Survival rate and neurological outcome after operation for advanced spinal metastasis (Tomita's classification > or = type 4)

Comparing the efficacy and safety of cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screws and conventional pedicle screw in surgery for spinal metastases: a retrospective comparative cohort study

Background

The incidence of cancer patients with bone metastasis is increasing annually. With the advancement of medical treatment for malignant tumors, the survival time of patients with spinal metastases is gradually being prolonged, and adjacent segment vertebral metastases often occur after conventional pedicle screw (CPS) surgery, leading to spinal instability, pain and nerve function injury again, with repeated symptoms. Combined pedicle screw fixation can maintain or reconstruct the spinal stability. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of cement-augmented fenestrated pedicle screws in the posterior approach for spinal metastases by comparing with CPS.

Methods

From January 2017 to August 2019, 52 patients with spinal metastases who underwent separation surgery and internal fixation via posterior approach were retrospectively enrolled. Cases were divided into the cement-augmented pedicle screw (CAPS) group (28 cases) and the CPS group (24 cases). The baseline data [age, gender, surgical sites, surgical segment, Tomita classification, Tomita score, Tokuhashi score, spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS)], surgical information, and local progression-free survival (PFS) time were compared between the two groups. Every patient was followed-up every 3 months with imaging examination. The visual analog scale (VAS) score and Frankel grade of the two groups were recorded before and 3 months after the operation were used to evaluate the efficacy. The operation time, the amount of intraoperative blood loss, the amount of bone cement injected in the pedicle screw group, and the complications of the surgery were recorded to evaluate the safety of CAPS.

Results

The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two group. Compared with the CPS group, the CAPS group showed significantly longer operation time (163±20 vs. 138±18 min, P<0.001) and lower VAS scores (2.93±1.33 vs. 4.17±1.34, P=0.002). Adjacent segment vertebral metastasis occurred in 10 cases (2 in the CAPS group and 8 in the CPS group, P=0.017). Internal implant failure occurred in 8 cases (1 in the CAPS group and 7 in the CPS group, P=0.011). Compared with the CPS group, the CAPS group had a significantly longer local PFS time (P<0.05).

Conclusions

CAPS could be a safe and effective choice in surgery for spinal metastases with the posterior approach.

IMPACT OF SURGERY ON AMBULATORY STATUS IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC NEOPLASTIC SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL

ABSTRACT Background: Spinal cord compression is a common complication of spine metastasis and multiple myeloma. About 30% of patients with cancer develop symptomatic spinal metastases during their illness. Prompt diagnosis and surgical treatment of these lesions, although palliative, are likely to reduce the morbidity and improve quality of life by improving ambulatory function. Study Design: Retrospective review of medical records. Objective: To evaluate postoperative functional recovery and the epidemiological profile of neoplastic spinal cord compression in two neurosurgical centers in southern Brazil. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of all patients who underwent palliative surgery for symptomatic neoplastic spine lesion from metastatic cancer, in two neurosurgical centers, between January 2003 and July 2021. The variables age, sex, neurological status, histological type, affected segment, complications and length of hospitalization were analyzed. Results: A total of 82 patients were included. The lesions occurred in the thoracic spine in 60 cases. At admission, 95% of the patients had neurological deficits, most of which were Frankel C (37%). At histopathological analysis, breast cancer was the most common primary site. After surgery, the neurological status of 46 patients (56%) was reclassified according to the Frankel scale. Of these, 22 (47%) regained ambulatory capacity. Conclusion: Surgical treatment of metastatic spinal cord compression improved neurological status and ambulatory ability in our sample. Level of evidence II; Retrospective study.

Spine metastasis in patients with prostate cancer: Survival prognosis assessment

BACKGROUND

Patients presenting spine metastasis (SpM) from prostate cancer (PC) form a heterogeneous population, through this study, we aimed to clarify and update their prognostic assessment.

METHODS

The patient data used in this study was obtained from a French national multicenter database of patients treated for PC with SpM between 2014 and 2017. A total of 72 patients and 365 SpM cases were diagnosed.

RESULTS

The median overall survival time for all patients following the event of SpM was 28.8 months. First, we identified three significant survival prognostic factors of PC patients with SpM: good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/World Health Organization personnel status (Status 0 hazard ratio [HR]: 0.031, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.008-0.127; p < .0001) or (Status 1 HR: 0.163, 95% CI: 0.068-0.393; p < .0001) and SpM radiotherapy (HR: 2.923, 95% CI: 1.059-8.069; p < .0001). Secondly, the presence of osteolytic lesions of the spine (vs. osteoblastic) was found to represent an independent prognosis factor for longer survival [HR: 0.424, 95% CI: 0.216-0.830; p = .01]. Other factors including the number of SpM, surgery, extraspinal metastasis, synchrone metastasis, metastasis-free survival, and SpM recurrence were not identified as being prognostically relevant to the survival of patients with PC.

CONCLUSION

Survival and our ability to estimate it in patients presenting PC with SpM have improved significantly. Therefore, we advocate the relevance of updating SpM prognostic scoring algorithms by incorporating data regarding the timeline of PC as well as the presence of osteolytic SpM to conceive treatments that are adapted to each patient.

How do vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty affect the quality of life of patients with multiple myeloma spinal metastasis?

BACKGROUND

Metastatic spinal lesions are diseases that impair the quality of life and require early diagnosis and treatment. The count of spinal metastasis patients rises day by day. Increased life expectancy has increased the incidence of cancer, making metastases more observable. The aim of our study was to investigate how the quality of life is affected in the patient group with vertebral fracture due to spinal metastases of multiple myeloma and undergoing vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two patients with fracture due to spinal metastasis and adequate follow-up between the years of 2011 and 2018 were included in the study. Patients were listed according to their primary malignancy and metastases. The effect of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty was investigated by evaluating preoperative and postoperative VAS and Oswestry Disability Index scores. All patients' radiographic kyphosis angle, compression ratio and wedging index were calculated before operation and after operation.

RESULTS

A total of 76 vertebrae were operated in 42 patients. Significant differences were found in the comparison of preoperative and postoperative quality of life according to VAS and Oswestry Disability Index scores in the patients undergoing vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty or both procedures after spinal metastases (VAS; p = 0.0001, ODI; p = 0.002/0.0001). There were statistically significant differences in preoperative local kyphosis angle, compression ratio and wedging index and post-op local kyphosis angle, compression ratio and wedging index (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, minimally invasive procedures performed after spinal metastases, improve the quality of life of the patients.

Contemporary spinal oncology treatment paradigms and outcomes for metastatic tumors to the spine: A systematic review of breast, prostate, renal, and lung metastases

Metastatic spinal disease most frequently arises from carcinomas of the breast, lung, prostate, and kidney. Management of spinal metastases (SpM) is controversial in the literature. Recent studies advocate more aggressive surgical resection than older studies which called for radiation therapy alone, challenging previously held beliefs in conservative therapy. A literature search of the PubMed database was performed for spinal oncology outcome studies published in the English language between 2006 and 2016. Data concerning study characteristics, patient demographics, tumor origin and spinal location, treatment paradigm, and median survival were collected. The search retrieved 220 articles, 24 of which were eligible to be included. There were overall 3457 patients. Nine studies of 1723 patients discussed parameters affecting median survival time with comparison of different primary cancers. All studies found that primary cancer significantly predicted survival. Median survival time was highest for primary breast and renal cancers and lowest for prostate and lung cancers, respectively. Multiple spinal metastases, a cervical location of metastasis, and pathologic fracture each had no significant influence on survival. Survival in metastatic spinal tumors is largely driven by primary tumor type, and this should influence palliative management decisions. Surgery has been shown to greatly increase quality of life in patients who can tolerate the procedure, even in those previously treated with radiotherapy. Surgery for SpM can be used as first-line therapy for preservation of function and symptom relief. Future studies of management of SpM are warranted and primary tumor diagnosis should be studied to determine contribution to survival.

New Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Predictive for Post-Treatment Ambulatory Function: Imaging Analysis of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective, single-institute, radiographical study.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to determine the correlation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings observed in metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) with post-treatment ambulatory status.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Previous studies have reported various predictors of ambulatory outcome in patients with MSCC, but the relationship between the MRI features and post-treatment ambulatory function remains to be elucidated.

METHODS

Fifty-six hospitalized patients with MSCC and risk of MSCC were examined using MRI before therapeutic intervention. Circumferential ratio of cord compression (CRCC), clock position of compression, cross-sectional area (CSA), and change in signal intensity of the spinal cord were recorded. Each imaging feature was analyzed statistically regarding unassisted ambulatory status at the time of hospital discharge as the endpoint.

RESULTS

CRCC showed a prognostic value for post-treatment ambulatory function. More than half of CRCC predicted poor functional prognosis with statistical significance. However, the site of cord compression expressed by clock position on axial plane showed no relationship with functional prognosis. CSA of the spinal cord was enlarged in 23% of patients at the level of MSCC, which indicated that cord compression could also be formed by a relative relationship between cord swelling and surrounding mass effect. The said patients showed a better functional outcome. High intensity of the spinal cord on T2-weighted sagittal image was not useful because of lack of inter-rater reliability.

CONCLUSION

CRCC on axial T2 image can guide clinicians to identify cancer patients at risk of paraplegia because of MSCC. More than half of CRCC entails urgent treatment despite preserved ambulatory function. Furthermore, some cases of MSCC accompany increased cord CSA. The measurement is also a useful guide to balance the risk and benefit of systemic steroid therapy. MRI is the key imaging modality in the risk assessment of MSCC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Patterns of Treatment for Metastatic Pathological Fractures of the Spine: The Efficacy of Each Treatment Modality

BACKGROUND

Metastatic pathological fractures of the spine are a major problem for cancer patients; however, there is no consensus on treatment strategy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate various treatment options by analyzing their patterns for metastatic pathological fractures of the spine.

METHODS

In this study, 54 patients (male:female = 36:18) who were diagnosed with metastatic pathological fractures of spine were recruited. Demographic data, origin of cancer, type of treatment, and results were obtained from electronic medical records. Treatment options were divided into radiotherapy (RT), vertebroplasty (VP) or kyphoplasty (KP), operation (OP), and other treatments. Treatment results were defined as aggravation, no response, fair response, good response, and unknown. The survival time after detection of pathologic fractures was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 62.3 years. Hepatocellular carcinoma was the most common cancer of primary origin (n = 9), followed by multiple myeloma (n = 8). RT was the most common primary choice of treatment (n = 29, 53.7%), followed by OP (n = 13, 24.1%), and VP or KP (n = 10, 18.5%). Only 13 of 29 RT cases and 7 of 13 OP cases demonstrated a fair or good response. The mean survival time following detection of pathological spinal fractures was 11.1 months for 29 patients, who died during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

RT was the most common primary choice of treatment for metastatic pathological fractures of the spine. However, the response rate was suboptimal. Although OP should be considered for the relief of mechanical back pain or neurologic symptoms, care should be taken in determining the surgical indication. VP or KP could be considered for short-term control of localized pain, although the number of cases was too small to confirm the conclusion. It is difficult to determine the superiority of the treatment modalities, hence, a common guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of metastatic pathological fractures of the spine is required.

Current paradigms for metastatic spinal disease: an evidence-based review

INTRODUCTION

Management of metastatic spine disease is quite complex. Advances in research have allowed surgeons and physicians to better provide chemotherapeutic agents that have proven more efficacious. Additionally, the advancement of surgical techniques and radiosurgical implementation has altered drastically the treatment paradigm for metastatic spinal disease. Nevertheless, the physician-patient relationship, including extensive discussion with the neurosurgeon, medicine team, oncologists, radiation oncologists, and psychologists, are all critical in the evaluation process and in delivering the best possible care to our patients. The future remains bright for continued improvement in the surgical and nonsurgical management of our patients with metastatic spine disease.

METHODS

We include an evidence-based review of decision making strategies when attempting to determine most efficacious treatment options. Surgical treatments discussed include conventional debulking versus en bloc resection, conventional RT, and radiosurgical techniques, and minimally invasive approaches toward treating metastatic spinal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical oncology is a diverse field in medicine and has undergone a significant paradigm shift over the past few decades. This shift in both medical and surgical management of patients with primarily metastatic tumors has largely been due to the more complete understanding of tumor biology as well as due to advances in surgical approaches and instrumentation. Furthermore, radiation oncology has seen significant advances with stereotactic radiosurgery and intensity-modulated radiation therapy contributing to a decline in surgical treatment of metastatic spinal disease. We analyze the entire spectrum of treating patients with metastatic spinal disease, from methods of diagnosis to the variety of treatment options available in the published literature.

Single-stage posterior decompression and stabilization for metastasis of the thoracic spine: prognostic factors for functional outcome and patients' survival

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

There are limited data analyzing radiological and clinical factors for the functional outcomes of surgery for spinal metastasis. Also, there are few studies to investigate the relationship between the functional outcome and the patients' survival. Thus, analysis of both functional outcomes and the survival with their relationship in a possibly homogenous group of patients is worth being reported.

PURPOSE

To assess treatment outcomes of single-stage posterior decompression and stabilization (PDS) with or without corpectomy for thoracic vertebral metastases and to analyze factors affecting both the functional outcome and the patients' survival after the surgical intervention.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A consecutive series of 105 patients, who underwent the previously stated surgery for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) of thoracic spine, were included and retrospectively analyzed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The postoperative functional outcomes were evaluated using visual analog scale and Frankel grade at postoperative 2 weeks, and all patients were followed for survival analysis.

METHODS

An institutional database was searched to identify all patients who underwent single-stage PDS for thoracic metastatic spinal tumors between March 2002 and June 2010. Demographic data as well as preoperative and postoperative medical conditions were collected from medical records. Radiological findings were confirmed on electronic archive. Survival data were obtained either on medical records or with a reference to governmental cancer registry system.

RESULTS

Postoperative pain improvement was more evident in patients receiving anterior column reconstruction and four or more levels of fixation (p=.02 and <0.01, respectively). Twenty-one patients (20%) showed improvement of the Frankel grade, and 10 of 21 Frankel C patients became ambulatory. The preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (≥70) and ambulatory status were significant predictors for the postoperative ambulatory function. After surgery, the median overall survival of the patients was 6.0 months. In the univariate analysis, the patient's age (younger than 60 years), type of primary cancer (ie, moderate and slow growth), no visceral metastases, less than three levels of spinal metastases, and postoperative adjuvant therapy were positively significant for the patients' survival (p<.05). In the multivariate analysis, limited (less than three levels) spinal metastases and postoperative adjuvant therapy were proven to significantly prolong the patient's survival (hazard ratios of 0.53 and 0.48, respectively, p<.05). Although the functional outcomes did not directly influence the patients' survival, the patients with better functional outcome showed increased chance of receiving postoperative adjuvant therapy (p<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Single-stage PDS with or without corpectomy effectively improved the functional status of patients with MSCC of the thoracic spine and also afforded the patients to have more chances of postoperative adjuvant therapy, which was significant for patients' survival. Therefore, we suggest that the role of surgery in the management of MSCC could be not only a symptomatic palliation but also a strategy to prolong patients' survival.

Efficacy of decompression and fixation for metastatic spinal cord compression: analysis of factors prognostic for survival and postoperative ambulation

OBJECTIVE

The goals of surgical intervention for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) are prolonging survival and improving quality of life. Non-ambulatory paraplegic patients, either at presentation or after treatment, have a much shorter life expectancy than ambulatory patients. We therefore analyzed prognostic factors for survival and postoperative ambulation in patients surgically treated for MSCC.

METHODS

We assessed 103 patients with surgically treated MSCC who presented with lower extremity weakness between January 2001 and December 2008. Factors prognostic for overall survival (OS) and postoperative ambulation, including surgical method, age, sex, primary tumor site, metastatic spinal site, surgical levels, Tokuhashi score, and treatment with chemo- or radiation therapy, were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Median OS was significantly longer in the postoperatively ambulatory group [11.0 months; 95% confidence interval (CI), 9.29-12.71 months] than in the non-ambulatory group (5.0 months; 95% CI, 1.80-8.20 months) (p=0.035). When we compared median OS in patients with high (9-11) and low (0-8) Tokuhashi scores, they were significantly longer in the former (15.0 months; 95% CI, 9.29-20.71 months vs. 9.0 months; 95% CI, 7.48-10.52 months; p=0.003). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative ambulation with or without aid [odds ratio (OR) 5.35; 95% CI 1.57-18.17; p=0.007] and hip flexion power greater than grade III (OR 6.23; 95% CI, 1.29-7.35; p=0.038) were prognostic of postoperative ambulation.

CONCLUSION

We found that postoperative ambulation and preoperative high Tokuhashi score were significantly associated with longer patient survival. In addition, preoperative hip flexion power greater than grade III was critical for postoperative ambulation.