Pulsed Radiofrequency Application for the Treatment of Pain Secondary to Sacroiliac Joint Metastases

The value of the sacroiliac joint area as a new morphological parameter of ankylosing spondylitis

A narrowed sacroiliac joint (SIJ) space has been considered to be a major morphologic parameter of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Previous studies revealed that the sacroiliac joint thickness (SIJT) correlated with AS in patients. However, irregular narrowing is different from thickness. Thus, we devised a method using the sacroiliac joint cross-sectional area (SIJA) as a new morphological parameter for use in evaluating AS. We hypothesized that the SIJA is a key morphologic parameter in diagnosing AS. SIJ samples were collected from 107 patients with AS, and from 85 control subjects who underwent SIJ-view X-rays that revealed no evidence of AS. We measured the SIJT and SIJA at the SIJ margin on X-rays using our picture archiving and communications system. The SIJT was measured at the narrowest point between the sacrum and the ilium. The SIJA was measured as the entire cross-sectional joint space area of the SIJ in the X-ray images. The average SIJT was 3.09 ± 0.61 mm in the control group, and 1.59 ± 0.52 mm in the AS group. The average SIJA was 166.74 ± 39.98 mm2 in the control group, and 68.65 ± 24.11 mm2 in the AS group. AS patients had significantly lower SIJT (P < .001) and SIJA (P < .001) than the control subjects. Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis showed that the best cutoff point for the SIJT was 2.33 mm, with 92.5% sensitivity, 94.1% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.95-0.99). The optimal cutoff point for the SIJA was 106.19 mm2, with 93.5% sensitivity, 95.3% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.98 (95% confidence interval: 0.97-1.00). Although the SIJT and SIJA were both significantly associated with AS, the SIJA parameter was a more sensitive measurement. We concluded that the SIJA is an easy-to-use, fast, cheap, and useful new morphological parameter for predicting AS.

Sacroiliitis in cancer patients: a review of current literature

The sacroiliac (SI) joint can be directly jeopardized by malignancy and indirectly by ergonomic changes of pelvic obliquity that introduces uneven weight distribution. Cancer treatment can exacerbate preexisting arthritis and cause diffuse arthropathies, but these are unlikely to be isolated to the SI joint. The cancer population is exposed to unique stressors that might facilitate development of SI joint pain that includes cancer itself and therapy-related complications. Like the general population, cancer patients are subject to aging and BMI and musculoskeletal structural changes that affect symmetric body functioning and posturing. No frank association between sacroiliitis and cancer has been identified. Therefore, we believe there is a need to characterize any relationship between cancer and SI joint dysfunction and pain.

Extraspinal Percutaneous Osteoplasty for the Treatment of Painful Bony Metastasis

BACKGROUND

Extraspinal percutaneous osteoplasties (POPs) are novel techniques for the treatment of painful bony metastasis, which is often the cause of both persistent and incidental breakthrough pain. This retrospective study explored the efficacy and complications of extraspinal POPs.

METHODS

The origin of the cancer metastasis, performed POP sites, necessity of adjacent joint injections, pain and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores, complications related to the POPs, and life expectancy were evaluated from the medical records from 2009 to 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 47 (M/F = 28/19) patients had received 54 POPs, including costoplasty, scapuloplasty, ilioplasty, humeroplasty, ischioplasty, femoroplasty, sternoplasty, and puboplasty, in order of frequency. The most common sites for the origin of the cancer, in order of frequency, were the lung, liver, breast, colon, and kidney. All patients receiving POPs including scapuloplasty, ilioplasty, humeroplasty, and femoroplasty needed adjacent joint injections before or after the POPs. Pain due to metastatic lesions was reduced significantly immediately after the POPs and the reduction was sustained until the end of their lives. The median KPS was increased from 35.4% to 67.7% immediately after the POPs. There were no complications related to the procedures. The mean life expectancy after performing the POPs, for 35 patients which died afterwards, was 99.3 days, ranging from 1 to 767 days.

CONCLUSION

Even though pain in the isolated POP sites may be difficult to measure due to overlapping systemic pain, the POPs provided immediate local pain relief, and the patients showed better physical performance without procedure-related complications.

A comprehensive review of pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of pain associated with different spinal conditions

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to evaluate the efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment of pain associated with different spinal conditions. The mechanisms of action and biological effects are shortly discussed to provide the scientific basis for this radiofrequency modality.

METHODS

We systematically searched for clinical studies on spinal clinical conditions using PRF. We searched the MEDLINE (PubMed) database. We classified the information in one table focusing on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and other types of studies. Date of last electronic search was October 2016.

RESULTS

We found four RCTs that evaluated the efficacy of PRF on cervical radicular pain and five observational studies. Two trials and three observational studies were conducted in patients with facet pain. For disc-related pathology, we found one RCT with PRF applied intradiscally and three RCTs for dorsal root ganglia PRF modulation lumbosacral radicular pain. For sacroiliac joint pain, spondylolisthesis, malignancies and other minor spinal pathology, limited studies were conducted.

CONCLUSION

From the available evidence, the use of PRF to the dorsal root ganglion in cervical radicular pain is compelling. With regard to its lumbosacral counterpart, the use of PRF cannot be similarly advocated in view of the absence of standardization of PRF parameters, enrolment criteria and different methods in reporting results; but, the evidence is interesting. The use of PRF in lumbar facet pain was found to be less effective than conventional RF techniques. For the other different spinal conditions, we need further studies to assess the effectiveness of PRF. Advances in knowledge: The use of PRF in lumbar facet pain was found to be less effective than conventional RF techniques. For the other different spinal conditions, we need further studies to assess the effectiveness of PRF.

Ultrasonography-guided pulsed radiofrequency of sciatic nerve for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome Type II

Although the major mechanism of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) involves dysfunctional central or sympathetic nervous system activation, the peripheral nervous system also contributes significantly to its clinical manifestations. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is a recently developed treatment option for neuropathic pain syndromes. Here, we report a case of CRPS Type II after a femur fracture and sciatic nerve injury, in which the pain was treated successfully with ultrasonography-guided selective sciatic nerve PRF application.