Factor VIII activity and bleeding risk during prophylaxis for severe hemophilia A: a population pharmacokinetic model

Patient Experience With Efanesoctocog Alfa for Severe Hemophilia A: Results From the XTEND-1 Phase 3 Clinical Study Exit Interviews

PURPOSE

Hemophilia A is a rare bleeding disorder that leads to recurrent hemarthrosis, which can ultimately result in reduced mobility and poor quality of life. Qualitative exit interviews provide insights into patient perspectives and support the interpretation of quantitative trial data, such as patient-reported outcome measures. In the Phase 3 XTEND-1 study (NCT04161495) of efanesoctocog alfa in participants with severe hemophilia A, exit interviews were conducted to understand pre- and post-study experiences with pain and physical functioning and to evaluate participants' treatment experiences.

METHODS

In XTEND-1, participants (≥12 years old) received once-weekly efanesoctocog alfa prophylaxis 50 IU/kg for 52 weeks (Arm A) or on-demand efanesoctocog alfa 50 IU/kg for 26 weeks followed by 26 weeks once-weekly prophylaxis (50 IU/kg; Arm B). Optional qualitative exit interviews were conducted using a semi-structured guide in a subset of participants following study completion. Interviews included open-ended questions about participants' pre- and post-study experiences with hemophilia A and targeted questions relating to improvements in patient-reported outcomes assessed during XTEND-1, including the Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults Physical Health subscale (Haem-A-QoL PH). Content validity of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity 3a measure was also assessed, particularly the worst pain item.

FINDINGS

Exit interviews were conducted with 29 of 159 patients enrolled in XTEND-1 (mean [range] age 40 [16-73] years). Of 17 participants enrolled in Arm A, 13 (76.5%) reported a "wearing off" feeling with pre-study treatment, including more aches/pain, breakthrough bleeds, and limited physical activities. Joint pain was the most reported pre-study symptom (96.6%; n = 28/29), followed by a reduced ability to move without pain (89.7%, n = 26/29). Improvements following efanesoctocog alfa prophylaxis in ≥1 Haem-A-QoL PH domain were reported by 89.7% (n = 26/29) of participants, with improvements in joint pain, the ability to move without pain, and painful swellings reported by at least 21 (84%) participants. Participants reported that the PROMIS Pain Intensity 3a items were relevant, clear, and easy to answer. Most participants (96.6%) were "quite satisfied" or "very satisfied" with efanesoctocog alfa prophylaxis. All participants preferred efanesoctocog alfa over pre-study treatment.

IMPLICATIONS

The exit interviews demonstrated that once-weekly efanesoctocog alfa prophylaxis resulted in patient-relevant and meaningful improvements in pain and physical functioning, consistent with the quantitative findings from XTEND-1. These results support the validity of the Haem-A-QoL PH and PROMIS Pain Intensity 3a assessed during XTEND-1, demonstrating the potential for change with efficacious treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04161495 REGISTRY URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04161495.

Comparative Effectiveness of Valoctocogene Roxaparvovec and Prophylactic Factor VIII Replacement in Severe Hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

A prospective, non-interventional study (270-902) followed 294 adults with severe hemophilia A (SHA) receiving prophylactic factor VIII (FVIII). From these participants, 112 rolled over into a single-arm, multicenter, phase 3 trial (GENEr8-1; NCT03370913) that evaluated efficacy and safety of valoctocogene roxaparvovec, a gene therapy that provides endogenous FVIII in individuals with SHA. Participants from 270-902 who did not roll over provide an opportunity for a contemporaneous external control. Therefore, the comparative effectiveness of valoctocogene roxaparvovec vs FVIII prophylaxis was evaluated using propensity scoring (PS).

METHODS

This post hoc analysis compared 112 participants from GENEr8-1 (treated cohort) to 73 participants in 270-902 who did not enroll in GENEr8-1 (control cohort). The primary analysis used standardized mortality ratio weighting to re-weight baseline characteristics of the control cohort to better match the treated cohort. Mean annualized bleeding rates (ABR) for treated and all bleeds were compared between cohorts along with the proportion of participants with zero bleeds (treated and all bleeds). Sensitivity and scenario analyses were also conducted.

RESULTS

PS adjustments reduced differences in baseline characteristics between cohorts. Mean treated (4.40 vs 0.85; P < 0.001) and all (5.01 vs 1.54; P < 0.001) ABR were significantly lower, and the proportions of participants with zero treated bleeds (82.1% vs 32.9%; P < 0.001) and all bleeds (58.0% vs 28.5%; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in GENEr8-1.

CONCLUSIONS

PS-adjusted analyses were consistent with prior intra-individual comparisons. Compared with participants receiving prophylactic FVIII, the participants receiving valoctocogene roxaparvovec experienced lower ABR, and a higher proportion had zero bleeds.

TRAIL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03370913.

Minimum factor VIII levels to prevent joint bleeding in mild hemophilia A

The severity of the bleeding phenotype in patients with hemophilia A (HA) broadly correlates with the degree of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency in plasma. However, the FVIII level necessary to achieve the goal of zero joint bleeds remains unclear. This study aimed to identify the minimum FVIII level necessary to prevent joint bleeds in patients with HA. In this retrospective study, patients with congenital mild HA treated on demand, aged ≥16 years, with no history of FVIII inhibitors, followed at the Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center in Milan, were enrolled. We investigated 270 male patients with a median age of 45 years (16-88) and median lifelong FVIII of 21 IU/dL. One hundred patients (37%) had a lifelong history of at least 1 joint bleed. The mean annualized joint bleeding rate (AJBR) and spontaneous AJBR were 0.016 (standard deviation [SD], 0.032) and 0.001 (SD, 0.010), respectively. After adjusting for age, for each IU/dL increase in FVIII, there was a 6% reduction in AJBR and an 11% reduction in spontaneous AJBR. The minimum FVIII levels needed to prevent lifelong any joint bleeds and spontaneous joint bleeds resulted to be 19.2 IU/dL and 17.7 IU/dL, respectively. In this large cohort of persons with mild HA, we identified the minimum FVIII levels needed to prevent total and spontaneous joint bleeds (19.2 IU/dL and 17.7 IU/dL, respectively). These findings could suggest important implications for the accurate design of prophylactic therapies for persons with moderate and severe HA, including gene therapy.

Targeting higher factor VIII levels for prophylaxis in haemophilia A: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

The standard of care in severe haemophilia A is prophylaxis, which has historically aimed for a factor VIII (FVIII) trough level of ≥1%. However, despite prophylactic treatment, people with haemophilia remain at risk of bleeds that have physical and quality of life implications, and that impact everyday life.

AIM

The aim of this review was to evaluate evidence supporting the relationship between targeting higher FVIII activity levels with prophylaxis and improved outcomes in people with haemophilia A.

METHODS

We conducted a narrative review that defined the unmet needs and treatment goals in people with haemophilia A, evaluated evidence to support targeting higher FVIII activity levels, and highlighted therapies that may support higher and sustained FVIII activity levels and improved outcomes for people with haemophilia A.

RESULTS

Despite recent advances in treatment, unmet needs remain, and people with haemophilia continue to experience joint and functional impairment, acute and chronic pain, and poor mental health. All these negatively impact their health-related quality of life. Evidence suggests that FVIII activity levels of up to 50% may be needed to achieve a near-zero joint bleed rate. However, achieving high FVIII activity levels with current standard and extended half-life (EHL) FVIII replacement therapies is associated with a high treatment burden. Innovative treatment options may provide high sustained FVIII activity levels and improved patient outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Evidence suggests that FVIII activity levels in people with haemophilia A should be sustained at higher levels to improve joint and patient outcomes and enable progression towards health equity.

Design of a Prospective Study on Pharmacokinetic-Guided Dosing of Prophylactic Factor Replacement in Hemophilia A and B (OPTI-CLOT TARGET Study)

In resource-rich countries, almost all severe hemophilia patients receive prophylactic replacement therapy with factor concentrates to prevent spontaneous bleeding in joints and muscles to decrease the development of arthropathy and risk of long-term disability. Pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided dosing can be applied to individualize factor replacement therapy, as interindividual differences in PK parameters influence factor VIII (FVIII) and FIX activity levels. PK-guided dosing may therefore lead to more optimal safeguarding of FVIII/FIX levels during prophylaxis and on demand treatment. The OPTI-CLOT TARGET study is a multicenter, nonrandomized, prospective cohort study that aims to investigate the reliability and feasibility of PK-guided prophylactic dosing of factor concentrates in hemophilia-A and -B patients in daily clinical practice. At least 50 patients of all ages on prophylactic treatment using standard half-life (SHL) and extended half-life (EHL) factor concentrates will be included during 9 months and will receive PK-guided treatment. As primary endpoint, a minimum of four FVIII/FIX levels will be compared with FVIII/FIX levels as predicted by Bayesian forecasting. Secondary endpoints are the association of FVIII and FIX levels with bleeding episodes and physical activity, expectations and experiences, economic analyses, and optimization of population PK models. This study will lead to more insight in the reliability and feasibility of PK-guided dosing in hemophilia patients. Moreover, it will contribute to personalization of treatment by greater knowledge of dosing regimens needed to prevent and treat bleeding in the individual patient and provide evidence to more clearly associate factor activity levels with bleeding risk.

Regression Analysis to Estimate the Factor VIII Activity of Patients with Hemophilia A Without Inhibitor who Received Emicizumab Therapy

BACKGROUND

 Emicizumab, a bispecific monoclonal antibody for hemophilia A (HA), has strong pharmacodynamic effects in several coagulation assays resulting in dosing difficulties with Factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates during bleeding emergencies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single and multiple regression models were studied to estimate FVIII activity using 27 archived plasma samples from three patients with HA without inhibitor under emicizumab treatment. Explanatory variables were FVIII chromogenic assay (CSA), Ad|min1|, Ad|min2|, the number of seconds of APTT, and the FVIII one-stage assay (OSA), which were measured without idiotype antibodies. The response variable was FVIII OSA measured with idiotype antibodies.

RESULTS

In the simple linear model, the FVIII CSA regression coefficient was 1.04 and the intercept was -14.55 (r² = 0.95; p < 0.001). In the multiple regression model, FVIII OSA and FVIII CSA were selected based on the Akaike Information Criterion, with regression coefficients of 1.74 and 1.15, respectively, and an intercept of -92.03 (r² = 0.96, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The regression models can estimate the FVIII:C levels in patients with HA receiving emicizumab and would be useful in a bleeding emergency and/or surgery.

Predictive Modeling Identifies Total Bleeds at 12-Weeks Postswitch to N8-GP Prophylaxis as a Predictor of Treatment Response

Background  Predicting annualized bleeding rate (ABR) during factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis for severe hemophilia A (SHA) is important for long-term outcomes. This study used supervised machine learning-based predictive modeling to identify predictors of long-term ABR during prophylaxis with an extended half-life FVIII.

Methods  Data were from 166 SHA patients who received N8-GP prophylaxis (50 IU/kg every 4 days) in the pathfinder 2 study. Predictive models were developed to identify variables associated with an ABR of ≤1 versus >1 during the trial's main phase (median follow-up of 469 days). Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC). Pre-N8-GP prophylaxis models learned from data collected at baseline; post-N8-GP prophylaxis models learned from data collected up to 12-weeks postswitch to N8-GP, and predicted ABR at the end of the outcome period (final year of treatment in the main phase).

Results  The predictive model using baseline variables had moderate performance (AUROC = 0.64) for predicting observed ABR. The most performant model used data collected at 12-weeks postswitch (AUROC = 0.79) with cumulative bleed count up to 12 weeks as the most informative variable, followed by baseline von Willebrand factor and mean FVIII at 30 minutes postdose. Univariate cumulative bleed count at 12 weeks performed equally well to the 12-weeks postswitch model (AUROC = 0.75). Pharmacokinetic measures were indicative, but not essential, to predict ABR.

Conclusion  Cumulative bleed count up to 12-weeks postswitch was as informative as the 12-week post-switch predictive model for predicting long-term ABR, supporting alterations in prophylaxis based on treatment response.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Clotting Factor Concentrates and Desmopressin in Hemophilia

Hemophilia A and B are bleeding disorders caused by a deficiency of clotting factor VIII and IX, respectively. Patients with severe hemophilia (< 0.01 IU mL⁻¹) and some patients with moderate hemophilia (0.01–0.05 IU mL⁻¹) administer clotting factor concentrates prophylactically. Desmopressin (d-amino d-arginine vasopressin) can be applied in patients with non-severe hemophilia A. The aim of administration of factor concentrates or desmopressin is the prevention or cessation of bleeding. Despite weight-based dosing, it has been demonstrated that factor concentrates still exhibit considerable pharmacokinetic variability. Population pharmacokinetic analyses, in which this variability is quantified and explained, are increasingly performed in hemophilia research. These analyses can assist in the identification of important patient characteristics and can be applied to perform patient-tailored dosing. This review aims to present and discuss the population pharmacokinetic analyses that have been conducted to develop population pharmacokinetic models describing factor levels after administration of factor VIII or factor IX concentrates or d-amino d-arginine vasopressin. In total, 33 publications were retrieved from the literature. Two approaches were applied to perform population pharmacokinetic analyses, the standard two-stage approach and non-linear mixed-effect modeling. Using the standard two-stage approach, four population pharmacokinetic models were established describing factor VIII levels. In the remaining 29 analyses, the non-linear mixed-effect modeling approach was applied. NONMEM was the preferred software to establish population pharmacokinetic models. In total, 18 population pharmacokinetic analyses were conducted on the basis of data from a single product. From all available population pharmacokinetic analyses, 27 studies also included data from pediatric patients. In the majority of the population pharmacokinetic models, the population pharmacokinetic parameters were allometrically scaled using actual body weight. In this review, the available methods used for constructing the models, key features of these models, patient population characteristics, and established covariate relationships are described in detail.

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome: focused for hematologists

The acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AvWS) is a rare bleeding disorder with laboratory findings similar to those of inherited von Willebrand disease. However, unlike the inherited disease, AvWS occurs in persons with no personal and family history of bleeding and is often associated with a variety of underlying diseases, most frequently lymphoproliferative, myeloproliferative and cardiovascular disorders. After the presentation of a typical case, in this narrative review we discuss the more recent data on the pathophysiology, clinical, laboratory and therapeutic aspects of this acquired bleeding syndrome. We chose to focus particularly on those aspects of greater interest for the hematologist.