S-Fas urinary excretion helps to predict the immunosuppressive treatment outcomes in patients with proliferative primary glomerulonephritis

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor urinary excretion revisited – MIF a potent predictor of the immunosuppressive treatment outcomes in patients with proliferative primary glomerulonephritis

Background

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a cytokine that shares many activities with other pro-inflammatory cytokines in primary glomerulonephritis (GN). This study assesses the influence of immunosuppressive treatment on serum and urine MIF in patients with proliferative (PGN) and non-proliferative (NPGN) glomerulonephritis, and evaluates the potential of MIF in predicting outcomes.

Methods

Eighty-four patients (45 males and 39 females) with primary GN were included. Urinary excretion of MIF (ng/mg of urinary creatinine) was measured both pre- and post-treatment with combined steroids and cyclophosphamide. After a 12-month follow-up, the patients were retrospectively divided into four subgroups: responders of proliferative GN (R-PGN), non-responders of proliferative GN (NR-PGN), responders of non-proliferative GN (R-NPGN) and non-responders of non-proliferative GN (NR-NPGN).

Results

The median pre-treatment urinary MIF values were higher in PGN than in NPGN (3.6 versus 2.2; ANOVA P = 0.039). The highest pre-treatment urinary excretion of MIF was observed in NR-PGN (median 6.1), which was significantly higher than other subgroups (ANOVA P < 0.05). The treatment significantly reduced MIF urinary excretion only in R-PGN (P < 0.01). In NR-PGN, pre- (5.9 ± 2.9 pg/mgCr) and post-treatment mean MIF excretion (4.9 ± 2.3 pg/mgCr) exceeded the calculated cut off value (3.3 pg/mgCr).

Conclusion

MIF urinary excretion appears to be a prognostic marker of therapy outcomes only in proliferative glomerulonephritis, in which lower urinary MIF may be linked with good prognosis, whereas a higher MIF urinary excretion value was a marker of unfavorable therapy outcomes. In Non-Responders, urinary MIF measurements may help to reconsider the choice of the immunosuppressive regimen at early stages of the treatment and act as an impulse to search for new therapeutic strategies.

Absence of C4d urinary excretion in the early post-transplant period is associated with improved long-term kidney graft survival

INTRODUCTION

C4d urinary excretion varies according to the risk of graft rejection or progression of chronic allograft nephropathy, but its influence on long-term kidney transplant (KTx) outcomes remains unclear. The aim of the study was to determine whether the initial (1-3 months post KTx) level of C4d urinary excretion may help to predict long-term kidney allograft transplantation outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study involved 185 patients who had undergone KTx. The urinary specimens taken from the morning urine portion were assessed by ELISA test for C4d excretion. To increase the objectivity of the assessment, all measurements were divided by urinary creatinine excretion (ng/mgCr). The study population was grouped according to the C4d excretion cut-off value into low (LC4d, 109 participants) and high (HC4d, 76 participants) C4d excretion groups. Additionally a subgroup with absence of C4d in the urine (ZC4d, 26 patients) was formed.

RESULTS

The calculated Roc curve indicated the cut off value of the urinary C4d excretion as 12.4ng/mgCr (AUC 0.77; 95%CI 0.73-0.95). The mean C4d urinary excretions in LC4d and HC4d were 1.9±3.27 and 20.6±4.6ng/mgCr, respectively, whereas after exclusion of ZC4d subgroup, the mean C4d was 14.9±6.3ng/mgCr in the remainder. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis demonstrated a slightly higher graft survival rate (GSR) in LC4d than in HC4d group (p=0.04 by log-rank). The subsequent analysis showed the highest GSR in ZC4d subgroup (p=0.0006 by log-rank).

CONCLUSION

Although lower C4d urinary excretion in the early post-transplant period seems to be associated with better long-term kidney allograft transplantation outcomes, only its absence in the urine appears to be a solid predictor of improved graft survival.