The Role of the Signal-to-Cutoff Ratio in Automated Anti-HCV Chemiluminescent Immunoassays by Referring to the Nucleic Acid Amplification Test and the Recombinant Immunoblot Assay

A new double-antigen sandwich test based on the light-initiated chemiluminescent assay for detecting anti-hepatitis C virus antibodies with high sensitivity and specificity

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a new double-antigen sandwich test that is based on the light-initiated chemiluminescent assay (LiCA®) for detecting anti-hepatitis C virus antibodies (anti-HCV) in comparison to Architect®.

Methods

Analytical characteristics and diagnostic performance were tested using seroconversion panels and large pools of clinical samples. Positive results were validated by the strip immunoblot assay (RIBA) and HCV RNA.

Results

Repeatability and within-lab imprecision of LiCA® anti-HCV were 1.31%-3.27%. The C5-C95 interval was -5.44%-5.03% away from C50. LiCA® detected seroconversion in an average of 28.9 days and showed a mean of 3.7 (p = 0.0056) days earlier than Architect®. In a pool of 239 samples with known HCV genotypes 1 to 6, both assays correctly detected all subjects. In 16,305 clinical patient sera, LiCA® detected 4 false-negative (0.25‰) and 14 false-positive (0.86‰) anti-HCV cases, while Architect® recorded 6 false-negative (0.37‰) and 138 false-positive (8.46‰) subjects, respectively. Compared to Architect®, LiCA® presented a significantly better performance in specificity (99.91% vs. 99.14%, n = 16,018, p < 0.0001), positive predictive value (95.29% vs. 67.06%, n = 419, p < 0.0001), and overall accuracy (99.89% vs. 99.12%, n = 16,305, p < 0.0001), while no significant difference in sensitivity (98.61% vs. 97.91%, n = 287, p = 0.5217) and negative predictive value (99.98% vs. 99.96%, n = 15,886, p = 0.3021) was seen. An S/Co value of 3.28 was predicted to be the threshold with a positivity ≥95% for the LiCA® anti-HCV assay.

Conclusion

LiCA® anti-HCV is a precise and fully automatic chemiluminescent assay with superior sensitivity and specificity. The assay can be used as a valuable tool to supplement the diagnosis of HCV infection.

High false discovery rate of the Architect anti-HCV screening test in blood donors in Uganda and evaluation of an algorithm for confirmatory testing

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Adequate supplies of donor blood remain a major challenge in sub-Saharan Africa. This is exacerbated by a lack of confirmatory testing for transfusion-transmitted infections by blood transfusion services (BTS), leading to significant blood disposal owing to putatively high seroprevalence rates amongst Ugandan blood donors. We aimed to ascertain the false discovery rate of the Architect anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening assay and categorize screen-reactive samples into three groups: presumed false positive, active and past infection, and develop an algorithm for confirmatory testing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 470 screen-reactive HCV blood donations were retested using the Architect anti-HCV assay, an alternative antibody test (SD Biosensor) and a core antigen (cAg) test. signal-to cut-off (S/CO) ratios and pre-analytical factors (centrifugation speed, haemolysis check, time between collection and testing) were recorded. Based on the S/CO ratio evaluation, we propose a testing algorithm to guide supplemental tests.

RESULTS

The false discovery rate of the Architect anti-HCV assay was 0.84 as 395/470 (84%) screen-reactive samples had no evidence of HCV infection (SD Biosensor and cAg negative) (presumed false positive), 38/470 (8.1%) were antigenaemic, and 32/470 (6.8%) had evidence of past infection. The median S/CO ratios of the presumed false-positive and active infection samples were 1.8 and 17.3, respectively. The positive predictive value of HCV positivity in samples with ratios above 12 was 91.8%. On retesting, 104/470 (22.1%) samples became negative.

CONCLUSION

The Architect anti-HCV assay has a very high false discovery rate in Ugandan BTSs, leading to excessive blood disposal. Pre-analytical factors likely contribute to this. An introduction of confirmatory testing using an algorithm based on S/CO ratio evaluation could limit unnecessary blood wastage and donor deferral.

The signal-to-cutoff ratios to predict HCV infection among people who inject drugs

People who inject drugs (PWIDs) are primarily the high-risk population for HCV infection. This study aims to determine the optimal cut-off values for predicting HCV infection status based on the Signal-to-Cutoff (S/CO) ratio. In this study, a total of 719 PWIDs’ samples were collected, and performed for screening test by ELISA assay, and followed by RIBA assay and NAT assay to detect HCV antibody and HCV RNA levels, respectively. The findings revealed that the prevalence of HCV infection among PWIDs was 54.66% (393/719), and the false-positive rate of HCV antibody detection by ELISA assay among PWIDs was only 3.85% (16/416). In addition, when the optimal cut-off value for S/CO ratio was 2.0, the sensitivity and specificity of HCV antibody were 100.00% and 93.55%, respectively. And when the optimal cut-off value for S/CO ratio was 21.36, the sensitivity and specificity of HCV RNA positive were 89.90% and 72.73%, respectively. In conclusion, the status of HCV infection can be predicted based on the S/CO ratios of the ELISA assay, which can improve diagnosis and facilitate timely treatment to effectively prevent the spread of HCV infection.

Comparative evaluation of the Geenius HCV supplemental assay and Inno-LIA HCV score assay in detecting anti-HCV antibodies

OBJECTIVE

This study compared two assays aimed at confirming the presence of anti-HCV antibodies (Ab) after a positive screening: Geenius HCV supplemental assay (Bio-Rad, Marne la Coquette, France) and the Inno-LIA HCV score assay (Fujirebio, Les Ulis, France).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 180 archived samples were investigated including 119 samples collected at different stages of HCV infection in 25 hemodialyzed patients who underwent HCV seroconversion, 14 samples from 4 commercial seroconversion panels, 47 Ab positive/HCV-RNA positive blood donations of which 7 showing an single reactivity in confirmatory assays. Samples were investigated and results were interpreted with the two assays according to the manufacturers' instructions.

RESULTS

Overall, Geenius and Inno-LIA were concordant for 84% (151/180) samples: 38 negative, 17 indeterminate and 96 positive. Of the 29 discrepant results, 26 were overclassified with Inno-LIA. HCV seroconversion was detected with Inno-LIA 4 and 7 days prior to Geenius in two panels. The high positive rate observed with Inno-LIA (64%) compared to Geenius (54%) was mainly due to low reactivities considered positive according to interpretation criteria, which could affect specificity.

CONCLUSION

Although HCV supplemental assays are not recommended for the diagnostic of HCV infection, which is primarily based on HCV-RNA testing, both assays are suitable as second line anti-HCV tests when Ab screening is positive and RNA testing cannot be performed. Moreover, Geenius system provides an objective result in less than 30minutes, which is compatible when a rapid diagnostic is required.

The impact of nucleic acid testing as a blood donor screening method in transfusion-associated hepatitis C among children with bleeding disorders in Indonesia: a single-center experience

Background

Children with bleeding disorders, such as hemophilia and von Willebrand disease (VWD), have an increased risk of acquiring transfusion-transmitted infections (TTI). Screening methods to exclude blood donations that are at risk of transmitting infection from donors to recipients are critical to preventing disease transmission. Nucleic acid testing (NAT) is the latest blood donor-screening method. This study aimed to determine the incidence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in children with hemophilia and VWD at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital with a history of blood transfusion before and after implementation of a NAT screening method.

Methods

A cohort retrospective study was conducted on children aged 0‒18 years with bleeding disorders and a history of blood transfusion. In our center, all blood transfusions before 2015 were screened using non-NAT methods, while all blood transfusions were screened using NAT starting in 2015. Eligible patient characteristics were collected from medical records. From July to December 2019, blood samples were obtained from eligible patients for anti-HCV examination. HCV RNA examinations were performed on subjects with reactive anti-HCV results, and the relative risk was calculated.

Results

In total, 108 eligible participants were included in this study. We observed that 91 (94.3%) patients had history of receiving non-NAT blood transfusions, while 17 (15.7%) patients received NAT-screened blood transfusions. The proportion of anti-HCV reactivity in the non-NAT group and that in the NAT group were 3.3% (3/91) and 0% (0/17), respectively.

Conclusion

None of the patients exhibited reactivity to anti-HCV after implementing the NAT screening method.

The role of a two-assay serological testing strategy for anti-HCV screening in low-prevalence populations

HCV screening depends mainly on a one-assay anti-HCV testing strategy that is subject to an increased false-positive rate in low-prevalence populations. In this study, a two-assay anti-HCV testing strategy was applied to screen HCV infection in two groups, labelled group one (76,442 people) and group two (18,415 people), using Elecsys electrochemiluminescence (ECL) and an Architect chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA), respectively. Each anti-HCV-reactive serum was retested with the other assay. A recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) and HCV RNA testing were performed to confirm anti-HCV positivity or active HCV infection. In group one, 516 specimens were reactive in the ECL screening, of which CMIA retesting showed that 363 (70.3%) were anti-HCV reactive (327 positive, 30 indeterminate, 6 negative by RIBA; 191 HCV RNA positive), but 153 (29.7%) were not anti-HCV reactive (4 positive, 29 indeterminate, 120 negative by RIBA; none HCV RNA positive). The two-assay strategy significantly improved the positive predictive value (PPV, 64.1% & 90.1%, P < 0.05). In group two, 87 serum specimens were reactive according to CMIA screening. ECL showed that 56 (70.3%) were anti-HCV reactive (47 positive, 8 indeterminate, 1 negative by RIBA; 29 HCV RNA positive) and 31 (29.7%) were anti-HCV non-reactive (25 negative, 5 indeterminate, 1 positive by RIBA; none HCV RNA positive). Again, the PPV was significantly increased (55.2% & 83.9%, P < 0.05). Compared with a one-assay testing strategy, the two-assay testing strategy may significantly reduce false positives in anti-HCV testing and identify inactive HCV infection in low-seroprevalence populations.

Differential reactivity of anti-hepatitis C virus screening assays in patients with waning antibodies

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) leads to persistent infection. Viral clearance can be obtained through pharmacological treatment or spontaneously. After viral clearance, anti-HCV antibodies (Abs) slowly decline and finally disappear. Subjects with a resolved HCV infection are reactive to anti-HCV screening assays for a long time. These subjects pose a diagnostic challenge, and therefore, a more accurate interpretation of laboratory tests is needed for cases with resolved HCV infection. However, the performances of anti-HCV screening assays against declining anti-HCV Abs have not been assessed. Here we evaluated 1509 samples with different screening assays. Screening assays provided discrepant results in patients with waning Abs. The identification of signal-to-cut-off values indicative of waning Abs for each anti-HCV assay could avoid unnecessary confirmatory tests and reduce the impact of misdiagnosis.