Quality assurance in cytology reporting in Ghana: an urgent call

Expanding management strategies for cervical precancerous lesions in resource-limited settings: insights from a training center in a district hospital in Ghana

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer continues to disproportionately burden women in low/middle-income countries like Ghana. We examined treatment patterns and histopathological outcomes among women screened using visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and/or mobile colposcopy who subsequently underwent thermal ablation, large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ), or cold knife conization at the Cervical Cancer Prevention and Training Centre, Battor. We also assessed the prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ (CIN2+) or micro-invasive disease and their associated factors for women who underwent excisional treatments. The treatment choices for cervical precancerous lesions suitable for resource-limited settings have also been described from the perspective of a center that manages a heterogenous population.

METHODS

We conducted an analysis of secondary data collected between June 2016 and June 2023 among women with positive findings on VIA or mobile colposcopy who subsequently underwent thermal ablation or large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). The prevalence of histopathology outcomes, including no dysplasia, CIN1 - 3, and micro-invasive disease, were estimated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Factors associated with histopathological findings were modeled using multinomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

For the study period, 14 (10.6%) of the total 132 participants underwent cervical lesion treatment at outreach locations, all via thermal ablation. The remaining 118 (89.4%) were treated at the Catholic Hospital, Battor using LLETZ (n = 66, 55.9%), thermal ablation (n = 51, 43.2%), and cold knife conization (n = 1, 0.9%). Among 65 women with histopathology reports, the most frequent histopathological finding was no dysplasia (47.7%; 95% CI, 35.1 - 60.5), followed by CIN2 and CIN3 (20.0%; 95% CI, 11.1 - 31.8 each), CIN1 (7.7%; 95% CI, 2.5 - 17.0) and micro-invasion (4.6%; 95% CI, 1.0 - 12.9). Those with micro-invasive disease were significantly older than those with CIN1, CIN2, and CIN3 (p = 0.036, 0.022, 0.009, respectively), but not significantly older than those who showed no dysplasia (p = 0.088). For each unit increase in age, the likelihood of CIN3 was relatively significantly reduced compared to no dysplasia (crude relative risk ratio [RRR] = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86 - 0.99). This association was neither observed with the remaining histopathological groups nor for parity and persisted after controlling for parity (adjusted RRR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85 - 0.99; p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

This paper largely demonstrates treatment options available to women and practitioners in LMICs. The high combined prevalence of high-grade precancerous lesions and micro-invasive disease underscores the need to increase cervical cancer awareness that would enhance screening attendance and hasten efforts at moving from opportunistic to organized screening in Ghana. This will enhance early cervical lesion detection and treatment, while simultaneously re-evaluating and cutting down on unnecessary treatment.

Tritesting in Battor, Ghana: an integrated cervical precancer screening strategy to mitigate the challenges of multiple screening visits and loss to follow-up

Background

Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing is more sensitive than cytology for detecting cervical precancer; however, increasing reports of high-risk HPV (hr-HPV)-negative cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and even malignancy motivate the use of combined testing. We present our experience with 'tritesting', defined as the performance of HPV DNA testing, cytology and visual inspection in a single session at the Cervical Cancer Prevention and Training Centre, Ghana. We further determined the prevalence rates of hr-HPV infection, abnormal cytology and cervical lesions among women screened using tritesting.

Methods

This descriptive retrospective cross-sectional study assessed all women screened via tritesting between April 2019 to April 2023. HPV DNA testing was performed using the Sansure MA-6000, GeneXpert or AmpFire platforms. Visual inspection was performed using enhanced visual assessment mobile colposcopy or visual inspection with acetic acid. Liquid-based cytology was performed using cervical samples taken with a Cervex-Brush® and fixed in PreservCyt, while samples for conventional cytology were taken using an Ayre spatula and cytobrush.

Results

Among 236 women screened (mean age, 39.1 years (standard deviation, 10.9)), the overall prevalence rates of hr-HPV infection and cervical lesions were 17.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 13.1-23.3) and 11.9% (95% CI, 8.0-16.7), respectively. Cytology yielded findings of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse in 2.5% (95% CI, 0.9-5.5) of women. Histopathology following loop electrosurgical excision procedure revealed CIN I (tritest positive) and CIN III (hr-HPV-positive, visual inspection 'positive', cytology-negative) in one woman each. Factors independently associated with hr-HPV infection among 'tritested' women were age ≥ 39 years, tertiary level of education and current contraceptive use. Twenty-seven out of 39 hr-HPV-positive women (69.2%; 95% CI, 52.4-83.0) showed a type 3 transformation zone and would have needed to be recalled for a cytologic sample to be taken in a 'see and triage' approach with HPV DNA testing and a visual inspection method.

Conclusion

This study brings tritesting into the spotlight, as an alternative to other methods, particularly for women who prefer this due to the advantage of a single visit to a health facility and being more cost-effective, if they have to travel long distances to access cervical screening services.

Self-sampling and HPV DNA testing for cervical precancer screening in a cohort of nuns in Ghana: a cross-sectional cohort study

Background

The need for cervical cancer screening has been emphasised in at-risk cohorts of women to reduce their risk of cervical cancer. Some women with decreased risk of acquiring human papillomavirus (HPV) infections, such as Catholic nuns, receive less attention and on occasion are missed in cervical cancer screening programmes. This study aimed to determine the high-risk HPV (hr-HPV) prevalence in such a cohort to emphasise the need for cervical precancer screening among all women. To improve compliance, we employed self-sampling.

Methods

This descriptive cross-sectional cohort study involved the data of 105 Catholic nuns subjected to cervical screening using self-samples in the Greater Accra, Volta, and Central regions of Ghana between June 4, 2022 and June 30, 2022. hr-HPV testing was performed on self-samples using the MA-6000 HPV DNA platform. Screen-positive nuns underwent follow-up pap smears and EVA colposcopy. In addition to descriptive analysis, univariate and multivariable nominal logistic regression was used to explore the relationship between hr-HPV positivity and selected continuous and categorical factors.

Findings

105 nuns from three convents were screened with hr-HPV DNA testing (MA-6000). Twenty-five tested positive for hr-HPV (prevalence of 23.8% (95% CI, 15.7-32.0) [HPV 18 only (n = 2, 1.9%), non-HPV 16/18 genotypes (others) (n = 22, 21.0%), and mixed infection with HPV 16 and other genotype(s) (n = 1, 1.0%)]. Pap smears for all 25 hr-HPV-positives came in as negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy, whereas EVA mobile colposcopy showed minor abnormal findings in two (8.0%; 95% CI, 1.0-26.0), both of whom were managed conservatively.

Interpretation

Our findings suggest that the hr-HPV prevalence in this cohort of nuns is similar to that of the general population. To meet the World Health Organization's target for cervical cancer elimination, it is important that all women are given access to cervical cancer screening and preventative services. Further, increasing 'anonymity' and privacy among nuns through self-sampling may be crucial to expanding choice, coverage, and uptake of screening in support of their health rights.

Funding

None.