Percutaneous placement of self-expandable metallic biliary stents in malignant extrahepatic strictures: indications of transpapillary and suprapapillary methods

Meta-analysis on clinical outcomes of suprapapillary versus transpapillary stent insertion in malignant biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Endoscopic biliary stenting is an essential treatment for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). However, the optimal location for the placement of metal stents (MS) or plastic stents (PS) during the management of MBO, whether above (suprapapillary) or across (transpapillary) the sphincter of Oddi (SO), has not been thoroughly evaluated. This meta-analysis aims to compare the clinical outcomes associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-guided biliary stents placed above and across the SO in patients with MBO.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of electronic databases was carried out to identify studies published from inception to April 2022. The clinical outcomes examined including stent patency, stent occlusion, and overall adverse events (AEs) such as cholangitis, post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), cholecystitis, stent migration, and bleeding. The selection of a random-effects model or fixed-effects model was based on the presence of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 12 articles involving 751 patients were analyzed. The findings showed that the suprapapillary approach had longer stent patency compared to the transpapillary approach (mean difference: 38.58; 95% confidence interval 16.02-61.14, P < 0.0001). Additionally, the suprapapillary approach was associated with a lower risk of stent occlusion and overall AEs (P = 0.04, P = 0.002, respectively), particularly in the incidence of PEP (P = 0.009). The incidence of cholangitis, cholecystitis, stent migration, and bleeding were similar between the suprapapillary and transpapillary approaches. The subgroup analyses indicated that suprapillary PS had a significant decrease in the incidence of stent occlusion and longer stent patency, while suprapillary MS had a significant decrease in the incidence of overall AEs and PEP than the transpapillary approach.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the transpapillary approach, the suprapapillary stent had superiority in longer stent patency, lower rates of stent occlusion and overall AEs, and notably, a lower incidence of PEP. The incidence of cholangitis, cholecystitis, stent migration, and bleeding were similar between the suprapapillary and transpapillary approaches. Further large-scale randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm our findings.

REGISTRATION NO

CRD42022336435.

Acute pancreatitis after percutaneous insertion of metallic biliary stents in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer

AIM

To investigate the incidence and clinical characteristics of acute pancreatitis following percutaneous insertion of metallic biliary stents in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. The clinical efficacy of metallic stent insertion was also evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 143 patients (75 men, 68 women; mean age, 65.8 years; range, 35-88 years) with unresectable pancreatic cancer who underwent percutaneous metallic biliary stent insertion between March 2007 and December 2017 were evaluated retrospectively. The incidence and clinical characteristics of acute pancreatitis were analysed. Stent patency and patient survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in all patients. Among 31 patients with serum amylase levels above normal values (30-110 U/l), only nine had symptoms of acute pancreatitis (incidence, 6.4%). No statistically significant risk factors were identified. Pancreatitis was successfully managed with conservative treatment at a mean of 2.9 days (range, 1-4 days). The median stent patency and patient survival times were 117 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 87-148 days) and 150 days (95% CI, 125-174.9 days), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute pancreatitis was a relatively rare complication after percutaneous insertion of metallic biliary stents in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer, and no significant risk factors were identified. Therefore, insertion of metallic biliary stents was seen to be a feasible and effective treatment approach in this patient group.

Differences in efficacy of uncovered self-expandable metal stent in relation to placement in the management of malignant distal biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Metal stent insertion is a common palliative treatment for distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) but whether placement across the sphincter of Oddi (SO) causes more complications or shorter survival is in question. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of percutaneous uncovered self-expandable metal stent placement above and across the SO in patients with distal MBO.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 59 patients who underwent uncovered metal stent placement for distal MBO between January 2012 and March 2016. Stents were placed above the SO for 22 subjects (group A) and across the SO for 37 subjects (group B). Early cholangitis, stent occlusion, and overall survival time were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Clinical success was 90.9 and 86.5% for groups A and B, respectively. Early cholangitis occurred in 2 patients (9.1%) in group A and in 6 patients (16.2%) in group B (P = 0.645). Median stent patency and median survival time was 105 and 140 days for group A, 120 and 160 days for group B, respectively. The stent occlusion (31.8% in group A and 21.6% in group B, P = 0.454) and the cumulative stent patency times (P = 0.886) did not differ between the two groups. There was no significant difference in cumulative patient survival between the two groups (P = 0.810).

CONCLUSION

Uncovered metal stent placement across the SO did not significantly affect early cholangitis, stent patency, or patient survival.

Bare-metal stents across the Vater's ampulla is a safe method for patients with lower bile duct obstruction

This study explored the effect of the implant position of stents across the Vater's ampulla on treatment outcomes in patients with lower bile duct obstruction.In the retrospective study, 41 patients with malignant obstruction of the lower bile duct and obstructive jaundice received percutaneous transhepatic biliary placement of bare-metal stents. Basic demographic data on patients, such as sex, age, and primary diseases, and follow-up data, including postoperative complications and jaundice-free survival, were recorded. The follow-up data on patients with an involved ampulla, patients with an uninvolved ampulla, patients with a stent across the ampulla, and patients with a stent at a site other than the ampulla were compared. Furthermore, prognostic factors for jaundice- free survival were investigated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.Among the 41 patients, 38 patients experienced subsiding of jaundice, whereas 3 cases had unsuccessful stent patency. Whether or not the ampulla was involved did not influence the incidence rates of postoperative complications and the jaundice-free survival time. Notably, when stents were placed across the ampulla, the jaundice-free survival time was significantly longer than when stents were placed at sites other than across the ampulla (P < .05). Furthermore, placement of the stent across the ampulla or at other sites was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio = 0.154, 95% confidence interval 0.042-0.560, P = .005) for jaundice-free survival of patients.The current study revealed that the implant position of a stent across the ampulla resulted in maintenance of stent patency and prolongation of the jaundice-free survival time.

Suprapapillary versus transpapillary stent placement for malignant biliary obstruction: which is better?

PURPOSE

To compare the complications, stent patency, and patient survival with self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) placed above or across the sphincter of Oddi in malignant biliary obstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2008 to December 2012, 155 patients were treated with percutaneous transhepatic SEMS placement. Seventy-four patients underwent suprapapillary stent placement (group A), and 81 patients underwent transpapillary stent placement (group B). Complications rates, stent patency, and patient survival were evaluated and analyzed for potential predictors.

RESULTS

In group A, 68 covered and 28 uncovered SEMSs were placed, and, in group B, 78 covered and 19 uncovered SEMSs were placed. Thirty-six stent-related early complications were observed in a total of 154 patients (23.4%): pancreatitis (n = 23), cholangitis (n = 12), and cholecystitis (n = 1). The early complication rates for groups A and B were 14.9% (11 of 74) and 31.3% (25 of 80), respectively (P = .016). Pancreatitis occurred in three patients (4.1%) in group A and 20 patients (25.0%) in group B (P = .001). Stent location was a single independent predictor of pancreatitis (P < .001). Stent occlusions by tumor growth was more frequently observed in group A than in group B (P = .007), whereas stent occlusion by sludge incrustation was more frequently found in group B than in group A (P = .007). There was no significant difference in cumulative stent patency (P = .401) or patient survival (P = .792) between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

To decrease the incidence of pancreatitis, suprapapillary placement of SEMSs is recommended for malignant biliary obstruction, but not in the lower 2 cm of the common bile duct.

Comparison of the efficacy of covered versus uncovered metallic stents in treating inoperable malignant common bile duct obstruction: a randomized trial

PURPOSE

To compare patency and overall survival achieved with covered versus uncovered metallic stents among patients with inoperable malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

There were 40 patients enrolled in this prospective randomized study between January 2012 and July 2013. Mean age of patients was 62.6 years (range, 43-86 y). The malignancies causing extrahepatic biliary obstruction were pancreatic cancer (n = 18), stomach cancer (n = 13), gallbladder cancer (n = 3), common bile duct cancer (n = 2), and other cancer types (n = 4). Uncovered (n = 20) and covered (n = 20) stents were used. Stent patency, overall survival, and complications were evaluated and statistically compared.

RESULTS

Mean patency of uncovered stents (413.3 d ± 63.0) was significantly longer than mean patency of covered ones (207.5 d ± 46.0; P = .041). Mean overall survival was 359.9 days ± 61.5 for uncovered stents, which was statistically similar to survival of 350.5 days ± 43.8 for covered stents (P = .271). Causes of recurrent obstruction included tumor ingrowth (n = 2), tumor overgrowth (n = 5), debris or food material (n = 5), and stent migration (n = 2). One case of acute cholecystitis occurred in covered stent group.

CONCLUSIONS

Uncovered metallic stents had superior patency duration than covered stents for patients with malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction. However, the overall complication and survival rates achieved with covered and uncovered stents were similar.

Percutaneous Biliary Stent Placement in Palliation of Malignant Bile Duct Obstruction

BACKGROUND

To summarize the experiences with the technique of percutaneous biliary stent placement for treatment of malignant biliary obstruction in patients with different types of biliary obstruction.

METHODS

Percutaneous biliary stent placement was performed in 126 patients with malignant biliary obstruction. The etiology included 56 cases of cholangiocarcinoma, 28 cases of pancreatic cancer, 12 cases of ampullary carcinoma, 10 cases of primary hepatic carcinoma, 8 cases of gastric cancer metastasis, 6 cases of gallbladder carcinoma, and 6 cases of liver metastasis of colon cancer. The obstructed lesion predominantly involved the common bile duct in 42 patients, common hepatic duct in 39 patients, and hilar bile duct in 45 patients. When the bile duct was punctured successfully under fluoroscopy, the guide wire was explored to across the obstruction segment under the assistant of catheter, then the stent was inserted along the super-slippery guide wire. In patients with hilar hepatic duct lesions involving both left and right hepatic ducts, the both ducts were punctured and bilateral stenting was performed. A 8.5 F internal/external drainage catheter was inserted. The liver function test and ultrasound were performed one week after the procedure to observe the decrease of bilirubin and alleviation of biliary obstruction.

RESULTS

A total of 166 stents were implanted in 126 patients. In the 42 patients with common bile duct obstruction, each patient was implanted one stent. In the 39 patients with common hepatic duct obstruction, each patient was impanted one stent. In the 45 patients with hilur bile duct obstruction, 38 patients were placed 2 stents, one patient was placed with 3 stents, and the rest were placed with one stent. The serum total bilirubin decreased from 309.2 ± 158.3 µmol/L before the procedure to148.5 ± 98.0 µmol/L one week after the procedure (P < 0.001). Alkaline phosphatase and alanine aminotransferase significantly decreased (P < 0.001). Five cases died within 1 month (4%) after the procedure. Complications occurred in 9 cases (7.1%). Six patients underwent combined duodenal self-expandable metal stent placement successfully.

CONCLUSIONS

The percutaneous biliary stent placement is a safe and effective palliative therapy for malignant biliary obstruction by improving liver function and 1ife quality.

Percutaneous drainage and stenting for palliation of malignant bile duct obstruction

Percutaneous biliary drainage and stenting (PTBD) for palliation of malignant obstructive jaundice has evolved to a safe and effective technique. PTBD is equally effective for treatment of distal and proximal bile obstruction. Metal self-expandable stents have proved superior to plastic stents and should therefore be used. Technical success is >90% en clinical success is >75% in all major series. There are a considerable number of complications, but most can be treated conservatively and procedure-related mortality is <2% in most series. Thirty-day mortality after PTBD is >10% in many series, but this is largely due to the underlying disease. About 10-30% of patients will have recurrent jaundice at some point in their disease after PTBD and require re-intervention.

Endobiliary stents for palliation in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice

BACKGROUND

Endobiliary drainage for malignant obstructive jaundice presents a viable palliative alternative. Its role and efficacy depend on factors related to the stent, procedure, and patient.

GOALS

To review the evidence in the literature in which settings plastic or metal stents are cost-effective, and whether adjuvant measures or patient-related factors affect duration of stent patency.

STUDY

Using databases a literature search was performed for papers published from 1979 to April 2004. All retrieved papers reporting experimental or clinical observations were rated according to strength of evidence, and carefully analyzed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Metal stents (Wallstent) stay patent longer than plastic stents (large-bore polyethylene with side-holes), overall median 250 and 110 days, respectively, and seem cost-effective in patients with longer than about 6 months survival, which cannot be accurately predicted. Antibiotics or choleretic agents do not prolong stent patency in clinical settings. In case of stent occlusion, indicated stent exchanges and insertion of a plastic stent, respectively, seem cost-effective in patients initially treated with plastic and metal stents.