Kidney Transplantation in Patients with Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome due to Complement Factor H Deficiency: Impact of Liver Transplantation

Deceased vs living donor grafts for pediatric simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: A single-center experience

Introduction

In conditions of limited experience of pediatric simultaneous liver‐kidney transplantation (SLKT) using grafts from living and deceased donors, there is a certain need to validate the approach.

Patients

The retrospective study of 18 pediatric patients who received SLKT between 2008 and 2019.

Results

Grafts were obtained from both living and deceased donors. The patients’ age ranged from 2 to 16 years (9 years ±4). The body weight of the children varied from 9.5 to 39 kg (22 kg ±9). The follow‐up period lasted from 1 to 109 months (median 38 months ±35). The various graft combinations were used in both groups. There was no mortality during the follow‐up. There was no significant difference in baseline parameters in recipients who received grafts from living and deceased donors except age (7.5 years ±2.2 vs 11.8 years ±4.1; P = .038). Rate of complications > grade II was higher among recipients of deceased donor SLKT (7.7% vs 60%; OR, 7.8; 95% CI, 1.04‐58.48; P = .044). All the patients are alive with both grafts functioning. All the living donors returned to the normal life.

Conclusion

SLKT is a safe and effective procedure for children with both simultaneous end‐stage liver disease and end‐stage renal disease. Both living donor partial liver and kidney transplantation and deceased donor liver‐kidney transplantation can be considered as safe and feasible options.

Consensus regarding diagnosis and management of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is defined by specific clinical characteristics, including microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and pathologic evidence of endothelial cell damage, as well as the resulting ischemic end-organ injuries. A variety of clinical scenarios have features of TMA, including infection, pregnancy, malignancy, autoimmune disease, and medications. These overlapping manifestations hamper differential diagnosis of the underlying pathogenesis, despite recent advances in understanding the mechanisms of several types of TMA syndrome. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is caused by a genetic or acquired defect in regulation of the alternative complement pathway. It is important to consider the possibility of aHUS in all patients who exhibit TMA with triggering conditions because of the incomplete genetic penetrance of aHUS. Therapeutic strategies for aHUS are based on functional restoration of the complement system. Eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody against the terminal complement component 5 inhibitor, yields good outcomes that include prevention of organ damage and premature death. However, there remain unresolved challenges in terms of treatment duration, cost, and infectious complications. A consensus regarding diagnosis and management of TMA syndrome would enhance understanding of the disease and enable treatment decision-making.

iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis reveals potential early diagnostic markers in serum of acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is the most effective treatment method for advanced stage liver disease but acute cellular rejection (ACR) seriously affects the prognosis of LT. To discover novel diagnostic biomarkers of ACR after LT, Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation (iTRAQ)-based mass spectrometry was performed to characterize alterations of serum proteins among patients validated to be pathologically ACR or pathologically no-ACR after LT and healthy controls. As a result, 10 differentially expressed proteins were found out between the ACR group and the No-ACR group; 88 differentially expressed proteins were found out between the ACR group and the Healthy Control group; 39 differentially expressed proteins were found out between No-ACR group and Healthy Control group. After analysis and ELISA validation, the results showed that CFHR1, CFHR5 and CFH could be candidate protein biomarkers for the early diagnosis of ACR after LT.