High expression of the stem cell marker <i>GPR56</i> at diagnosis identifies acute myeloid leukemia patients at higher relapse risk after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in context with the CD34+/CD38- population

Role of Adhesion G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Immune Dysfunction and Disorder

Disorders of the immune system, including immunodeficiency, immuno-malignancy, and (auto)inflammatory, autoimmune, and allergic diseases, have a great impact on a host’s health. Cellular communication mediated through cell surface receptors, among different cell types and between cell and microenvironment, plays a critical role in immune responses. Selective members of the adhesion G protein-coupled receptor (aGPCR) family are expressed differentially in diverse immune cell types and have been implicated recently in unique immune dysfunctions and disorders in part due to their dual cell adhesion and signaling roles. Here, we discuss the molecular and functional characteristics of distinctive immune aGPCRs and their physiopathological roles in the immune system.

Role of GPR56 in Platelet Activation and Arterial Thrombosis

The adhesion G protein-coupled receptor GPR56 mediates cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interactions. To examine the function of GPR56 in platelet activation and arterial thrombosis, we generated GPR56-knockout mice and evaluated GPR56 expression in human and mouse platelets. The results revealed that the levels of the GPR56 N-terminal fragment were significantly higher on the first day after myocardial infarction than on the seventh day in the plasma of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Next, we investigated the effects of GPR56 on platelet function in vitro and in vivo. We observed that collagen-induced aggregation and adenosine triphosphate release were reduced in Gpr56 ^-/- platelets. Furthermore, P-selectin expression on the Gpr56 ^-/- platelet surface was also reduced, and the spreading area on immobilized collagen was decreased in Gpr56 ^-/- platelets. Furthermore, collagen-induced platelet activation in human platelets was inhibited by an anti-GPR56 antibody. Gpr56 ^-/- mice showed an extended time to the first occlusion in models with cremaster arteriole laser injury and FeCl₃-induced carotid artery injury. GPR56 activated the G protein 13 signaling pathway following collagen stimulation, which promoted platelet adhesion and thrombus formation at the site of vascular injury. Thus, our study confirmed that GPR56 regulated the formation of arterial thrombosis. Inhibition of the initial response of GPR56 to collagen could significantly inhibit platelet activation and thrombus formation. Our results provide new insights for research into antiplatelet drugs.

Clinical Implications of the FLT3-ITD Allelic Ratio in Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the Context of an Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Although the presence of FLT3-ITD, as well as levels of the FLT3-ITD allelic ratio, have been described as prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), little is known about how the FLT3-ITD allelic ratio impacts patients' outcomes when receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We analyzed 118 patients (median age at diagnosis 58.3, range 14.3-82.3 years) harboring FLT3-ITD, of whom 94 patients were consolidated with an allogeneic HSCT and included in outcome analyses. A high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio was associated with a higher white blood cell count, higher blood and bone marrow blasts, and worse ELN2017 risk at diagnosis. Patients with a high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio more often had NPM1 mutations, while patients with a low allelic ratio more often had FLT3-TKD mutations. Patients with a high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio were less likely to achieve a measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative remission prior to allogeneic HSCT and had a trend for a shorter time to relapse. However, there was no distinct cumulative incidence of relapse, non-relapse mortality, or overall survival according to the FLT3-ITD allelic ratio in transplanted patients. While co-mutated FLT3-TKD was associated with better outcomes, the MRD status at HSCT was the most significant factor for outcomes. While our data indicates that an allogeneic HSCT may mitigate the adverse effect of a high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio, comparative studies are needed to evaluate which FLT3-ITD mutated patients benefit from which consolidation strategy.

Prognostic impact of the AML ELN2022 risk classification in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation

For most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) offers the highest chance of cure. Recently, the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) published updated recommendations on the diagnosis and risk classification in AML based on genetic factors at diagnosis as well as a dynamic adjustment (reclassification) according to the measurable residual disease (MRD) status for the favorable and intermediate risk groups. Validation of the ELN2022 risk classification has not been reported. We retrospectively analyzed 522 AML patients who received an HSCT at a median age of 59 (range 16-76) years. For patients with adequate material available and in remission prior to HSCT (n = 229), the MRD status was evaluated. Median follow-up after HSCT was 3.0 years. ELN2022 risk at diagnosis was in 22% favorable, in 26% intermediate, and in 52% adverse. ELN2022 risk at diagnosis is associated with the cumulative incidence of relapse/progression (CIR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in the whole patient cohort, as well as the subgroup of patients transplanted in first remission. However, the risk stratification based on the ELN2022 classification did not significantly improve outcome prognostication in comparison to the ELN2017 classification. In our study, the newly added group of patients with myelodysplasia-related gene mutations did not have adverse outcomes. Re-classifying these patients into the intermediate risk group and adjusting the grouping for all AML patients by MRD at HSCT, led to a refined and improved risk stratification, which should be validated in independent studies.

Functions of G protein-coupled receptor 56 in health and disease

Human G protein-coupled receptor 56 (GPR56) is encoded by gene ADGRG1 from chromosome 16q21 and is homologously encoded in mice, at chromosome 8. Both 687 and 693 splice forms are present in humans and mice. GPR56 has a 381 amino acid-long N-terminal extracellular segment and a GPCR proteolysis site upstream from the first transmembrane domain. GPR56 is mainly expressed in the heart, brain, thyroid, platelets, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Accumulating evidence indicates that GPR56 promotes the formation of myelin sheaths and the development of oligodendrocytes in the cerebral cortex of the central nervous system. Moreover, GPR56 contributes to the development and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells, induces adipogenesis, and regulates the function of immune cells. The lack of GPR56 leads to nervous system dysfunction, platelet disorders, and infertility. Abnormal expression of GPR56 is related to the malignant transformation and tumor metastasis of several cancers including melanoma, neuroglioma, and gastrointestinal cancer. Metabolic disorders and cardiovascular diseases are also associated with dysregulation of GPR56 expression, and GPR56 is involved in the pharmacological resistance to some antidepressant and cancer drug treatments. In this review, the molecular structure, expression profile, and signal transduction of GPR56 are introduced, and physiological and pathological functions of GRP56 are comprehensively summarized. Attributing to its significant biological functions and its long N-terminal extracellular region that interacts with multiple ligands, GPR56 is becoming an attractive therapeutic target in treating neurological and hematopoietic diseases.

Impact of the MRD status in AML patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first vs second remission

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) offers the best chance for relapse-free survival to most acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. It might be performed in complete remission or delayed until after first relapse due to relevant treatment-related morbidity and mortality. The measurable residual disease (MRD) status at HSCT adds refined prognostic information to the assigned European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 genetic risk at diagnosis. We analyzed 580 AML patients receiving allogeneic HSCT in either first (79%) or second (21%) remission. Although - due to common treatment strategies - some adverse risk characteristics, such as monosomal or complex karyotypes were less frequent in patients transplanted in second remission, they had worse outcomes compared to patients transplanted in first remission. The MRD status at HSCT was an independent prognostic factor irrespective of the number of remission at HSCT. Noteworthy, MRDpos patients transplanted in first remission and MRDneg patients transplanted in second remission had similar outcomes. In the clinically highly relevant group of ELN2017 intermediate risk individuals, the MRD status provided the highest prognostic value with very dismal outcomes of patients transplanted in MRDpos second remission. The adverse outcomes of MRDpos patients and individuals transplanted in second remission should be considered when planning consolidation treatment, to avert an allogeneic HSCT in MRDpos second remission when possible.

Role of ADGRG1/GPR56 in Tumor Progression

Cellular communication plays a critical role in diverse aspects of tumorigenesis including tumor cell growth/death, adhesion/detachment, migration/invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) which constitute the largest group of cell surface receptors are known to play fundamental roles in all these processes. When considering the importance of GPCRs in tumorigenesis, the adhesion GPCRs (aGPCRs) are unique due to their hybrid structural organization of a long extracellular cell-adhesive domain and a seven-transmembrane signaling domain. Indeed, aGPCRs have been increasingly shown to be associated with tumor development by participating in tumor cell interaction and signaling. ADGRG1/GPR56, a representative tumor-associated aGPCR, is recognized as a potential biomarker/prognostic factor of specific cancer types with both tumor-suppressive and tumor-promoting functions. We summarize herein the latest findings of the role of ADGRG1/GPR56 in tumor progression.

Risk Stratification, Measurable Residual Disease, and Outcomes of AML Patients with a Trisomy 8 Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

For most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) harboring a trisomy 8 an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a suitable and recommended consolidation therapy. However, comparative outcome analyses between patients with and without trisomy 8 undergoing allogeneic HSCT have not been performed so far.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical features, outcomes, and measurable residual disease (MRD) of 659 AML (12%, n = 81, with a trisomy 8) patients subjected to allogeneic HSCT as a consolidation therapy.

RESULTS

The presence of a trisomy 8 associated with a trend for higher age at diagnosis, AML of secondary origin, lower white blood cell counts at diagnosis, worse ELN2017 genetic risk, wild-type NPM1, and mutated IDH1/2 and JAK2. Outcomes after allogeneic HSCT in the entire cohort did not differ between patients with a sole trisomy 8, trisomy 8 with additional cytogenetic aberrations or without a trisomy 8. A trisomy 8 did not affect outcomes within the three ELN2017 risk groups. In accordance with findings in unselected patient cohorts, persistent MRD at allogeneic HSCT in patients with a trisomy 8 identified individuals with a higher risk of relapse following allogeneic HSCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of trisomy 8 patients after allogeneic HSCT did not compare unfavorably to that of other AML patients following allogeneic HSCT. Rather than the presence or absence of a trisomy 8, additional genetic aberrations and MRD at HSCT define outcome differences and aid in informed treatment decisions.

ELN risk stratification and outcomes in secondary and therapy-related AML patients consolidated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Secondary or therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (s/tAML) differs biologically from de novo disease. In general s/tAML patients have inferior outcomes after chemotherapy, compared to de novo cases and often receive allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for consolidation. The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk stratification system is commonly applied in AML but the clinical significance is unknown in s/tAML. We analyzed 644 s/tAML or de novo AML patients receiving HSCT. s/tAML associated with older age and adverse risk, including higher ELN risk. Overall, s/tAML patients had similar cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), but higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) and shorter overall survival (OS). In multivariate analyses, after adjustment for ELN risk and pre-HSCT measurable residual disease status, disease origin did not impact outcomes. Within the ELN favorable risk group, CIR was higher in s/tAML compared to de novo AML patients likely due to a different distribution of genetic aberrations, which did not translate into shorter OS. Within the ELN intermediate and adverse group outcomes were similar in de novo and s/tAML patients. Thus, not all s/tAML have a dismal prognosis and outcomes of s/tAML after allogeneic HSCT in remission are comparable to de novo patients when considering ELN risk.

Nutritional Status at Diagnosis and Pre-transplant Weight Loss Impact Outcomes of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

The nutritional status at diagnosis, as well as weight loss during chemotherapy, are important factors for morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. They might also influence outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We evaluated the body mass index (BMI) at diagnosis, prior to HSCT, and the BMI difference (ΔBMI = BMI_HSCT–BMI_diagnosis) in 662 AML patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Patients being obese at AML diagnosis had significantly higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and shorter overall survival (OS) after HSCT, but no distinct cumulative incidence of relapse than nonobese patients. Weight loss during chemotherapy (ΔBMI > –2) was a strong predictor for higher NRM and shorter OS in univariate and multivariate analyses. These results were observed across all European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 risk groups but especially in patients with favorable or intermediate ELN2017 risk and patients transplanted in morphologic complete remission. Only in patients being obese at AML diagnosis, weight loss did not result in adverse outcomes. ΔBMI > –2 represents a strong, independent, and modifiable risk factor for AML patients treated with HSCT. Nutritional monitoring and supplementation during disease course might improve patients’ outcomes.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation mitigates the adverse prognostic impact of high diagnostic BAALC and MN1 expression in AML

For most acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) offers the highest chance of sustained remissions and long-term survival. At diagnosis, high expression of the AML-associated genes BAALC (brain and acute leukemia, cytoplasmic) and MN1 (meningioma-1) were repeatedly linked to inferior outcomes in patients consolidated with chemotherapy while data for patients receiving HSCT remain limited. Using clinically applicable digital droplet PCR assays, we analyzed the diagnostic BAALC/ABL1 and MN1/ABL1 copy numbers in 302 AML patients. High BAALC/ABL1 and MN1/ABL1 copy numbers associated with common adverse prognostic factors at diagnosis. However, while high diagnostic copy numbers of both genes associated with shorter event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients receiving chemotherapy, there was no prognostic impact in patients undergoing HSCT. Our data suggests that the adverse prognostic impact of high BAALC and MN1 expression are mitigated by allogeneic HSCT. But preHSCT BAALC/ABL1 and MN1/ABL1 assessed in remission prior to HSCT remained prognosticators for EFS and OS independent of the diagnostic expression status. Whether allogeneic HSCT may improve survival for AML patients with high diagnostic BAALC or MN1 expression should be investigated prospectively and may improve informed decisions towards individualized consolidation options in AML.