Major Salivary Gland Tumors: A Clinicopathological Study

Sonographic and Cytological Evaluation of Salivary Gland Tumors

INTRODUCTION

Salivary gland tumours are relatively uncommon, but they have a multifaceted clinical presentation and varied morphological configuration. The investigations required for these tumours remain debatable. We conducted a study to determine the accuracy of various modalities used in salivary gland tumours.

METHODS

We enrolled 72 subjects, consisting of 44 females and 28 males, with a mean age of 40.93 ± 16.51 years (range: 15 to 79 years), suffering from various salivary gland tumours. The tumour distribution included 42 parotid gland tumours (58.33%), followed by 21 submandibular gland tumours (29.16%), three sublingual gland tumours (4.16%), and six minor salivary gland tumours (8.33%). These individuals were subjected to clinical examination, sonography, and fine needle aspiration cytology as per indications. The results of each modality were compared to surgical pathology to find sensitivity and accuracy.

RESULTS

The clinical examination was found to be least sensitive (83.8%) as compared to FNAC (97.6%), and ultrasound (100%). Ultrasound had the highest diagnostic accuracy (86.2%) as compared to clinical examination (80.6%) and FNAC (82.6%).

CONCLUSION

Although sonography was found to have the highest sensitivity and accuracy as compared to fine needle aspiration cytology and clinical examination, the difference was subtle, as both sonography and fine needle aspiration cytology had a statistically significant correlation with histopathology.

Utility of the Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology: A retrospective 5 years study

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is an established technique for preoperative diagnosis of salivary gland lesions; however, lack of a uniform reporting system has been a handicap. The main aims of this study were to evaluate the utility of the - "The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology" (MSRSGC) and ascertain the risk of malignancy (ROM) for each category.

METHODS

All salivary gland FNACs over 5 years (January 2014-December 2018) were reviewed and assigned a diagnostic category from the MSRSGC. Clinical data were taken from Cytology records. Cytodiagnosis was correlated with histopathology wherever available and ROM was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 120 salivary gland FNACs were studied. Age ranged between 5 and 85 years, male:female ratio was 2:1 and parotid was the commonest gland aspirated. Cases were reclassified as I non-diagnostic (2.5%), II non-neoplastic (15%), III atypia of uncertain significance-AUS (1.7%), IV A neoplasm benign (50%), IV B neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (12.5%), V suspicious for malignancy (5%), and VI malignant (13.3%). Follow-up was available in 70 (58.3%) cases. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were 92.3%, 100%, 100%, and 98.27% respectively. ROM was non-neoplastic (0%), AUS (50%), neoplasm benign (0%), neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (28.6%), suspicious for malignancy (100%), and malignant (100%).

CONCLUSION

Salivary gland FNAC is a reliable diagnostic tool and the "Milan system" will further increase FNA reliability, help risk stratification, and improve patient care.