Reduced chest expansion in primary fibromyalgia syndrome

Reliability of Chest Wall Mobility and Its Correlation with Lung Functions in Healthy Nonsmokers, Healthy Smokers, and Patients with COPD

Chest wall circumference measurements are common evaluation methods in clinical settings by therapists in order to obtain chest wall mobility. Previous published results have been conflicting, and there is a lot of variability in the method of testing, which needs testing in different conditions. Seventy subjects (25 healthy nonsmokers, 25 healthy smokers, and 20 COPD) aged between 18 and 70 years participated in the study. Upper and lower chest expansion (CE) measurements (2 levels) are performed with cloth inch tape. Intrarater (between day) and interrater (within-day) reliability of CE measurements was evaluated by two examiners. Lung function parameters, forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC, and vital capacity (VC) were measured using a computerized spirometer (Spiro lab 3). The intrarater reliability for upper and lower CE showed very good agreement with intraclass correlation (ICC) values between 0.90 and 0.93 for upper CE and 0.85 to 0.86 for lower CE. The interrater reliability for upper CE showed good to very good agreement with ICC values ranging between 0.78 and 0.83, and lower CE showed very good agreement with ICC values ranging between 0.82 and 0.84. Upper and lower CE showed a significant and positive correlation with all lung function parameters, with strong correlation with FEV1/FVC (r = 0.68). Upper and lower CE measurements with inch tape showed good intra- and interrater reliability and reproducibility in healthy nonsmokers, healthy smokers, and COPD subjects. Compared to upper, lower CE correlated well with the lung function parameters. Upper and lower CE may be more useful in clinical practice to evaluate chest mobility and to give indirect information on lung function but interpretation with caution is required when considering implementation into clinical setting.

Reliability and Reproducibility of Chest Wall Expansion Measurement in Young Healthy Adults

OBJECTIVE

The purposes of this study were to (1) evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of chest expansion (CE) measurement on 2 different levels and (2) observe relationships between upper and lower CE measurements and lung function.

METHODS

Fifty-three healthy subjects aged between 18 and 39 years were recruited. Chest expansion measurements were taken with a cloth tape measure at 2 levels of the rib cage (upper and lower). Reproducibility of the measurement was measured for 2 physiotherapists and on 2 different days. Lung function (ie, forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1], forced vital capacity (FVC), vital capacity and, inspiratory capacity) was measured for all subjects by a spirometer (MEC Pocket-spiro USB100, Medical Electronic Construction, Brussels, Belgium).

RESULTS

Upper CE was less than lower CE (5.4 cm and 6.4 cm, respectively; P < .001). Intrarater and interrater reliability were good for upper and lower CE. Reproducibility between physiotherapists was verified for both CE measurements. Reproducibility between days was only verified for upper CE. Sex influenced lower CE. Upper and lower CE values were correlated (r = 0.747; P < .01). Lower and upper CE were significantly and positively correlated with all lung function parameters and inspiratory muscle strength (moderately and weakly, respectively) except to inspiratory capacity for upper CE (P = .051) and for FEV1/FVC for both CE measurements.

CONCLUSION

Upper and lower CE measurements showed good intra- and interrater reliability and reproducibility in healthy subjects. Although both measurements were correlated with lung functions (ie, FEV1, FVC, and vital capacity), the findings of this study showed that upper CE measurements may be more useful in clinical practice to evaluate chest mobility and to give indirect information on lung volume function and inspiratory muscle strength.

Is chest expansion a determinant of pulmonary muscle strength in primary fibromyalgia?

OBJECTIVE

To examine the possible relationship between chest expansion and pulmonary muscle strength in patients with primary fibromyalgia (PFM).

METHODS

Forty-one consecutive women with PFM were compared with age and body mass index matched 40 healthy women concerning pulmonary function tests, chest expansion, and maximum respiratory pressures indicating pulmonary muscle strength, and endurance (MVV). Pain was scored according to a visual analog scale (VAS). Chest pain was scored on a 10 point scale.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding chest expansion (P > 0.05). Maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP, MEP) were lower in fibromyalgia patients than controls (P < 0.05). However, chest expansion and dyspnea score were insignificant between groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Reduced maximum respiratory pressures (MIP, MEP) may result from isometric type pulmonary muscle dysfunction as a result of low physical performance in fibromyalgia patients, despite insignificant finding of chest expansion and dyspnea score according to controls.