part to the rarity of the disease and dearth of clinical trials, there is currently no standard of care for CNL. Available therapies range from conventional oral chemotherapy to targeted JAK inhibitors to hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), the latter representing the only potentially curative modality. For this reason, coupled with CNL's typically aggressive clinical course, allogeneic HSCT remains the primary recommended therapy for eligible patients. For ineligible patients, a number of nontransplant therapies have been evaluated in limited trials. These agents may additionally be considered "bridging" therapies pre-transplant in order to control myeloproliferation and alleviate symptoms. Historically, the most commonly utilized first-line agent has been hydroxyurea, though most patients ultimately require second (or subsequent)-line therapy; still hydroxyurea remains the conventional frontline option. Dasatinib has demonstrated efficacy in vitro in cases of CSF3R terminal membrane truncation mutations and may cautiously be considered upfront in such instances, though no substantive studies have validated its efficacy in vivo. Numerous other chemotherapy agents, practically re-appropriated from the pharmaceutical arsenal of MPN, have been utilized in CNL and are typically reserved for second/subsequent-line settings; these include interferon-alpha (IFN-a), hypomethylating agents, thalidomide, cladribine, and imatinib, among others. Most recently, ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor targeting JAK-STAT signaling downstream from CSF3R, has emerged as a potentially promising new candidate for the treatment of CNL. Increasingly robust data support the clinical efficacy, with associated variable reductions in allele burden, and tolerability of ruxolitinib in patients with CNL, particularly those carrying the CSF3RT618I mutation. Similar to conventional nontransplant strategies, however, no disease-modifying or survival benefits have been demonstrated. While responses to JAK-STAT inhibition in CNL have not been uniform, data are sufficient to recommend consideration of ruxolitinib in the therapeutic repertory of CNL. There remains a major unmet need for prospective trials with investigational therapies in CNL.

Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Laboratory Workup in the Era of Next-Generation Sequencing

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the impact of next-generation sequencing (NGS) on laboratory approach of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs).

RECENT FINDINGS

Next-generation sequencing has provided valuable information on the mutational landscape of MPNs and has been used for various applications, including diagnosis, risk stratification, monitoring of residual disease or disease progression, and target therapy. Most commonly, targeted sequencing of a panel of genes that have been shown to be recurrently mutated in myeloid neoplasms is used. Although numerous studies have shown the benefit of using NGS in the routine clinical care of MPN patients, the complexity of NGS data and how these data may contribute to the clinical outcome have limited the development of a standard clinical guideline. We review recent literature and discuss how to interpret and use NGS data in the clinical care of MPN patients.

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia: 2020 update on diagnosis, molecular genetics, prognosis, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a rare, often aggressive myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) defined by persistent mature neutrophilic leukocytosis, bone marrow granulocyte hyperplasia, and frequent hepatosplenomegaly. The seminal discovery of oncogenic driver mutations in colony-stimulating factor 3 receptor (CSF3R) in the majority of patients with CNL in 2013 anchored a new scientific framework, deepening our understanding of its molecular pathogenesis, providing a diagnostic biomarker, and rationalizing the use of pharmacological targeting.

DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA

In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) included the presence of activating CSF3R mutations as a central diagnostic feature of CNL. Other criteria include leukocytosis of ≥25 × 10⁹ /L comprising >80% neutrophils with <10% circulating precursors and rare blasts, and absence of dysplasia or monocytosis, while not fulfilling criteria for other MPN.

DISEASE UPDATES

Increasingly comprehensive genetic profiling of CNL has disclosed a complex genomic landscape and additional prognostically relevant mutational combinations. Though prognostic determination and therapeutic decision-making remain challenging, emerging data on prognostic markers and the use of newer therapeutic agents, such as JAK inhibitors, are helping to define state-of-the-art management in CNL.

Efficacy of Ruxolitinib in Patients With Chronic Neutrophilic Leukemia and Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

PURPOSE

Colony-stimulating factor-3 receptor (CSF3R)-T618I is a recurrent activating mutation in chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) and to a lesser extent in atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) resulting in constitutive JAK-STAT signaling. We sought to evaluate safety and efficacy of the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in patients with CNL and aCML, irrespective of CSF3R mutation status.

METHODS

We conducted a phase II study of ruxolitinib in 44 patients (21 CNL and 23 aCML). The primary end point was overall hematologic response rate (ORR) by the end of 6 continuous 28-day cycles for the first 25 patients enrolled. We considered a response as either partial (PR) or complete response (CR). We expanded accrual to 44 patients to increase our ability to evaluate secondary end points, including grade ≥ 3 adverse events, spleen volume, symptom assessment, genetic correlates of response, and 2-year survival.

RESULTS

ORR was 32% for the first 25 enrolled patients (8 PR [7 CNL and 1 aCML]). In the larger cohort of 44 patients, 35% had a response (11 PR [9 CNL and 2 aCML] and 4 CR [CNL]), and 50% had oncogenic CSF3R mutations. The mean absolute allele burden reduction of CSF3R-T618I after 6 cycles was greatest in the CR group, compared with the PR and no response groups. The most common cause of death is due to disease progression. Grade ≥ 3 anemia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 34% and 14% of patients, respectively. No serious adverse events attributed to ruxolitinib were observed.

CONCLUSION

Ruxolitinib was well tolerated and demonstrated an estimated response rate of 32%. Patients with a diagnosis of CNL and/or harboring CSF3R-T618I were most likely to respond.

Colony-stimulating Factor 3 Receptor Mutated Chronic Neutrophilic Leukemia: A Rare Case Report

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a rare myeloproliferative neoplasm, which is characterized by sustained peripheral leukocytosis with neutrophilia, hepatosplenomegaly, and hypercellularity of the bone marrow, with less than 5% myeloblasts along with normal neutrophil maturation and no dysplasia. In 2016, World Health Organization (WHO) included activating mutations in the gene for colony-stimulating factor 3 receptor (CSF3R) as one of the diagnostic criteria with CSF3RT618I being the most common mutation. We report a rare case of CNL (JAK2V617F negative, BCR-ABL1 negative, CSF3RT618I positive) in an elderly female who had an aggressive clinical course of the disease.

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia: 2018 update on diagnosis, molecular genetics and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW AND DIAGNOSIS

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a potentially aggressive myeloproliferative neoplasm, for which current WHO diagnostic criteria include leukocytosis of ≥ 25 x 10⁹ /L of which ≥ 80% are neutrophils, with < 10% circulating neutrophil precursors with blasts rarely observed. In addition, there is no dysplasia, nor clinical or molecular criteria for other myeloproliferative neoplasms.

UPDATE ON DIAGNOSIS

Previously the diagnosis of CNL was often as one of exclusion based on no identifiable cause for physiologic neutrophilia in patients fulfilling the aforementioned criteria. The 2016 WHO classification now recognizes somatic activating mutations of CSF3R (most commonly CSF3RT618I) as diagnostic, allowing for an accurate diagnosis for the majority of suspected cases through molecular testing. These mutations are primary driver mutations, accounting for the characteristic clinical phenotype and potential susceptibility to molecularly targeted therapy.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Concurrent mutations, common to myeloid neoplasms and their precursor states, most frequently in SETBP1 and ASXL1, are frequent and appear to be of prognostic significance. Although data are evolving on the full genomic profile, the rarity of CNL has delayed complete understanding of its full molecular pathogenesis and individual patient prognosis.

Recent Progress in Chronic Neutrophilic Leukemia and Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We reviewed recent diagnostic and therapeutic progress in chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) and atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML). We summarized recent genetic data that may guide future efforts towards implementing risk-adapted therapy based on mutational profile and improving disease control and survival of affected patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent genetic data in CNL and aCML prompted modifications to the World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria, which have improved our understanding of how CNL and aCML are different diseases despite sharing common findings of peripheral granulocytosis and marrow myeloid hyperplasia. The overlap of recurrently mutated genes between aCML and CMML support considering CSF3R-T618I mutated cases as a distinct entity, either as CNL or CNL with dysplasia. Ongoing preclinical and clinical studies will help to further inform the therapeutic approach to these diseases. Our understanding of CNL and aCML has greatly advanced over the last few years. This will improve clarity for the diagnosis of these diseases, provide a strategy for risk stratification, and guide risk-adapted therapy.

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia: new science and new diagnostic criteria

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a distinct myeloproliferative neoplasm defined by persistent, predominantly mature neutrophil proliferation, marrow granulocyte hyperplasia, and frequent splenomegaly. The seminal discovery of oncogenic driver mutations in CSF3R in the majority of patients with CNL in 2013 generated a new scientific framework for this disease as it deepened our understanding of its molecular pathogenesis, provided a biomarker for diagnosis, and rationalized management using novel targeted therapies. Consequently, in 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) revised the diagnostic criteria for CNL to reflect such changes in its genomic landscape, now including the presence of disease-defining activating CSF3R mutations as a key diagnostic component of CNL. In this communication, we provide a background on the history of CNL, its clinical and hemopathologic features, and its molecular anatomy, including relevant additional genetic lesions and their significance. We also outline the recently updated WHO diagnostic criteria for CNL. Further, the natural history of the disease is reviewed as well as potential prognostic variables. Finally, we summarize and discuss current treatment options as well as prospective novel therapeutic targets in hopes that they will yield meaningful improvements in patient management and outcomes.

Targeted next-generation sequencing identifies clinically relevant mutations in patients with chronic neutrophilic leukemia at diagnosis and blast crisis

PURPOSE

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia is a rare form of myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by mature neutrophil hyperleukocytosis. The majority of patients harbor somatic mutations of CSF3R gene and are potentially amenable to targeted therapy with JAK inhibitors. The incidence and clinical significance of additional mutations requires clarification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A next-generation sequencing approach for myeloid malignancy-associated mutations was applied to diagnostic and matched blast crisis samples from four chronic neutrophilic leukemia patients.

RESULTS

Next-generation sequencing confirmed the CSF3R T618I in all patients with identification of concurrent SRSF2, SETBP1, NRAS and CBL mutations at diagnosis. At blast crisis, clonal evolution was evidenced by an increased CSF3R T618I allele frequency and by loss or acquisition of CBL and NRAS mutations.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic utility of a targeted next-generation sequencing approach was clearly demonstrated with the identification of additional mutations providing the potential for therapeutic stratification of chronic neutrophilic leukemia patients.

Somatic SETBP1 mutations in myeloid neoplasms

SETBP1 is a SET-binding protein regulating self-renewal potential through HOXA-protein activation. Somatic SETBP1 mutations were identified by whole exome sequencing in several phenotypes of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN), including atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia as well as in secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). Surprisingly, its recurrent somatic activated mutations are located at the identical positions of germline mutations reported in congenital Schinzel-Giedion syndrome. In general, somatic SETBP1 mutations have a significant clinical impact on the outcome as poor prognostic factor, due to downstream HOXA-pathway as well as associated aggressive types of chromosomal defects (-7/del(7q) and i(17q)), which is consistent with wild-type SETBP1 activation in aggressive types of acute myeloid leukemia and leukemic evolution. Biologically, mutant SETBP1 attenuates RUNX1 and activates MYB. The studies of mouse models confirmed biological significance of SETBP1 mutations in myeloid leukemogenesis, particularly associated with ASXL1 mutations. SETBP1 is a major oncogene in myeloid neoplasms, which cooperates with various genetic events and causes distinct phenotypes of MDS/MPN and sAML.

SETBP1 dysregulation in congenital disorders and myeloid neoplasms

Myeloid malignancies are characterized by an extreme molecular heterogeneity, and many efforts have been made in the past decades to clarify the mechanisms underlying their pathogenesis.

In this scenario SET binding protein 1 (SETBP1) has attracted a lot of interest as a new oncogene and potential marker, in addition to its involvement in the Schinzel-Giedon syndrome (SGS). Our review starts with the analysis of the structural characteristics of SETBP1, and extends to its corresponding physiological and pathological functions. Next, we describe the prevalence of SETBP1 mutations in congenital diseases and in hematologic malignancies, exploring how its alterations might contribute to tumor development and provoke clinical effects. Finally, we consider to understand how SETBP1 activation could be exploited in molecular medicine to enhance the cure rate.