Berger J, Pandya D, Colson J, Martinez OV, Anderson AD, Camargo JF. "What am I?" microbiology of culture-positive, biofire® blood culture identification 2 panel-negative bloodstream infections.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2025;
112:116846. [PMID:
40252586 DOI:
10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.116846]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2025] [Revised: 04/06/2025] [Accepted: 04/10/2025] [Indexed: 04/21/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The BioFire® blood culture identification 2 panel (BCID2) detects 33 of the most common bloodstream infection (BSI) pathogens, yet it can fail to detect the causal agent of sepsis in up to 13 % of cases, mostly due to infections caused by off-panel target microorganisms. A better understanding of the microbiology of culture-positive, BCID2-negative BSI is needed.
METHODS
Single-center, retrospective study of microbiology and outcomes in 275 cases of BCID2-negative BSI between 2022 and 2024.
RESULTS
A total of 257 adult patients with 275 cases of culture-positive, BCID2-negative BSI were analyzed. Viable organisms were identified in 95.2 % of the cases. False negative results (i.e., in-BCID2 panel target microorganism) occurred at 3.3 % and corresponded mostly to Candida spp. (67 %). Although microorganisms considered of low clinical significance accounted for more than a third of the cases, off-BCID2 panel, clinically relevant microorganisms identified by culture included Bacteroides spp. (other than B. fragilis; 12 %), Clostridium spp. (5.8 %), Candida spp. (4.4 %), Achromobacter xylosoxidans, Pasteurella multocida, Trichosporon asahii, Fusarium spp., Rhodococcus equi, Capnocytophaga spp., and Burkholderia cepacia, among others. Only 116 (42 %) were on appropriate antibiotic therapy at the time of BCID2 result. 30-day mortality was 24 % in the entire cohort, but as high as 33 %, 44 %, and 42 % for Bacteroides spp., Clostridium spp. and Candida BSI, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
These results highlight the limitations of the BCID2 panel (e.g., need for inclusion of pan-Bacteroides and Clostridium spp., and optimization of sensitivity for Candida spp.); and provide useful insights on the most common causes of BCID2-negative BSI.
Collapse