Quantitative PCR-based chimerism in bone marrow or peripheral blood to predict acute myeloid leukemia relapse in high-risk patients: results from the KIM-PB prospective study

Chimerism testing in myeloid malignancies: techniques, considerations, and connections to post-transplant outcomes

Relapse represents the most significant cause of death post-allogeneic stem cell transplant (aSCT) for patients with myeloid malignancies. Early intervention among patients deemed high risk for relapse is one focus to improve aSCT-related outcomes. As such, the early identification of residual malignant cell burden is of critical importance. Chimerism testing, the assessment of the relative percentage of donor to recipient haematopoietic cells based on genetic differences, offers one practical means to assess for residual host haematopoietic cells, which could be indicative of leukaemic cell burden. The purpose of this review paper is to discuss the use of chimerism testing to better understand the risk of relapse. Important consideration will be given to the various laboratory techniques used to compute donor chimerism percentage and their relative limitations, the external factors that may influence the relative value of donor to recipient chimerism ​and its importance among the major myeloid malignancy diagnostic categories. Special attention will be paid to strategies to improve the sensitivity and specificity of chimerism testing, namely its concurrent use with measurable residual disease and the use of lineage-specific chimerism to both improve relapse detection and guide therapy decisions.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Chimerism Tests in Predicting Leukemia Relapse Using Increasing Mixed Chimerism

Chimerism test was evaluated to predict leukemia relapse. Increasing mixed chimerism (IMC), defined as recipient increase ≥0.1% in peripheral blood total cell chimerism, was used as a surrogate of disease activity. Combination of quantitative PCR and short-tandem repeat method was applied to achieve high assay sensitivity. Total of 184 patients received stem cell transplant for acute myeloid leukemia (N = 110), acute lymphocytic leukemia (N = 41), myelodysplastic syndrome (N = 30), and 2389 chimerism tests (median follow-up, 1054 days). Sixty-six patients relapsed, and 118 patients did not. Cumulative incidence of relapse increased after 1 IMC or ≥2 consecutive IMCs (hazard ratios, 9.9 and 44.4, respectively). Predicted percentage relapse by day 30 after IMC was 0% (0 IMC), 10% (1 IMC), and 40% (≥2 IMCs). The last chimerism results before relapse detected IMC in 57 of 66 relapsed patients (sensitivity, 86.4%). Nine patients had no IMC before relapse (false negative) because of rapidly evolving relapse (N = 4) or extramural relapse (N = 5). In 118 patients without relapse, 158 of 1873 tests detected IMC (false positive, 8.4%; specificity, 91.6%). The false-positive rates increased with higher percentage recipient T-cell chimerism levels, indicating T-cell contamination as a cause. Chimerism monitoring predicts relapse. However, caution must be taken for false-positive or false-negative IMCs. T-cell removal can improve chimerism test specificity in patients with mixed T-cell chimerism.

Prospects and Potential for Chimerism Analysis after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Chimerism analysis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation serves to confirm engraftment, indicate relapse of hematologic malignancy, and attribute graft failure to either immune rejection or poor graft function. Short tandem repeat PCR (STR-PCR) is the prevailing method, followed by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), with detection limits of 1-5% and 0.1%, respectively. Chimerism assays using digital PCR or next-generation sequencing, both of which are more sensitive than STR-PCR, are increasingly used. Stable mixed chimerism is usually not associated with poor outcomes in non-malignant diseases, but recipient chimerism may foretell relapse of hematologic malignancies, so higher detection sensitivity may be beneficial in such cases. Thus, the need for and the type of intervention, e.g., immunosuppression regimen, donor lymphocyte infusion, and/or salvage second transplantation, should be guided by donor chimerism in the context of the feature and/or residual malignant cells of the disease to be treated.

Intestinal IgA-positive plasma cells are highly sensitive indicators of alloreaction early after allogeneic transplantation and associate with both graft-versus-host disease and relapse-related mortality

Intestinal immunoglobulin A (IgA) is strongly involved in microbiota homeostasis. Since microbiota disruption is a major risk factor of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), we addressed the kinetics of intestinal IgA-positive (IgA+) plasma cells by immunohistology in a series of 430 intestinal biopsies obtained at a median of 1,5 months after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) from 115 patients (pts) at our center. IgA+ plasma cells were located in the subepithelial lamina propria and suppressed in the presence of histological aGvHD (GvHD Lerner stage 0: 131+/-8 IgA+ plasma cells/mm2; stage 1-2: 108+/-8 IgA+ plasma cells/mm2; stage 3-4: 89+/-16 IgA+ plasma cells/mm2; P=0.004). Overall, pts with IgA+ plasma cells below median had an increased treatment related mortality (P=0.04). Time courses suggested a gradual recovery of IgA+ plasma cells after day 100 in the absence but not in the presence of GvHD. Vice versa IgA+ plasma cells above median early after allo-SCT were predictive of relapse and relapse-related mortality (RRM): pts with low IgA+ cells had a 15% RRM at 2 and at 5 years, while pts with high IgA+ cells had a 31% RRM at 2 years and more than 46% at 5 years; multivariate analysis indicated high IgA+ plasma cells in biopsies (hazard ratio =2.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-7.00) as independent predictors of RRM, whereas Lerner stage and disease stage themselves did not affect RRM. In contrast, IgA serum levels at the time of biopsy were not predictive for RRM. In summary, our data indicate that IgA+ cells are highly sensitive indicators of alloreaction early after allo-SCT showing association with TRM but also allowing prediction of relapse independently from the presence of overt GvHD.

Bone marrow CD34+ molecular chimerism as an early predictor of relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Background

Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring is an important tool to optimally address post-transplant management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the impact of bone marrow CD34+ molecular chimerism and WT1 on the outcome of a consecutive series of 168 AML patients submitted to allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Results

The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was significantly lower in patients with donor chimerism on CD34+ cells ≥ 97.5% and WT1 < 213 copies/ABL x 10^4 both at 1^st month (p=0.008 and p<0.001) and at 3^rd month (p<0.001 for both). By combining chimerism and WT1 at 3^rd month, 13 patients with chimerism < 97.5% or WT1 > 213 showed intermediate prognosis. 12 of these patients fell in this category because of molecular chimerism < 97.5% at a time-point in which WT1 was < 213.

Conclusions

Our results confirm that lineage-specific molecular chimerism and WT1 after allo-SCT (1^st and 3^rd month) are useful MRD markers. When considered together at 3^rd month, CD34+ molecular chimerism could represent an earlier predictor of relapse compared to WT1. Further studies are necessary to confirm this preliminary observation.

Chimerism analysis for clinicians: a review of the literature and worldwide practices

This review highlights literature pertinent to chimerism analysis in the context of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We also conducted a survey of testing practices of program members of CIBMTR worldwide. Questions included testing methods, time points, specimen type, cell lineage tested and testing indications. Recent literature suggests that detection of low level mixed chimerism has a clinical utility in predicting relapse. There is also increasing recognition of HLA loss relapse to potentially guide rescue decisions in cases of relapse. These developments coincide with wider access to high sensitivity next generation sequencing (NGS) in clinical laboratories. Our survey revealed a heterogeneity in practices as well as in findings and conclusions of published studies. Although the most commonly used method is STR, studies support more sensitive methods such as NGS, especially for predicting relapse. There is no conclusive evidence to support testing chimerism in BM over PB, particularly when using a high sensitivity testing method. Periodic monitoring of chimerism especially in diagnoses with a high risk of relapse is advantageous. Lineage specific chimerism is more sensitive than whole blood in predicting impending relapse. Further studies that critically assess how to utilize chimerism testing results will inform evidence based clinical management decisions.

A practical guide to chimerism analysis: Review of the literature and testing practices worldwide

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Currently there are no widely accepted guidelines for chimerism analysis testing in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) patients. The objective of this review is to provide a practical guide to address key aspects of performing and utilizing chimerism testing results. In developing this guide, we conducted a survey of testing practices among laboratories that are accredited for performing engraftment monitoring/chimerism analysis by either the American Society for Histocompatibility & Immunogenetics (ASHI) and/or the European Federation of Immunogenetics (EFI). We interpreted the survey results in the light of pertinent literature as well as the experience in the laboratories of the authors.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

In recent years there has been significant advances in high throughput molecular methods such as next generation sequencing (NGS) as well as growing access to these technologies in histocompatibility and immunogenetics laboratories. These methods have the potential to improve the performance of chimerism testing in terms of sensitivity, availability of informative genetic markers that distinguish donors from recipients as well as cost.

SUMMARY

The results of the survey revealed a great deal of heterogeneity in chimerism testing practices among participating laboratories. The most consistent response indicated monitoring of engraftment within the first 30 days. These responses are reflective of published literature. Additional clinical indications included early detection of impending relapse as well as identification of cases of HLA-loss relapse.