Response evaluation after primary systemic therapy of Her2 positive breast cancer – an observational cross-sectional study

Is CT or FDG-PET more useful for evaluation of the treatment response in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer? a case report and literature review

Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1 (RECIST ver1.1) has been widely adopted to evaluate treatment efficacy in solid tumors, including breast cancer (BC), in clinical trials and clinical practice. RECIST is based mainly on computed tomography (CT) images, and the role of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is limited. However, because the rate of tumor shrinkage on CT does not necessarily reflect the potential remaining tumor cells, there may be a discrepancy between the treatment response and prognosis in some cases. Here we report a case of metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive BC where FDG-PET was preferable to CT for evaluation of the treatment response. A 40-year-old woman became aware of a lump in her right breast in September 201X. She was pregnant and underwent further examinations, including a biopsy, in November. The diagnosis was HER2-positive BC (cT2N2bM1, stage IV). Trastuzumab plus pertuzumab plus docetaxel (TPD) therapy was initiated in December 201X. CT performed in February 201X+1 showed cystic changes in the metastatic lesions in the liver, and the treatment response was stable disease (SD) according to RECIST. However, FDG-PET in March 201X+1 did not detect abnormal uptake of FDG in the hepatic lesions. The disease remained stable thereafter. Thus, tumor shrinkage may not be apparent in situations where the response to treatment results in rapid changes in blood flow within the tumor, which is associated with cystic changes. When patients with hypervascular liver metastases receive treatment with highly effective regimens, the target lesion may show cystic changes rather than shrinkage, as observed in the present case. Therefore, FDG-PET is sometimes superior to CT in judging a tumor response.

Methodological Errors in Clinical Studies Published by Medical Journals of Ex-Yugoslav Countries

INTRODUCTION

Certain methodological principles should be inexcusably followed when designing clinical or observational research to avoid bias and presentation of results that do not reflect the truth about the phenomenon that is the object of the study.

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the methodological quality of clinical trials and observational studies published in medical journals from ex-Yugoslav countries indexed in Pubmed/MEDLINE.

METHODS

Clinical studies published in medical journals of ex-Yugoslav countries were retrieved from the Pubmed/MEDLINE database, and the sample for analysis was randomly chosen from the retrieved publications. The rate of the most common errors in the design of clinical/observational studies was established by a careful reading of the sampled publications and their checking against predefined criteria.

RESULTS

The studies published in two countries that are now member states of the European Union (Slovenia and Croatia) have significantly higher citation rates, impact factor, and methodological quality scores than studies from other ex-Yugoslav countries. While publications from Croatia show clear improvement trend throughout the last two decades, which is visible also in the last 10 years in Slovenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, quality of clinical research published in journals from Serbia was stagnating in the same period.

CONCLUSIONS

There are significant differences in methodological quality and scientometric characteristics of clinical research published in medical journals of ex-Yugoslav countries that could be mitigated by more intensive training of clinical researchers in statistics and research design, as well as by more rigorous editorial practices.

Morphological and pathological response in primary systemic therapy of patients with breast cancer and the prediction of disease free survival: a single center observational study

AIM

To identify breast cancer subtypes likely to respond to primary systemic therapy (PST or neoadjuvant therapy) and to assess the accuracy of physical examination (PE) and breast ultrasonography (US) in evaluating and predicting residual size of breast carcinoma following PST.

METHODS

116 patients who received at least two cycles of PST between 1998 and 2009 were selected from a prospectively collected clinical database. Radiological assessment was done by mammography and US. Prior to PST, tumors were subclassified according to core biopsy (NCB) and/or fine-needle aspiration-based immunohistochemical profiles of NCB. Pathological response rates were assessed following the surgeries by using Chevallier classification. Tumor measurements by PE and US were obtained before and after PST. Different clinical measurements were compared with histological findings. Disease-free survival (DFS) was assessed.

RESULTS

Pathological complete remission (pCR=Chevallier I/II) was observed in 25 patients (21.5%), 44% of whom had triple negative histology, 28% Her2 positive and 76% had high-grade tumor. Of 116 patients, 24 received taxane-based PST, 48 combined taxane + anthracycline treatment, 8 trastuzumab combinations, 21 anthracycline-based treatments, and 15 other treatments. In the taxane treated group, the pCR rate was 30%, in the taxane + anthracycline group 25%, in the anthracycline group 9.5%, and in trastuzumab group 37.5%. After PST, PE and US were both significantly associated with pathology (P<0.001 and P=0.004, respectively). Concerning OS, significant difference was observed between the Chevallier III and IV group (P=0.031) in favor of Chevallier III group. In the pCR group, fewer events were observed during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that even limited, routinely used immunohistochemical profiling of tumors can predict the likelihood of pCR to PST: patients with triple negative and Her2-positive cancers are more likely to achieve pCR to PST. Also, PE is better correlated with pathological findings than US.

Predictive and prognostic value of FDG-PET/CT imaging and different response evaluation criteria after primary systemic therapy of breast cancer

OBJECTIVES

(1) To predict pathological complete remission (pCR) and survival after primary systemic therapy (PST) in patients diagnosed with breast cancer by using two different PET/CT based scores: a simplified PERCIST-based PET/CT score (Method 1) and a combined PET/CT score supplemented with the morphological results of the RECIST system (Method 2) and (2) to assess the effect of different breast carcinoma subtypes on tumor response and its evaluation.

METHODS

Eighty-eight patients were enrolled in the study who underwent PET/CT imaging before and after PST. PET/CTs were evaluated by changes in maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) and tumor size. Method 1 and 2 were applied to predict pathological complete remission (pCR). Kaplan-Meier analyses for survival were performed. Classification into biological subtypes was performed based on the pre-therapeutic tumor characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 30/88 patients showed pCR (34.1 %). Comparing pCR/non-pCR patient groups, significant differences were detected by changes in SUVmax (p < 0.001) and tumor size (p < 0.001) regarding the primary breast lesions. To predict pCR, Method 2 had higher sensitivity (72.4 % vs. 44.8 %) and negative predictive value (57.9 % vs. 45.8 %) with lower false negativity rate (16 vs. 32) than Method 1. pCR rate was higher in Her2-positive and triple negative tumors. Despite the significant differences detected between the biological subtypes regarding changes in primary tumor SUVmax (p = 0.007) and size (p = 0.015), the subtypes only had significant impact on response evaluation with Method 2 and not with Method 1. In our study, neither clinical nor pathological CR were predictors of longer progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that combined PET/CT criteria are more predictive of pCR. The effect of biological subtypes is significant on pCR rate as well as on the changes in FDG-uptake and morphological tumor response. Response evaluation with combined criteria was also able to reflect the differences between the biological behavior of breast tumor subtypes.