Acute eosinophilic pneumonia associated with amitriptyline in a hemodialysis patient

Sulfa-induced acute eosinophilic pneumonia

Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) is an infrequently seen interstitial lung disease secondary to medications. We report a series of 3 case of severe AEP which developed as a result of sulfa medication. 2 patients had received treatment with sulfamethoxazole for acne and 1 was treated with sulfasalazine for colitis. Patients were on sulfa medication for 1-3 weeks prior to presentation. All patients presented with fever, acute onset bilateral pulmonary infiltrates as well as marked peripheral eosinophilia. Mean eosinophil count was 2.21 × 10⁹/L. There was a lack of response to steroids. One patient required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and prolonged mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy. 2 patients underwent successful lung transplantation (1 bilateral living-related lobar lung transplant and 1 orthotropic cardiopulmonary allotransplantation). In all cases lung biopsy and explants showed acute and organizing diffuse alveolar damage with increased interstitial and airspace eosinophils. To our knowledge, our series is the first to show the clinical features of sulfa induced AEP in an adolescent population.

Smoking-related interstitial lung diseases

Cigarette smoke, a toxic collection of thousands of chemicals generated from combustion of tobacco, is recognized as the primary causative agent of certain diffuse interstitial and bronchiolar lung diseases. Most patients afflicted with these disorders are cigarette smokers, and smoking cessation has been shown to be capable of inducing disease remission and should occupy a pivotal role in the management of all smokers with these diffuse lung diseases. The role of pharmacotherapy with corticosteroids or other immunomodulating agents is not well established but may be considered in patients with progressive forms of smoking-related interstitial lung diseases.

Drug-induced eosinophilic lung disease

For most patients who have suspected drug-induced eosinophilic lung disease, the history provides a presumptive diagnosis that can be confirmed by pulmonary findings and eosinophilia after cessation of the drug. As new drugs are developed and released for clinical use, many will result in eosinophilic lung disease in susceptible patients. Therefore, development of pulmonary abnormalities in conjunction with blood or lung eosinophilia after prescription ofa newly released medication should raise the possibility of drug-induced lung disease, even if that medication has not yet been reported to cause eosinophilic lung disease. In all patients, the diagnosis requires exclusion of other causes of eosinophilic lung disease by history, and, if necessary, laboratory testing or lung biopsy.

Bronchoalveolar lavage in drug-induced lung disease

Given the varying histologic reactions and differ-ent mechanisms of action, it is not surprising that no uniform constellation of BAL changes is seen in drug-induced lung disease. BAL findings are not specific for any drug-induced lung disease and the definitive diagnosis cannot rely solely on the BAL findings. BAL findings can, however, contribute to the expected clinicopathologic pattern of a given drug-induced lung disease. BAL also is helpful in the differential diagnosis, primarily in the exclusion of an infective cause and of involvement of the lungs by the underlying disease (eg, metastatic cancer or malignant lymphoma).