Percutaneous placement of self-expandable metallic stents in patients with obstructive jaundice secondary to metastatic gastric cancer after gastrectomy

EUS-guided hepaticojejunostomy in patients with history of total gastrectomy: a multicenter retrospective feasibility study (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is an effective biliary drainage technique for patients with altered anatomy or duodenal strictures. EUS-guided hepaticojejunostomy (EUS-HJS) can be used to create a fistula between the left hepatic duct and the jejunum in patients with a history of total gastrectomy. No specific data on this technique have been published. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of EUS-HJS in patients with a history of total gastrectomy.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included all adult patients who underwent EUS-HJS at 3 tertiary French centers and 1 tertiary Swiss center between May 2011 and February 2023. The primary outcome was clinical success, which was defined as the disappearance of pruritus, jaundice, and/or cholangitis. An improvement in bilirubin >30% within the first week and/or bilirubin normalization within 1 month after the procedure were also considered indicators of clinical success. Secondary outcomes were technical success, rate of adverse events, need for endoscopic revision, possibility of resuming anticancer treatment, median survival, and technical differences compared with EUS-HGS.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with history of complete gastrectomy who underwent EUS-HJS were included. Technical success was achieved in 100% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 85-100). Clinical success was achieved in 80% of patients (95% CI, 58-92). The incidence of recorded adverse events was 33% (95% CI, 17-55), with cholangitis being the most frequent adverse event. Seven patients (39%) were able to benefit from anticancer treatment after the procedure. Median survival time was 6 months (interquartile range, 1.5-12).

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-HJS is an effective and feasible procedure for patients whose anatomy has been altered by total gastrectomy.

Malignant biliary obstruction due to metastatic non-hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer

Malignant biliary obstruction generally results from primary malignancies of the pancreatic head, bile duct, gallbladder, liver, and ampulla of Vater. Metastatic lesions from other primaries to these organs or nearby lymph nodes are rarer causes of biliary obstruction. The most common primaries include renal cancer, lung cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, lymphoma, and melanoma. They may be difficult to differentiate from primary hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer based on imaging studies, or even on biopsy. There is also no consensus on the optimal method of treatment, including the feasibility and effectiveness of endoscopic intervention or surgery. A thorough review of the literature on pancreato-biliary metastases and malignant biliary obstruction due to metastatic non-hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer is presented. The diagnostic modality and clinical characteristics may differ significantly depending on the type of primary cancer. Different primaries also cause malignant biliary obstruction in different ways, including direct invasion, pancreatic or biliary metastasis, hilar lymph node metastasis, liver metastasis, and peritoneal carcinomatosis. Metastasectomy may hold promise for some types of pancreato-biliary metastases. This review aims to elucidate the current knowledge in this area, which has received sparse attention in the past. The aging population, advances in diagnostic imaging, and improved treatment options may lead to an increase in these rare occurrences going forward.

Survival benefit of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for malignant biliary tract obstruction-a prospective study comparing external and internal drainage techniques

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical results of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) in patients with non-operable malignant biliary tract obstruction (MBTO) and the survival benefit of internal drainage.

METHODS

Prospective data of consecutive patients of PTBD from May 2014 to August 2017 was analyzed for 30-day, 90-day and 1-year mortality, and mean survival of patients undergoing external drainage (ED) and internal drainage (ID) using internal-external ring biliary catheterization or biliary stent were compared. Other important variables evaluated were drop in the total bilirubin (TBil) levels, improvement in pain and pruritus, procedure-related complications, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

In 87 cases (54 male, 33 female) with mean age 37.3 y (22-70 y; 95% CI: 31.1 y-43.5 y), 10, 45 and 32 patients underwent stenting, external and internal-external catheterization, respectively (total 152 procedures [> 1 in 35.63%, n = 31]). PTBD resulted in decrease in mean TBil by 8.2738 ± 0.912 mg/dL at 30 days (P < 0.001), 55.14% (n = 48) cases reaching 3 mg/dL at mean 45 days, and 35/48 cases received chemotherapy. Overall mortality was 6.89%, 37.93% and 90.80% at 30 days, 90 days and 1 year, respectively. Mean survival with ID (236.40 ± 33.37 days) was better than with ED (110.35 ± 26.16 days) (P < 0.001). Pain (62.06%; n = 54; mean Visual Analog Scale [VAS] score = 6.7) improved significantly (mean VAS score 3.4; P < 0.001). Pruritus (n = 29) was relieved in 100% of the cases. Complication rate of 18.39% (n = 16) and no procedure-related death were seen.

CONCLUSION

PTBD offers a safe and significant improvement in TBil, pain, and pruritus in non-operable MBTO, with ID offering additional survival benefit over ED.

Clinical results after biliary drainage by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for analysis of metastatic cancer survival and prognostic factors

BACKGROUND

Malignant biliary obstruction secondary to metastatic cancer is associated with poor prognosis. To the best of our knowledge, no previous study has investigated long-term survival and associated prognostic factors after biliary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) drainage for obstruction jaundice secondary to various types of metastatic cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 60 patients who underwent biliary ERCP drainage for obstructive jaundice secondary to metastatic cancer at two hospitals during the period from November 2012 to December 2019. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Biliary drainage was successfully achieved in 55 (91.7%) patients, 37 of whom received subsequent treatment. Overall median survival time was 133 days after stent placement. The overall survival (OS) rates after ERCP drainage were significantly better in the post-drainage treatment group than in the post-drainage untreated group (239 days vs. 45 days, p < 0.001). Good ECOG performance status before drainage, albumin level ≥ 35 g/L, successful drainage, absence of ascites, and post-drainage treatment were identified as factors of improved survival in univariate analysis. ECOG performance status and post-drainage treatment were independent predictors of OS in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that stent placement with ERCP was a safe and effective treatment method for patients with malignant biliary obstruction caused by metastatic cancer and may be preferred over percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Post-drainage treatment and a good ECOG performance status were predictors of better prognosis.

Percutaneous unilateral biliary metallic stent placement in patients with malignant obstruction of the biliary hila and contralateral portal vein steno-occlusion

Objective

To investigate the outcomes of percutaneous unilateral metallic stent placement in patients with a malignant obstruction of the biliary hila and a contralateral portal vein steno-occlusion.

Materials and Methods

Sixty patients with a malignant hilar obstruction and unilobar portal vein steno-occlusion caused by tumor invasion or preoperative portal vein embolization were enrolled in this retrospective study from October 2010 to October 2013. All patients were treated with percutaneous placement of a biliary metallic stent, including expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)-covered stents in 27 patients and uncovered stents in 33 patients.

Results

A total of 70 stents were successfully placed in 60 patients. Procedural-related minor complications, including self-limiting hemobilia (n = 2) and cholangitis (n = 4) occurred in six (10%) patients. Acute cholecystitis occurred in two patients. Successful internal drainage was achieved in 54 (90%) of the 60 patients. According to a Kaplan-Meier analysis, median survival time was 210 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 135-284 days), and median stent patency time was 133 days (95% CI, 94-171 days). No significant difference in stent patency was observed between covered and uncovered stents (p = 0.646). Stent dysfunction occurred in 16 (29.6%) of 54 patients after a mean of 159 days (range, 65-321 days).

Conclusion

Unilateral placement of ePTFE-covered and uncovered stents in the hepatic lobe with a patent portal vein is a safe and effective method for palliative treatment of patients with a contralateral portal vein steno-occlusion caused by an advanced hilar malignancy or portal vein embolization. No significant difference in stent patency was detected between covered and uncovered metallic stents.