Performance Evaluation of the Real-Q Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Quantification Kit Using Two Real-Time PCR Systems for Quantifying CMV DNA in Whole Blood

QuantiFERON monitor predicts early cytomegalovirus infection and viral burden in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major cause of transplantation-related morbidity and mortality. This study assessed the utility of the QuantiFERON monitor (QFM; Qiagen) for the prediction of early CMV infection and viral burden.

METHODS

QuantiFERON-CMV (QF-CMV; Qiagen) and QFM were measured at the post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) week 4. CMV DNA was measured at every visit until post-HSCT week 24. The QFM cutoff specific to CMV infection was established.

RESULT

At the post-HSCT week 4, the QFM cutoff predicting CMV infection was 86.95 IU/mL. While QF-CMV results at the post-HSCT week 4 were associated with high-level CMV infection (CMV DNA ≥ 5,000 IU/mL) but not with CMV infection (CMV DNA ≥ 500 IU/mL), QFM was associated with both CMV infection and high-level CMV infection. Both indeterminate QF-CMV and nonreactive QFM were associated with increased peak CMV DNA.

CONCLUSION

Low QFM is a risk factor for CMV infection and increased CMV viral loads. QFM at post-HSCT week 4 can be utilized as an assay to predict the risk and burden of early CMV infection in HSCT recipients, in conjunction with other risk factors.

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for screening congenital cytomegalovirus infection in newborns

Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common cause of sensorineural hearing loss and neurodevelopmental impairment in newborns. However, congenital CMV infection cannot be diagnosed using samples collected more than 3 weeks after birth because testing after this time cannot distinguish between congenital infection and postnatal infection. Herein, we developed a robust loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the large-scale screening of newborns for congenital CMV infection. In contrast to conventional quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), which detects CMV within a dynamic range of 1.0 × 106 to 1.0 × 102 copies/μL, our quantitative LAMP assay (qLAMP) detects CMV within a dynamic range of 1.1 × 108 to 1.1 × 103 copies/μL. Moreover, the turnaround time for obtaining results following DNA extraction is 90 min in qPCR but only 15 min in qLamp. The colorimetric LAMP assay can also detect CMV down to 1.1 × 103 copies/μL within 30 min, irrespective of the type of heat source. Our LAMP assay can be utilized in central laboratories as an alternative to conventional qPCR for quantitative CMV detection, or for point-of-care testing in low-resource environments, such as developing countries, via colorimetric naked-eye detection. KEY POINTS: • LAMP assay enables large-scale screening of newborns for congenital CMV infection. • LAMP allows colorimetric or quantitative detection of congenital CMV infection. • LAMP assay can be used as a point-of-care testing tool in low-resource environments.

Impact of antiviral treatment on long-term prognosis in non-immunocompromised patients with CMV reactivation

Background

Reactivation of human cytomegalovirus (CMV) occurs in non-immunocompromised patients with or without specific organ involvement, but it is still unknown whether it has a clinical implication on long-term prognosis or not.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study evaluating non-immunocompromised adult patients with CMV reactivation was conducted during the period between January 2010 and February 2018. Patients were divided into ganciclovir-treated and non-treated groups. Patients who died within 30 days from CMV reactivation were excluded as they died from complex causes of conditions. Survivors were followed for 30-months to evaluate long-term prognosis.

Results

A total of 136 patients with CMV reactivation was included, consisting of 66 ganciclovir-treated (48.5%) and 70 non-treated (51.5%) patients. Overall, patients were old-aged (median 70 years old) and most were treated with pneumonia of any cause (91.2%). More patients in ganciclovir-treated group were treated at intensive care unit (43.9% vs 24.3%, respectively) and had higher viral load over 5000 copies/ml (48.5% vs 22.9%) than non-treated group (all P < 0.05). Primary and secondary endpoints including 30-months survival (28.0 vs 38.9%, respectively) and 12-months survival (40.3% vs 49.2%) were not statistically different between the ganciclovir-treated and non-treated groups. In the multivariate analyses, ganciclovir treatment was not associated with 30-months survival (HR 1.307, 95% CI 0.759–2.251) and 12-months survival (HR 1.533, 95% CI 0.895–2.624).

Conclusion

In a retrospective cohort study evaluating non-immunocompromised patients with CMV reactivation, ganciclovir treatment was not associated with long-term prognosis. Antiviral treatment in this condition would not be necessary unless organ involvement is suspected.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-06098-4.

Performance Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter DxN VERIS Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Assay in Comparison With the Abbott RealTime HBV Assay

The detection and quantification of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA plays an important role in diagnosing and monitoring HBV infection as well as in assessing the therapeutic response. We compared the analytical performance of a random access, fully automated HBV assay—DxN VERIS Molecular Diagnostics System (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA)—with that of Abbott RealTime HBV assay (Abbott Laboratories, Des Plaines, IL, USA). The between-day precision of the VERIS assay ranged from 0.92% (mean 4.68 log IU/mL) to 4.15% (mean 2.09 log IU/mL) for pooled sera from HBV patients. HBV DNA levels measured by the VERIS HBV assay correlated with the calculated HBV DNA levels (r²=0.9994; P<0.0001). The lower limit of quantification was estimated as 8.76 IU/mL (Probit analysis, 95% confidence interval: 7.32–12.00 IU/mL). Passing-Bablok regression analysis showed good concordance between the VERIS and RealTime assays for 187 chronic HBV samples (y=−0.2397+0.9712x; r=0.981), as well as for 20 drug-resistant HBV genotype C positive samples (y=−0.5415+0.9954x; r=0.961). The VERIS assay demonstrated performance similar to the RealTime assay and is suitable for high-throughput HBV DNA monitoring in large hospital laboratories.

Evaluation of cellulose pads as a method to detect cytomegalovirus DNA in neonatal urine

Background Several approaches exist to screen neonates for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. We here describe a new method using cellulose pads for urine collection and its evaluation in an experimental and a clinical setting. Methods We systematically tested the effect of storage duration of the pads after exposure to cytomegalovirus-positive urine, meconium contamination and specimen handling on the cytomegalovirus load and the detection rate. Further, the method was tested in clinical practice in a cohort of 500 neonates. Results Following exposure of urine pads with cytomegalovirus-positive urine, the viral load decreased after 15 min, 12 h, 24 h, and 7 days to 63.2%, 42.1%, 31.6%, and 9.3% of the baseline value. Cytomegalovirus detection rate after seven days was 100%. Contamination with meconium resulted in a comparable reduction of the viral load. The detection rate for dried urine pads after seven days was 93.3%. In clinical practice, urine collection from pads was successful in 73.6% by the first attempt and in 26.4% by the second attempt. Conclusions Urine collection using cellulose pads seems feasible regardless of a reduction of the cytomegalovirus load due to exposure to the pad itself or to meconium. Drying of the exposed urine pad should be avoided.

Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction Systems for Detecting Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus Using Real-Time PCR: A Comparison Study Between the QIAsymphony RGQ and QIAcube Systems

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) are increasingly important in immunocompromised patients. Nucleic acid extraction methods could affect the results of viral nucleic acid amplification tests. We compared two automated nucleic acid extraction systems for detecting CMV and EBV using real-time PCR assays.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-three whole blood (WB) samples were tested for CMV detection, and 117 WB samples were tested for EBV detection. Viral nucleic acid was extracted in parallel by using QIAsymphony RGQ and QIAcube (Qiagen GmbH, Germany), and real-time PCR assays for CMV and EBV were performed with a Rotor-Gene Q real-time PCR cycler (Qiagen). Detection rates for CMV and EBV were compared, and agreements between the two systems were analyzed.

RESULTS

The detection rate of CMV and EBV differed significantly between the QIAsymphony RGQ and QIAcube systems (CMV, 59.5% [91/153] vs 43.8% [67/153], P=0.0005; EBV, 59.0% [69/117] vs 42.7% [50/117], P=0.0008). The two systems showed moderate agreement for CMV and EBV detection (kappa=0.43 and 0.52, respectively). QIAsymphony RGQ showed a negligible correlation with QIAcube for quantitative EBV detection. QIAcube exhibited EBV PCR inhibition in 23.9% (28/117) of samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Automated nucleic acid extraction systems have different performances and significantly affect the detection of viral pathogens. The QIAsymphony RGQ system appears to be superior to the QIAcube system for detecting CMV and EBV. A suitable sample preparation system should be considered for optimized nucleic acid amplification in clinical laboratories.