The change of QRS duration after pulmonary valve replacement in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot and pulmonary regurgitation

Pulmonary Valve Replacement Timing Following Initial Tetralogy of Fallot Repair: A Systematic Review

Pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) is a critical aspect of surgical management for patients with tetralogy of Fallot (ToF). Determining an optimal timeframe for intervention is imperative, as it directly impacts long-term outcomes and the risk of complications in ToF patients. Ventriculotomy with the transannular patch is currently indicated for right ventricular outflow tract obstruction, but the patch itself can lead to pulmonary regurgitation (PR), dyspnea, and cyanosis, among other complications. This investigation seeks to establish an evidence-based timeline to enhance the overall quality of care for individuals with this congenital heart condition. From 2002 to 2022, 21,935 articles regarding the PVR timing for ToF were examined and filtered. The publications were screened using PRISMA guidelines, and 32 studies were included for analysis and review. Among the studies, PVR was strongly indicated for patients who had developed severe PR, especially in asymptomatic patients and those experiencing fatigue and exercise intolerance. Severe PR was associated with arrhythmias such as right bundle branch block, atrioventricular block, and prolonged QRS intervals, in which male sex and high right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) were significant predictors of long preoperative QRS duration. Most physicians found RVEDV necessary for making surgical referrals despite a lack of correlation between PR severity and RVEDV or indexed right ventricular end-systolic volume (RVESVi). However, asymptomatic ToF patients with preoperative RVESVi benefited from PVR. Except for some variations in QRS intervals among studies, arrhythmias tended to persist post-op, yet NYHA functional class and RV size improved significantly following PVR. Older age at PVR was found to be associated with adverse cardiac events, whereas early PVR presented with appropriately short QRS intervals. Cardiac function tended to be significantly worse in patients undergoing late PVR versus early PVR, with timelines ranging from one to three decades following initial ToF repair. Choosing the best timeline for PVR largely depends on the patient's baseline cardiopulmonary presentation, and additional quantitative deformation analysis can help predict an appropriate timeline for ToF patients.