Loss of Neutralizing Activity of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab (Evusheld™) Against Omicron BN.1, a Dominant Circulating Strain Following BA.5 During the Seventh Domestic Outbreak in Korea in Early 2023

Investigation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection status in solid organ transplant recipients treated with tixagevimab/cilgavimab

INTRODUCTION

Tixagevimab and cilgavimab (T/C) are neutralizing antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that can be used to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, their neutralizing activity against recent variants was reduced, raising concerns regarding the emergence of breakthrough coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to investigate the status of the COVID-19 breakthrough after T/C administration.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated breakthrough COVID-19 in SOT recipients administered T/C at Kyoto University Hospital, Japan, from November 2022 to March 2023. Patients were monitored for 6 months after T/C administration. SARS-CoV-2 infection was diagnosed using polymerase chain reaction or antigen tests. The monthly incidence rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection were calculated using the person-time method.

RESULTS

T/C were administered to 67 SOT recipients (liver, 16; lung, 36; and kidney, 15), of whom five were infected with SARS-CoV-2. All five cases were classified as mild, and none of these patients required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) or died. All infected individuals tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 after March 2023, when T/C-resistant subvariant strains became predominant. The monthly incidence rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection, calculated using the person-time method, suggested an increasing trend.

CONCLUSIONS

During the T/C-resistant variant epidemic, SARS-CoV-2 infections were identified even after T/C administration, suggesting that the prophylactic effects of T/C were invalid. Therefore, emerging variants must be carefully monitored and characterized to determine appropriate antiviral strategies, such as the use of suitable neutralizing antibodies.

Evolution of neutralizing antibodies through vaccination and breakthrough infections in the era of COVID-19 endemicity

Despite a high vaccination rate, the COVID-19 pandemic continues with immune-evading Omicron variants. The success of additional antigenic stimulation through breakthrough infection (BI) and updated vaccination in overcoming antigenic imprinting needs to be determined. Participants in a long-term follow-up cohort of healthcare worker (HCW) vaccinee were categorized according to their infection/vaccination status. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike/nucleocapsid protein antibodies were measured, and plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNTs) against wild-type (WT), BA.5, BN.1, and XBB.1.5 were conducted. The neutralization activity of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) products was evaluated to assess the immune status of the general population. Ninety-five HCWs were evaluated and categorized into seven groups. The WT PRNT ND50 value was highest regardless of infection/vaccination status, and groups with recent antigenic stimulation showed high PRNT titers overall. Groups with double Omicron stimulation, either by BI plus BA.4/5 bivalent vaccination or repeated BI, exhibited significantly higher BA.5 and BN.1 PRNT to WT PRNT ratios than those with single Omicron stimulation. Overall group immunity was estimated to be boosted in January 2023, reflecting the effect of the BA.4/5 bivalent booster and additional BIs, but slightly declined in June 2023. A substantial increase in the antibody concentrations of IVIG products was noticed in 2022, and recently produced IVIG products exhibited a substantial level of cross-reactive neutralizing activity against emerging variants. Neutralizing activity against emerging variants could be enhanced by repeated antigenic stimulation via BI and/or updated vaccination. Overall group immunity was elevated accordingly, and IVIG products showed substantial activity against circulating strains.

Clinical utility of quantitative immunoassays and surrogate virus neutralization tests for predicting neutralizing activity against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.5 variants

Developing new antibody assays for emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants is challenging. SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization tests (sVNT) targeting Omicron BA.1 and BA.5 have been devised, but their performance needs to be validated in comparison with quantitative immunoassays. First, using 1749 PRNT-positive sera, we noticed that log-transformed optical density (OD) ratio of wild-type (WT) sVNT exhibited better titer-correlation with plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) than % inhibition value. Second, we tried 798 dilutional titration tests with 103 sera, but nonlinear correlation between OD ratio and antibody concentration limited titration of sVNT. Third, the titer-correlations of two sVNT kits for BA.1 and two quantitative immunoassays for WT were evaluated with BA.1 and BA.5 PRNT. All tested kits exhibited a linear correlation with PRNT titers, but the sVNT kits exhibited high false-negative rates (cPass-BA.1 kit, 45.4% for BA.1 and 44.2% for BA.5; STANDARD F-BA.1 kit, 1.9% for BA.1 and 2.2% for BA.5), while quantitative immunoassays showed 100% sensitivity. Linear mixed-effects model suggested superior titer-correlation with PRNT for quantitative immunoassays compared to sVNT kits. Taken together, the use of quantitative immunoassays for WT, rather than rapid development of new kits, would be practical for predicting neutralizing activities against emerging new variants.