1
|
Curcean S, Curcean A, Martin D, Fekete Z, Irimie A, Muntean AS, Caraiani C. The Role of Predictive and Prognostic MRI-Based Biomarkers in the Era of Total Neoadjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3111. [PMID: 39272969 PMCID: PMC11394290 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16173111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2024] [Revised: 09/02/2024] [Accepted: 09/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Abstract
The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in rectal cancer management has significantly increased over the last decade, in line with more personalized treatment approaches. Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) plays a pivotal role in the shift from traditional surgical approach to non-surgical approaches such as 'watch-and-wait'. MRI plays a central role in this evolving landscape, providing essential morphological and functional data that support clinical decision-making. Key MRI-based biomarkers, including circumferential resection margin (CRM), extramural venous invasion (EMVI), tumour deposits, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and MRI tumour regression grade (mrTRG), have proven valuable for staging, response assessment, and patient prognosis. Functional imaging techniques, such as dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), alongside emerging biomarkers derived from radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI) have the potential to transform rectal cancer management offering data that enhance T and N staging, histopathological characterization, prediction of treatment response, recurrence detection, and identification of genomic features. This review outlines validated morphological and functional MRI-derived biomarkers with both prognostic and predictive significance, while also exploring the potential of radiomics and artificial intelligence in rectal cancer management. Furthermore, we discuss the role of rectal MRI in the 'watch-and-wait' approach, highlighting important practical aspects in selecting patients for non-surgical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Curcean
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 8 Victor Babes Street, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 'Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta' Oncology Institute, 34-36 Republicii Street, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Andra Curcean
- Department of Imaging, Affidea Center, 15c Ciresilor Street, 400487 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Daniela Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 'Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta' Oncology Institute, 34-36 Republicii Street, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Zsolt Fekete
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 8 Victor Babes Street, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 'Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta' Oncology Institute, 34-36 Republicii Street, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Alexandru Irimie
- Department of Oncological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 8 Victor Babes Street, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Department of Oncological Surgery, 'Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta' Oncology Institute, 34-36 Republicii Street, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Alina-Simona Muntean
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 'Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta' Oncology Institute, 34-36 Republicii Street, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Cosmin Caraiani
- Department of Medical Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim HY, Cho SH, Jang JK, Kim B, Lee CM, Lim JS, Moon SK, Oh SN, Seo N, Park SH. Interpretation of Complete Tumor Response on MRI Following Chemoradiotherapy of Rectal Cancer: Inter-Reader Agreement and Associated Factors in Multi-Center Clinical Practice. Korean J Radiol 2024; 25:351-362. [PMID: 38528693 PMCID: PMC10973736 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2023.1213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To measure inter-reader agreement and identify associated factors in interpreting complete response (CR) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study involved 10 readers from seven hospitals with experience of 80-10210 cases, and 149 patients who underwent surgery after CRT for rectal cancer. Using MRI-based tumor regression grading (mrTRG) and methods employed in daily practice, the readers independently assessed mrTRG, CR on T2-weighted images (T2WI) denoted as mrCRT2W, and CR on all images including diffusion-weighted images (DWI) denoted as mrCRoverall. The readers described their interpretation patterns and how they utilized DWI. Inter-reader agreement was measured using multi-rater kappa, and associated factors were analyzed using multivariable regression. Correlation between sensitivity and specificity of each reader was analyzed using Spearman coefficient. RESULTS The mrCRT2W and mrCRoverall rates varied widely among the readers, ranging 18.8%-40.3% and 18.1%-34.9%, respectively. Nine readers used DWI as a supplement sequence, which modified interpretations on T2WI in 2.7% of cases (36/1341 [149 patients × 9 readers]) and mostly (33/36) changed mrCRT2W to non-mrCRoverall. The kappa values for mrTRG, mrCRT2W, and mrCRoverall were 0.56 (95% confidence interval: 0.49, 0.62), 0.55 (0.52, 0.57), and 0.54 (0.51, 0.57), respectively. No use of rectal gel, larger initial tumor size, and higher initial cT stage exhibited significant association with a higher inter-reader agreement for assessing mrCRoverall (P ≤ 0.042). Strong negative correlations were observed between the sensitivity and specificity of individual readers (coefficient, -0.718 to -0.963; P ≤ 0.019). CONCLUSION Inter-reader agreement was moderate for assessing CR on post-CRT MRI. Readers' varying standards on MRI interpretation (i.e., threshold effect), along with the use of rectal gel, initial tumor size, and initial cT stage, were significant factors associated with inter-reader agreement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hae Young Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Hyun Cho
- Department of Radiology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Keon Jang
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Bohyun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chul-Min Lee
- Department of Radiology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joon Seok Lim
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Kyoung Moon
- Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Soon Nam Oh
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Nieun Seo
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Ho Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim TH, Firat C, Thompson HM, Gangai N, Zheng J, Capanu M, Bates DDB, Paroder V, García-Aguilar J, Shia J, Gollub MJ, Horvat N. Extramural Venous Invasion and Tumor Deposit at Diffusion-weighted MRI in Patients after Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal Cancer. Radiology 2023; 308:e230079. [PMID: 37581503 PMCID: PMC10478788 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Abstract
Background Diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging is useful in detecting tumor in the primary tumor bed in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after neoadjuvant therapy, but its value in detecting extramural venous invasion (EMVI) and tumor deposit is not well validated. Purpose To evaluate diagnostic accuracy and association with patient prognosis of viable EMVI and tumor deposit on DW images in patients with LARC after neoadjuvant therapy using whole-mount pathology specimens. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and surgery from 2018 to 2021. Innovative five-point Likert scale was used by two radiologists to independently evaluate the likelihood of viable EMVI and tumor deposit on restaging DW MRI scans in four axial quadrants (12 to 3 o'clock, 3 to 6 o'clock, 6 to 9 o'clock, and 9 to 12 o'clock). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed at both the per-quadrant and per-patient level, with whole-mount pathology as the reference standard. Weighted κ values for interreader agreement and Cox regression models for disease-free survival and overall survival analyses were used. Results A total of 117 patients (mean age, 56 years ± 12 [SD]; 70 male, 47 female) were included. Pathologically proven viable EMVI and tumor deposit was detected in 29 of 117 patients (25%) and in 44 of 468 quadrants (9.4%). Per-quadrant analyses showed an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.83), with sensitivity and specificity of 55% and 96%, respectively. Good interreader agreement was observed between the radiologists (κ = 0.62). Per-patient analysis showed sensitivity and specificity of 62% and 93%, respectively. The presence of EMVI and tumor deposit on restaging DW MRI scans was associated with worse disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 5.6; 95% CI: 2.4, 13.3) and overall survival (HR, 8.9; 95% CI: 1.6, 48.5). Conclusion DW imaging using the five-point Likert scale showed high specificity and moderate sensitivity in the detection of viable extramural venous invasion and tumor deposits in LARC after neoadjuvant therapy, and its presence on restaging DW MRI scans is associated with worse prognosis. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Méndez and Ayuso in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hannah M. Thompson
- From the Departments of Radiology (T.H.K., N.G., D.D.B.B., V.P.,
M.J.G., N.H.), Pathology (C.F., J.S.), Surgery (H.M.T., J.G.A.), and
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.Z., M.C.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065
| | - Natalie Gangai
- From the Departments of Radiology (T.H.K., N.G., D.D.B.B., V.P.,
M.J.G., N.H.), Pathology (C.F., J.S.), Surgery (H.M.T., J.G.A.), and
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.Z., M.C.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065
| | - Junting Zheng
- From the Departments of Radiology (T.H.K., N.G., D.D.B.B., V.P.,
M.J.G., N.H.), Pathology (C.F., J.S.), Surgery (H.M.T., J.G.A.), and
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.Z., M.C.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065
| | - Marinela Capanu
- From the Departments of Radiology (T.H.K., N.G., D.D.B.B., V.P.,
M.J.G., N.H.), Pathology (C.F., J.S.), Surgery (H.M.T., J.G.A.), and
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.Z., M.C.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065
| | - David D. B. Bates
- From the Departments of Radiology (T.H.K., N.G., D.D.B.B., V.P.,
M.J.G., N.H.), Pathology (C.F., J.S.), Surgery (H.M.T., J.G.A.), and
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.Z., M.C.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065
| | - Viktoriya Paroder
- From the Departments of Radiology (T.H.K., N.G., D.D.B.B., V.P.,
M.J.G., N.H.), Pathology (C.F., J.S.), Surgery (H.M.T., J.G.A.), and
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.Z., M.C.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065
| | - Julio García-Aguilar
- From the Departments of Radiology (T.H.K., N.G., D.D.B.B., V.P.,
M.J.G., N.H.), Pathology (C.F., J.S.), Surgery (H.M.T., J.G.A.), and
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.Z., M.C.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065
| | - Jinru Shia
- From the Departments of Radiology (T.H.K., N.G., D.D.B.B., V.P.,
M.J.G., N.H.), Pathology (C.F., J.S.), Surgery (H.M.T., J.G.A.), and
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.Z., M.C.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065
| | - Marc J. Gollub
- From the Departments of Radiology (T.H.K., N.G., D.D.B.B., V.P.,
M.J.G., N.H.), Pathology (C.F., J.S.), Surgery (H.M.T., J.G.A.), and
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.Z., M.C.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065
| | - Natally Horvat
- From the Departments of Radiology (T.H.K., N.G., D.D.B.B., V.P.,
M.J.G., N.H.), Pathology (C.F., J.S.), Surgery (H.M.T., J.G.A.), and
Epidemiology and Biostatistics (J.Z., M.C.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY 10065
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nougaret S, Rousset P, Lambregts DMJ, Maas M, Gormly K, Lucidarme O, Brunelle S, Milot L, Arrivé L, Salut C, Pilleul F, Hordonneau C, Baudin G, Soyer P, Brun V, Laurent V, Savoye-Collet C, Petkovska I, Gerard JP, Cotte E, Rouanet P, Catalano O, Denost Q, Tan RB, Frulio N, Hoeffel C. MRI restaging of rectal cancer: The RAC (Response-Anal canal-CRM) analysis joint consensus guidelines of the GRERCAR and GRECCAR groups. Diagn Interv Imaging 2023; 104:311-322. [PMID: 36949002 DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2023.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop guidelines by international experts to standardize data acquisition, image interpretation, and reporting in rectal cancer restaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS Evidence-based data and experts' opinions were combined using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method to attain consensus guidelines. Experts provided recommendations for reporting template and protocol for data acquisition were collected; responses were analysed and classified as "RECOMMENDED" versus "NOT RECOMMENDED" (if ≥ 80% consensus among experts) or uncertain (if < 80% consensus among experts). RESULTS Consensus regarding patient preparation, MRI sequences, staging and reporting was attained using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. A consensus was reached for each reporting template item among the experts. Tailored MRI protocol and standardized report were proposed. CONCLUSION These consensus recommendations should be used as a guide for rectal cancer restaging with MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Nougaret
- Department of Radiology IRCM, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute, 34000 Montpellier, France; INSERM, U1194, University of Montpellier, 34295, Montpellier, France.
| | - Pascal Rousset
- Department of Radiology, CHU Lyon-Sud, EMR 3738 CICLY, Université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, 69495 Pierre-Benite, France
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kirsten Gormly
- Jones Radiology, Kurralta Park, 5037, Australia; University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
| | - Oliver Lucidarme
- Department of Radiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, 75013 Paris, France; LIB, INSERM, CNRS, UMR7371-U1146, Sorbonne Université, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Serge Brunelle
- Department of Radiology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - Laurent Milot
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon, 69003 Lyon, France
| | - Lionel Arrivé
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, 75012 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Celine Salut
- CHU de Bordeaux, Department of Radiology, Université de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Franck Pilleul
- Department of Radiology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France Univ Lyon, INSA-Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS UMR 5220, U1206, 69621, Lyon, France
| | | | - Guillaume Baudin
- Department of Radiology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 06100 Nice, France
| | - Philippe Soyer
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Vanessa Brun
- Department of Radiology, CHU Hôpital Pontchaillou, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Valérie Laurent
- Department of Radiology, Nancy University Hospital, Université de Lorraine, 54500 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | | | - Iva Petkovska
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Jean-Pierre Gerard
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Eddy Cotte
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud University Hospital, 69310 Pierre Bénite, France; Lyon 1 Claude Bernard University, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
| | - Philippe Rouanet
- Department of Surgery, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier Cancer Research Institute, INSERM U1194, University of Montpellier, 34295, Montpellier, France
| | - Onofrio Catalano
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Quentin Denost
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque, Université de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Regina Beets Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nora Frulio
- CHU de Bordeaux, Department of Radiology, Université de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Christine Hoeffel
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Robert Debré & CRESTIC, URCA, 51092 Reims, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Niu S, Chen Y, Peng F, Wen J, Xiong J, Yang Z, Peng J, Bao Y, Ding L. The role of MRI after neochemoradiotherapy in predicting pathological tumor regression grade and clinical outcome in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1118518. [PMID: 37377906 PMCID: PMC10292078 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1118518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the predictive value of tumor regression grade assessed by MRI (mr-TRG) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo-CRT) for postoperative pathological TRG (pTRG) and prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (LARC). Materials and methods This was a retrospective study from a single center experience. The patients who were diagnosed with LARC and received neo-CRT in our department between January 2016 and July 2021 were enrolled. The agreement between mrTRG and pTRG was assessed with the weighted κ test. Overall survival (OS), progress-free survival (PFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test. Results From January 2016 to July 2021, 121 LARC patients received neo-CRT in our department. Among them, 54 patients had complete clinical data, including MRI of pre- and post-neo-CRT, postoperative tumor samples, and follow-up. The median follow-up time was 34.6 months (range: 4.4-70.6 months). The estimated 3-year OS, PFS, LRFS and DMFS were 78.5%, 70.7%, 89.0%, and 75.2%, respectively. The median time from the completion of neo-CRT to preoperative MRI and surgery was 7.1 weeks and 9.7 weeks, respectively. Out of 54 patients, 5 patients achieved mrTRG1 (9.3%), 37 achieved mrTRG2 (68.5%), 8 achieved mrTRG3 (14.8%), 4 achieved mrTRG4 (7.4%), and no patient achieved mrTRG5 after neo-CRT. Regarding pTRG, 12 patients achieved pTRG0 (22.2%), 10 achieved pTRG1 (18.5%), 26 achieved pTRG2 (48.1%), and 6 achieved pTRG3 (11.1%). The agreement between three-tier mrTRG (mrTRG1 vs. mrTRG2-3 vs. mrTRG4-5) and pTRG (pTRG0 vs. pTRG1-2 vs. pTRG3) was fair (weighted kappa=0.287). In a dichotomous classification, the agreement between mrTRG(mrTRG1 vs. mrTRG2-5)and pTRG(pTRG0 vs. pTRG1-3) also resulted in fair agreement (weighted kappa=0.391). The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of favorable mrTRG (mrTRG 1-2) for pathological complete response (PCR) were 75.0%, 21.4%, 21.4%, and 75.0%, respectively. In univariate analysis, favorable mrTRG (mrTRG1-2) and downstaging N were significantly associated with better OS, while favorable mrTRG (mrTRG1-2), downstaging T, and downstaging N were significantly associated with superior PFS (p<0.05). In multivariate analysis, downstaging N was an independent prognostic factor for OS. Meanwhile, downstaging T and downstaging N remained independent prognostic factors for PFS. Conclusions Although the consistency between mrTRG and pTRG is only fair, favorable mrTRG after neo-CRT may be used as a potential prognostic factor for LARC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaoqing Niu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fang Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jie Wen
- Department of Interventional Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianqi Xiong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhuangzhuang Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianjun Peng
- Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yong Bao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li Ding
- Department of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Seo N, Lim JS. [Interpretation of Rectal MRI after Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients with Rectal Cancer]. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY 2023; 84:550-564. [PMID: 37325000 PMCID: PMC10265231 DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2023.0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
MRI is currently the imaging modality of choice to evaluate rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment. The purposes of restaging MRI are to assess the resectability of rectal cancer and to decide whether organ preservation strategies can be applied in patients with a complete clinical response. This review article indicates the key MRI features needed to evaluate rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment using a systematic approach. Assessment of primary tumor response including MRI findings to predict a complete response is discussed. Additionally, MRI evaluation of the relationship between the primary tumor and adjacent structures, lymph node response, extramural venous invasion, and tumor deposits after neoadjuvant treatment is presented. Knowledge of these imaging features and their clinical relevance may help radiologists provide an accurate and clinically valuable interpretation of restaging rectal MRI.
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim B, Lee CM, Jang JK, Kim J, Lim SB, Kim AY. Deep learning-based imaging reconstruction for MRI after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: effects on image quality and assessment of treatment response. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY (NEW YORK) 2023; 48:201-210. [PMID: 36261505 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03701-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Revised: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the effects of deep learning-based imaging reconstruction (DLR) on the image quality of MRI of rectal cancer after chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and its accuracy in diagnosing pathological complete responses (pCR). METHODS We included 39 patients (men: women, 21:18; mean age ± standard deviation, 59.1 ± 9.7 years) with mid-to-lower rectal cancer who underwent a long-course of CRT and high-resolution rectal MRIs between January 2020 and April 2021. Axial T2WI was reconstructed using the conventional method (MRIconv) and DLR with two different noise reduction factors (MRIDLR30 and MRIDLR50). The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the tumor was measured. Two experienced radiologists independently made a blind assessment of the complete response on MRI. The sensitivity and specificity for pCR were analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations. RESULTS Thirty-four patients did not have a pCR whereas five (12.8%) had pCR. Compared with the SNR of MRIconv (mean ± SD, 7.94 ± 1.92), MRIDLR30 and MRIDLR50 showed higher SNR (9.44 ± 2.31 and 11.83 ± 3.07, respectively) (p < 0.001). Compared to MRIconv, MRIDLR30 and MRIDLR50 showed significantly higher specificity values (p < 0.036) while the sensitivity values were not significantly different (p > 0.301). The sensitivity and specificity for pCR were 48.9% and 80.8% for MRIconv; 48.9% and 88.2% for MRIDLR30; and 38.8% and 86.7% for MRIDLR50, respectively. CONCLUSION DLR produced MR images with higher resolution and SNR. The specificity of MRI for identification of pCR was significantly higher with DLR than with conventional MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bona Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Chul-Min Lee
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.,Department of Radiology, Hanyang University Medical Center, 222-1, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Keon Jang
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
| | - Jihun Kim
- Department of Pathology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Seok-Byung Lim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Ah Young Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shin J, Seo N, Baek SE, Son NH, Lim JS, Kim NK, Koom WS, Kim S. MRI Radiomics Model Predicts Pathologic Complete Response of Rectal Cancer Following Chemoradiotherapy. Radiology 2022; 303:351-358. [PMID: 35133200 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.211986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Preoperative assessment of pathologic complete response (pCR) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is increasingly needed for organ preservation, but large-scale validation of an MRI radiomics model remains lacking. Purpose To evaluate radiomics models based on T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted MRI for predicting pCR after nCRT in LARC and compare their performance with visual assessment by radiologists. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with LARC (clinical stage T3 or higher, positive nodal status, or both) who underwent post-nCRT MRI and elective resection between January 2009 and December 2018. Surgical histopathologic analysis was the reference standard for pCR. Radiomic features were extracted from the volume of interest on T2-weighted images and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps from post-nCRT MRI to generate three models: T2 weighted, ADC, and both T2 weighted and ADC (merged). Radiomics signatures were generated using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator with tenfold cross-validation. Three experienced radiologists independently rated tumor regression grades at MRI and compared these with the radiomics models' diagnostic outcomes. Areas under the curve (AUCs) of the radiomics models and pooled readers were compared by using the DeLong method. Results Among 898 patients, 189 (21%) achieved pCR. The patients were chronologically divided into training (n = 592; mean age ± standard deviation, 59 years ± 12; 388 men) and test (n = 306; mean age, 59 years ± 12; 190 men) sets. The radiomics signatures of the T2-weighted, ADC, and merged models demonstrated AUCs of 0.82, 0.79, and 0.82, respectively, with no evidence of a difference found between the T2-weighted and merged models (P = .49), while the ADC model performed worse than the merged model (P = .02). The T2-weighted model had higher classification performance (AUC, 0.82 vs 0.74 [P = .009]) and sensitivity (80.0% vs 15.6% [P < .001]), but lower specificity (68.4% vs 98.6% [P < .001]) than the pooled performance of the three radiologists. Conclusion An MRI-based radiomics model showed better classification performance than experienced radiologists for diagnosing pathologic complete response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Taylor in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaeseung Shin
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, South Korea (J.S., N.S., S.E.B., J.S.L., S.K.); Data Science Team, Center for Digital Health, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, South Korea (N.H.S.); and Departments of Surgical Oncology (N.K.K.) and Radiation Oncology (W.S.K.), Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Nieun Seo
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, South Korea (J.S., N.S., S.E.B., J.S.L., S.K.); Data Science Team, Center for Digital Health, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, South Korea (N.H.S.); and Departments of Surgical Oncology (N.K.K.) and Radiation Oncology (W.S.K.), Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Song-Ee Baek
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, South Korea (J.S., N.S., S.E.B., J.S.L., S.K.); Data Science Team, Center for Digital Health, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, South Korea (N.H.S.); and Departments of Surgical Oncology (N.K.K.) and Radiation Oncology (W.S.K.), Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Nak-Hoon Son
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, South Korea (J.S., N.S., S.E.B., J.S.L., S.K.); Data Science Team, Center for Digital Health, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, South Korea (N.H.S.); and Departments of Surgical Oncology (N.K.K.) and Radiation Oncology (W.S.K.), Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Joon Seok Lim
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, South Korea (J.S., N.S., S.E.B., J.S.L., S.K.); Data Science Team, Center for Digital Health, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, South Korea (N.H.S.); and Departments of Surgical Oncology (N.K.K.) and Radiation Oncology (W.S.K.), Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Nam Kyu Kim
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, South Korea (J.S., N.S., S.E.B., J.S.L., S.K.); Data Science Team, Center for Digital Health, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, South Korea (N.H.S.); and Departments of Surgical Oncology (N.K.K.) and Radiation Oncology (W.S.K.), Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Woong Sub Koom
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, South Korea (J.S., N.S., S.E.B., J.S.L., S.K.); Data Science Team, Center for Digital Health, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, South Korea (N.H.S.); and Departments of Surgical Oncology (N.K.K.) and Radiation Oncology (W.S.K.), Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sungwon Kim
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, South Korea (J.S., N.S., S.E.B., J.S.L., S.K.); Data Science Team, Center for Digital Health, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, South Korea (N.H.S.); and Departments of Surgical Oncology (N.K.K.) and Radiation Oncology (W.S.K.), Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|