Serum Procalcitonin as a Useful Serologic Marker for Differential Diagnosis between Acute Gouty Attack and Bacterial Infection

Serum Inflammatory Markers and Amputations in Hand Osteomyelitis: A Retrospective Review of 146 Cases

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of hand osteomyelitis requires correlation of clinical, radiological, and microbiological findings. The role of serum inflammatory markers in diagnosing and prognosticating hand osteomyelitis remains uncertain. We sought to determine the utility of inflammatory markers in the diagnosis and follow-up of hand osteomyelitis, and their ability to predict outcomes, particularly amputation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 146 patients diagnosed with hand osteomyelitis and with serum inflammatory marker levels measured after the onset of symptoms and within 14 days either side of diagnosis. Blood results at first presentation including white cell count (WCC), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were reviewed, and associations with amputations assessed. Follow-up markers taken at 15 to 60 days from diagnosis were analyzed where available.

RESULTS

Mean WCC and CRP at diagnosis were 9.2 (SD: 4.6) and 30.2 (SD: 42.4) respectively, compared with 8.2 (SD: 3.9) and 30.2 (SD: 42.4) at follow-up. At diagnosis, sensitivity of CRP was 74%, and WCC was 31%. Each marker had a low positive predictive value for amputation at diagnosis (<29%). A rise in CRP between diagnosis and follow-up was associated with an increased risk of amputation compared with a fall in CRP. The finding that WCC and CRP were both normal at diagnosis had a high negative predictive value against amputation (96%).

CONCLUSION

C-reactive protein has a higher sensitivity than WCC, NLR, and PLR when used as a diagnostic adjunct in hand osteomyelitis. White cell count and CRP both within reference ranges at diagnosis was highly negatively predictive against amputation.

Modified Baihu decoction therapeutically remodels gut microbiota to inhibit acute gouty arthritis

Background: Acute gouty arthritis (AGA) is the most common first symptom of gout, and the development of gout as a metabolic and immune inflammatory disease is also correlated with the gut microbiota. However, the mechanism of the effect of changes in the gut microbiota on AGA remains unclear. The intestinal flora can not only affect purine metabolism or regulate inflammation, but also influence the therapeutic effect of drugs on AGA. The aim of this study was to investigate the exact mechanism of modified Baihu decoction (MBD) in the treatment of AGA and whether it is related to the regulation of the structure of the intestinal flora. Methods: On the 21st day of MBD administration by continuous gavage, a rat acute gouty arthritis model was constructed using sodium urate (0.1 mL/rat, 50 mg/mL), and the ankle joint swelling was measured before and 4 h, 8 h, 24 h, and 48 h after the injection of sodium urate. After 48 h of sodium urate injection, serum, liver, kidney, ankle synovial tissue and feces were collected from rats. The collected samples were examined and analyzed using H&E, Elisa, Immunohistochemistry, Histopathology, 16S rDNA, and Biochemical analysis. To investigate the mechanism of MBD to alleviate AGA using pro-inflammatory factors and intestinal flora. Results: MBD (5.84, 35 g/kg) was administered orally to AGA rats and diclofenac sodium tablets (DS-tablets) were used as standard treatment control. Serum biochemical assessment confirmed that MBD is a safe drug for the treatment of AGA. In addition, our findings confirmed that MBD relieved AGA-related symptoms, such as toe swelling. Lowering serum levels of uric acid, IL-1β, and TGF-β1 immunohistochemical results also confirmed that MBD reduced the expression of inflammatory elements such as IL-1β, NLRP3, ASC, and Caspase-1 in synovial tissue.Furthermore, compared with control group, the 16s rDNA sequencing of AGA rat faeces revealed an increase in the relative abundance of Lachnospiraceae, Muribaculaceae, and Bifidobacteriaceae species. While the relative abundance of Lactobacillaceae, Erysipelotrichaceae, Ruminococcaceae, Prevotellaceae and Enterobacteriaceae showed a relative decrease in species abundance. Of these, the reduction in species abundance of Enterobacteriaceae was associated with a reduction in amino acid metabolism and environmental perception. After MBD therapeutic intervention, the disturbance of the intestinal flora caused by AGA was restored. Conclusion: In summary, MBD is an effective agent for the treatment of AGA, with the potential mechanism being the regulation of intestinal flora to control inflammation. This would help to promote the therapeutic effect of MBD on AGA.

What Are the Most Effective Factors in Determining Future Exacerbations, Morbidity Weight, and Mortality in Patients with COPD Attack?

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the important factors that affect COPD prognosis. Materials and Methods: We included 160 hospitalized patients with COPD exacerbation in the study. The hemoglobin (HB), hematocrit (HCT), leukocytes, red cell distribution width (RDW), mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width, plateletcrits, platelets, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, eosinophils, uric acid, albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, arterial blood gases (PO2 and PCO2), pulmonary function test (FEV1 and FVC), echocardiography (ejection fraction-EF), Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage, Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) and Borg scales, Charlson comorbidity index, body mass index (BMI), and the length of hospital stay were examined on the first day of hospitalization. Admission to the hospital with a new attack, hospitalization in the intensive care unit (ICU), and mortality during the six months after discharge were evaluated. Results: High CRP and procalcitonin levels were observed in the group with a long hospital stay. In the mortality group, the HB, HCT, BMI, and PO2 values were significantly lower than in the group without mortality, while the age and GOLD stage were higher. The age, Borg and mMRC scores, number of exacerbations experienced in the previous year, RDW, eosinophil count, and PCO2 were significantly higher in the ICU group than that without an ICU stay. The HCT and EF values were lower in the ICU group than that without an ICU stay. The FEV1 and FVC values were significantly lower in the follow-up attack group than those without a follow-up attack. The duration of COPD and the number of attacks that were experienced in the previous year were high. Conclusion: Scoring combining selected biomarkers and other factors is a strong determinant of the prognosis.

COVID-19, what could sepsis, severe acute pancreatitis, gender differences, and aging teach us?

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes a potentially life-threatening disease, defined as Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19). The most common signs and symptoms of this pathological condition include cough, fever, shortness of breath, and sudden onset of anosmia, ageusia, or dysgeusia. The course of COVID-19 is mild or moderate in more than 80% of cases, but it is severe or critical in about 14% and 5% of infected subjects respectively, with a significant risk of mortality. SARS-CoV-2 related infection is characterized by some pathogenetic events, resembling those detectable in other pathological conditions, such as sepsis and severe acute pancreatitis. All these syndromes are characterized by some similar features, including the coexistence of an exuberant inflammatory- as well as an anti-inflammatory-response with immune depression. Based on current knowledge concerning the onset and the development of acute pancreatitis and sepsis, we have considered these syndromes as a very interesting paradigm for improving our understanding of pathogenetic events detectable in patients with COVID-19. The aim of our review is: 1)to examine the pathogenetic mechanisms acting during the emergence of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory processes in human pathology; 2)to examine inflammatory and anti-inflammatory events in sepsis, acute pancreatitis, and SARS-CoV-2 infection and clinical manifestations detectable in patients suffering from these syndromes also according to the age and gender of these individuals; as well as to analyze the possible common and different features among these pathological conditions; 3)to obtain insights into our knowledge concerning COVID-19 pathogenesis. This approach may improve the management of patients suffering from this disease and it may suggest more effective diagnostic approaches and schedules of therapy, depending on the different phases and/or on the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

[Acute exacerbation of the underlying disease or infection : Which diagnostics are warranted in patients with immunosuppressive treatment for inflammatory rheumatic diseases?]

Infectious diseases always have to be considered in the differential diagnosis of new symptoms in patients with immunosuppressive treatment for established inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Knowledge about the specific frequency and type of infections that can be expected under immunosuppressive treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases as well as the diagnostic value of laboratory tests and imaging results can facilitate the often difficult differential diagnosis.

Role of biomarkers in the diagnosis of bacterial infections in rheumatic diseases

In modern rheumatology, the problem of differential diagnosis of bacterial infection and active rheumatic process still retains its relevance. At the same time, it is very important to search for a biomarker - the gold standard for the diagnosis of an infection in patients with rheumatic diseases (RDs) in order to rapidly determine a treatment policy. This review analyzes the diagnostic significance and possibility of using some laboratory markers for bacterial infections in modern rheumatology. It emphasizes the importance of a multimarker approach that allows increasing the significance of individual parameters in the diagnosis of infections in RD.

Value of serum procalcitonin for the diagnosis of bacterial septic arthritis in daily practice in rheumatology

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Septic arthritis is a diagnostic and therapeutic emergency because of a high morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, the etiologic diagnosis is often difficult. The aim of our study was to determine if serum procalcitonin was a discriminatory biomarker in case of arthritis of undetermined etiology.

METHOD

Patients were separated in five groups: gouty arthritis, calcium pyrophosphate deposition arthritis, osteoarthritis or post-traumatic arthritis ("mechanical" arthritis), chronic inflammatory rheumatic arthritis, and septic arthritis. Levels of serum white blood cells, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin were measured.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients were included: 18 in the "gout" group, 26 in the "calcium pyrophosphate deposition arthritis" group, 16 in the mechanical group, 18 in the "chronic inflammatory rheumatic" group, and 20 in the "sepsis" group. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of white blood cells, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin levels to diagnose a septic arthritis were 0.69 (IC95% 0.55-0.83), 0.82 (IC95% 0.73-0.91), and 0.87 (IC95% 0.76-0.98) respectively. For a cutoff of 0.5 ng/ml, procalcitonin sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 65%, 91%, 65%, 91%, 7.2, and 0.4, respectively. Serum C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels were correlated, were not different in sepsis or gout groups, and were higher in non-septic arthritis with poly-arthritis than with mono-arthritis (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum procalcitonin is a useful biomarker in arthritis management with diagnosis performances higher than those of other biomarkers (white blood cells, C-reactive protein).Key Points• Diagnostic performances of serum procalcitonin level in septic arthritis are higher than those of serum C-reactive protein or white blood cells levels.• Serum procalcitonin levels are not different in septic arthritis or gouty arthritis.• Serum procalcitonin levels are higher in non-septic arthritis with poly-arthritis than with mono-arthritis.