1
|
Rizzoli P. Medication-Overuse Headache. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2024; 30:379-390. [PMID: 38568489 DOI: 10.1212/con.0000000000001403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Medication-overuse headache (MOH) has been described for almost 100 years and is characterized as a daily or near-daily headache that usually presents in patients with preexisting primary headache disorders who are overusing one or more acute or symptomatic headache medications. This article reviews the diagnosis and management of patients with MOH. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS The International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria for MOH have changed over time. The worldwide prevalence appears to be between 1% and 2%. Together, headache disorders, including MOH, are currently ranked as the second leading cause of years lived with disability in the Global Burden of Disease world health survey. Significant neurophysiologic changes are seen in the brains of patients with MOH, including functional alterations in central pain processing and modulating systems and central sensitization. Research supports updates to the principles of management, including weaning off the overused medication, preventive therapy, biobehavioral therapy, and patient education. ESSENTIAL POINTS MOH is a fairly common and treatable secondary headache disorder that produces significant disability and a substantial reduction in quality of life. The costs related to lost income and disability are substantial. MOH is intimately related to chronic migraine, which continues to be underrecognized and undertreated. Treatment focuses on both the institution of effective preventive migraine therapy and the reduction or removal of the overused medications. Educational efforts directed toward both providers and patients have been shown to be effective in reducing the effect of MOH.
Collapse
|
2
|
Hird MA, Sandoe CH. Medication Overuse Headache: an Updated Review and Clinical Recommendations on Management. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2023; 23:389-398. [PMID: 37271793 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-023-01278-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OVERVIEW Medication overuse headache (MOH) is highly prevalent among individuals with primary headache disorders. PURPOSE OF REVIEW (1) Provide an update on epidemiology, risk factors, and treatment strategies of MOH and (2) provide recommendations on the management of MOH. RECENT FINDINGS The prevalence of MOH ranges from 0.5 to 7.2%. Risk factors for MOH include female sex, lower socioeconomic status, some psychiatric conditions, and substance use disorders, among others. Recent large clinical trials support preventative therapy as an integral component of MOH management. Emerging clinical trial evidence supports anti-CGRP mAbs as effective preventative treatments among individuals with migraine and MOH. Among the large clinical trials, candesartan, topiramate, amitriptyline, and onabotulinumtoxinA were the most used preventative therapies, providing further support for these agents. MOH management requires a multifaceted and patient-centered approach that involves patient education, behavioral interventions, withdrawal of the overused medication, and initiation of preventative medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan A Hird
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Claire H Sandoe
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
- Centre for Headache, Women's College Hospital, 3rd Floor, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1B2, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Artemenko AR, Abramov VG, Konovalova ZN, Korenko AN, Krasavina DA, Kurenkov AL, Latysheva NV, Naprienko MV, Orlova OR, Filatova EG, Shevchenko VS, Yakovleva PN. [Botulinum toxin type A (Relatox) in the treatment of chronic migraine in adults: results of phase IIIb, randomized, one-blind, multicenter, active-controlled, parallel-group trial]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2023; 123:89-99. [PMID: 37315247 DOI: 10.17116/jnevro202312305189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To access the efficacy and safety of the first Russian botulinum toxin type A (Relatox) as a headache prophylaxis in adult with chronic migraine (CM). MATERIAL AND METHODS The randomized, one-blind, multicenter, active-controlled, parallel-group trial study involved 209 patients with CM aged from 19 to 65 years. The patients were randomized to injections of the Russian botulinum toxin type A - Relatox (n=101) or onabotulinumtoxinA injections - Botox (n=108). The duration of the study was 16 weeks, which included five visits of patients every 4 weeks. Relatox and Botox were injected once into seven muscle groups of the head and neck at a dose of 155-195 units. Primary efficacy variable was mean change from baseline in frequency of headache days after 12 weeks. Secondary efficacy variables were mean changes from the baseline to week 12 in frequency of migraine days, acute headache pain medication intakes days; headache intensity; proportion of patients achieving ≥50% reduction from baseline in headache days, the proportion of the patients with medication overuse, the proportion of the patients with severe (≥60) Headache Impact Test-6 score and with a severe (≥21) MIDAS score. RESULTS Analyses demonstrated a large mean decrease from baseline in frequency of headache days, without statistically significant between-group differences Relatox vs Botox at week 12 (-10.89 vs -10.06; p=0.365) and at other time points. Significant differences from baseline were also observed for all secondary efficacy variables at all time points without differences between the groups. The proportion of patients achieving ≥50% reduction from baseline in headache days was 75.0% and 70% in the Relatox and Botox groups, respectively (OR, CI 95% 1.58 [0.84; 3.02], p=0.155). Adverse events (AE) occurred in 15.8% of Relatox patients and 15.7% of Botox patients (p=1.000). No unexpected AE were identified. CONCLUSION The results demonstrate that the first Russian botulinum toxin type A (Relatox) is an effective prophylactic treatment for CM in adult patients. Relatox led to significant improvements from baseline in multiple measures of headache symptoms, headache-related disability and quality of life. For the first time, a comparative analysis of two botulinum toxin type A products in parallel groups showed no less (not inferior) efficacy and safety of Relatox relative to Botox in the treatment of CM in adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Artemenko
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
- LLC Medical Center «Practical Neurology», Moscow, Russia
| | - V G Abramov
- Federal Siberian Scientific and Clinical Center, Krasnoyarsk, Russia
| | - Z N Konovalova
- LLC Central Institute of Botulinotherapy and Actual Neurology, Moscow, Russia
| | - A N Korenko
- LLC «Professorial Clinic «Oda», St. Petersburg, Russia
- Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - D A Krasavina
- LLC «Professorial Clinic «Oda», St. Petersburg, Russia
- Staint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - A L Kurenkov
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
- National Medical Research Center for Children's Health, Moscow, Russia
| | - N V Latysheva
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
- LLC «Cephalgologist», Moscow, Russia
| | - M V Naprienko
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
- LLC «Cephalgologist», Moscow, Russia
| | - O R Orlova
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
- LLC Central Institute of Botulinotherapy and Actual Neurology, Moscow, Russia
| | - E G Filatova
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
- LLC «Cephalgologist», Moscow, Russia
| | - V S Shevchenko
- LLC Medical Center «Practical Neurology», Moscow, Russia
- National Medical Research Center «Treatment and Rehabilitation Center», Moscow, Russia
| | - P N Yakovleva
- LLC Central Institute of Botulinotherapy and Actual Neurology, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Scher AI, Bendtsen L. Patient-Centered Treatment of Chronic Migraine With Medication Overuse: More Is Not Always Better. Neurology 2022; 98:563-564. [PMID: 35169016 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000200252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ann I Scher
- From the Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics (A.I.S.), Uniformed Services University, Bethesda MD; Department of Neurology (L.B.), Danish Headache Centre, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Lars Bendtsen
- From the Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics (A.I.S.), Uniformed Services University, Bethesda MD; Department of Neurology (L.B.), Danish Headache Centre, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|