A Novel Flow Diverter (Tubridge) for the Treatment of Recurrent Aneurysms: A Single-Center Experience

Current status and prospects of endovascular treatment for intracranial vertebral artery aneurysms: A narrative review

Intracranial vertebral artery (VA) aneurysms are complex entities. Endovascular treatment (EVT) can be used to treat intracranial VA aneurysms. Nevertheless, managing these lesions with EVT remains challenging. Moreover, the suitability of EVT for every type of intracranial VA aneurysm has not been fully confirmed. Therefore, we conducted a needed review of the current literature and our experience summarizing the current status of and advancements in EVT in the management of intracranial VA aneurysms. In our review, several issues are discussed, including the anatomy and anomalies of the intracranial VA, the classification and natural history of intracranial VA aneurysms, indications and techniques for EVT in the management of intracranial VA aneurysms, and the outcomes of and complications experienced by patients who undergo EVT. A flowchart describing EVT options for dissecting intracranial VA aneurysms derived from the findings of this review and our experience is provided. The key to successful EVT is preservation of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery and avoidance of injury to any brainstem perforators. Currently, intracranial VA reconstruction via flow diverter deployment plays an important role in achieving successful treatment. For appropriate cases, both reconstructive and deconstructive EVT can result in good patient outcomes. However, EVT-related complications should be considered. If management of complex intracranial VA aneurysms with EVT would be expected to disproportionally harm the patient, extracranial-intracranial bypass and aneurysmectomy are often necessary. In addition, new products and techniques that show promise for achieving successful EVT in the management of intracranial VA aneurysms are described.

Efficacy and safety of flow diverters in retreatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms-A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Treatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms after their initial therapy has been a significant challenge in the field of neurointervention. Recently flow diverters stents are widely used for treating intracranial aneurysms. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the safety and efficacy of flow diverter in treating recurrent or recanalized intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

This meta-analysis is reported following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We conducted a systematic review of literature in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Sciences, and Scopus databases. Pooled prevalence and the corresponding 95% are calculated from extracted data using a random-effect model.

RESULTS

The systematic literature search included 21 studies involving 411 patients, with 135 (32.8%) being male and 276 (67.2%) being females with a total number of 447 aneurysms. The overall rate of adequate occlusion was 90.67% (95% CI: 84.23%-94.65%), and the rates were comparable between the surgery (93.48%), coiling (91.78%), and stenting (85.77%) groups. The overall pooled rate of complete occlusion was 81.80 (95% CI: 71.14%-89.13%). On doing a subgroup analysis, the complete occlusion rates were 89.68%, 84.39%, and 73.47% for the surgery, coiling, and stenting groups, respectively. The overall mortality rate and achieving modified Rankin scale score of 0-2 was 1.28% (95% CI: 0.45%-3.64%) and (95% CI: 89.92%-97.84%), respectively. No significant heterogeneity is noted in the included studies.

CONCLUSION

Flow diverter stents are an effective and safe method for retreating recurrent or residual intracranial aneurysms with a high rate of complete and adequate occlusion. The rate of mortality, intracerebral hemorrhage, and overall and procedural complications following using flow diverters for intracranial aneurysms is low.

Comparison of Pipeline embolization device versus Tubridge embolization device in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter, propensity score matched study

BACKGROUND

Flow diverter devices (FDs) are increasingly used for treating unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs), but limited studies compared different FDs.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a propensity score matched analysis comparing the Pipeline embolization device (PED) and Tubridge embolization device (TED) for UIAs.

METHODS

Patients with UIAs treated with either PED or TED between July 2016 and July 2022 were included. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for age, sex, comorbidities, smoking, drinking, aneurysm size, morphology, neck, location, parent artery diameter, adjunctive coiling, and angiographic follow-up duration. Perioperative complications and clinical and angiographic outcomes were compared after matching.

RESULTS

735 patients treated by PED and 290 patients treated by TED were enrolled. Compared with the PED group, patients in the TED group had a greater number of women and patients with ischemia, a smaller proportion of vertebrobasilar and non-saccular aneurysms, a smaller size and neck, and fewer adjunctive coils and overlapping stents, but a larger parent artery diameter and lumen disparities. After adjusting for these differences, 275 pairs were matched. No differences were found in perioperative complications (4.4% vs 2.5%, P=0.350), in-stent stenosis (16.0% vs 15.6%, P>0.999), or favorable prognosis (98.9% vs 98.5%, P>0.999). However, PED showed a trend towards better complete occlusion over a median 8-month angiographic follow-up (81.8% vs 75.3%, P=0.077).

CONCLUSION

Compared with PED, TED provides a comparable rate of perioperative and short-term outcomes. Nevertheless, a better occlusion status in the PED group needs to be further verified over a longer follow-up period.

Comparison of pipeline embolization device and tubridge flow diverter for posterior circulation aneurysms: A multicentre propensity score matched study

Rationale and objectives

The off-label use of flow diverters (FDs) has broadened to include treating aneurysms in posterior circulation (PC). A novel flow diverter, the Tubridge flow diverter (TFD), has been created in China specifically for treating PC aneurysms. However, studies comparing between pipeline embolization device (PED) and TFD are rare. Thus, our study aimed to explore the effectiveness of PED and TFD in the treatment of PC aneurysms using a propensity score matched cohort design.

Methods

Retrospective data collection was conducted on patients who underwent treatment with either PED or TFD over the period from 2015 through 2020. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to calibrate for patient age; history of ischemic stroke; aneurysm size; morphology; location and neck; number of FDs; parent vessel diameter; and the employment of assisted coiling and balloon techniques. Data on previously ruptured aneurysms was not included in the analysis. A comparison was conducted between the two devices to assess perioperative complications, aneurysm occlusion rates, and functional outcomes.

Results

A total of 252 PC aneurysms were treated in 248 patients. Clinical and imaging follow-ups were lost in 26 and 47 patients, respectively. Major perioperative complications occurred in 7.5% of the cases, with favorable clinical outcomes in 91.0% and complete occlusion in 79.1%. Eighty-two (32.5%) aneurysms were treated with TFD, while 170 (67.5%) aneurysms were treated with PED. PSM was used to account for these significant variations, producing 82 matched pairs of unruptured aneurysms treated with PED or TFD. In terms of functional and angiographic outcomes, no significant differences were found between PED and TFD (functional outcome, p = 0.594 and angiographic outcome, p = 0.415). However, more perioperative major complications were found in patients treated with TFD (p = 0.005) compared with those receiving PED.

Conclusion

The comparative study of PED and TFD in the treatment of PC aneurysms resulted in positive clinical results and sustained occlusion rates, with acceptable perioperative complications. However, higher quality studies are needed to enhance our understanding of the use of FDs for treating of PC aneurysms.

Flow diverter retreatment for intracranial aneurysms: A meta-analysis of efficacy and feasibility

BACKGROUND

Recurrent intracranial aneurysm carries a risk of rupture and retreatment is often necessary. However, there is no consensus on the best retreatment modality of choice. Flow diverter has emerged as a promising option for this population in recent years. Given its high cost, patient selection to optimize outcomes is very important.

PURPOSE

To identify patient factors predisposing to failure of flow diverter retreatment.

METHOD

We conducted a systematic search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid/Medline, and ClinicalTrial.gov from 2000 to 2021. Studies regarding flow diverter retreatment of recurrent aneurysms were analyzed if they meet the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of twenty-six studies were identified. Among 374 patients retreated with flow diverters, about 0.86 [0.81; 0.92] were successfully occluded and only 0.06 [0.02; 0.10] had unfavorable neurological outcomes. Major complications included intracranial hemorrhage (n = 7), ischemic stroke or thromboembolic event (n = 12), and death (n = 2). In-stent stenosis was reported in 10 of the cases. Saccular aneurysms are associated with a higher occlusion rate while aneurysm location, size, status, and prior treatment modality have no significant impact on retreatment efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that flow diverter is an effective retreatment strategy except in patients with non-saccular aneurysms. It should be considered as a first-line option for patients with recurrent intracranial aneurysm.

Comparison Between the Efficacy of a Flow Diverter and Interventional Trapping with Bypass in the Treatment of Unruptured Large- or Giant-Sized ICA Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

Management of large- or giant-sized internal carotid artery aneurysms (LICAAs) remains challenging. Whether a flow diverter device (FDD) or interventional trapping with extracranial-intracranial bypass (ITB) is better, remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of unruptured LICAA patients treated with FDD or ITB at 3 medical centers. Both the effectiveness and safety results of FDD and ITB were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 101 aneurysms in 95 patients treated with FDDs and 36 aneurysms in 36 patients managed with ITBs were included (September 2014-June 2021). There was no significant difference between the groups in the complete obliteration rate 1 year after surgery (P = 0.101). There were 2 relapse cases (2.0%) and 4 retreated cases (4.0%) in the FDD group and 1 relapse case (2.8%) and 2 retreated cases (5.6%) in the ITB group. Neither the relapse rates nor retreat rates between groups were significantly different. The neurological morbidity rates were 4.0% (4/101) and 2.8% (1/36) in the FDD group and ITB group, respectively, and were not significantly different. There was 1 mortality case in each group, and the mortality rates were not significantly different (P = 0.443). Both the perioperative and overall (perioperative plus long-term) complication rates in the FDD group were significantly lower than those in the ITB group (P = 0.033, P = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

FDD had comparable surgical efficacy and a significantly lower postoperative complication rate to traditional ITB. FDD might be preferable to ITB as a treatment modality for LICAA.

A novel flow diverter device (Tubridge) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The flow diverter (FD) device has become a feasible and effective option for treating intracranial aneurysms. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tubridge FD (TFD) in treating intracranial aneurysms and provide evidence for further research and clinical application. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to July 31, 2022, were searched. The eligible studies should include TFD investigations in treating intracranial aneurysms. Pooled technical success rate, complete occlusion rate, improvement rate, stable rate, symptom elimination rate, and adverse events rate were calculated with either the fixed-effects model or the random-effects model, depending on the results of tests for heterogeneity. Egger's tests were performed to assess the potential publication bias. A total of 7 studies (145 patients) were included in this study. The pooled technical success rate was 0.98, the complete occlusion rate was 0.79, the improvement rate was 0.21, and the stable rate was 0.05. One included study reported that the surgery-related mortality rate in the Tubridge group was higher than that in the control group (3.66% vs. 1.61%), while the surgery-related morbidity rate in the Tubridge group was 2.4% and that in the control group was 0. Findings of this meta-analysis indicate that TFD manifests promising and effective performance with acceptable adverse events in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Pipeline versus Tubridge in the treatment of unruptured posterior circulation aneurysms

BACKGROUND

To compare the safety and efficacy of pipeline embolization device (PED) and Tubridge flow diverter (TFD) for unruptured posterior circulation aneurysms.

METHODS

Posterior aneurysm patients treated with PED or TFD between January, 2019, and December, 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' demographics, aneurysm characteristics, treatment details, complications, and follow-up information were collected. The procedural-related complications and angiographic and clinical outcome were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were involved; PED was applied for 55 patients and TFD for 52 patients. A total of 9 (8.4%) procedural-related complications occurred, including 4 (7.3%) in PED group and 5 (9.6%) in TFD group. During a mean of 10.3-month angiographic follow-up for 81 patients, complete occlusion was achieved in 35 (85.4%) patients in PED group and 30 (75.0%) in TFD group. The occlusion rate of PED group is slightly higher than that of TFD group. A mean of 25.0-month clinical follow-up for 107 patients showed that favorable clinical outcome was achieved in 53 (96.4%) patients in PED group and 50 (96.2%) patients in TFD group, respectively. No statistical difference was found in terms of procedural-related complications (p = 0.737), occlusion rate (p = 0.241), and favorable clinical outcome (0.954) between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study found no difference in complication, occlusion, and clinical outcome between PED and TFD for unruptured PCAs.

Flow diversion for posterior circulation aneurysms: a multicenter retrospective study

Background

The prevalence of intracranial aneurysms is approximately 3% worldwide. Posterior circulation (PC) aneurysms have a higher risk of treatment complications than anterior circulation aneurysms. Improving the survival rate and quality of life of patients with PC aneurysms remains one of the most important issues in the field.

Objectives

Flow diverter (FD) treatment of PC aneurysms remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the effects of FD treatment and analyze differences among different application methods or aneurysm types in PC aneurysms.

Design

This is a multicenter retrospective study.

Methods

Patients with PC aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device (PED) or Tubridge embolization device (TED) between 2015 and 2020 in five neurovascular centers were retrospectively enrolled. The primary outcomes were major perioperative complication, clinical outcome, and aneurysm occlusion rates. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine the risk factors of each outcome.

Results

In total, 252 aneurysms were included. Major perioperative complication, favorable clinical outcome, and complete occlusion rates were 7.5%, 91.0%, and 79.1%, respectively. Compared with other types of aneurysms, dissecting aneurysms had the best clinical outcome and highest occlusion rate. Both clinical and angiographic outcomes were independently associated with the aneurysm location at the basilar artery. Aneurysm size was not associated with any outcome. TED had similar clinical and angiographic outcomes compared with PED but more perioperative major complications. Tandem treatment and coiling assistance may have poorer clinical outcomes but similar occlusion rates. Single- and multiple-stent treatments had similar outcomes.

Conclusion

FD treatment of PC aneurysms achieved favorable clinical outcomes and long-term aneurysm occlusion rates with acceptable perioperative complication rates, especially in dissecting and non-basilar artery aneurysms. There was no additional improvement in outcomes with coiling assistance, multi-stent application, or tandem treatment. Therefore, the use of PC aneurysms should be carefully considered.

Tubridge Flow Diverter for the Treatment of Unruptured Dissecting Cerebral Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

The Tubridge flow diverter is a device widely used in China aimed at reconstructing parent artery and occluding complex aneurysm. The experience of the Tubridge in treating unruptured vertebrobasilar artery dissecting aneurysms is still limited. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Tubridge flow diverter for the treatment of vertebrobasilar artery dissecting aneurysms.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical records of aneurysms treated with the Tubridge flow diverter between 2019 and 2021 in a national cerebrovascular disease center. Therapeutic process, occlusion rate, and clinical outcome were compared.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients with 23 vertebrobasilar artery aneurysms were identified. The results showed that the mean length and mean maximal width were 15.14 and 9.14 mm, respectively, in the vertebrobasilar artery. Twenty-four Tubridge flow diverters were successfully implanted without unfold failure. A complete occlusion rate at the last angiographic follow-up was achieved in 78.26% of vertebrobasilar artery aneurysms. Fifteen branch arteries were covered, and only 1 branch artery disappeared at follow-up. Mild asymptomatic cerebral infarction occurred in 3 patients (13.04%); intracranial hemorrhage was not found in the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary experience suggests that the Tubridge flow diverter might be a safe and effective tool for dissecting cerebral aneurysms. Branch arteries were well protected and mild asymptomatic cerebral infarction occurred in some patients. Adequate evidence is required to clear the definite indications and complications in a multicenter randomized controlled trial with a long-term follow-up.

Flow Diverter Device-Assisted Coiling Treatment for Cerebral Blister Aneurysm: A Single-Center Study

Although endovascular treatment is a promising approach, blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs) still present treatment challenges. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of flow diverter device-assisted coiling (FDDAC) for the treatment of BBAs, which are broad based and friable with a high rebleeding risk. Eight patients (five females and three males) who presented with subarachnoid hemorrhages (SAH) due to BBA ruptures between May 2020 and May 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. All patients were treated by flow diverter device (Tubridge) adjunctive coil embolization using a semi-deploying technique. The demographic information, angiographic data, interval between admission and treatment, materials, therapy, clinical outcomes (including periprocedural and intraprocedural mortality and morbidity), and follow-up results of all patients were reviewed. The mean age of the patients with BBAs was 48.5 years (range 31–62 years); aneurysm sizes ranged from 2.2 × 1.7 mm to 4.6 × 3.2 mm, and the median Hunt–Hess score was 3. All aneurysms were completely closed at follow-up, and all 8 patients had excellent clinical outcomes (modified Rankin scores = 0–2) at discharge. Angiograms showed complete aneurysm occlusion after 6 months to 1 year. In addition, there were no cases of re-rupture, re-treatment, or recurrence of the aneurysms. FDDAC is safe to use in patients with BBAs and provides an alternative treatment option for this disease.

Tubridge flow diverter for the treatment of small and medium aneurysms

Background

Tubridge flow diverter is a widely used device aimed at reconstructing parent arteries and occluding complex aneurysms in China. The experience of Tubridge in treating small and medium aneurysms is still limited. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Tubridge flow diverter for the treatment of the two types of aneurysms.

Methods

We reviewed the clinical records of aneurysms treated with a Tubridge flow diverter between 2018 and 2021 in a national cerebrovascular disease center. Cases were divided into small and medium aneurysms according to aneurysm size. The therapeutic process, occlusion rate, and clinical outcome were compared.

Results

In total, 57 patients and 77 aneurysms were identified. The patients were divided into two groups: small aneurysms (39 patients, 54 aneurysms) and medium aneurysms (18 patients, 23 aneurysms). There were 19 patients with tandem aneurysms (a total of 39 aneurysms) in the two groups, among which 15 patients (30 aneurysms) were in the small aneurysm group and four patients (nine aneurysms) were in the medium aneurysm group. The results show that the mean maximal diameter/neck in the small and medium aneurysms was 3.68/3.25 and 7.61/6.24 mm, respectively. In total, 57 Tubridge flow diverters were successfully implanted without unfolding failure, and there were six patients with new mild cerebral infarction in the small aneurysm group. The complete occlusion rate on the last angiographic follow-up was achieved in 88.46% of the small aneurysms group and 81.82% of the medium aneurysms group. The complete occlusion rate of patients with tandem aneurysms in the last angiographic follow-up was 86.67% (13/15) of the small aneurysms group and 50% (2/4) of the medium aneurysm group. Intracranial hemorrhage was nonencountered in the two groups.

Conclusion

Our preliminary experience suggests that the Tubridge flow diverter might be a safe and effective treatment for small and medium aneurysms along the internal carotid artery. Long stents may increase the risk of cerebral infarction. Adequate evidence is required to clarify the definite indications and complications in a multicenter randomized controlled trial with a long-term follow-up.

Effect and safety of Tubridge flow diverter in the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms

The effect and safety of the Tubridge flow diverting device are unknown in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms after optimization of the device, improvement in the deployment of the device, and accumulation of experience of using the device. This retrospective one-center study was performed to investigate the clinical effect and safety of the Tubridge flow diverting device in the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Twenty-three patients with 33 unruptured intracranial aneurysms which were treated with the Tubridge device were retrospectively enrolled. The clinical data, endovascular procedure, complications, and follow-up were analyzed. Twenty-seven Tubridge devices were deployed to treat the 33 aneurysms, and the deployment was failed in 1 case, resulting in the success stenting rate of 96.3%. In 5 (15.2%) aneurysms, coils were loosely packed. Peri-procedural complications occurred in 2 patients (8.7%), including 1 procedure-related complication in which the distal end of a Tubridge device herniated into the aneurysm cavity. In another case, weakness of left upper limb occurred on the second day post procedure, with instent thrombosis being suspected, which was recovered after medication. No other complications occurred. Twenty-three (100%) patients had clinical follow-up 6 months later, with the mRS of 0 in 21 patients, 1 in 1, and 2 in 1. Five (21.7%) patients with 11 aneurysms underwent digital subtraction angiography at 6-month follow-up, with 8 aneurysms being completely occluded (Raymond grade I) and 3 aneurysms still visible (Raymond grade III). The Tubridge flow diverter may be safe and effective in the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with low perioperative complications and good follow-up outcomes even though multi-center and prospective clinical studies with a large size sample are still needed to validate these results.

Tubridge flow diverter alone vs. Tubridge flow diverter and coils for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A propensity score matching analysis

Background

The study was designed to assess the clinical performance of a tubridge flow diverter (TFD) in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms and to compare the efficacy and safety between intracranial aneurysms treated with TFD alone and TFD combined with coiling.

Methods

In this retrospective study, patients treated with the TFD alone or TFD combined with coiling between June 2018 to November 2022 were included. The patient demographics, the characteristics of the aneurysm, and the treatment outcomes between the two groups were compared. Propensity score matching was performed to match the variables with a significant difference between groups.

Results

In the current study, data from 93 consecutive patients including 104 aneurysms treated with TFD were analyzed. In total, 43 patients with 49 aneurysms were treated with TFD alone, and 50 patients with 55 aneurysms were treated with TFD combined with coiling. Aneurysms in the TFD combined with the coiling group were larger (12.9 ± 8.6 vs. 8.7 ± 8.8 mm, P = 0.016) and more likely to be saccular (92.7% vs. 75.5%, P = 0.027) than in the TFD alone group. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of perioperative complication rate. During the follow-up period, the complete occlusion rate in the TFD combined with the coiling group was higher (80.0% vs. 43.8%, P = 0.001) than in the TFD alone group. These results were further confirmed using a propensity score matching analysis.

Conclusion

TFD combined with coiling can be a safe and effective alternative option for the treatment of complex aneurysms. Given the potential risks of these therapeutic modalities, thus very careful consideration is required on an individual patient basis.

Microcatheter-guided compartment packing of acutely ruptured complex intracerebral aneurysms (ARCIAs): Preliminary experience and technical note

Objective

We present our initial experience using the microcatheter-guided compartment packing (MCP) technique for endovascular embolization of acutely ruptured complex intracerebral aneurysms (ARCIAs) and evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficiency of this technique.

Methods

This retrospective, single-center study included 28 patients who underwent coil embolization using the MCP technique for ARCIAs at our institution between January 2021 and January 2022. The MCP technique was the placement of microcatheters in different compartments within the aneurysm to deploy the coils simultaneously or sequentially. Patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, procedural parameters, grade of occlusion, complications, and clinical results were analyzed. The clinical outcomes were evaluated with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores.

Results

Of the 28 patients successfully treated with the MCP technique, 24 (85.7%) aneurysms were considered as complete occlusions (Raymond I) based on the immediate postembolization angiogram results. Complications occurred in 2/28 treatments, including guidewire perforation with subarachnoid hemorrhage and cerebral vasospasm-related cerebral infarction. An angiography follow-up demonstrated complete occlusion in 25/28 aneurysms. Twenty-six (92.9%) patients had favorable 90-day outcomes (mRS 0-2) after the endovascular coil embolization.

Conclusion

The MCP technique is simple, safe, and effective, achieving good packing density and initial occlusion rate when used to treat ARCIAs.

Use of flow diverter device in basilar artery for aneurysm treatment: Case series and literature review

Background

Flow diverters (FDs) for the treatment of basilar artery (BA) aneurysms remain controversial. In this study, we report our initial experience of flow diversion for treatment of this pathology.

Methods

Consecutive patients with an aneurysm of the BA that was treated by implantation of the FD were included in our retrospective study. Procedural complications, aneurysm occlusion, and a functional outcome were evaluated. FD placement in BA for aneurysm treatment reported in the literature was also reviewed and summarized.

Results

Sixteen patients with 16 BA aneurysms were treated by FD implantation with (n = 8) or without (n = 8) adjunctive coiling. The Tubridge was used in 13 (81.3%) and Pipeline in 3 (18.8%) procedures. Average aneurysm size was 15.7 mm. Four aneurysms were located at the basilar apex, six at the basilar trunk, and six at the vertebrobasilar junction. Three patients experienced procedural complications (18.8%), including two ischemic strokes and one hydrocephalus, with resultant mortality in one case (6.3%). Median follow-up was 7.7 months and available for 15 aneurysms. Complete/near-complete occlusion was seen in 13 (86.7%) aneurysms.

Conclusion

In our initial experience, flow diversion is feasible and safe in the treatment of BA aneurysms with promising occlusion rates at mid-term follow-up. Larger cohort studies are required to validate these results.

Treatment of recurrent and residual aneurysms with the low-profile Acandis Acclino stent: Multi-center review of 19 patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the low-profile Acandis Acclino microstent for embolization of recurrent and residual intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

Consecutive patients treated with the Acclino for aneurysm remnants at three German neurovascular centers were enrolled. The technical success, complications, angiographic and clinical outcome were investigated.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (median age: 53 years) with 19 aneurysm remnants (median size: 5 mm, anterior circulation: 14) were included. Initial aneurysm treatment consisted of stand-alone coiling in 14 cases, stent-assisted coiling in 4 and clipping in 1. Acclino stent-assisted coil embolization was performed technically successfully in all patients. Morbidity occurred in one patient (5.3%) due to aneurysm perforation. At the angiographic follow-up with a median follow-up duration of 21 months (range: 5-37 months), complete occlusion was obtained in 76.9%. The retreatment rate was 7.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Retreatment of aneurysm remnants with the Acclino microstent was associated with high aneurysm occlusion rates and acceptable morbidity. Further studies will be necessary to draw a definite conclusion.

Retreatment With Flow Diverters and Coiling for Recurrent Aneurysms After Initial Endovascular Treatment: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis

Background: Flow diverters and conventional coiling are established modalities for the retreatment of intracranial recurrent aneurysms after initial endovascular treatment. We aimed to compare the efficacy of these techniques. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data for patients with recurrent aneurysms after initial endovascular treatment retreated in our center with either a pipeline embolization device (PED) or conventional coil embolization from January 2012 to July 2020. We performed 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) using the nearest neighbor method. We controlled for: initial treatment strategy, aneurysm size, neck diameter, symptom presentation, history of aneurysm rupture, age, sex, fusiform-dissecting aneurysm, bifurcation aneurysm, and aneurysm location. The clinical and morphological factors of all patients at initial treatment and the angiographic and clinical results at the second treatment were collected and compared between the propensity-matched pairs. Results: A total of 105 intracranial aneurysms were identified; 18 patients (17.1%) were treated with a PED, and 87 (82.9%) were treated via conventional coil embolization. PSM resulted in 12 matched pairs (12 patients in the PED group and 24 in the coiling group). There was no significant difference of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications between the groups, the obliteration rate of branches covered by stent, or modified Rankin Scale scores at the last clinical follow-up. Importantly, the retreatment strategy in the PED group provided significantly different results vs. the coiling group (P < 0.001), with a lower recurrence rate (0.0 vs. 29.2%, respectively; P = 0.037). However, the procedural failure rate and the parent artery stenosis were more frequently in PED group compared with coiling group (both were 16.7 vs. 0.0%; P = 0.040). Conclusions: Endovascular retreatment for recurrent aneurysms after initial endovascular treatment might be safe and effective. Flow diverters might be associated with reduced risk of recanalization and an increased risk of procedural failure and mild parent artery stenosis.

Flow diverter stents in the treatment of recanalized intracranial aneurysms

BACKGROUND

We assessed the safety and efficacy of flow diverter stents (FDSs) in the treatment of recanalized or residual intracranial aneurysms treated endovascularly.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Patients whose recanalized or residual aneurysms were treated with FDSs in five tertiary hospitals were reviewed retrospectively. The patients' demographic data, aneurysm characteristics, types of previous treatment, and clinical complications, or serious adverse events associated with FDSs, as well as the results of neurological and angiographic follow-up assessments, were recorded.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients (37 males) with 87 aneurysms were included in this study. Eighty (91.9%) aneurysms were in the anterior and seven (8.1%) in the posterior circulation. The initial treatment methods were the primary coiling or balloon remodeling technique in 69 (79.3%) and stent-assisted coiling in 18 (20.7%) aneurysms. The endovascular procedure was successful in all patients. Complications occurred in four patients, for a total complication rate of 4.6%. A technical complication developed in one patient (1.2%). An in-stent thrombosis treated with tirofiban was seen in two cases. Late in-stent stenosis exceeding 50% was treated with balloon angioplasty in one patient. The mean length of follow-up was 21.0 months. The first angiographic follow-up (3-6 months) revealed the complete occlusion of 74 aneurysms (85.1%). While 76 aneurysms (87.4%) were occluded at the last angiographic follow-up (mean: 26.0 months), 11 aneurysms (12.6%) were still filling. Morbimortality was zero.

CONCLUSION

The drawback of endovascular treatment is aneurysmal remnants or recurrences, which is safely and durably amenable to flow diversion.

[Finite element simulation of stent implantation and its applications in the interventional planning for hemorrhagic cardio-cerebrovascular diseases]

Numerical simulation of stent deployment is very important to the surgical planning and risk assess of the interventional treatment for the cardio-cerebrovascular diseases. Our group developed a framework to deploy the braided stent and the stent graft virtually by finite element simulation. By using the framework, the whole process of the deployment of the flow diverter to treat a cerebral aneurysm was simulated, and the deformation of the parent artery and the distributions of the stress in the parent artery wall were investigated. The results provided some information to improve the intervention of cerebral aneurysm and optimize the design of the flow diverter. Furthermore, the whole process of the deployment of the stent graft to treat an aortic dissection was simulated, and the distributions of the stress in the aortic wall were investigated when the different oversize ratio of the stent graft was selected. The simulation results proved that the maximum stress located at the position where the bare metal ring touched the artery wall. The results also can be applied to improve the intervention of the aortic dissection and the design of the stent graft.

Endovascular treatment of traumatic carotid pseudoaneurysm with Tubridge flow diverter: A case report

Traumatic pseudoaneurysm is a rare lesion with a high risk of rupture, and represents one of the most difficult lesions to treat, either surgically or endovascularly. Herein, we describe the case of a 32-year-old man with a traumatic pseudoaneurysm of the internal carotid artery, which was treated by overlapped flow diverters (Tubridge). The patient recovered well, and the follow-up angiography at four months showed complete occlusion of the pseudoaneurysm and patency of the internal carotid artery and the ophthalmic artery.

Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device Sizing Based on Conventional 2D Measurements and Virtual Simulation Using the Sim&Size Software: An Agreement Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Sim&Size software simulates case-specific intraluminal Pipeline Embolization Device behavior, wall apposition, and device length in real-time on the basis of rotational angiography DICOM data. The purpose of this multicenter study was to evaluate whether preimplantation device simulation with the Sim&Size software results in selection of different device dimensions than manual sizing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a multicenter cohort of 74 patients undergoing aneurysm treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device, we compared apparent optimal device dimensions determined by neurointerventionalists with considerable Pipeline Embolization Device experience based on manual 2D measurements taken from rotational angiography with computed optimal dimensions determined by Sim&Size experts blinded to the neurointerventionalists' decision. Agreement between manually determined and computed optimal dimensions was evaluated with the Cohen κ. The significance of the difference was analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

The agreement index between manual selection and computed optimal dimensions was low (κ for diameter = 0.219; κ for length = 0.149, P < .01). Computed optimal device lengths were significantly shorter (median, 14 versus 16 mm, T = 402, r = -0.28, P < .01). No significant difference was observed for device diameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Low agreement between manually determined and computed optimal device dimensions is not proof, per se, that virtual simulation performs better than manual selection. Nevertheless, it ultimately reflects the potential for optimization of the device-sizing process, and use of the Sim&Size software reduces, in particular, device length. Nevertheless, further evaluation is required to clarify the impact of device-dimension modifications on outcome.

Age of Data in Contemporary Research Articles Published in Representative General Radiology Journals

Objective

To analyze and compare the age of data in contemporary research articles published in representative general radiology journals.

Materials and Methods

We searched for articles reporting original research studies analyzing patient data that were published in the print issues of the Korean Journal of Radiology (KJR), European Radiology (ER), and Radiology in 2017. Eligible articles were reviewed to extract data collection period (time from first patient recruitment to last patient follow-up) and age of data (time between data collection end and publication). The journals were compared in terms of the proportion of articles reporting the data collection period to the level of calendar month and regarding the age of data.

Results

There were 50, 492, and 254 eligible articles in KJR, ER, and Radiology, respectively. Of these, 44 (88%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 75.8-94.8%), 359 (73%; 95% CI: 68.9-76.7%), and 211 (83.1%; 95% CI: 78-87.2%) articles, respectively, provided enough details of data collection period, revealing a significant difference between ER and Radiology (p = 0.002). The age of data was significantly greater in KJR (median age: 826 days; range: 299-2843 days) than in ER (median age: 570 days; range: 56-4742 days; p < 0.001) and Radiology (median age: 618; range: 75-4271 days; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Korean Journal of Radiology did not fall behind ER or Radiology in reporting of data collection period, but showed a significantly greater age of data than ER and Radiology, suggesting that KJR should take measures to improve the timeliness of its data.