1
|
Goldman MJ, Teh BS, Lo SS, Butler EB, Baskin DS. Radiosurgery for Intracranial Meningiomas: A Review of Anatomical Challenges and an Update on the Evidence. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 17:45. [PMID: 39796674 PMCID: PMC11718812 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17010045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2024] [Revised: 12/19/2024] [Accepted: 12/20/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2025] Open
Abstract
Radiation has been used to treat meningiomas since the mid-1970s. Traditionally, radiation was reserved for patients unfit for major surgery or those with surgically inaccessible tumors. With an increased quantity and quality of imaging, and an aging population, there has been a rise in incidentally diagnosed meningiomas with smaller tumors at diagnosis time. Deciding if, how, and when to intervene must be determined on a case-by-case basis. Anatomical location and adjacent vital structures are crucial for decision-making. Prior review articles have detailed outcomes of radiosurgery in broad anatomical regions such as the skull base, but a recent deluge of research on increasingly specific anatomical subregions deserves attention. This narrative review synthesizes information regarding specific anatomical subregions, including anatomical challenges, radiosurgical outcomes, and unique considerations. Via MEDLINE and ascendancy search, we utilized evidence available for each anatomical region and herein discuss details of published research and explore future directions. Meningioma management remains individualized based on patient comorbidities, tumor location/characteristics, symptomatic burden, and patient age. In addition to stereotactic radiosurgery's established role for surgically inaccessible, recurrent, and high-grade meningiomas, its use as upfront management for small asymptomatic meningiomas is increasingly investigated. For all subregions reported, radiosurgical intervention resulted in high tumor control rates and acceptably low adverse radiation events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J. Goldman
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Bin S. Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (B.S.T.); (E.B.B.)
| | - Simon S. Lo
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA;
| | - E. Brian Butler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (B.S.T.); (E.B.B.)
| | - David S. Baskin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
- Kenneth R. Peak Brain and Pituitary Tumor Treatment Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10022, USA
- Department of Medicine, Texas A & M Medical School, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pattankar S, Misra BK. Treatment Strategies and Current Results of Petroclival Meningiomas. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 2023; 48:251-275. [PMID: 37770687 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-36785-4_9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
Petroclival meningiomas (PCMs) are complex skull-base tumors that continue to pose a formidable surgical challenge to neurosurgeons because of their deep-seated location/intimate relationship with the brainstem and neurovascular structures. The advent of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), along with the shifting of management goals from complete radiological cure to maximal preservation of the patient's quality of life (QOL), has further cluttered the topic of "optimal management" in PCMs. Not all patients with PCM need treatment ("watchful waiting"). However, many who reach the neurosurgeons with a symptomatic disease need surgery. The goal of the surgery in PCMs is a GTR, yet this can be achieved in only less than half of the patients with acceptable morbidity. The remainder of the patients are better treated by STR followed by SRS for residual tumor control or close follow-up. A small subset of patients with PCM may be best treated by primary SRS. In this chapter, we have tried to summarize the scientific evidence pertaining to the management of PCMs (including the senior author's series), particularly those regarding the available treatment strategies and current outcomes, and discuss the decision-making process to formulate an "optimal management" plan for individual PCMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjeev Pattankar
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, P D Hinduja Hospital and MRC, Mumbai, India
| | - Basant K Misra
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, P D Hinduja Hospital and MRC, Mumbai, India.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Surgical results of 158 petroclival meningiomas with special focus on standard craniotomies. J Neurooncol 2022; 160:55-65. [PMID: 36103000 PMCID: PMC9622548 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04105-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Objective The goal of this retrospective study is the evaluation of risk factors for postoperative neurological deficits after petroclival meningioma (PCM) surgery with special focus on standard craniotomies. Materials and methods One-hundred-fifty-eight patients were included in the study, of which 133 patients suffered from primary and 25 from recurrent PCM. All patients were operated on and evaluated concerning age, tumor size, histology, pre- and postoperative cranial nerve (CN) deficits, morbidity, mortality, and surgical complications. Tumor-specific features—e.g., consistency, surface, arachnoid cleavage, and location—were set in a four-grade classification system that was used to evaluate the risk of CN deficits and tumor resectability. Results After primary tumor resection, new CN deficits occurred in 27.3% of patients. Preoperative ataxia improved in 25%, whereas 10% developed new ataxia. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 59.4%. The morbidity rate, including hemiparesis, shunt-dependence, postop-hemorrhage, and tracheostomy was 22.6% and the mortality rate was 2.3%. In recurrent PCM surgery, CN deficits occurred in 16%. GTR could be achieved in three cases. Minor complications occurred in 20%. By applying the proposed new classification system to patients operated via standard craniotomies, the best outcome was observed in type I tumor patients (soft tumor consistency, smooth surface, plane arachnoid cleavage, and unilateral localization) with GTR in 78.7% (p < 0.001) and 11.9% new CN deficits (p = 0.006). Conclusion Standard craniotomies as the retrosigmoid or subtemporal/pterional approaches are often used for the resection of PCMs. Whether these approaches are sufficient for GTR—and avoidance of new neurological deficits—depends mainly on the localization and intrinsic tumor-specific features. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-022-04105-5.
Collapse
|
4
|
Yoo J, Lim SH, Jung IH, Park HH, Han J, Hong CK. Factors Associated With Abducens Nerve Palsy in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Petroclival Meningiomas. J Neuroophthalmol 2022; 42:e209-e216. [PMID: 34974485 DOI: 10.1097/wno.0000000000001473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the surgical resection of petroclival meningiomas, preserving the cranial nerves is crucial. The abducens nerve is particularly vulnerable during surgery. However, the preoperative risk factors and postoperative prognosis of abducens nerve palsy (ANP) are poorly understood. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 70 patients who underwent surgery for petroclival meningiomas between May 2010 and December 2019, divided into gross-total resection (GTR) and subtotal resection (STR) groups. The relationship of preoperative clinical factors with the incidence and recovery of postoperative ANP was analyzed. RESULTS Postoperative ANP was observed in 23 patients (32.9%). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that the tumor-to-cerebellar peduncle T2 imaging intensity index (TCTI) (P < 0.001) and internal auditory canal invasion (P = 0.033) contributed to postoperative ANP. GTR was achieved in 37 patients (52.9%), and 10 (27.0%) of them showed ANP. STR was achieved in 33 patients (47.1%), and 13 (39.4%) of them showed ANP. Recovery from ANP took a median of 6.6 months (range, 4.5-20.3 months). At 6 months after the operation, recovery of the abducens nerve function was observed in 16 patients (69.0%); of whom, 4 (40.0%) were in the GTR group and 12 (92.3%) were in the STR group (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS TCTI and internal auditory canal invasion were the risk factors for postoperative ANP. Although intentional STR did not prevent ANP immediately after the operation, recovery of the abducens nerve function after surgery was observed more frequently in the STR group than in the GTR group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihwan Yoo
- Department of Neurosurgery (JY, SHL, IHJ, HHP), Brain Tumor Center, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea ; Yonsei University College of Medicine (JY), Seoul, Republic of Korea ; Department of Ophthalmology (JH), Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea ; and Department of Neurosurgery (CKH), Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Haq IBI, Wahyuhadi J, Suryonurafif A, Arifianto MR, Susilo RI, Nagm A, Goto T, Ohata K. Modified Transpetrosal-Transtentorial Approach for Resection of Large and Giant Petroclival Meningioma: Technical Nuance and Surgical Experiences. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2021; 83:578-587. [PMID: 34794193 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meningiomas arising from the petroclival area remain a challenge for neurosurgeons. Various approaches have been proposed to achieve maximum resection with minimal morbidity and mortality. Also, some articles correlated preservation of adjacent veins with less neurologic deficits. OBJECTIVE To describe the experiences in using a new technique to achieve maximal resection of petroclival meningiomas and preserving the superior petrosal veins (SPVs) and the superior petrosal sinus (SPS). METHODS A retrospective analysis of 26 patients harboring a true petroclival meningioma with a diameter ≥25 mm and undergoing surgery with the modified transpetrosal-transtentorial approach (MTTA) was performed. RESULTS Fifty-four percent of 22 patients complained of severe headache at presentation. There was also complaint of cranial nerve (CN) deficit, with CN VII deficit being the most common (present in 42% of patients). The average tumor size (measured as maximum diameter) was 45.2 mm, and most of the tumors compressed the brainstem. Total resection was achieved in 12 patients (46.2%), whereas the others were excised subtotally (54.8%). Most of the patients had WHO grade I (96.1%) meningioma; only one had a grade II (3.8%) meningioma. In addition, clinical improvement and persistence of symptoms were observed in 17 (65.4%) and 8 (30.7%) patients, respectively, and postoperative permanent CN injury was observed in 3 (11.5%) patients. CONCLUSION Using the MTTA, maximal resection with preservation of the CNs and neurovascular SPV-SPS complex can be achieved. Therefore, further studies and improvements of the technique are required to increase the total resection rate without neglecting the complications that may develop postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irwan Barlian Immadoel Haq
- Department of Neurosurgery, dr. Soetomo Academic General Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.,Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Joni Wahyuhadi
- Department of Neurosurgery, dr. Soetomo Academic General Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.,Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Akhmad Suryonurafif
- Department of Neurosurgery, dr. Soetomo Academic General Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.,Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Muhammad Reza Arifianto
- Department of Neurosurgery, dr. Soetomo Academic General Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.,Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Rahadian Indarto Susilo
- Department of Neurosurgery, dr. Soetomo Academic General Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.,Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Alhusain Nagm
- Department of Neurosurgery, Al-Azhar University/Faculty of Medicine Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Takeo Goto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kenji Ohata
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Giammattei L, di Russo P, Starnoni D, Passeri T, Bruneau M, Meling TR, Berhouma M, Cossu G, Cornelius JF, Paraskevopoulos D, Zazpe I, Jouanneau E, Cavallo LM, Benes V, Seifert V, Tatagiba M, Schroeder HWS, Goto T, Ohata K, Al-Mefty O, Fukushima T, Messerer M, Daniel RT, Froelich S. Petroclival meningiomas: update of current treatment and consensus by the EANS skull base section. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163:1639-1663. [PMID: 33740134 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-04798-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal management of petroclival meningiomas (PCMs) continues to be debated along with several controversies that persist. METHODS A task force was created by the EANS skull base section along with its members and other renowned experts in the field to generate recommendations for the management of these tumors. To achieve this, the task force reviewed in detail the literature in this field and had formal discussions within the group. RESULTS The constituted task force dealt with the existing definitions and classifications, pre-operative radiological investigations, management of small and asymptomatic PCMs, radiosurgery, optimal surgical strategies, multimodal treatment, decision-making, and patient's counselling. CONCLUSION This article represents the consensually derived opinion of the task force with respect to the management of PCMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Giammattei
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
| | - P di Russo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - D Starnoni
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Center, University Hospital of Lausanne and Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - T Passeri
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - M Bruneau
- Department of Neurosurgery, Erasme Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - T R Meling
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - M Berhouma
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hopital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon, France
| | - G Cossu
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Center, University Hospital of Lausanne and Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - J F Cornelius
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - D Paraskevopoulos
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barts Health NHS Trust, St. Bartholomew's and The Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | - I Zazpe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - E Jouanneau
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hopital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon, France
| | - L M Cavallo
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Naples Federico II, Napoli, NA, Italy
| | - V Benes
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Medical Faculty, Military University Hospital and Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - V Seifert
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - M Tatagiba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - H W S Schroeder
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - T Goto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - K Ohata
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - O Al-Mefty
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - T Fukushima
- Department of Neurosurgery, Carolina Neuroscience Institute, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - M Messerer
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Center, University Hospital of Lausanne and Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - R T Daniel
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Center, University Hospital of Lausanne and Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - S Froelich
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|