Effectiveness and Acceptability of Bag-and-mask Ventilation with Visual Monitor for Improving Neonatal Resuscitation in Simulated Setting in Six Hospitals of Nepal

Real-Time Digital Feedback Device and Simulated Newborn Ventilation Quality

OBJECTIVES

Effective bag-valve-mask ventilation is critical for reducing perinatal asphyxia-related neonatal deaths; however, providers often fail to achieve and maintain effective ventilation. The Augmented Infant Resuscitator (AIR) attaches to bag-valve-masks and provides visual feedback on air leaks, blocked airways, harsh breaths, and improper ventilatory rates. We evaluated the effect of this real-time-digital feedback on ventilation quality and the effective determination of airway integrity in a randomized controlled study in Uganda and the United States.

METHODS

Birth attendants trained in newborn resuscitation were randomized to receive either real-time AIR device feedback (intervention) or no feedback (control) during ventilation exercises. Intervention-arm participants received a 2-minute orientation on interpreting AIR feedback using a single-page iconography chart. All participants were randomly assigned to 3 blinded ventilation scenarios on identical-appearing manikins with airways that were either normal, significantly leaking air, or obstructed.

RESULTS

We enrolled 270 birth attendants: 77.8% from Uganda and 22.2% from the United States. Birth attendants receiving AIR feedback achieved effective ventilation 2.0 times faster: intervention mean 13.8s (95% confidence interval 10.6-17.1) versus 27.9s (21.6-34.3) for controls (P < .001). The duration of effective ventilation was 1.5 times longer: intervention mean 72.1s (66.7-77.5) versus 47.9s (41.6-54.2) for controls (P < .001). AIR feedback was associated with significantly more accurate and faster airway condition assessment (intervention mean 43.7s [40.5-47.0] versus 55.6s [51.6-59.6]).

CONCLUSIONS

Providers receiving real-time-digital AIR device feedback achieved effective ventilation significantly faster, maintained it longer, and determined airway condition faster and more accurately than providers in the control group.

Visual attention during pediatric resuscitation with feedback devices: a randomized simulation study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of feedback devices on visual attention and the quality of pediatric resuscitation.

METHODS

This was a randomized cross-over simulation study at the Medical University of Vienna. Participants were students and neonatal providers performing four resuscitation scenarios with the support of feedback devices randomized. The primary outcome was the quality of resuscitation. Secondary outcomes were total dwell time (=total duration of visit time) on areas of interest and the workload of participants.

RESULTS

Forty participants were analyzed. Overall, chest compression (P < 0.001) and ventilation quality were significantly better (P = 0.002) when using a feedback device. Dwell time on the feedback device was 40.1% in the ventilation feedback condition and 48.7% in the chest compression feedback condition. In both conditions, participants significantly reduced attention from the infant's chest and mask (72.9 vs. 32.6% and 21.9 vs. 12.7%). Participants' subjective workload increased by 3.5% (P = 0.018) and 8% (P < 0.001) when provided with feedback during a 3-min chest compression and ventilation scenario, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of pediatric resuscitation significantly improved when using real-time feedback. However, attention shifted from the manikin and other equipment to the feedback device and subjective workload increased, respectively.

IMPACT

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with feedback devices results in a higher quality of resuscitation and has the potential to lead to a better outcome for patients. Feedback devices consume attention from resuscitation providers. Feedback devices were associated with a shift of visual attention to the feedback devices and an increased workload of participants. Increased workload for providers and benefits for resuscitation quality need to be balanced for the best effect.