Fluoroscopically guided three-tube insertion for the treatment of postoperative gastroesophageal anastomotic leakage

Treatment of intrathoracic anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy for gastroesophageal cancer: a systematic review

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a significant complication following esophagectomy. AL affects 8%-17% of patients and is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay. To this date, no consensus exists on the most optimal treatment. This systematic review aimed to determine the most effective treatment approach. A systematic search of Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase databases was conducted. Only studies reporting on the treatment of intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction for cancer were included. Studies investigating other esophageal disorders or failing to report the location of the anastomosis were excluded. The methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Out of 12,966 identified studies, 38 were included for analysis after removing duplicates and screening titles, abstracts, and full texts. Of these, five were found to be of poor methodological quality and 33 were of moderate quality. The most researched treatment methods were Endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVT), naso-fistula tube drainage (NFTD), and stent treatment. The success and mortality rates for EVT were 82% and 10.7%, for NFTD, 94% and 5.2%, and, for stent treatment, 75.1% and 13.5%, respectively. AL can be effectively treated with EVT, stent treatment, and NFTD. The NFTD approach appeared to have a higher success rate and lower mortality than other treatment modalities. However, it requires a longer treatment duration. Due to limitations within the included studies, a definitive recommendation regarding the optimal treatment for AL cannot be made.

Suction Drainage for Anastomotic Leakage After Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage is one of the most life-threatening complications after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (ILE), with various treatment strategies. Endoscopic techniques are emerging as a less invasive alternative to surgery. Among the current endoscopic techniques, a single placement of an endoluminal nasogastric tube inside the cavity with controlled suction drainage (SD) seems to be an attractive option. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of SD as treatment for anastomotic leakage after ILE.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis was performed among patients who underwent ILE in a high-volume esophageal cancer center in the Netherlands. Patients with an anastomotic leakage that received SD as primary treatment were selected. A nasogastric tube was endoscopically placed into the cavity of the leakage for controlled suction with 15 mm Hg.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients received SD and was successful in 26 patients (77%). Seven patients (21%) developed empyema despite the SD for which additional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was performed. Mortality was 5.9% (2 patients) and median intensive care unit and hospital stay were 3 days (1 to 9) and 25 days (14 to 43), respectively. The median time to closure of the leak was 41 days (23 to 65). A total of 16 patients underwent home treatment for a median of 23 (14 to 42) days.

CONCLUSIONS

Controlled SD seems to be an effective treatment for anastomotic leakage after ILE. This therapy can safely and effectively be completed in an ambulant, outpatient setting.

Successful management of gastric remnant necrosis after proximal gastrectomy using a double elementary diet tube: a case report

Background

The stomach has many incoming vessels and is resistant to ischemia due to the rich microvascular network within its submucosal layer. Although reports of gastric remnant necrosis after gastrectomy have been rare, mortality rates remain substantially high when present. A double elementary diet (W-ED) tube, which can be used for both enteral feeding and gastrointestinal tract decompression, has been developed for anastomotic leakage and postoperative nutritional management after upper gastrointestinal surgery. The current report presents a case of gastric remnant necrosis after proximal gastrectomy that was successfully managed through conservative treatment with a W-ED tube.

Case presentation

A 73-year-old male was referred to our hospital for an additional resection after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric cancer. Endoscopic findings showed an ESD scar on the posterior wall of the upper portion of the stomach, while computed tomography (CT) showed no obvious regional lymph node enlargement and distant metastases. The patient subsequently underwent laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy and esophagogastrostomy but developed candidemia on postoperative day 7. On postoperative day 14, endoscopy revealed gastric ischemic changes around the anastomotic site, suggesting that the patient’s candidemia developed due to gastric necrosis. His vital signs remained normal, while the gastric remnant ischemia was localized. Given that surgery in the presence of candidemia was considered extremely risky, conservative treatment was elected. A W-ED tube was placed nasally, after which enteral feeding was initiated along with gastrointestinal tract decompression. Although the patient subsequently developed anastomotic leakage due to gastric remnant necrosis, local control was achieved and conservative treatment was continued. On postoperative day 52, healing of the gastric remnant necrosis and anastomotic leakage was confirmed, after which the patient started drinking water. Although balloon dilation was required due to anastomotic stenosis, the patient was able to resume oral intake and was discharged on postoperative day 88.

Conclusions

Herein, we present our experience with a case of gastric remnant necrosis after proximal gastrectomy, wherein conservative management was achieved using a W-ED tube. In cases involving high operative risk, the management should be mindful of gastric remnant necrosis as a post-gastrectomy complication.

An interventional radiology technique to treat pharyngeal or esophageal perforation associated with mediastinal abscess in children

PURPOSE

Pharyngeal or esophageal perforation with mediastinal abscess is notably dangerous in children and can be very difficult to treat. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of the transnasal placement of a mediastinal drainage catheter and a nasojejunal feeding tube, with or without gastric decompression, in the treatment of the above perforations in children.

METHODS

We placed transnasal mediastinal drainage catheters and nasojejunal feeding tubes in 14 pediatric patients. Patients with esophageal perforation also underwent the placement of a gastric decompression tube. Four of these patients additionally received chest drainage tubes.

RESULTS

The fistula healed after a median of 66 days (range, 5-404 days). Corrosive esophagitis occurred in two patients with pharyngeal perforations. One of these patients underwent surgical treatment 2 months after fistula healing, and the other underwent repeated balloon dilatation procedures for cicatricial restenosis. Four months after the fistula had healed, the patients with esophageal perforations were all free from recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The use of interventional radiology to place a transnasal mediastinal drainage catheter, a nasojejunal feeding tube, and a gastric decompression tube is a safe, easy, inexpensive, and efficacious way to treat pharyngeal or esophageal perforation complicated by mediastinal abscess in children.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review

Background

Anastomotic leakage (0-30%) after esophagectomy is a severe complication and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine which treatment for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy have the best clinical outcome, based on the currently available literature.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science until April 2017. All studies reporting on the specific treatment of cervical or intrathoracic anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal or cardia cancer were included. The primary outcome parameter was postoperative mortality. Methodological quality was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale.

Results

Nineteen retrospective cohort studies including 273 patients were identified. Methodological quality of all studies was poor to moderate. Mortality rates of intrathoracic anastomotic leakages in the treatment groups were as follows: conservative (14%), endoscopic stent (8%), endoscopic drainage (8%), endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure system (0%), and surgery treatment group (50%). Mortality rates of cervical anastomotic leakages in the treatment groups were as follows: conservative (8%), endoscopic stent (29%), and endoscopic dilatation (0%).

Discussion

Due to small cohorts, heterogeneity between studies, and lack of data regarding leakage characteristics, no evidence supporting a specific treatment for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy was found. A severity score based on leakage characteristics instead of treatment given is essential for determining the optimal treatment of anastomotic leakage. In the absence of robust evidence-based treatment guidelines, we suggest customized treatment depending on sequelae of the leak and clinical condition of the patient. PrDepartment of Surgery, Radboudumc, P.O.B. 9101/618 NLactical advices are provided.

Trial registration

Registration number PROSPERO: CRD42016032374.

Feasibility of complete nasogastric tube omission in esophagectomy patients

Routine nasogastric tube (NGT) placement is a common practice in esophagectomy patients. However, its continued application has been controversial in recent years. In this review, we will discuss the potential risks and benefits, including anastomosis leak, pneumonia, NGT reinsertion, patients' discomfort and hospital length of stay, to evaluate the feasibility of complete NGT omission in esophagectomy patients.

Choice of therapeutic strategies in intrathoracic anastomotic leak following esophagectomy

Background

The aim of this study was to analyze our experience with management of intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy.

Methods

Clinical data from 33 patients who developed intrathoracic anastomotic leak were evaluated retrospectively. These patients were selected from 1867 patients undergoing resection carcinoma of the esophagus and reconstruction between January 2003 and December 2012.

Results

Surgical intervention and the reformed “three-tube method” were applied in 13 and 20 patients, respectively. The overall incidence of intrathoracic anastomotic leakage was 1.8%. The median time interval from esophagectomy to diagnosis of leak was 9.7 days. Sixteen patients were confirmed as having leakage by oral contrast computed tomography (CT). Age and interval from surgery to diagnosis of leak were identified as statistically significant parameters between contained and uncontained groups. Moreover, patients with hypoalbuminemia had a longer time to leak closure than patients without hypoalbuminemia. Six patients died from intrathoracic anastomotic leak, with a mortality rate of 18.2%. There was no statistically significant difference in the time to leak closure between patients who underwent surgical exploration and those who received conservative treatment.

Conclusions

Intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy was associated with significant mortality. Once intrathoracic anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy was diagnosed or highly suspected, individualized management strategies should be implemented according to the size of the leak, extent of the abscess, and status of the patient. In the majority of patients with anastomotic leak, we preferred the strategy of conservative treatment.